TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
☐   Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐   ¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☑   Definitive Proxy Statement
☐   Definitive Additional Materials
Check the appropriate box:
¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨☐   Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12
INTUIT INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
þNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨      Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
         the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
         Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:

f57292def5729200a01a02.gifAggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
INTUIT INC.
2700 Coast Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94043(3)
NOTICEPer unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)
Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)
Filing Party:
(4)
Date Filed:

TABLE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSCONTENTS
Dear Stockholder:
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-cover.jpg]
You are cordially invited to attend our 2017
Notice of 2019 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders which will be held at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard
and Proxy Statement
Thursday, January 17, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-icover2.jpg]
Our Mission is
powering prosperity
around the world
The benefits we deliver:
More Money,
More Time, on
January 19, 2017 at our offices at 2750 Coast Avenue, Building 6, Mountain View, California 94043. We are holding the meeting for the following purposes:
More Confidence
1. To elect the nine directors nominated by the Board of Directors
Our core
company
attributes:
Customer-Obsessed,
Design-Inspired, Technology-Powered
The
customers we serve:
Small Business, Self-Employed
and named in the proxy statement to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified;Consumers
2. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2017;
The partners who help us deliver those benefits:
3. To approve the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to (a) increase the share reserve by an additional 23,110,386 shares; (b) reapprove the material terms of performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m); and (c) amend certain terms of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.Accountants, Developers,
Financial
Institutions,
Mega Platforms, Educational
Institutions,
Governments
4. To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation.
Our durable advantage:
Stockholders will also consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.Personalized Experiences, Trusted Open Platform,
Indispensable Connections
Only stockholders who owned our stock at the close of business on November 21, 2016 may vote at the annual meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please cast your vote, as instructed in the
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, over the Internet or by telephone, as promptly as possible. You may also request a paper proxy card to submit your vote by mail, if you prefer. We encourage you to vote via the Internet. We believe it is convenient for our stockholders, while significantly lowering the cost of our annual meeting and conserving natural resources.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for2019 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on
January 19, 2017. The proxy statement is available electronically at http://investors.intuit.com/financial-information/proxy-statements/default.aspx and Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 is available electronically at http://investors.intuit.com/financial-information/annual-reports/default.aspx.
By order of the Board of Directors,
signaturea02.gif
Laura A. Fennell
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary
Mountain View, California
November 23, 2016

INTUIT INC.
PROXY STATEMENT 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Page

Page
A-1




INTUIT INC.
2700 Coast Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94043

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS


2017 PROXY SUMMARY

Intuit Inc.’s (“Intuit” or the “Company”) Board of Directors (the “Board”) is asking for your proxy for use at the Intuit Inc. 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) and at any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

We have first released this proxy statement to Intuit stockholders beginning on November 23, 2016.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Thursday, January 17, 2019
Time and DateThursday, January 19, 2017 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time
PlaceIntuit’s offices at 2750 Coast Avenue, Building 6, Mountain View, California 94043
Record DateNovember 21, 2016
VotingStockholders of Intuit as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of Intuit common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on.
Intuit’s offices at
2750 Coast Avenue, Building 6,
Mountain View, California 94043
Webcast of MeetingLive Webcast:

If you are not able to attend the Meeting in person, you may joinview the proceedings online by joining a live webcast of the Meeting on the Internet by visiting at http://investors.intuit.com on Thursday, January 19, 201717, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time.

Meeting Information

The following chart describes the proposals to be considered at the meeting, the vote required to elect directors and to approve each other proposal, the manner in which votes will be counted and the Board’s voting recommendation:

AGENDA ITEMFOR MORE
INFORMATION
Page 19
ProposalVoting OptionsVote Required to Adopt the ProposalEffect of Abstentions
Effect of Broker Non-Votes”2.
Board’s Voting RecommendationPage 31
1. Election of directorsFor, against or abstain on each nomineeA nominee for director will be elected ifNo effectNo effectFOR the election of each of the director nominees
2. Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2019.For, against or abstainPage 72The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the annual meeting and voted for or against the proposalNo effectNot applicable (1)FOR
3. Approval of the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive PlanFor, against or abstainThe affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the annual meeting and voted for or against the proposalNo effectNo effectFOR
4. Advisory vote to approve Intuit’s executive compensationFor, against or abstainThe affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the annual meeting and voted for or against the proposalNo effectNo effectFOR
(1) This is considered to be a routine matter and, therefore, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares, the nominee has discretionary authority to vote on this Proposal but not any other Proposals since they are considered to be “non-routine” matters.

Note: We also will also consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Meeting and(and any postponement(s)postponements or adjournment(s) thereof.adjournments of the Meeting). As of the date of this proxy statement, we have not received notice of other mattersany such matters.
HOW TO VOTE
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_howtovote-inperson.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_howtovote-bymail.gif]
Note for Street-Name Holders:
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must instruct your nominee how to vote the shares held in your account. The nominee will give you a voting instruction form. If you do not provide voting instructions, your nominee may vote only on Proposal 3.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_howtovote-byphone.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_howtovote-internet.gif]
Your vote is important. Please vote as promptly as possible.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on January 17, 2019 (the “Meeting”): Both the proxy statement and Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, are available electronically at http://investors.intuit.com/financial-information and www.proxyvote.com.
By order of the Board of Directors,
[MISSING IMAGE: sig_kerry-mclean.jpg]
Kerry J. McLean
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Mountain View, California
November 21, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Letter to Our Stockholders
“At Intuit, we think of ourselves
as a 35-year-old startup, and
we never stop reimagining how we do things so we can better deliver on our core mission.”
November 21, 2018
Dear Fellow Intuit Stockholders:
I am pleased to report that mayIntuit is stronger than ever and well positioned for an even better tomorrow.
We continue to be properly presentedinspired by our mission to Power Prosperity Around the World. Every day each Intuit employee works to improve the financial lives of our customers by helping them make more money with no unnecessary work, while giving them complete confidence in their actions and decisions. In today’s fast-changing world, we never stop looking for new and innovative ways to use technology to make a positive difference in the lives of the millions of people we serve across the globe.
With our mission as our guiding light, I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish this past year. By any measure, our performance in 2018 was very strong, with total company revenue growth of 15 percent. One year into our new One Intuit Ecosystem strategy, it is clear we are on the right track and poised for continued growth.
Strong Financial Results
This year’s strong financial results were driven by a continued dedication to innovation to unlock game-changing opportunities, a renewed focus on customer obsession, and increased investment in our employees so they can do the best work of their lives. At Intuit, we think of ourselves as a 35-year-old startup, and we never stop reimagining how we do things so we can better deliver on our core mission.
Delivering on our Mission
We also deliver on our mission by embracing our role as a good corporate citizen to have a positive impact on the world. As a values-driven company, we are committed to supporting our global community, protecting our environment and operating with integrity. This year we released our new Corporate Social Responsibility report, which highlights our work drawing on the collective strengths of our people and our products to power prosperity around the world, especially for those who need it most.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
“Our leadership team is truly global and diverse in its makeup and understands
the importance of embracing diversity and inclusion
for the future of Intuit.”
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bsmith.jpg]
A New Generation of Leaders
As proud as we are of all that we have been able to accomplish, Intuit’s culture is one of change and re-invention, and that is true for our leadership structure as well. Serving as CEO of Intuit has been the job of a lifetime for me, but after 11 years as CEO, it is time for me to pass the torch to the next generation of leadership.
This past August, we shared that Sasan Goodarzi will assume the role as Intuit’s sixth CEO at the Meeting.start of the calendar year. Sasan is an amazing leader and the right person to steer this exceptional company into the future. In his 13 years at Intuit, he’s led every major Intuit business and also served as our CIO. At every stop, Sasan has built high-performing and highly engaged teams that delivered impressive results.

One of Intuit’s enduring strengths is a long history of successful leadership development and succession planning. Beyond a new CEO, we are also excited about other changes in the senior leadership team at Intuit, and I am thrilled that we have been able to promote from within for these positions. Our leadership team is truly global and diverse in its makeup and understands the importance of embracing diversity and inclusion for the future of Intuit.
HowI am privileged to Votehave served this company for the past 16 years, and am honored to have the opportunity to continue to serve the company as the Executive Chairman of the Board when I step down as CEO. I’m proud of the culture we’ve built and of the transformation we’ve executed during a time of unprecedented change in the technology world and our society at large, and I look forward to continuing to be a part of Intuit’s next chapter. Most importantly, I’m proud of the prosperity we’re enabling for the tens of millions of customers we serve around the world every day.

A New Era
Please actThe changes in our leadership team mark an exciting new era for Intuit, yet our mission to Power Prosperity Around the World remains our North Star. Our One Intuit Ecosystem strategy remains our compass, and our operating values remain the pillars of our culture.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, the executive team and the entire Intuit organization, thank you for being an Intuit shareholder and for your support of Intuit. I hope to see you at our Annual Meeting on January 17, and I encourage you to vote your proxy as soon as possiblepossible.
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_2018-bsmith.jpg]
Brad Smith
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Intuit Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Proxy Summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
We have first released this proxy statement to Intuit stockholders beginning on November 21, 2018.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_annualmeeting.jpg]
Stockholders of Intuit as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of Intuit common stock is entitled to one vote your shares, even if you planfor each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals.
AGENDA
ProposalBoard
Recommendation
For more
information
Page 19
Page 31
Page 72
Proxy Summary | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
2018 Performance Highlights
We delivered a very strong year in fiscal 2018. Overall revenue grew by 15%, highlighted by growth of 18% in the Small Business & Self-Employed Group and 14% in the Consumer Group. We added over one million QuickBooks Online subscribers in fiscal year 2018 to attendend the Meeting. You may vote viayear with 3.4 million subscribers, with growth remaining strong across multiple geographies. In our Small Business & Self-Employed Group, Online Ecosystem revenue grew 40% to $1.2 billion.
We are excited by the Internet, by telephone or, if you have received a printed version of these proxy materials, by mail. If your shares are held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must instruct your nominee on how to vote the shares heldprogress we’ve made in your account. If you do not provide your nominee with voting instructions, your nominee may only vote on Proposal 2 (ratifying the selectionthis first year of our independent registered public accountant).refreshed One Intuit Ecosystem strategy. The One Intuit Ecosystem strategy connects our customers, our partners, and our products across business lines through value-creating solutions. These solutions include offerings such as our ProAdvisor matchmaking platform, TurboTax Live, and our TurboTax Self-Employed bundle. We see many more opportunities to connect our ecosystem on the horizon.
Key highlights from fiscal 2018 include the following:
Revenue of
$6B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  15% from FY17
GAAP operating income of $1.5B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  7% from FY17
Non-GAAP operating income of
$2B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  14% from FY17
GAAP diluted EPS of $4.64
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]24.7% from $3.72 in FY17
Non-GAAP diluted EPS of
$5.61
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]27.2% from $4.41 in FY17
Repurchased over
$270M

of shares and increased dividend 15% to $1.56
All fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 figures that appear in this section and throughout this proxy statement are as reported under ASC 605.
See Appendix A included in this proxy statement for information regarding non-GAAP financial measures, including a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
Leadership Succession
In August 2018, we announced that Brad Smith will be stepping down as the President and CEO of Intuit effective January 1, 2019 and will assume the role of Executive Chairman of the Board. Consistent with the long-term leadership succession planning conducted by our Board of Directors, the Board appointed Sasan Goodarzi to assume the role of President and CEO effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Goodarzi also will join the Board at the start of the year. As part of our ongoing leadership succession planning, we also announced other leadership role changes that affect the named executive officers in this proxy statement. Laura Fennell,who served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary during fiscal 2018, assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Chief People and Places Officer effective August 1, 2018. Tayloe Stansbury will be stepping down from his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, effective January 1, 2019, to be succeeded by Marianna Tessel, who currently serves as Senior Vice President, Chief Product Development Officer, for the Small Business & Self-Employed Group. Neil Williams, our former Chief Financial Officer, stepped down from that role, and was succeeded by Michelle Clatterbuck on February 1, 2018.
2INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Proxy Summary


Board NomineesHighlights
Our Board of Directors is committed to excellence in its governance practices, including Board composition. The Board and its Nominating and Governance Committee Memberships After Meetingbelieve that a diverse and experienced board is of the utmost importance for reaching sound decisions that drive stockholder value. As evidence of this commitment to a diversity of perspectives, Intuit has undergone significant Board refreshment in recent years, and our eleven Board nominees have varying tenures, ages, genders, ethnic backgrounds and professional experiences.

BOARD OVERVIEW
The following charts reflect the tenure, age and gender of the nominees for our Board of Directors:
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_boardoverview.jpg]
EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE
The following chart reflects the experience and expertise of our 11 nominees for our Board of Directors. These are the skills and qualifications our Board considers important for our directors in light of our current business and structure.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_exp-exp.jpg]
Proxy Summary | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
BOARD NOMINEES AND COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee.nominee, including their current committee memberships.
Committee Memberships(1)
Director NomineeAgeDirector
Since
Principal OccupationOther Public
Com­pany Boards
Inde­pen­dentAcqui­si­tionAudit and RiskCom­pen­sa­tion and
Orga­ni­za­tional
Devel­op­ment
Nom­i­nating and
Gover­nance
Eve Burton602016Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Hearst Corporation0
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
C
Scott D. Cook661984Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.1
Richard L. Dalzell612015Former Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.1
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
C
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Sasan Goodarzi(2)
50N/AExecutive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business &
Self-Employed, Intuit Inc.
1
Deborah Liu422017Vice President, Marketplace,
Facebook, Inc.
0
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Suzanne
Nora Johnson
612007Former Vice-Chairman,
The Goldman Sachs Group
3
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
C
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Dennis D. Powell702004Former Chief Financial Officer,
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
C
Brad D. Smith(3)
542008Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Intuit Inc.2
Thomas Szkutak572018Former Chief Financial Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.1
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Raul Vazquez472016Chief Executive Officer and Director, Oportun, Inc.0
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Jeff Weiner482012Chief Executive Officer,
LinkedIn Corporation
0
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_bullet-grayfill.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_gray-check.gif]
Number of meetings in fiscal 2018​5964
(1) Blue “C” indicates a committee chair

Committee Memberships
NameDirector Since (1)OccupationIndependentACARCCODCNGCOther Public Company Boards
Eve Burton2016Senior Vice(2) Mr. Goodarzi will become President and General Counsel, The Hearst CorporationXXX
Scott D. Cook1984Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
Richard L. Dalzell2015Former Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.XCXTwilio, Inc.
Diane B. Greene2006Senior Vice President, Google, Inc., Former President and Chief Executive Officer, VMware, Inc.XXCAlphabet Inc.
Suzanne Nora Johnson2007Former Vice-Chairman, The Goldman Sachs GroupXCXAmerican International Group, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; VISA Inc.
Dennis D. Powell2004Former Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc.XXCApplied Materials, Inc.
Brad D. Smith2008Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Intuit Inc.Nordstrom, Inc.
Raul Vazquez2016Chief Executive Officer and Director, OportunXXX
Jeff Weiner2012Chief Executive Officer, LinkedIn Corporation (2)XXXLinkedIn Corporation (2)

(1) Four of our nine directors have served on our Board for fewer than five years. These four directors constitute more than fifty percent of our seven independent directors.
(2) LinkedIn Corporation has entered into a Merger Agreement with Microsoft Corporation, pursuant to which LinkedIn will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft. Mr. Weiner is expected to continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer of LinkedIn following consummationand a member of the transaction, which remains subject to certain conditions.Board effective January 1, 2019
(3) Mr. Smith will become Executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2019


4INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Proxy Summary
ACAcquisition Committee
ARCAudit and Risk Committee
CODCCompensation and Organizational Development Committee
NGCNominating and Governance Committee
CChair
AttendanceDuring fiscal 2016, all of our incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she sits.


Fiscal 2016
Executive Compensation Highlights
CommitmentCOMPENSATION PRACTICES
We employ a number of practices that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and related approach to Pay for Performanceexecutive compensation.
What we doWhat we don’t do
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
A significant portion of our fiscal 2018 senior executive officer compensation is in the form of incentives tied to achievement of particular performance measures.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
We have “clawback” provisions for equity awards that can be earned based on performance, and for cash bonus payments under our Senior Executive Incentive Plan.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
We have robust stock ownership guidelines for senior executive officers and outside directors: 10x salary for our CEO; 5x salary for our CFO and the general managers of our two biggest business units; 3x salary for other executive vice presidents; 1.5x salary for senior vice presidents; 10x annual cash retainer for non-employee directors; and 10x salary for the Executive Chairman.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
Mr. Smith’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs include a holding period, in the form of an automatic deferral of the release of the underlying shares for one year after the awards vest.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
Half of equity grant value is in relative TSR RSUs that require above-median TSR (60th percentile) to earn a target award.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_x.gif]
We do not allow directors or executive officers to pledge Intuit stock or engage in hedging transactions involving Intuit stock.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_x.gif]
We do not provide supplemental company-paid retirement benefits designed for executive officers.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_x.gif]
We do not provide any excise tax “gross-up” payments.
PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYOUTS
Our executive compensation programs are designed to reward both short- and long-term growth in the revenues and profitability of our business, as well as total stockholder return (“TSR”). Our short-term performance-based that compares favorably to the TSR of certain peer companies. As shown below, the vast majority of fiscal 2018 compensation consistsfor our named executive officers was performance-based.
CEO Total Direct Compensation(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pie-ceo1.jpg]
Other NEOs Total Direct Compensation(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pie-neo.jpg]
(1)
Total direct compensation reflects base salary, actual bonus payout, and equity awards granted during fiscal 2018. Consistent with disclosure in the Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table, equity awards are reported at grant date fair value (which, for the Relative TSR RSUs, is based on the target number of annualshares subject to the award), and salary and incentive cash bonuses, which are reported based upon achievement of annual corporate operating goals, including revenue, non-GAAP operating incomeon the actual amounts earned with respect to fiscal 2018.
Proxy Summary | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement5

Consistent with our compensation objectives, our Named Executive Officers received the following base salaries, cash incentives and deferred revenue balance atequity incentives in fiscal year end,2018:
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Name and PositionSalary
($)​
Annual Cash
Incentive
($)​
Option
Awards
($)​
RSUs
($)​
Relative
TSR RSUs
($)​
Total
($)​
Brad D. Smith
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
1,000,0002,065,0004,493,4374,441,1208,141,37020,140,927
Michelle M. Clatterbuck
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
570,385560,5001,499,9963,499,732(1)2,999,8709,130,483
Laura A. Fennell
Executive Vice President and
Chief People and Places Officer
675,000716,8501,499,9961,499,7992,999,8707,391,515
Sasan K. Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and
General Manager, Small Business &
Self-Employed Group
750,000885,0002,749,9832,749,8125,500,01512,634,810
H. Tayloe Stansbury
Executive Vice President,
Chief Technology Officer
675,000716,8501,499,9961,499,7992,999,8707,391,515
R. Neil Williams
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
455,769455,769
(1)
This amount includes $1,999,933 attributable to Ms. Clatterbuck’s March 15, 2018 promotion grant, and $1,499,799 attributable to her year-end focal equity grant in July 2018.
The table above excludes the fair value of RSUs granted to executive officers under the Management Stock Purchase Program. It also excludes certain items that are reflected as well as on an assessment“All Other Compensation” in the Fiscal 2018 Summary Compensation Table. These items are not typically considered in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations regarding annual compensation for our senior executives because the amounts are non-recurring, not material, or both, or the benefits relate to relocation assistance, one-time reimbursements of individual contributioncertain tax penalties that fell outside the executive’s control due to Intuit’s administrative error, or are available to a large group of employees. For a complete discussion of our executive compensation program, please see the “Compensation Discussion and performance. Our fiscal 2016 long-term

compensation consisted of 50% performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) based on relative total stockholder return (“Relative TSR RSUs”), 25% service-based RSUsAnalysis” and 25% non-qualified stock options.
Fiscal 2016 Business Highlights
Intuit achieved revenue of $4.7 billion, GAAP operating income of $1.2 billion, non-GAAP operating income of $1.6 billion, GAAP diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $3.69 and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.78 (see table on page A-3the “Executive Compensation Tables” sections of this proxy statement forstatement.
6INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Proxy Summary

STOCKHOLDER VALUE DELIVERED
Over the last five years, Intuit’s cumulative total return exceeded both the broad market (based on a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures) and a one-year TSR of 6.19% for fiscal 2016.
Our revenue, GAAP and non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP earnings per share for fiscal 2016 exceeded our guidance.
We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding Intuit’s operating results primarily because they exclude amounts that we do not consider part of ongoing operating results when planning and forecasting and when assessingcomparison against the performance of the organization, our individual operating segments or our senior management.
Key highlights from fiscal 2016 include the following:
Fiscal 2016 revenue of $4.7 billion, an increase of 12% over fiscal 2015; GAAP operating income of $1.2 billion, an increase of 68% over the prior year, and non-GAAP operating income of $1.6 billion, up 36%; GAAP diluted earnings per share of $3.69, up from $1.28 in 2015, and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.78, up 46%, in each case, exceeding our guidance for the year; note that fiscal 2016 GAAP earnings per share includes $0.65 net income per share from discontinued operations and fiscal 2015 GAAP earnings per share includes $0.17 net loss per share from discontinued operations;
A year-over-year increase of 15% in TurboTax Online units in the U.S., with total TurboTax units growing 12% (excluding the Free File Alliance, which is our free tax offering for eligible taxpayers);
The Consumer Tax business had revenue growth of 10% for fiscal 2016;
Two dozen product innovations in TurboTax, helping to drive share growth in the do-it-yourself software category for the third year in a row;
An increase of 41% in total QuickBooks Online subscribers, reaching 1.513 million subscribers at the end of the 2016 fiscal year, including 45% growth in QuickBooks Online subscribers outside the U.S. to 287,000 and growth in QuickBooks Self-Employed subscribers from 25,000 to 85,000;
Continued momentum in the Small Business Online ecosystem with revenue growth of 25% for the year;
Online payroll customer growth of 17% and online active payments customers growth of 6%;
Continued discipline in the Company’s financial strategy, focusing on cash management and maintaining a strong balance sheet, including paying dividends of $0.30 per share each quarter,S&P 500 Index) and the repurchase of $2.3 billion of shares in fiscal 2016, reducing our weighted average share count by 7%; andoverall technology sector (based on a comparison against the Morgan Stanley Technology Index).
Employee engagement and customer satisfaction scores that continued to reflect best-in-class levels, with Intuit continuing its run of 15 consecutive appearances in Fortune Magazine’s “Top 100 Places to Work” list and placing at #4 on Fortune Magazine’s “Most Admired Software Company” list.
Stockholder Value Delivered
Intuit’s TSR has performed well in recent years. Measured at the end of fiscal 2016, we delivered one-year TSR of 6.19%, three-year annualized TSR of 21.52% and five-year annualized TSR of 20.22%, with our stock price achieving an all-time high as the fiscal year came to a close. The graph below compares the cumulative TSRtotal return on Intuit common stock for the last five full fiscal years with the cumulative total returns on the S&P 500 Index and the Morgan Stanley Technology Index for the same period. ItThe graph assumes that $100 was invested in Intuit common stock and in each of the other indices on July 31, 20112013 and that all dividends were reinvested. Over this five-year period, Intuit’s TSR exceeded both the broad market (as evidenced by a comparison against the S&P 500 Index) and the overall technology sector (as evidenced by a comparison against the Morgan Stanley Technology Index). The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data  with Intuit common stock prices based on the closing price on the dates indicated  and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of Intuit’s common stock.

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_chrt-line.jpg]
intu2016.jpg
Stockholder Engagement
We understand the importance of assessing our corporate governance and compensation practices regularly. Since our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have sought meetings with the governance teams of stockholders who collectively hold approximately 44% of our outstanding shares. Investors holding approximately 22% of our outstanding shares accepted the invitation to meet with our management team (and, at times, our Lead Independent Director) to discuss our corporate governance and compensation practices.
During the fall fiscal 2019 outreach, we discussed the following topics with these stockholders:

Succession planning and the changes in Intuit’s leadership team

Strategic initiatives, including progress with respect to our One Intuit Ecosystem strategy

Updates on key drivers of financial performance

Alignment between our strategy and our executive compensation practices, and stock-based compensation practices, generally

Capital allocation, including dividends, use of stock repurchases, and strategy with respect to mergers
and acquisitions

Board structure, diversity and refreshment

Our board evaluation process

Our approach to corporate citizenship and social responsibility, including sustainability, diversity and pay equity

Enterprise risk management

Cybersecurity risk management
See the Stockholder Engagement Process discussion in the Corporate Governance section below for more detail about our stockholder engagement programs, including a summary of the feedback we received during those meetings.
 July 31, 2011 July 31, 2012 July 31, 2013 July 31, 2014 July 31, 2015 July 31, 2016
Intuit Inc.$100.00
 $125.62
 $139.91
 $181.28
 $236.44
 $251.09
S&P 500$100.00
 $109.13
 $136.41
 $159.52
 $177.40
 $187.36
Morgan Stanley Technology Index$100.00
 $111.45
 $118.36
 $151.58
 $169.91
 $190.19
Proxy Summary | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement7


Stockholder Engagement Process

Communication with our stockholders, and understanding their perspectives, is very important to us. During fiscal 2016 management, and on occasion, our Lead Independent Director, held discussions with many of our largest stockholders during scheduled events including our annual meeting and investor day, as well as in private meetings throughout the year. We solicited their feedback on various topics, including board succession planning, structure and diversity, our board evaluation process, executive compensation, cybersecurity, corporate governance, enterprise risk management and sustainability. We have considered such feedback in our adoption of proxy access and enhancements to our proxy disclosure. Both management and our Board of Directors will continue to engage with our stockholders on a regular basis in order to understand their perspectives and incorporate their feedback.






Compensation Practices
Intuit employs a number of practices that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, including the following:
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Compensation Practices
ü   A significant portion of our fiscal 2016 senior executive officer compensation is in the form of incentives tied to achievement of particular performance measures;
Corporate Governance
ü   We have “clawback” provisions for operating performance-based equity awards and beginning in the 2016 fiscal year implemented “clawback” provisions for cash bonus payments under our Senior Executive Incentive Plan;
ü   We have stock ownership guidelines for executive officers at the senior vice president level and above and non-employee directors, with the CEO guideline set at six times salary, the senior vice president level and above guideline set at one and a half times salary, and the non-employee director guideline set at five times annual cash retainer;
ü   The CEO’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs granted in fiscal 2015 and 2016 include a mandatory one-year holding period, requiring the CEO to hold the underlying shares for at least one year after the awards vest;
û We prohibit directors and executive officers from pledging Intuit stock or engaging in hedging transactions involving Intuit stock;
û   We do not provide supplemental company-paid retirement benefits designed for executive officers;
û   We do not provide any excise tax “gross-up” payments; and
û   We do not provide perquisites or other executive benefits based solely on rank.





CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Intuit is committed to excellence in corporate governance and maintainsgovernance. We maintain numerous policies and practices that promote good corporate governance,demonstrate this commitment, including the following:those summarized below.

Corporate Governance Practices
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-independence.gif]    Independence
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-stockholderengage.gif]    Stockholder Engagement
Corporate Governance Practices
ü   The Board has adopted majority voting in uncontested elections of directors;
ü   A majority of the board membersAll non-employee directors are independent of Intuit and its management;
ü   The independent members of the Board

Independent directors meet regularly without the presence of management;in executive session
ü
All members of the Board’s Acquisition Committee, Audit and Risk Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Compensation and Organizational Development Committee ofand Nominating and Governance Committee are independent

Intuit’s investor relations team, management team, and on occasion, Lead Independent Director, engage with our larger stockholders and report to the Board are independent;
ü   The charters ofon the committees of the Board clearly establish the committees’ respective roles and responsibilities;stockholders’ perspectives
ü

Our bylaws provide our stockholders with a proxy access right;right

Stockholders may act by written consent
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-acctabilitycheckb.gif]    üAccountability[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-interestalign.gif]       The Board and its committees receive periodic updates on regulatory and other developments relevant to the Board from management and outside experts;Alignment with Stockholder Interests
ü   Intuit’s internal audit control function maintains critical oversight over the key areas
Annual election of its businessall directors and financial processesmajority voting in uncontested elections

Annual stockholder advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation

Annual Board evaluation of CEO performance

Clawback policy

Pay-for-performance executive compensation program

Robust stock ownership guidelines for officers and controls,directors

Prohibition against director and reports directly to Intuit’s Auditofficer hedging and Risk Committee;pledging of Intuit stock
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-boardpractices.gif]    Board Practices
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-transparency.gif]    Transparency
ü   Intuit’s investor relations team, management team and our
Lead Independent Director regularly communicate with our stockholders and, report tobeginning in calendar 2019, separate Chairman of the Board and CEO

Corporate Governance Principles that are publicly available and reviewed annually

Balanced and diverse Board composition

Rigorous annual Board and committee self-evaluation process

Annual review of management succession planning

Regular review of cybersecurity and other significant risks to Intuit

Issuance of a new CSR Report and launch of a new corporate social responsibility website to disclose corporate responsibility practices, including with respect to diversity and inclusion and sustainability (https://www.intuit.com/company/social-responsibility/)

Clear, understandable and detailed financial reporting and proxy statement disclosure

Public disclosure on the stockholders’ perspectives;Corporate Governance website of Corporate Governance Principles, Board Code of Ethics, Bylaws, and Committee Charters (http://investors.intuit.com/ corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/default.aspx)

Voluntary website disclosure regarding Intuit’s political expenditures and political accountability policy (http://​investors.intuit.com/Corporate-Governance/Conduct-Guidelines/Political-Accountability-Policy/default.aspx)
[MISSING IMAGE: ico_2019-ethicspractices.gif]    Ethics Practices
ü   Intuit has adopted a
Code of Conduct & Ethics for employees that is monitored by Intuit’s ethics office and also has a overseen by the General Counsel

Code of Ethics that applies to all Board members; andmembers
ü   Intuit’s ethics office has a

Ethics hotline available to all employees and Intuit’s as well as third parties

Audit and Risk Committee has procedures in placeresponsibility to receive and processreview complaints including on a confidential and anonymous basis, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing and federal securities law matters or violations of the Code of Conduct & Ethics and for employees to make confidential, anonymous complaints regarding accounting, auditing and federal securities law matters or violations of the Intuit’s Code of Conduct & Ethics.

Our Board has adopted
8INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Corporate Governance Principles that are designed to assist the Board in observing practices and procedures that serve the best interests of Intuit and our stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing these Corporate Governance Principles, reviewing them at least annually and making recommendations to the Board regarding any changes. These Corporate Governance Principles address, among other things, our policy on succession planning and senior leadership development, Board performance evaluations, committee structure and stock ownership requirements.Practices

We maintain a corporate governance page on our company website that contains key information about corporate governance matters. This information includes copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, Political Accountability Policy, Code of Conduct & Ethics for all employees, including our Company’s senior executive and financial officers, our Operating Values, the charter for each Board committee and the Code of Ethics for our Board. The link to this corporate governance page can be found at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/default.aspx.
Board Responsibilities Leadershipand Structure and Executive Sessions
THE BOARD’S ROLE
The Board oversees management’s performance on behalf of Intuit’s stockholders. The Board’s primary responsibilities areare:
To monitor management’s performance to assess whether Intuit is operating in an effective, efficient and ethical manner in order to create value for Intuit’s stockholdersTo periodically review Intuit’s long-range strategic plan, business initiatives, enterprise risk management, capital projects and budget mattersTo oversee long-term succession planning, and to (1) select, oversee and determine compensation for the Chief Executive Officer who, with senior management, runs Intuit on a day-to-day basis.
The Board’s Role in Strategy
Our Board recognizes the importance of ensuring that our overall business strategy is designed to create long-term, sustainable value for Intuit stockholders. As a result, the Board maintains an active oversight role in helping management formulate, plan and implement Intuit’s strategy. The Board has a robust annual strategic planning process during which elements of our business and financial plans, strategies, and near- and long-term initiatives are developed and reviewed. This annual process culminates with a full-day Board session to review Intuit’s overall strategy with our senior leadership team. In addition to our business strategy, the Board reviews Intuit’s three-year financial plan, which serves as the basis for the Annual Operating Plan for the upcoming year.
The Board considers the progress of and challenges to Intuit’s strategy, as well as related risks, throughout the year. At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the CEO has an executive session with the Board to discuss strategic and other significant business developments since the last meeting.
Board Oversight of Risk
The Board oversees Intuit’s risk management program and delegates certain risk oversight responsibilities to its committees. Management is responsible for balancing risk and opportunity in support of Intuit’s objectives, and carries out the daily processes, controls and practices of our risk management program, many of which are embedded in our operations.
Our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program covers the full range of material risks to Intuit, including strategic, operational, financial, compliance and reputational risks. Intuit’s Chief ExecutiveRisk Officer, who with seniorreports up to our General Counsel, facilitates the ERM program as part of our strategic planning process. As part of our ERM process, management runs Intuit on a day-to-day basis, (2) monitor management’s performance to assess whether Intuit is operating in an effective, efficientidentifies, assesses, prioritizes and ethical manner in order to create valuedevelops mitigation plans for Intuit’s stockholders,top risks. These plans are reviewed annually with the full Board.
Board Oversight

Regularly review and discuss significant risks with management, including through annual strategic discussions and reviews of annual operating plans, financial performance, merger and acquisition opportunities, market environment updates, international business activities, and presentations on specific risks.

Consider regular reports from each committee regarding risk matters under its purview.
Audit and Risk Committee

Has primary responsibility for overseeing our ERM program.

The Chief Risk Officer reports on a quarterly basis to the Audit and Risk Committee on Intuit’s top risk areas and the progress of the ERM program.

Has oversight responsibilities with respect to particular risks such as financial management, fraud and cybersecurity.

Annually reviews our ERM policies and processes, and from time to time separately reviews the Board’s approach to risk oversight.
Compensation and Organizational
Development Committee
Considers the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices, both for executives in particular and for employees generally.
Nominating and
Governance Committee
Considers risks associated with corporate governance and overall board effectiveness, including recruiting appropriate Board members.
Acquisition Committee
Considers risks associated with Intuit’s merger and acquisition activities and the strategy and business models of acquisition candidates.
Board Responsibilities and (3) periodically review Intuit’s long-range strategic plan, business initiatives, capital projects and budget matters.Structure |Corporate Governance|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement9

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
The Board appoints a Chairman, who may be an officer of Intuit if the Board determines that it is in the best interests of Intuit and its stockholders. The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerCEO may be held by the same person or by different people. IfWhen the Chairman is alsosame person holds both roles, the Chief Executive Officer, thenindependent directors of the Board has determined that it will appoint a Lead Independent Director. The Board annually reviews its leadership structure to assess what best serves the interests of Intuit and its stockholders at a given time.
Currently, Mr. Smith holds the roles of both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.CEO. The Board believeshas determined that the combination of thecombining these roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer iswas appropriate at this time because ofunder Mr. Smith’s leadership given his deep understanding of the Company’sIntuit’s business and culture, as well as Mr. Smith’s instrumental contributionshis leadership in developingshaping and leadingdriving the Company’scompany’s strategic priorities. Mr. Smith’s leadership as the Chairman and CEO helpshas helped to effectively driveexecute the Company’scompany’s strategy and to facilitate the critical flow of information between the Board of Directors and management.

management. This role, combined withEffective January 1, 2019, Mr. Smith will step down as President and CEO and will become the independent membersExecutive Chairman of the Board of Directors, led by a Lead Independent Director acting in accordance with the Company’s robust corporate governance practices and policies, provides effective oversight.Board.
Because Mr. Smith serves as both the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, the CompanyThe company and the Board recognize the importance of providingthe additional, effective oversight that is provided by its independent oversight of the Board. The independent directors of the Board designated Ms. Nora Johnson to serve as the Company’smembers, led by a Lead Independent Director for a period of at least one year. Her responsibilities and authority include:
Authority to call executive sessions of the independent directors;
Presiding at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, which occur at least quarterly;
Conferring with the Chairman on agenda topics for Board meetings, and approving the agenda and schedule for Board meetings to ensure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;
Approving information sent to the Board;
Serving as liaison betweenDirector. Accordingly, even though the Chairman and CEO roles will be separate, the independent directors;Board believes it is important to continue having a Lead Independent Director. The Board annually reviews and appoints the Lead Independent Director.
Being available for consultations and communications with major stockholders upon request.
Role of Executive Chairman of the Board
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bdsmith.jpg]
In addition to his role leading the
Board of Directors, Mr. Smith will have
certain operational responsibilities as Executive Chairman, including:

Advising and supporting the CEO on Intuit’s long-term strategy planning and capability building

Setting the agenda for Board meetings in
consultation with the Lead Independent Director and
the CEO

Providing feedback to the CEO regarding his performance

Serving as liaison between the Board and senior management

Conducting the annual board evaluation in consultation with the Lead Independent Director, at the direction of the Nominating and Governance Committee

Being available to the CEO and the Board to assume additional responsibilities, as may be requested from time to time

Calling special meetings of the Board and
stockholders
Role of Lead Independent Director
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-snjohnson.jpg]
In October 2018, the independent directors of the Board reappointed Ms. Nora Johnson to serve as Lead Independent Director for a period of at least one year. Her responsibilities and authority include:

Presiding at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, which occur at least quarterly

Approving the agenda for Board meetings in consultation with the Chairman and CEO and the schedule for Board meetings to provide that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items

Ensuring the Board receives adequate and timely information

Serving as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors

Conducting the annual board evaluation in consultation with the Executive Chairman, at the direction of the Nominating and Governance Committee

Being available for consultations and communications with major stockholders upon request

Calling executive sessions of the independent directors
BOARD MEETINGS
The Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. The Board held fivefour meetings during fiscal 2018.
102016INTUIT. 2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Board Responsibilities and Structure

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD, COMMITTEE AND ANNUAL STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS
The Board expects that all directors will prepare for, attend and participate in all Board and applicable committee meetings, and will see that other commitments do not materially interfere with their service on the Board. Directors generally may not serve on the boards of more than six public companies, including Intuit’s Board. Any director who has delegated certain responsibilities and authoritya principal job change, including retirement, must offer to submit a letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Board. The Board, in consultation with the Nominating and Governance Committee, will review each offered resignation and determine whether to accept or reject such resignation after considering whether the composition of the Board remains appropriate under the new circumstances.
During fiscal 2018, all current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the committees described below. Committees report regularly on which they served. Nine of the ten directors nominated and elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended that meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles encourage all directors to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Director Independence
To be considered independent under Nasdaq rules, a director may not be employed by Intuit or engage in certain types of business dealings with Intuit. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board annually review relevant transactions, relationships, and arrangements that may affect the independence of our Board members. As required by Nasdaq rules, the Board also makes a determination that, in its opinion, no relationship exists that would interfere with any independent director’s exercise of independent judgment. In making these determinations, the Board reviews and discusses information provided by the directors and by Intuit with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they relate to Intuit and Intuit’s management.
Upon review of these relationships and the other information provided by our directors and director nominees, the Board determined that there are no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment by Intuit’s independent directors in carrying out their activitiesresponsibilities as directors and actionsthat the following current directors and director nominees are independent: Ms. Burton, Mr. Dalzell, Ms. Liu, Ms. Nora Johnson, Mr. Powell, Mr. Szkutak, Mr. Vazquez and Mr. Weiner. In addition, Diane Greene, who did not stand for reelection at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, was independent during the period that she served on the Board.
Qualifications of Directors
The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that all nominees for Board membership should possess:

the highest ethics, integrity and values

an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment

broad, high-level experience in business, technology, government, education or public policy

a commitment to representing the long-term interests of Intuit’s stockholders

sufficient time to carry out the duties of an Intuit director
When evaluating candidates for director, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the full range of skills it has determined should be represented on the Board, as reflected in the Experience and Expertise chart included in the Proxy Summary. The committee also considers other factors such as independence, diversity, and other qualities that may contribute to the full Board.Board’s overall effectiveness. The committee may engage third-party search firms to assist in identifying and evaluating Board candidates.
Although our nomination policy does not prescribe specific standards for diversity, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee do seek nominees with a diverse set of skills that will complement the skills and experience of our existing directors and provide an overall balance of perspectives and backgrounds. In selecting nominees, the committee therefore looks for individuals with varied professional experience, background, knowledge, skills and viewpoints in order to build and maintain a group of directors that, as a whole, provides effective oversight of the management of the company. As part of its annual evaluation process, the committee assesses its ability to build an effective and representative board.
Director Independence |Corporate Governance|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement11

Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
Our Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any stockholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for the committee’s consideration should submit the candidate’s name and qualifications to: Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850 or via our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/contact-the-board/default.aspx. You may find our Corporate Governance Principles, which outline our Board membership criteria, at http://investors.intuit.com/​corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/default.aspx.
In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders (either individually or in a group of up to 20 stockholders) who have owned 3% or more of Intuit’s outstanding shares continuously for at least three years to submit director nominees (the greater of two directors or up to 20% of our Board) for inclusion in our proxy materials. For additional information, please see “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” in this proxy statement.
Board Evaluation Process
The Board has an annual evaluation process that is led by the Chairman of the Board and our outside counsel and coordinated and overseen by our Nominating and Governance Committee. Each year, our Board members complete an assessment of Board performance, includingperformance. This assessment includes an evaluation of the issues addressed by the Board, Board culture and structure, processes and information received by the Board. Each Board member assesses the performance of the Committees, including both performance of the Committee and an assessment of how each Committee keeps the full Board informed. In addition, each Board member assesses his or her own performance as well as the performance of his or her fellow Board members. Board members then meet individually with the Chairman of the Board and outside counsel to discuss their assessments and to provide further feedback to share with the other Board members. The Chairman then shares that feedback with the Nominating and Governance Committee and the assessment is discussed by the full Board. The feedback received by the Board is used to identify the strengths and opportunities of each Board member and provide insight into the areas in which each Board member can be most valuable to the Company, as well as to identify skills or expertise that may be used as criteria when the Board considers new Board candidates. In addition, the committees use feedback to improve their agenda topics and the information presented to the committees in order to ensure they continue to address the issues most critical to them in an effective manner. of:
the topics covered by the Board during the yearBoard culture and structureBoard processesinformation received by the Board
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews each director’s performance annually when considering whether to re-nominateoversees this process, which is led by the director for re-election to the Board.
Board Oversight of Risk
Intuit’s management is responsible for balancing risk and opportunity in support of Intuit’s objectives. Management exercises this responsibility day to day through ongoing identification of risks related to significant business activities, implementation of risk mitigation activities and alignment of risk management to the Company’s strategy. Intuit’s Chief Risk Officer, who reports through to our General Counsel, facilitates the Enterprise Risk Management, or “ERM,” program as part of our strategic planning process. The ERM program helps identify the top risks for each business unit and for Intuit as a whole.
The Board oversees risk management for the Company both directly and through its committees, as follows:
The Audit and Risk Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing our ERM program. The Chief Risk Officer reports on a quarterly basis to the Audit and Risk Committee on Intuit’s top risk areas and the progress of the ERM program. The Audit and Risk Committee also has oversight responsibilities with respect to particular risks such as financial management, fraud and cybersecurity.
The Board’s other committees – Compensation and Organizational Development, Nominating and Governance, and Acquisition – oversee risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility. The Compensation and Organizational Development Committee considers the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices

for executives and employees generally. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers risks associated with corporate governance and overall board effectiveness, including recruiting appropriate Board members. The Acquisition Committee considers risks associated with Intuit’s merger and acquisition activities and the strategy and business models of acquisition candidates.
The full Board receives an annual update from the Chief Risk Officer regarding the top enterprise-wide risks and the mitigation plans associated with each risk. In addition, the Board provides oversight of specific business strategic risks including those relating to Intuit’s business models and inorganic growth strategy.
At quarterly Board meetings, the CEO and heads of our principal business units provide detailed reports to the Board, which include discussions of the risks involved in their respective areas of responsibility. In addition, members of each committee provide a report to the full Board covering the committee’s risk oversight and other activities. The senior management team also informs the Board routinely of developments that could affect our risk profile or other aspects of our business.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Company conducted a review of its key compensation programs, policies and practices in conjunction with Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee’s independent compensation consultant, which prepared a report on the Company’s incentive programs.
This analysis was reviewedLead Independent Director (together with the CompensationExecutive Chairman, beginning in 2019) and Organizational Development Committee at its October 19, 2016 meeting. The review and analysis did not identify any compensation programs, policies or practices that create incentives to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.our outside counsel.
The analysis noted the following factors:[MISSING IMAGE: chrt_2019-boardevalproc.jpg]
12Overall compensation levels are in a competitive market range.INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
Mix of short-term and long-term incentives, with different performance periods and a broad mix of performance measures.

The compensation programs provide an effective balance in (1) cash and equity mix, (2) annual incentives that are based in part on company-wide performance metrics that align with the Company’s business plans and strategic objectives and in part on a qualitative evaluation of business unit and individual performance, and (3) long-term incentives generally provided through a combination of stock options (generally vesting over three years with terms of seven years), service-based RSUs (generally vesting over three years), and performance-based RSUs (earned after three years based on one-, two- and three-year relative TSR).
Stock ownership guidelines for executive officers at the senior vice president level and above as well as for non-employee directors.
The one-year holding requirement added to the CEO’s Relative TSR RSUs and service-based RSUs beginning with the fiscal 2015 grant, which make up the majority of his grant value.
Severance that is limited in scope and at the lower end of the competitive range for a company of Intuit’s size and scope.
The insider trading policy, which prohibits officers from pledging shares, trading put or call options, and engaging in short sales or hedging transactions involving the Company’s securities.
“Clawback” provisions for operating performance-based equity awards and for cash bonus payments under the Company’s Senior Executive Incentive Plan (“SEIP”).
A Compensation and Organizational Development Committee process that allows for the sharing of robust information and internal discussion prior to making key compensation decisions.
Director Independence
To be considered independent under NASDAQ rules, a director may not be employed by Intuit or engage in certain types of business dealings with Intuit. In assessing director independence under NASDAQ rules, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board review relevant transactions, relationships and arrangements that may affect the independence of our Board members. In addition, as required by NASDAQ rules, the Board makes a determination as to each independent director that no relationship exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed and discussed

information provided by the directors and by Intuit with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they relate to Intuit and Intuit’s management.
In determining the independence of our directors, our Board of Directors considered transactions involving payments made by us to companies in the ordinary course of business where Ms. Greene and Mr. Weiner serve as executives. Consistent with NASDAQ independence standards, Intuit did not make payments to, or receive payments from, any of these companies for property or services in the current or any of the last three fiscal years that exceed 5% of Intuit’s or any of the other parties’ consolidated gross revenues. In addition, in considering Mr. Weiner's independence, the Board considered a transaction involving a contribution made individually by Mr. Smith to DonorsChoose.org, a charitable institution where Mr. Weiner serves as a director. Upon review of these relationships and the other information provided by our directors and director nominees, the Board determined that none of these relationships would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment by these directors in carrying out their responsibilities as directors and that the following current directors are independent: Ms. Burton, Mr. Dalzell, Ms. Greene, Ms. Nora Johnson, Mr. Powell, Mr. Vazquez and Mr. Weiner. In addition, the Board previously determined that Edward Kangas, who did not stand for reelection to the Board in January 2016, was an independent director.
Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Stockholders Meetings
The Board expects that each director will prepare for, attend and participate in all Board and applicable committee meetings and that each Board member will see that other commitments do not materially interfere with his or her service on the Board. Directors generally may not serve on the boards of more than six public companies, including Intuit’s Board. Any director, who has a principal job change, including retirement, must offer to submit a letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Board. The Board, in consultation with the Nominating and Governance Committee, will review each offered resignation and determine whether or not to accept such resignation after consideration of the continued appropriateness of Board membership under the new circumstances.
During fiscal 2016, all current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served. Seven of the eight directors nominated and elected at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in January 2016 attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Neither Mr. Campbell nor Mr. Kangas, whose terms ended on the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, were in attendance. Our Corporate Governance Principles encourage all directors to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Committees and ChartersStockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
The Board currently has a standing Acquisition Committee, Audit and Risk Committee, Compensation and Organizational Development Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee. Each committee has a charter which it reviews annually and makes recommendations to our Board for its revision to reflect evolving best practices. Copies of each committee charter can be found on our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/default.aspx. The members of each committee are independent and appointed by the Board based on recommendations of theOur Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any stockholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for the committee’s consideration should submit the candidate’s name and qualifications to: Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850 or via our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/contact-the-board/default.aspx. You may find our Corporate Governance Principles, which outline our Board membership criteria, at http://investors.intuit.com/​corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/default.aspx.
In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders (either individually or in a group of up to 20 stockholders) who have the opportunity to meet in closed session, without management present, during each committee meeting. Current committee members are identified in the following table.

Director Acquisition Committee Audit and Risk Committee Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Nominating and Governance Committee
Eve Burton X X    
Scott D. Cook        
Richard L. Dalzell Chair X    
Diane B. Greene     X Chair
Suzanne Nora Johnson     Chair X
Dennis D. Powell X Chair    
Brad D. Smith        
Raul Vazquez X X    
Jeff Weiner     X X
Number of meetings in Fiscal 2016 6 12 5 4


Acquisition Committee
The Acquisition Committee reviews and approves acquisition, divestiture and investment transactions proposed by Intuit’s management in which the total consideration to be paidowned 3% or received by Intuit is within certain limits that may be established by the Board from time to time.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee represents and assists the Board in its oversightmore of Intuit’s financial reporting, internal controlsoutstanding shares continuously for at least three years to submit director nominees (the greater of two directors or up to 20% of our Board) for inclusion in our proxy materials. For additional information, please see “Stockholder Proposals and audit functions, and is directly responsibleNominations for the selection, retention, compensation and oversight of the work of Intuit’s independent auditor. It also oversees cybersecurity and other risks relevant to our information technology environment.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit and Risk Committee is independent, as defined under applicable NASDAQ listing standards and SEC rules related to audit committee members, and is financially literate, as required by NASDAQ listing standards. Mr. Powell has been determined by the Board to meet the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules, and to meet the qualifications of “financial sophistication” in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards.
The Audit and Risk Committee held closed sessions with our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, in all of its regularly scheduled meetings.
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee
The Compensation and Organizational Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) assists the Board in the review and approval of executive compensation and the oversight of organizational and management development for executive officers and other employees of Intuit. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews Intuit’s key management from the perspectives of leadership development, organizational development and succession planning through Intuit’s High Performance Organization Review. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee also meets with key senior executives. The systemic assessment of Intuit’s organization and talent planning helped the Compensation Committee to evaluate Intuit’s efforts at hiring, developing and retaining executives in an increasingly competitive environment, with the goal of creating and growing Intuit’s “bench strength” at the most senior executive levels.
Each member of this Committee is independent under NASDAQ listing standards and is a “Non-Employee Director,” as defined in Rule 16(b)-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee held a portion of each meeting in closed session, with only the Compensation Committee members and, on certain occasions, William Campbell, who served as Chairman of the Board until the Company’s 20162020 Annual Meeting of StockholdersStockholders” in January 2016, present. For more information on the responsibilities and activitiesthis proxy statement.
Board Evaluation Process
Each year, our Board members complete an assessment of the Compensation Committee, including the committee’s processes for determining executive compensation, see the “Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Report” on page 40 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 41, including in particular, the discussion of the “Role of Compensation Consultants, Executive Officers and the Board in Compensation Determinations” beginning on page 60.
The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing the compensation for non-employee directors onperformance. This assessment includes an annual basis and making recommendations to the Board, in the event the Committee determines changes are appropriate.evaluation of:
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of Ms. Nora Johnson, Ms. Greene, Mr. Kangas, Mr. Dalzell or Mr. Weiner, each of whom served on the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2016, has at any time been one of our executive officers or employees. No executive officer of Intuit during fiscal 2016 served, or currently serves, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on Intuit’s Board or Intuit’s Compensation Committee.
Nominating and Governance Committee
the topics covered by the Board during the yearBoard culture and structureBoard processesinformation received by the Board
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and makes recommendations tooversees this process, which is led by the Board regarding Board composition and appropriate governance standards. Our Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent, as defined under applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a process to identify and evaluate candidates for director, whether recommended by management, Board members, or stockholders (if made in accordanceLead Independent Director (together with the procedures set forth below under “StockholderExecutive Chairman, beginning in 2019) and our outside counsel.
[MISSING IMAGE: chrt_2019-boardevalproc.jpg]
12INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates”). The Committee’s policy is to evaluate candidates properly recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by others.Candidates


Qualifications of Directors
The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that all nominees for Board membership should possess the highest ethics, integrity and values and be committed to representing the long-term interests of Intuit’s stockholders. In addition, nominees should have broad, high-level experience in business, government, education, technology or public interest. They should have sufficient time to carry out their duties as directors of Intuit and have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider additional factors – such as independence, diversity, expertise and specific skills, and other qualities that may contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness – when evaluating candidates for director. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also engage third-party search firms to provide assistance in identifying and evaluating Board candidates.
Consideration of director candidates typically involves a series of discussions and a review of available information concerning the candidate, the existing composition of the Board and other factors the Committee deems relevant. In conducting its review and evaluation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may solicit the views of management, other Board members and other individuals it believes may have insight into a candidate.
In considering diversity in the selection of nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee looks for individuals with varied professional experience, background, knowledge, skills and viewpoints in order to achieve and maintain a group of directors that, as a whole, provides effective oversight of the management of the Company. Although our nomination policy does not prescribe specific standards for diversity, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee do look for nominees with a diverse set of skills that will complement the existing skills and experience of our directors and provide an overall balance of diversity of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses its effectiveness in this regard as part of its annual evaluation process. Our Board is currently composed of a group of leaders with broad and diverse experience in many fields, including: management of large global enterprises; technology and innovation leadership; strategic planning; consumer software and technology products and services; public policy; social networking; financial services; legal and compliance; executive compensation; and corporate governance. Our Board members have acquired these diverse skills through their accomplished careers and their service as executives and directors of a wide range of other public and private companies.
Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates
As discussed above, ourOur Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by a stockholder. Astockholders. Any stockholder seekingwho wishes to recommend a candidate for the committee’s consideration should submit the candidate’s name and qualifications to: Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850 or via our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/conduct-guidelines/contact-the-board/default.aspx. You may find a copy of a document entitled “Process of Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director” on our website Corporate Governance Principles, which outline our Board membership criteria, at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/conduct-guidelines/default.aspx.
In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders (either individually or in a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholdersstockholders) who have owned 3% or more of Intuit’s outstanding shares that are entitled to vote generally in the election of directors continuously for at least three years to submit director nominees (for the(the greater of 2two directors or up to 20% of our Board) for inclusion in our proxy materials if the stockholder(s) provide timely written notice of such nomination and the stockholder and nominee satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws. Stockholders who wish to nominate directors for inclusion in our proxy materials or directly at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders in accordance with the procedures in our bylaws should follow the instructions undermaterials. For additional information, please see “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20182020 Annual Meeting” sectionMeeting of Stockholders” in this proxy statement.
Board Evaluation Process
Each year, our Board members complete an assessment of Board performance. This assessment includes an evaluation of:
the topics covered by the Board during the yearBoard culture and structureBoard processesinformation received by the Board
The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees this process, which is led by the Lead Independent Director (together with the Executive Chairman, beginning in 2019) and our outside counsel.
[MISSING IMAGE: chrt_2019-boardevalproc.jpg]
12INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates

Board Committees and Charters
The Board has delegated certain responsibilities and authority to its four standing committees, as described below. Committees report regularly to the full Board on their activities and actions.
The Board currently has a standing Acquisition Committee, Audit and Risk Committee, Compensation and Organizational Development Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee. Each committee has a charter that it reviews annually, making recommendations to our Board for any charter revisions that might be needed to reflect evolving best practices. Copies of each committee charter can be found on our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-guidelines/default.aspx. The members of each committee are independent and appointed by the Board based on recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Committees have the opportunity to meet in closed session, without management present, during each committee meeting.
CURRENT MEMBERS
Richard L. Dalzell (Chair)
Eve Burton
Deborah Liu
Dennis D. Powell
Raul Vazquez
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD IN FISCAL 2018
5
Acquisition Committee
The Acquisition Committee reviews and approves acquisition, divestiture and investment transactions proposed by Intuit’s management in which the total amount to be paid or received by Intuit exceeds certain thresholds that are established by the Board from time to time.
CURRENT MEMBERS
Dennis D. Powell (Chair)
Richard L. Dalzell
Thomas Szkutak
Raul Vazquez
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD IN FISCAL 2018
9
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee represents and assists the Board in its oversight of Intuit’s financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions, and is directly responsible for the selection, retention, compensation and oversight of Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit and Risk Committee also oversees cybersecurity and other risks relevant to our information technology environment, receiving regular cybersecurity updates from Intuit’s management team. This committee also receives periodic reports from management regarding Intuit’s ethics and compliance program.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit and Risk Committee is both independent (as defined under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules related to audit committee members) and financially literate (as required by Nasdaq listing standards). The Board also has determined that each of Mr. Powell and Mr. Szkutak qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules, and has “financial sophistication” in accordance with Nasdaq listing standards.
The Audit and Risk Committee held closed sessions with our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, in all of its regularly scheduled meetings during 2018.
Board Committees and Charters|Corporate Governance|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement13

CURRENT MEMBERS
Eve Burton (Chair)
Suzanne Nora Johnson
Thomas Szkutak
Jeff Weiner
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD IN FISCAL 2018
4
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding Board composition as well as governance standards for our company. The committee also oversees our Political Accountability Policy, Corporate Governance Principles and Board Code of Ethics, reviewing each of these policies on an annual basis.
The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a process to identify and evaluate candidates for director. The committee’s policy is to evaluate candidates properly recommended by stockholders (that is, in accordance with the procedures set forth above under “Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates”) in the same manner it evaluates candidates recommended by management or current Board members. From time to time, the committee retains a third-party search firm to help identify potential director candidates.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent, as defined under applicable Nasdaq listing standards.
CURRENT MEMBERS
Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair)
Deborah Liu
Jeff Weiner
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD IN FISCAL 2018
6
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee
The Compensation and Organizational Development Committee (“Compensation Committee”) assists the Board in reviewing and approving executive compensation and in overseeing organizational and management development for executive officers and other employees of Intuit. Together with the CEO and the Chief People and Places Officer, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews Intuit’s key management personnel from the perspectives of leadership development, organizational development, and succession planning. These reviews help the Compensation Committee to evaluate Intuit’s strategies for hiring, developing and retaining executives in an increasingly competitive environment, with the goal of creating and growing Intuit’s “bench strength” at senior executive levels. In addition, this committee annually reviews the company’s non-employee director compensation programs and makes recommendations to the Board.
The Compensation Committee’s other responsibilities include overseeing stock compensation programs and pay equity matters across the company.
For more information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation Committee, including its processes for determining executive compensation, see the “Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Report” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below, particularly the discussion of the “Role of Compensation Consultants, Executive Officers and the Board in Compensation Determinations.”
Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent under Nasdaq listing standards. Each member is also a “Non-Employee Director,” as defined in SEC Rule 16(b)-3, and an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (under the definition in effect prior to its deletion under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017 and generally applicable to Intuit beginning in fiscal 2019). During fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee held a portion of each regularly scheduled meeting in closed session with only the committee members present.
14INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Board Committees and Charters

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No director who served on the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2018 has at any time been an executive officer or employee of Intuit. In addition, no executive officer of Intuit during fiscal 2018 served, or currently serves, on the board of directors or the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve on Intuit’s Board or Intuit’s Compensation Committee. No executive officer of Intuit during fiscal 2018 served, or currently serves, on the board of directors of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on Intuit’s Compensation Committee.
Compensation Risk Assessment
Intuit conducted a review of its key compensation programs, policies and practices in conjunction with FW Cook, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, which prepared a report on our company-wide compensation programs.
This analysis was reviewed with the Compensation Committee at its October 30, 2018 meeting. The review and analysis did not identify any compensation programs, policies or practices that create incentives to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Intuit.
The factors summarized below support this conclusion:

Overall compensation levels are in a competitive market range for a company of Intuit’s size and scope, which helps ensure reasonable risk-taking incentives.

Our programs use a mix of short-term and long-term incentives, with different performance periods and a broad mix of metrics, including both revenue-driven and profit-driven performance measures, in order to deter undue focus on a single goal.

Our compensation programs are designed to create a balance of different incentives by using: (1) a mix of cash and equity, (2) annual incentives that are based in part on company-wide performance metrics that align with our business plans and in part on strategic objectives, and (3) long-term incentives that generally combine stock options (typically vesting over four years with terms of seven years), service-based RSUs (typically vesting over four years), and performance-based RSUs (earned after three years based on one-, two- and three-year relative TSR).

Annual cash incentives for participants in Intuit’s Senior Executive Incentive Plan (“SEIP”) are capped at 250% of target overall and 150% of target based on the achievement of objective performance goals (i.e., before possible adjustments based on personal performance). All other eligible employees participate in a common company-funded cash incentive pool with a fixed dollar ceiling.

We have established robust stock ownership guidelines for the CEO (10 times base salary), CFO (5 times base salary), principal Business Unit leaders (5 times base salary), Executive Vice Presidents (3 times base salary), Senior Vice Presidents (1.5 times base salary), and non-employee directors (10 times retainer) that serve as material risk-mitigating elements for those subject to the guidelines.

The CEO’s Relative TSR RSUs and service-based RSUs have a one-year holding requirement after they vest.

Severance is limited and at the lower end of the competitive range for a company of Intuit’s size and scope.

Our insider trading policy prohibits officers from pledging shares, trading put or call options, and engaging in short sales or hedging transactions involving Intuit’s securities.

We have established “clawback” provisions for performance-based equity awards and for cash bonus payments under the SEIP.

The Compensation Committee provides close oversight of the compensation programs, including a significant level of engagement, self-assessment, and executive session discussions.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |Corporate Governance|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement15

Stockholder Engagement Process

Intuit regularly engages with stockholders to better understand their perspectives. During fiscal 20162018 we held discussions with many of our largest stockholders during scheduled events, including our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and annual meeting and investor day, as well as in private meetings throughout the year.

INVESTOR DAY
In September 20162018 we hosted our annual investor day, during which our management team interactedspoke directly with our stockholders regarding ourabout Intuit’s performance in the prior year as well as our short- and long-term growth strategies. In addition, membersstrategies and financial principles.
INVESTOR OUTREACH
Members of the management team, and on occasion,at times the Lead Independent Director, held private in-person and telephonic meetings with stockholders to discuss their perspectives and feedback on various topics including executive compensation, corporate governance, cybersecurity, board structure and succession planning, our board evaluation process, and diversity, enterprise risk management and sustainability.topics.

Since the beginning of fiscal 2016, management met with stockholders holding 33% of our outstanding shares. Management, the investor relations team and our Lead Independent Director, who participate in stockholder engagement meetings, regularly share stockholder feedback with relevant Board committees and the full Board. In general, feedback from our stockholders regarding our compensation programs and corporate governance practices is very positive. The Board carefully considers the feedback from stockholders and has implemented such feedback into our proxy disclosures and corporate governance practices, such as amending our bylaws to provide for proxy access.

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_chrt-flow2.jpg]
We will continue to engage with our stockholders on a regular basis in order to understand their perspectives and incorporate their feedback, as appropriate, on our performance, business strategies, executive compensation programs and corporate governance practices.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
Stockholder Communications with the Board
The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for receiving stockholder communications on behalf of the Board. Any stockholder may send communications by mail to the entire Board or to individual directors c/o Corporate Secretary, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850 or via our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/conduct-guidelines/contact-the-board/default.aspx. The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary to review this correspondence and determine in his or her discretion, whether matters submitted are appropriate for Board consideration. The Corporate Secretary may also forward certainstockholder communications elsewhere indetermined appropriate for Board consideration are reviewed by the Company for reviewNominating and possible response. In particular, communicationsGovernance Committee on behalf of the Board. Communications such as product or commercial inquiries or complaints, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations, advertisements or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material will not be forwarded to the Board. The Corporate Secretary may also forward certain communications elsewhere in the company for review and possible response.
16INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Stockholder Engagement Process


SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Security Ownership Table
Corporate Social Responsibility
Intuit is committed to being a good corporate citizen, starting with the culture we build within the company.
The following table shows sharesDiversity and inclusion. Diversity and inclusion are part of Intuit’s common stockwho we are, and are supported at all levels of the company. As of July 2018, women represented 39 percent of our global workforce, holding 27 percent of our technology positions and 51 percent of our non-technical positions. Women also held 31 percent of our leadership roles. In the United States, women represent 41 percent of our domestic workforce, holding 28 percent of the technical jobs and 53 percent of the non-technical roles. Women held 32 percent of our U.S.-based leadership positions.
We are committed to equal pay. We are committed to equal pay, and in 2018, we continued to refine and refocus our pay equity analysis, which we conducted with an independent outside company for the first time in 2017. A regular statistical analysis of employee pay based on gender and ethnicity is part of how we operate as a company, and we’ll continue to refine this in an effort to improve future pay analyses.
We determined that, we believe are owned as of October 31, 2016 by:August 1, 2018:
Each Named Executive Officer (defined
In the U.S., women earn, on page 41);average, 99.4 cents for every $1.00 that men earn
Each director

In the U.S., minorities earn, on average, 99.1 cents for every $1.00 whites earn

In India, women earn, on average, 96.2 cents for every $1.00 men earn

In all other countries, women earn on average $1.01 for every $1.00 that men earn
Sustainability. We are focused on managing our own environmental footprint and nominee;have achieved carbon neutrality for our worldwide operations through a three-pronged strategy of boosting energy efficiency internally, investing in renewable energy, and buying carbon offsets.
All current directors, nomineesEmployee and executive officers as a group;corporate giving. Through the employee giving and volunteering program, “We Care and Give Back,” Intuit provides employees with four business days of paid time off to volunteer in their local communities. Intuit also matches employee donations to qualified non-profit organizations of their choice, up to country-specific maximums (in the United States, that maximum is $5,000). In 2018, Intuit employees donated over 36,000 hours to charities around the world, and Intuit provided $2.7 million in matching donations and grants.
We also contribute both our products and expertise to help build financial capability and economic opportunity in underserved communities. We do this through product donations and innovation training that empowers people to develop innovative solutions to social problems. In 2018, we donated:

2.3 million copies of federal and state TurboTax tax software to lower income taxpayers through the IRS and state Free File programs; and
Each stockholder beneficially owning more than 5% of our common stock.
Unless indicated
126,000 QuickBooks licenses to non-profits and small business development organizations and education institutions in the notes, each stockholder has sole votingU.S. and investment power for all shares shown, subject to community property laws that may apply to create shared votingCanada
In total, we gave $77 million in combined cash and investment power. Unless indicated in the notes, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mountain View, California 94039-7850.product donations through employee and corporate giving.
To learn more about our corporate social responsibility efforts please go to: We calculated the “Percent of Class” based on https://www.intuit.com/company/social-responsibility/257,067,597 shares of common stock outstanding on October 31, 2016. In accordance with SEC regulations, we also include (1) shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2016, and (2) shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs that are vested but unreleased, or will become vested and settled within 60 days of October 31, 2016. Those shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such option or RSU for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (#) Percent of Class (%)
Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers:  
  
Scott D. Cook(1) 12,934,313
 5.03%
Brad D. Smith(2) 857,662
 *
R. Neil Williams(3) 178,740
 *
Sasan K. Goodarzi(4) 259,707
 *
H. Tayloe Stansbury(5) 57,230
 *
Daniel A. Wernikoff(6) 174,884
 *
Eve Burton(7) 961
 *
Richard L. Dalzell(8) 5,424
 *
Diane B. Greene(9) 29,987
 *
Suzanne Nora Johnson(10) 30,831
 *
Dennis D. Powell(11) 31,780
 *
Raul Vazquez 
 *
Jeff Weiner(12) 18,220
 *
All current directors and executive officers as a group (15 people)(13) 14,730,493
 5.70%
Other 5% Stockholders:  
  
BlackRock, Inc.(14) 18,411,014
 7.16%
Capital World Investors(15) 17,255,000
 6.71%
The Vanguard Group(16) 15,503,587
 6.03%

[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_inline11.gif]
Indicates ownership of 1% or less.
(1)
Represents 12,782,312 shares held by trusts Recognized as one
of which Mr. Cook is a trustee and 152,001 shares held by a trust Mr. Cook has investment control over, but of which he is not a trustee.Fortune’s Best Companies to
Work For for
17 consecutive years
[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_inline12.gif]
(2)
For the past 12 years, Intuit has earned a perfect score on the Includes 649,374 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Smith.Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index

(3)
Includes 174,013 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Williams.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_inline13.gif]
(4)
Includes $2.7 Million259,707 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Goodarzi.
Employee-driven giving (donation matching, grants, and disaster relief) in FY18
[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_inline14.gif]
(5)Includes 56,560 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Stansbury.
(6)
Includes Achieved carbon neutrality171,307 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Wernikoff. for our worldwide operations since 2015
(7)
Includes 961 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Burton.
(8)Includes 5,424 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Dalzell.
(9)
Includes 15,094 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Greene.
(10)
Includes 15,094 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Nora Johnson.
(11)
Includes 15,094 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Powell.
(12)
Represents 18,220 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Weiner.
(13)
Includes 1,509,312 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units. Represents shares and options held by the 13 individuals in the table, plus an additional 22,290 outstanding shares and 128,464 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by other executive officers.
(14)
Ownership information for BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 26, 2016 by BlackRock, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2015. BlackRock reported sole voting power as to 15,369,718 shares and sole dispositive power as to 18,411,014 shares. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022.
(15)
Ownership information for Capital World Investors (“Capital World”) is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016 by Capital World, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2015. Capital World reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 17,255,000 shares. The address of Capital World is 333 Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
(16)Ownership information for The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016 by Vanguard, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2015. Vanguard reported sole voting power as to 494,119 shares, shared voting power over 26,100 shares, sole dispositive power as to 14,982,006 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 521,581 shares. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

Corporate Social Responsibility |Corporate Governance|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement17

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Transactions with Related Persons
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing, and approving or ratifying, as appropriate, transactions between Intuit (or its subsidiaries) and any “related person” of Intuit. Under SEC rules, “related persons” include directors, officers, nominees for director, 5% stockholders, and their immediate family members. The Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a written policy, which is described below, to evaluate these transactions for approval or ratification.
Section 16(a)Identification of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires Intuit’srelated persons. Information about our directors and executive officers and greater-than-10% stockholderspersons related to file formsthem and their affiliated entities is collected and updated through annual Director & Officer Questionnaires and quarterly director and executive officer affiliation summaries. Directors and executives provide the names of their immediate family members as well as the entities with which they and their immediate family members are affiliated, including board memberships, executive officer positions, and charitable organizations.
Audit and Risk Committee annual pre-approval. On an annual basis, Intuit’s procurement and legal departments prepare requests for pre-approval of transactions or relationships involving related persons or parties with which Intuit is expected to do business during the SECupcoming fiscal year. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews these requests during its regular fourth quarter meeting and generally pre-approves annual spending and/or revenue levels for each transaction or relationship.
Periodic approvals. During the year, the list of known related persons is circulated to report their ownership ofappropriate Intuit sharesemployees and any changes in ownership. Anyone requiredis used to file formsidentify transactions with related persons. If Intuit identifies an actual or potential transaction with a related person that was not pre-approved by the SEC must also send copiesAudit and Risk Committee, Intuit’s legal department collects information regarding the transaction, including the identity of the formsother party, the value of the transaction, and the size and significance of the transaction to Intuit. We have reviewed all formsboth Intuit and the other party. This information is provided to us. Based on thatthe Audit and Risk Committee, which in its discretion may approve, ratify, rescind, place conditions upon, or take any other action with respect to the transaction.
Monitoring of approved transactions and relationships. Following approval by the Audit and Risk Committee, Intuit personnel review and on written information givenmonitor the “related person” transactions and relationships from time to ustime. If transaction levels approach the limits approved by our executive officersthe Audit and directors, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met duringRisk Committee, a new approval request is submitted to the Audit and Risk Committee for review at its next meeting.
Since the beginning of fiscal 2018, there have been no transactions, and there currently are no proposed transactions, in excess of $120,000 between Intuit (or its subsidiaries) and a related person in which the related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
182016INTUIT.2019 Proxy Statement |Corporate Governance|Transactions with Related Persons


PROPOSAL NO. 1

CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Proposal No. 1
Election of Directors
The board currently consists of nine directors, all of whom were nominated
Our Board Nominees
There are eleven nominees standing for election to the Board at the 2017 Annual Meeting based on the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee.Meeting. All nominees, other than Mr. Vazquez, who was appointedGoodarzi, were elected to the Board in May 2016, was recommended for consideration by the Nominatingour stockholders at last year’s annual meeting. Mr. Smith will be stepping down from his role as President and Governance Committee atChief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2019. At that time, by Scott Cook. Mr. Vazquez’s name was provided to a third party search firm, who presented several candidates, including Mr. Vazquez, tohe will become Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, for consideration.and Mr. Goodarzi will assume the role of President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board conducted interviewsdetermined that it is appropriate for Mr. Goodarzi, as he assumes his new role, to also serve as a member of multiple candidates before concludingthe Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board has appointed Mr. Goodarzi to the Board, effective as of January 1, 2019.
DIVERSITY OF EXPERIENCE
Our Board is currently composed of a group of leaders with broad and diverse experience in many areas, including small business and consumer domain; SaaS, mobile and data domain; platform and digital marketing; information security; public policy and government relations; global experience; leadership as a CEO or CFO; and financial expertise. These are the skills and qualifications our Board considers important for our directors in light of our current business and structure. Our Board members have acquired these diverse skills through their accomplished careers and their service as executives and directors of a wide range of other public and private companies. See the charts in the Proxy Summary for additional detail regarding the diversity of our Board members.
BOARD REFRESHMENT
Our slate of nominees reflects Intuit’s commitment to ongoing Board refreshment, while at the same time valuing the experience that Mr. Vazquez wasour longer-tenured directors bring. Five of our eight independent director nominees have served on our Board for fewer than five years.
EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE
The following chart reflects the best matchexperience and expertise of our 11 nominees for our Board of Directors. These are the Board’s needs.skills and qualifications our Board considers important for our directors in light of our current business and structure.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_exp-exp.jpg]
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement19

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-eburton.jpg]
Committees:

Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Acquisition
Eve Burton
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Hearst Corporation
Director since: 2016      Age: 60
Ms. Burton joined The Hearst Corporation, one of the nation’s largest global diversified communications companies, in 2002 as Vice President and General Counsel. She was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel in 2012, and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since August, 2018. Ms. Burton has responsibility for day-to-day management of the Office of General Counsel, which provides services to all of Hearst’s more than 350 businesses around the world, including legal, compliance, labor relations, government affairs and corporate human resources. She is also one of Hearst’s leaders in establishing worldwide strategic enterprise deals with technology and content partners. Ms. Burton is a member of the CEO’s strategic advisory group, the Hearst Venture Investment Committee and Hearst’s Risk Working Group. She is also involved with Hearst’s innovation program. Prior to joining Hearst, Ms. Burton served as Vice President and Chief Legal Counsel at Cable News Network (CNN). Ms. Burton also serves on the Board of Directors of Hearst and previously served
on the Board of Directors of AOL. Her non-profit Board affiliations include the David and Helen Gurley Brown Institute for Media Innovation at Stanford and Columbia Universities and she is also a trustee of Middlebury College. Ms. Burton holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Hampshire college and a Juris Doctor degree from Columbia Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Ms. Burton brings to the Board legal and business experience as a general counsel for a global company engaged in a broad range of diversified communications activities and strategic partnerships and investments. She also brings insights into operational and security issues facing online consumer services companies, as well as expertise in the area of government relations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-sdcook.jpg]
Committees:
None
Scott Cook
Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.
Director since: 1984      Age: 66
A co-founder of Intuit, Mr. Cook served as Intuit’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1994 and as Chairman of the Board from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Cook served as a director of eBay Inc., from 1998 to 2015, where he was a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Cook has been a director of the Procter & Gamble Company since 2000. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Southern California and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Cook brings to the Board experience as an entrepreneur and corporate executive with a background in guiding and fostering innovation at companies in technology and other sectors, as well as his knowledge of Intuit’s operations, markets, customers, management and strategy and his experience as a Board member of other large, global, consumer-focused companies.
Other Public Company Boards
The Procter & Gamble Company since 2000 (serves on the Innovation & Technology Committee and the Compensation & Leadership Development Committee)
20INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rldalzell.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition (Chair)

Audit and Risk
Richard L. Dalzell
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.
Director since: 2015      Age: 61
Mr. Dalzell was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Amazon.com, Inc., until his retirement in 2007. Previously, Mr. Dalzell served in numerous other positions at Amazon.com, Inc., including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Architecture and Platform Software and Chief Information Officer from 2001 to 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2000 to 2001, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to his employment with Amazon.com, Inc., Mr. Dalzell was Vice President of the Information Systems Division at Walmart Inc. from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Dalzell was a director of AOL.com, Inc. from 2009 until it was acquired by Verizon Communications Inc. in 2015. Mr. Dalzell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Dalzell brings to the Board extensive experience, expertise and background in information technology, platform software, cloud computing and cybersecurity, as well as a global perspective, gained from his service as the Chief Information Officer of Amazon.com, Inc. He also brings corporate leadership experience gained from his service in various senior executive roles at Amazon.com, Inc.
Other Public Company Boards
Twilio, Inc. since 2014 (serves on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sasan-goodarzi.jpg]
Committees:
None
Sasan Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business & Self-Employed Group, Intuit Inc. He has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit Inc., and a member of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2019.
Director since: N/A      Age: 50
Mr. Goodarzi has been Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Small Business Group since May 2016. He previously was Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Consumer Tax Group from August 2015 through April 2016 and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Consumer Tax Group from August 2013 to July 2015. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2011 to July 2013, having rejoined Intuit after serving as Chief Executive Officer of Nexant Inc., a privately held provider of intelligent grid software and clean energy solutions, since November 2010. During his previous tenure at Intuit from 2004 to 2010, Mr. Goodarzi led several business units including Intuit Financial Services and the professional tax division. Prior to joining Intuit, Mr. Goodarzi worked for Invensys, a global provider of industrial automation, transportation and controls technology, serving as global president of the
products group. He also held a number of senior leadership roles in the automation control division at Honeywell. Mr. Goodarzi holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Central Florida and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Goodarzi will bring to the Board a deep understanding of Intuit’s business and culture as well as instrumental contributions in developing and implementing the company’s new strategic priorities.
Other Public Company Boards
Atlassian Corporation Plc. since 2018 (serves on the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement21

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-dliu.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Compensation and Organizational Development
Deborah Liu
Vice President, Marketplace, Facebook, Inc.
Director since: 2017      Age: 42
Ms. Liu has had various roles at Facebook, an online social networking company, since July 2009. She has run their developer and commerce businesses as Vice President, Marketplace since August 2017, prior to which, she served as Vice President, Platform and Marketplace from October 2015 to July 2017. She served as Director of Product Management from February 2014 to September 2015, during which time she led the development of Facebook’s first mobile ad product for apps and Audience Network while also building the company’s games business and payments platform. Ms. Liu has been named one of the most powerful female engineers of 2017 by Business Insider and is a 15-year veteran in the tech industry. Prior to Facebook, she spent several years in product management roles at PayPal and eBay, including leading the integration between the two companies. Actively involved with promoting diversity and women in tech, Ms. Liu serves on the board of Expanding Your Horizons Network, a non-profit that
focuses on inspiring girls to pursue STEM careers. She co-created the Women in Product nonprofit after realizing that there was no forum for this underrepresented community to connect and serves as the Board Chair. Ms. Liu has a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Duke University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business.
Relevant Expertise
As the vice president of marketplace of a public technology company, Ms. Liu brings to the Board the experience and understanding of the power of mobile platforms and building personalized and rich experiences across apps, products, people and third-party integrations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-snjohnson.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development (Chair)

Nominating and Governance
Suzanne Nora Johnson
Former Vice-Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group
Director since: 2007      Age: 61
Lead Independent Director since: 2016
Ms. Nora Johnson held several management positions at The Goldman Sachs Group, including Vice Chairman, Chairman of the Global Markets Institute, and Head of the Global Investments Research Division from 1985 until 2007. Ms. Nora Johnson’s significant non-profit board affiliations include, among others, the Brookings Institution, the Carnegie Institution for Science and the University of Southern California. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Southern California and a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Ms. Nora Johnson brings to the Board valuable business experience managing large, complex, global institutions as well as insights into how changes in the financial services industry, public policy and the macro-economic environment affect our businesses.
Other Public Company Boards
American International Group, Inc. since 2008 (serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee);
Pfizer Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Audit Committee);
VISA Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Compensation Committee and serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee)
22INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-ddpowell.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Audit and Risk (Chair)
Dennis D. Powell
Former Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Director since: 2004      Age: 70
Mr. Powell was executive advisor of Cisco Systems, Inc. from 2008 to 2010. He joined Cisco in 1997 and held several management positions throughout his tenure, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2008; Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance Vice President from 2002 to 2003; and Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2002. Prior to Cisco, Mr. Powell held the position of senior partner at Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where his tenure spanned 26 years. Mr. Powell served on the board of directors of VMware, Inc. from 2007 until 2015. Mr. Powell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting from Oregon State University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Powell brings to the Board executive management experience with large, global organizations, as well as deep financial expertise and insights into operational issues, which he gained through his tenure as an executive at a large public technology company.
Other Public Company Boards
Applied Materials, Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Audit Committee and serves on the Corporate Governance and the Nominating Committee and the Investment Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bdsmith.jpg]
Committees:
None
Brad D. Smith
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Intuit Inc. until January 1, 2019, at which time he will become Executive Chairman of the Board.
Director since: 2008      Age: 54
Chairman since: 2016
Mr. Smith is currently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, and has announced his decision to step down from his role as President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Smith joined Intuit in 2003 and has served over the years in a number of senior positions: Senior Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Division from 2006 to 2007; Senior Vice President and General Manager, QuickBooks from 2005 to 2006; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group from 2004 to 2005; and Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Accountant Central and Developer Network from 2003 to 2004. Before joining Intuit, Mr. Smith was at ADP, where he held several executive positions from 1996 to 2003, including Senior Vice President of Marketing and Business Development. Mr. Smith served on the board of directors of Yahoo! Inc. from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from Marshall University and a Master’s degree in Management from Aquinas College.
Relevant Expertise
Having served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, Mr. Smith brings to the Board significant knowledge of Intuit’s strategy, markets, operations and employees and provides industry expertise and context on all matters that come before the Board.
Other Public Company Boards
Nordstrom, Inc. since 2013 (serves as Chairman of the Board, on the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee);
SurveyMonkey since 2017 (chairs the Compensation Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement23

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-tszkutak.jpg]
Committees:

Audit and Risk

Nominating and Governance
Thomas Szkutak
Former Chief Financial Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.
Director since: 2018      Age: 57
Mr. Szkutak served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amazon.com, a global online retailer and cloud computing company, from 2002 until 2015. Prior to that, he spent 20 years with General Electric, where he held a variety of positions, including chief financial officer of GE Lighting from 2001 to 2002, finance director of GE Plastics Europe from 1999 to 2001, and executive vice president of finance at GE Asset Management (formerly known as GE Investments) from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Szkutak has also served as an advisor and operating partner of Advent International, a global private equity firm, since August 2017. He is a graduate of GE’s financial management program. Mr. Szkutak received a
Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Boston University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Szkutak brings to the Board deep financial expertise and executive management experience with large, global organizations, which he gained through his experience as the chief financial officer of a publicly traded company.
Other Public Company Boards
athenahealth, Inc. since 2016 (chairs the Audit Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rvazquez.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Audit and Risk
Raul Vazquez
Chief Executive Officer and Director, Oportun, Inc.
Director since: 2016      Age: 47
Mr. Vazquez has served as Chief Executive Officer and board member of Oportun, a financial technology company, since April 2012. Prior to joining Oportun, he spent nine years at Walmart in various senior leadership roles, including Executive Vice President and President of Walmart West, Chief Executive Officer of Walmart.com, and Executive Vice President of Global eCommerce for developed markets. Mr. Vazquez previously worked in startup companies in e-commerce, at a global strategy consulting firm focused on Fortune 100 companies, and as an industrial engineer for Baxter Healthcare. Mr. Vazquez served as a member of the board of directors of Staples, Inc. from 2013 to June 2016. Mr. Vazquez also served as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board’s Community Advisory Council from September 2015 to November 2017. Mr. Vazquez has also served on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s
Consumer Advisory Board from August 2016 until June 2018. Mr. Vazquez received a Bachelor of Science degree, a Master of Science degree in industrial engineering from Stanford University and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Vazquez brings to the Board a wide range of experience in innovative consumer financial products, retail, marketing, e-commerce, technology and community development, as well as corporate leadership experience with global organizations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
24INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-jweiner.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development

Nominating and Governance
Jeff Weiner
Chief Executive Officer, LinkedIn Corporation
Director since: 2012      Age: 48
Mr. Weiner has served as the Chief Executive Officer of LinkedIn, an online professional network provider, since June 2009, and as a director of LinkedIn from 2009 to 2016. He served as LinkedIn’s Interim President from December 2008 until June 2009. Before joining LinkedIn, Mr. Weiner was an executive in residence at Accel Partners and Greylock Partners, both venture capital firms, from September 2008 to June 2009. From May 2001 to June 2008 he held several positions at Yahoo! Inc., one of the world’s largest digital media companies, including as an Executive Vice President of Yahoo’s network division. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Weiner brings to the Board experience and insights as the chief executive officer of a successful technology company. He also has deep expertise and knowledge in social networking platforms, consumer web and mobile products.
Other Public Company Boards
None
ELECTION MECHANICS
Each nominee, if elected, will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until a qualified successor is elected, unless the nominee dies, resigns or is removed from the Board prior to such meeting. Although we know of no reason why any of the nominees would not be able to serve, if any nominee is unable to serve or for good cause does not serve, the proxy holder willcan vote your shares to approve the election of anyeither for a substitute nominee (if one is proposed by the BoardBoard) or just for the remaining nominees, leaving a vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board.
Each of our director nominees is currently serving on the Board. If a nominee who is currently serving as a director isdoes not re-elected,receive more votes in favor than votes against his or her re-election, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, in accordance with Intuit’s Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles, each director has submitted an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if stockholders do not elect the director. In that situation, our Nominating and Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board would act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it, within 90 days of the date that the election results were certified.
Intuit is committed to ongoing Board refreshment, while at the same time valuing the experience that our longer-tenured directors bring. Four of our nine directors have served on our Board for fewer than five years. These four directors constitute more than fifty percent of our seven independent directors.
Directors Standing for Election
Information concerning the nominees for director is provided below.

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominated directors.
eveburtonhresbackadjv2.jpg
Eve Burton (Age 58)
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, The Hearst Corporation
Ms. Burton has been an Intuit Director since January 2016 and is a member of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Acquisition Committee. Ms. Burton has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of The Hearst Corporation, a diversified media company, since March 2012. She joined The Hearst Corporation in 2002 as Vice President and General Counsel. Ms. Burton is also a member of Hearst CEO’s
strategic advisory group and of the Hearst Venture Investment Committee. She also serves as an Adjunct Professor of Constitutional Law and Journalism at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. Prior to joining The Hearst Corporation, Ms. Burton was Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of CNN from 2000 to 2001. Ms. Burton serves on the board of The Hearst Corporation and was a member of the AOL board of directors from 2013 to 2015 until its acquisition by Verizon Communications Inc. Her non-profit board affiliations include the David and Helen Gurley Brown Institute for Media Innovations at Stanford and Columbia Universities and the board of trustees of Middlebury College. Ms. Burton holds a Juris Doctorate from Columbia University.

Relevant Expertise
Ms. Burton brings to the Board legal and business experience as a general counsel for a global company engaged in a broad range of diversified communications activities and strategic partnerships and investments. She also brings insights into operational and security issues facing online consumer services companies as well as an expertise in the area of government relations.

Other Public Company Boards
None



Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement25

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
scottcookbw.jpg
Director Compensation
Scott D. Cook (Age 64)
Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.

Mr. Cook has been an Intuit director since 1984. A co-founder of Intuit, Mr. Cook served as Intuit’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1994 and served as Chairman of the Board from 1993 to 1998.Mr.
Cook was a director of eBay Inc. from 1998 to 2015 where he was a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Cook has been a director of The Procter & Gamble Company since 2000
where he chairs the Innovation & Technology Committee and is a member of the Compensation & Leadership Development Committee. Mr. Cook holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Southern California and a Master in Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Cook brings to the Board experience as an entrepreneur and corporate executive with a background in guiding and fostering innovation at companies in technology and other sectors, as well as his knowledge of Intuit’s operations, markets, management and strategy and his experience as a Board member of other large, global, consumer-focused companies.

Other Public Company Boards
The Procter & Gamble Company


Overview of Our Compensation Program for
Non-Employee Directors
rickdalzellbw.jpg
Richard L. Dalzell (Age 59)
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.

Mr. Dalzell has been an Intuit director since January 2015 and is a member of the Audit and Risk Committee and chairs the Acquisition Committee. Mr. Dalzell was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Amazon.com, Inc., an online retailer, until his retirement in 2007. Previously, Mr. Dalzell served in numerous other positions at Amazon.com, Inc., including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Architecture
and Platform Software and Chief Information Officer from 2001 to 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2000 to 2001 and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to his employment with Amazon.com, Inc., Mr. Dalzell was Vice President of the Information Systems Division at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. from 1994 to 1997. Since 2014, Mr. Dalzell has been a director of Twilio, Inc., where he is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Dalzell was a director of AOL.com, Inc. from 2009 until its acquisition by Verizon Communications Inc. in 2015. Mr. Dalzell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Dalzell brings to the Board extensive experience, expertise and background in Internet information technology, platform software, cloud computing and cybersecurity, as well as a global perspective, gained from his service as the Chief Information Officer of Amazon.com, Inc. He also brings corporate leadership experience gained from his service in various senior executive roles at Amazon.com, Inc.

Other Public Company Boards
Twilio, Inc.



dianegreenbw.jpg
Diane B. Greene (Age 61)
Senior Vice President, Google Inc.

Ms. Greene has been an Intuit director since 2006 and is a member of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee and chairs the Nominating and Governance Committee. Ms. Greene has served as the Senior Vice President of Enterprise Business at Google Inc. since December 2015. She has also served on the board of directors of Alphabet Inc. (and before its restructuring, Google Inc.) since January 2012. Ms.
Greene co-founded VMware, Inc. in 1998 and took the company public in 2007. Ms. Greene served as chief executive officer and president of VMware from 1998 to 2008, a member of the board of directors of VMware from 2007 to 2008, and as an Executive Vice President of EMC Corporation from 2005 to 2008. Prior to VMware, Ms. Greene held technical leadership positions at Silicon Graphics, Tandem, and Sybase and was chief executive officer of VXtreme. In addition to Ms. Greene’s public company board experience, she is a member of The MIT Corporation. Ms. Greene holds a Bachelor of Arts in mechanical engineering from the University of Vermont, a Master of Science degree in naval architecture from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Science degree in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley.

Relevant Expertise
Ms. Greene brings to the Board experience and insight as a successful technology entrepreneur and former chief executive officer of a public company, as well as deep expertise and knowledge of cloud computing and software as a service businesses.

Other Public Company Boards
Alphabet, Inc.


suzannenorajohnsonbw.jpg
Suzanne Nora Johnson (Age 59)
Former Vice-Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group

Ms. Nora Johnson has been an Intuit director since 2007 and Lead Independent Director since January 2016. She also chairs the Compensation and Organizational Committee and is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Ms. Nora Johnson joined The Goldman Sachs Group in 1985 and held several management positions throughout her tenure including: Vice Chairman, Chairman of the Global Markets
Institute, and Head of the Global Investments Research Division. Ms. Nora Johnson has been a member of the board of directors of: American International Group, Inc. since 2008; Pfizer Inc. since 2007; and VISA Inc. since 2007. Ms. Nora Johnson’s significant non-profit board affiliations include, among others, TechnoServe and the University of Southern California. Ms. Nora Johnson earned a Bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California and a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School.

Relevant Expertise
Ms. Nora Johnson brings to the Board valuable business experience managing large, complex, global institutions as well as insights into how changes in the financial services industry, public policy and the macro-economic environment affect our businesses.

Other Public Company Boards
American International Group, Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
VISA Inc.



dennispowellbw.jpg
Dennis D. Powell (Age 68)
Former Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Mr. Powell has been an Intuit director since 2004 and is Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee and a member of the Acquisition Committee. Mr. Powell was executive advisor of Cisco Systems, Inc. from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Powell joined Cisco in 1997 and held several management positions throughout his tenure including: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2008; Senior Vice President,
Corporate Finance Vice President from 2002 to 2003; and Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2002. Prior to Cisco, Mr. Powell held the position of senior partner at Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where his tenure spanned 26 years. Mr. Powell has been a member of the board of directors of Applied Materials, Inc. since 2007 and served on the board of directors of VMware, Inc. from 2007 until 2015. Mr. Powell holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting from Oregon State University.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Powell brings to the Board executive management experience with large, global organizations as well as deep financial expertise and insights into operational issues, which he has gained through his tenure as an executive at a large public technology company.

Other Public Company Boards
Applied Materials, Inc.


bradsmithbw.jpg
Brad D. Smith (Age 52)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Intuit Inc.

Mr. Smith has been an Intuit director since 2008 and Chairman of the Board since January 2016 and is currently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit. Mr. Smith joined Intuit in 2003 and has served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Division from 2006 to 2007, Senior Vice President and General Manager, QuickBooks from 2005 to 2006, Senior Vice President and General Manager,
Consumer Tax Group from 2004 to 2005 and as Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Accountant Central and Developer Network from 2003 to 2004. Before joining Intuit, Mr. Smith held the position of Senior Vice President of Marketing and Business Development of ADP, where he held several executive positions from 1996 to 2003. Mr. Smith served on the board of directors of Yahoo! Inc. from 2010 until 2013. Mr. Smith was elected to the board of directors of Nordstrom, Inc. in June 2013, where he chairs the Audit Committee and serves on the Technology Committee. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Marshall University and a Master’s degree in Management from Aquinas College.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Smith, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, brings to the Board the most relevant knowledge of Intuit’s strategy, markets, operations and employees and provides industry expertise and context on all matters that come before the Board.

Other Public Company Boards
Nordstrom, Inc.



raulvazquezbw.jpg
Raul Vazquez (Age 45)
Chief Executive Officer and Director, Oportun

Raul Vazquez has been an Intuit director since May 2016 and serves as a member of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Acquisition Committee. Mr. Vazquez has served as chief executive officer and board member of Oportun, a financial technology company since April 2012. Prior to joining Oportun, Vazquez spent nine years at Walmart in various senior leadership roles, including executive vice president and
president of Walmart West, chief executive officer of Walmart.com, and executive vice president of Global eCommerce for developed markets. Mr. Vazquez previously worked in startup companies in e-commerce, at a global strategy consulting firm focused on Fortune 100 companies and as an industrial engineer for Baxter Healthcare. Mr. Vazquez also served as a member of the board of directors of Staples, Inc. from 2013 to June 2016. In September 2015, Mr. Vazquez was named to the Federal Reserve Board’s Community Advisory Council and currently serves as its chair, and in August 2016, Mr. Vazquez was named to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Consumer Advisory Board. Mr. Vazquez received a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degree in industrial engineering from Stanford University and an MBA from the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Vazquez brings to the Board a wide range of experience in innovative consumer financial products, retail, marketing, e-commerce, technology and community development, as well as corporate leadership experience with global organizations.

Other Public Company Boards
None


jeffweinerbw.jpg
Jeff Weiner (Age 46)
Chief Executive Officer, LinkedIn Corporation

Mr. Weiner has been a director of Intuit since April 2012 and is a member of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of LinkedIn, an Internet professional network provider, since June 2009, and as a director of LinkedIn since July 2009. The acquisition of LinkedIn by Microsoft Corp. is pending. He served
as LinkedIn’s Interim President from December 2008 until June 2009. Before joining LinkedIn, Mr. Weiner was an executive in residence at Accel Partners and Greylock Partners, both venture capital firms, from September 2008 to June 2009. From May 2001 to June 2008 he held several positions at Yahoo! Inc., one of the world’s largest digital media companies, including most recently as an Executive Vice President of Yahoo’s network division. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Relevant Expertise
Mr. Weiner brings to the Board experience and insights as the chief executive officer of a successful public technology company as well expertise and knowledge in social networking platforms, consumer web and mobile products.

Other Public Company Boards
LinkedIn Corporation



The Board recommends that you vote
FOR the election of each of the nominated directors.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Overview

Our director compensation programs are designed to provide an appropriate incentive to attract and retain qualified non-employee board members.members and to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the equity and cash compensation for directors on an annual basis and making recommendations to the Board inif it determines changes are needed.
Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and considers information from its independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, regarding the eventamounts and type of compensation paid to non-management directors at companies within the same peer group the committee used to assess executive compensation.
In October 2017, as a result of this review, the Compensation Committee determinesrecommended no changes to the director cash compensation program but did recommend certain changes to director equity compensation, which the Board approved. In particular, the $75,000 RSU grant that had previously been provided to new directors upon joining the Board was discontinued, and the vesting schedule of certain director equity awards was modified, as described further below. In addition, the stock ownership guideline that applies to non-employee directors was increased from five times the annual Board cash retainer to ten times the Board cash retainer.
In October 2018, the Compensation Committee again reviewed director compensation and recommended, and the Board determined, to increase the annual cash retainers for non-employee directors to $75,000 in calendar 2019.
2018 Annual Cash Retainers
Non-employee directors are needed. paid annual cash retainers for Board membership, plus additional cash retainers for their committee service in the amounts shown in the following table:
PositionAnnual Amount ($)​
Non-Employee Board Member(1)60,000​
Lead Independent Director*40,000​
Members of each of Audit and Risk Committee, Acquisition Committee, and
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee
15,000​
Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee10,000​
Audit and Risk Committee Chair**32,500​
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Chair**25,000​
Acquisition Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee Chairs**17,500​
(1)
Beginning in calendar 2019, the annual retainer for Non-Employee Board Members will be $75,000.
*
The following table summarizesLead Independent Director also receives the fiscal Board membership retainer.
**
Committee chairs also receive the committee membership retainer.
262016INTUIT compensation earned2019 Proxy Statement |Director Compensation |Overview of Our Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors

These retainers are paid in quarterly installments and are pro-rated for any changes to committee service that occur during the year. Directors may elect to defer cash retainers into tax-deferred Intuit stock units by making an irrevocable written election before the start of each membercalendar year. These tax-deferred stock units, known as Conversion Grants, are granted quarterly and are fully vested at the time of grant. The shares underlying these stock units are distributable five years from the date of grant, or upon an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of the ownership of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant).
We reimburse non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.
2018 Director Equity Compensation Program
Grants are made to non-employee directors in the form of a fixed dollar value of RSUs in the following amounts:
Board PositionFixed Amount of Award ($)​Vesting schedule​
Non-Employee Board Member (annual grant)260,000​Generally vests in full on the first business day
of the 12th month following the grant date.​
Because the formula is based on a fixed dollar amount, the number of RSUs awarded annually to non-employee directors varies, depending on the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The annual grants are awarded on the day following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For a director who joins between annual meetings, the annual grant will be prorated based on the number of full months of expected service until the first anniversary of the most recent annual meeting, and it will vest on the same day as the other than Mr. Smith, whose compensationdirectors’ annual grants. Once RSUs vest, issuance of shares is described under “Executive Compensation” beginningdeferred until five years from the date of grant, or an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant). The short vesting schedule serves to avoid director entrenchment, while the five-year deferral ensures long-term alignment of director interests with those of our stockholders.
All of the RSUs that we grant to our directors have dividend rights, which are accumulated and paid only when the shares are issued. Dividend equivalent rights on page 63.RSUs that fail to vest are forfeited.
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that the annual aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year (not including awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments) may not exceed $625,000, plus an additional $250,000 for any Lead Independent Director or non-employee Chairman of the Board.
Director Stock Ownership Requirement
In October 2017, the Board approved increasing the director stock ownership requirement from five times to ten times the amount of the annual Board member retainer for fiscal 2018. Unvested RSUs and vested deferred RSUs held by a Board member are counted as shares when determining the number of shares owned. Directors must comply with the new guidelines within five years from the date they join the Board. If any director does not meet the stock ownership requirement within this time frame, then 50% of his or her annual cash retainers will be made in the form of Intuit stock until compliance is achieved. As of October 31, 2018, all of our current directors were in compliance with the revised policy.
Director Stock Ownership Requirement |Director Compensation |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement27

Director Summary Compensation TableStock Ownership Requirement

Director Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($)(1) All Other Compensation ($) Total ($)
Eve Burton 
(2) 424,896
(2) 
  424,896
William V. Campbell 200,000
(3) (5) 
  
  200,000
Scott D. Cook 
  
  1,090,000
(4) 1,090,000
Richard L. Dalzell 
(2) 367,419
(2) 
  367,419
Diane B. Greene 102,500
  259,955
  
  362,455
Edward A. Kangas 30,000
(5) 
  
  30,000
Suzanne Nora Johnson 139,375
  259,955
  
  399,330
Dennis D. Powell 122,500
  259,955
  
  382,455
Raul Vazquez 45,000
  269,976
  
  314,976
Jeff Weiner 
(2) 344,953
(2) 
  344,953

(1)
These amounts representIn October 2017, the Board approved increasing the director stock ownership requirement from five times to ten times the amount of the annual Board member retainer for fiscal 2018. Unvested RSUs and vested deferred RSUs held by a Board member are counted as shares when determining the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during fiscal 2016, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), assuming no forfeitures. Please see the “Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2016” and “Outstanding Equity Awards for Directors at Fiscal Year-End 2016 (Exercisable and Unexercisable)” tables for information regarding the grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the fiscal year and the number of awards outstanding for each director at the end of the fiscal year.
(2)Ms. Burton, Mr. Dalzell, and Mr. Weiner elected to receive fees due them for service on the Board and Committees during calendar year 2016 in RSUs, in accordance with Intuit’s Director Compensation Program, which is tied to the calendar year rather than Intuit’s fiscal year. These RSUs were awarded in January 2016 and are in respect of service provided during calendar year 2016 (which includes the first quarter of Intuit’s fiscal 2017). Please see the “Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2016” table for more information.
(3)This amount represents a stipend paid to Mr. Campbell for his role as a member and Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, in accordance with the compensation program adopted by the Board which became effective in January 2012.
(4)
Mr. Cook is an employee of Intuit; thus, he is not compensated as a director. Mr. Cook’s compensation represents an annual salary of $550,000 and an incentive bonus of $540,000 awarded for service in fiscal 2016. Mr. Cook did not receive any equity awards from Intuit during fiscal 2016.
(5)Mr. Campbell and Mr. Kangas did not stand for re-election to Intuit’s Board in January 2016.


Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2016
The following table shows each RSU grant made to each of our directors, other than Mr. Smith, during fiscal 2016, including the grant date, number of shares and grant date fair value.
  Stock Awards
Director Name Grant Date Shares Subject to Award (#) 
Grant Date Fair Value
($)(1)
Eve Burton 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Eve Burton 1/22/2016 801
(3)74,982
Eve Burton 1/22/2016 961
(4)89,959
Scott D. Cook   
 
Richard L. Dalzell 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Richard L. Dalzell 1/22/2016 1,148
(4)107,464
Diane B. Greene 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Suzanne Nora Johnson 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Dennis D. Powell 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Raul Vazquez 5/5/2016 1,942
(5)194,977
Raul Vazquez 5/5/2016 747
(6)74,999
Jeff Weiner 1/22/2016 2,777
(2)259,955
Jeff Weiner 1/22/2016 908
(4)84,998

(1)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 assuming no forfeitures. The grant date fair value of these awards is equal to the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. See Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 for more information on the valuation of RSUs.
(2)Annual Non-Employee Board Member grant which, subject to the director’s continued service, vests as to 100% of the shares on January 1, 2017.
(3)Initial Non-Employee Board Member grant which, subject to the director’s continued service, vests as to 50% of the shares on January 22, 2017 and 50% on January 22, 2018.
(4)Represents RSUs awarded pursuant to a Conversion Grant (described below under “Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors”) for shares equivalent in fair value on the date of grant to annual retainers for Board and Committee service for calendar year 2016.
(5)Prorated Annual Non-Employee Board Member grant which, subject to the director’s continued service, vests as to 100% of the shares on May 1, 2017.
(6)Initial Non-Employee Board Member grant which, subject to the director’s continued service, vests as to 50% of the shares on May 1, 2017 and 50% on May 1, 2018.

Outstanding Equity Awards forowned. Directors at Fiscal Year-End 2016 (Exercisable and Unexercisable)
The following table provides information on the outstanding equity awards held by our directors, other than Mr. Smith, as of July 31, 2016.

Director Name 
Aggregate Shares Subject to Outstanding Stock
Awards (#)
 
Eve Burton 4,539
(1)
Scott D. Cook 
 
Richard L. Dalzell 8,620
(2)
Diane B. Greene 17,871
(3)
Suzanne Nora Johnson 17,871
(3)
Dennis D. Powell 17,871
(3)
Raul Vazquez 2,689
 
Jeff Weiner 20,997
(4)


(1) Includes 721 vested RSUs on which settlement is deferred in accordance with Intuit’s Director Equity Compensation Plan.
(2) Includes 5,137 vested RSUs on which settlement is deferred in accordance with Intuit’s Director Equity Compensation Plan.
(3) Includes 15,094 vested RSUs on which settlement is deferred in accordance with Intuit’s Director Equity Compensation Plan.
(4) Includes 17,993 vested RSUs on which settlement is deferred in accordance with Intuit’s Director Equity Compensation Plan.


Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews best practices and considers how the Company’s compensation program for non-employee directors compares to the programs of its compensation peers. In conducting this review, the Compensation Committee relies upon information provided to it by FW Cook. The current compensation program approved by our Board for our non-employee directors and the Chairman of the Board has been in effect since January 2012,must comply with the exceptions of an increase in the stipend for the Compensation Committee Chair from $17,500 to $20,000 in January 2014 and a further increase from $20,000 to $25,000 effective January 2016, the increase in the annual cash stipend paid to the Chairman of the Board in lieu of participation in the non-employee director cash compensation program from $240,000 for calendar year 2013 to $260,000 effective January 2014, and the addition of an annual cash stipend for the Lead Independent Director of $40,000 effective January 2016. In October 2016, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, amending the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to provide that annual aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year (not including awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments), will not exceed $625,000, with such limit to be increased by an additional $250,000 for any Lead Independent Director or Non-Employee Director Chairman of the Board, which amendment is subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, as further described under Proposal 3 below.
Annual Retainer
Non-employee directors are paid annual cash retainers for Board membership, plus additional cash retainers for their committee service in the amounts indicated in the following table:
PositionAnnual Amount ($)
Non-Employee Board Member60,000
Lead Independent Director40,000
Members of each of Audit and Risk Committee, Acquisition Committee, and Compensation and Organizational Development Committee15,000
Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee10,000
Audit and Risk Committee Chair*32,500
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Chair*25,000
Acquisition Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee Chairs*17,500

* Committee chair retainers are in addition to committee membership retainers.

These annual retainers are paid in quarterly installments and are pro-rated for any changes to a committee that occurs during any quarter. Directors may elect to defer cash retainers into additional tax-deferred Intuit stock units by making an irrevocable written election prior to the start of each calendar year. Such tax-deferred stock units, known as Conversion Grants, vest in four installments, commencing on the grant date (which is the first business day following the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders) and quarterly thereafter, and will be distributable at the earlier of (i)new guidelines within five years from the date they join the Board. If any director does not meet the stock ownership requirement within this time frame, then 50% of grant, (ii) separation from the Board,his or (iii) a change in control of the ownership of Intuit. We reimburse non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.

Director Equity Compensation Program

Grants areher annual cash retainers will be made to non-employee directors in the form of a fixed dollar valueIntuit stock until compliance is achieved. As of RSUsOctober 31, 2018, all of our current directors were in compliance with the following amounts:
revised policy.
Board PositionFixed Amount of Award ($)
Non-Employee Board Member (annual grant)260,000
New Board Member (additional grant upon joining Board)75,000

Director Stock Ownership Requirement |Director Compensation |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement27

Because the formula is based on a fixed dollar amount, the number of RSUs awarded annually to non-employee directors may vary, depending on the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The annual grants will be awarded on the day following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For a new Board Member, the annual grant will be prorated based on the number of full months of expected service until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Subject to the director’s continued service, vesting of the annual RSU grants will occur on the first day of the twelfth month following the

date of grant. For example, for grants made in January 2017, the vesting date would be January 1, 2018. A new Board Member’s additional grant will vest in two equal installments over two years. Once RSUs vest, settlement of the awards must be deferred until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of grant, (ii) separation from the Board, or (iii) a change in control of Intuit. Directors may defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time at their option.
All of the RSUs that we grant to our Board Members have dividend rights, which are accumulated and paid when the shares are issued.
Eve Burton
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Hearst Corporation
Director Stock Ownership Requirementsince: 2016      Age: 60
Ms. Burton joined The Hearst Corporation, one of the nation’s largest global diversified communications companies, in 2002 as Vice President and General Counsel. She was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel in 2012, and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since August, 2018. Ms. Burton has responsibility for day-to-day management of the Office of General Counsel, which provides services to all of Hearst’s more than 350 businesses around the world, including legal, compliance, labor relations, government affairs and corporate human resources. She is also one of Hearst’s leaders in establishing worldwide strategic enterprise deals with technology and content partners. Ms. Burton is a member of the CEO’s strategic advisory group, the Hearst Venture Investment Committee and Hearst’s Risk Working Group. She is also involved with Hearst’s innovation program. Prior to joining Hearst, Ms. Burton served as Vice President and Chief Legal Counsel at Cable News Network (CNN). Ms. Burton also serves on the Board of Directors of Hearst and previously served
on the Board of Directors of AOL. Her non-profit Board affiliations include the David and Helen Gurley Brown Institute for Media Innovation at Stanford and Columbia Universities and she is also a trustee of Middlebury College. Ms. Burton holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Hampshire college and a Juris Doctor degree from Columbia Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Each director is requiredMs. Burton brings to hold sharesthe Board legal and business experience as a general counsel for a global company engaged in a broad range of diversified communications activities and strategic partnerships and investments. She also brings insights into operational and security issues facing online consumer services companies, as well as expertise in the area of government relations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-sdcook.jpg]
Committees:
None
Scott Cook
Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.
Director since: 1984      Age: 66
A co-founder of Intuit, common stock with an aggregate value of five times the amountMr. Cook served as Intuit’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1994 and as Chairman of the annual Board from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Cook served as a director of eBay Inc., from 1998 to 2015, where he was a member retainer, which value will be measuredof the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Cook has been a director of the Procter & Gamble Company since 2000. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Southern California and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Cook brings to the Board experience as an entrepreneur and corporate executive with a background in guiding and fostering innovation at companies in technology and other sectors, as well as his knowledge of July 31st of each year.Unvested RSUsIntuit’s operations, markets, customers, management and vested deferred RSUs held bystrategy and his experience as a Board member are countedof other large, global, consumer-focused companies.
Other Public Company Boards
The Procter & Gamble Company since 2000 (serves on the Innovation & Technology Committee and the Compensation & Leadership Development Committee)
20INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rldalzell.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition (Chair)

Audit and Risk
Richard L. Dalzell
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.
Director since: 2015      Age: 61
Mr. Dalzell was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Amazon.com, Inc., until his retirement in 2007. Previously, Mr. Dalzell served in numerous other positions at Amazon.com, Inc., including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Architecture and Platform Software and Chief Information Officer from 2001 to 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2000 to 2001, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to his employment with Amazon.com, Inc., Mr. Dalzell was Vice President of the Information Systems Division at Walmart Inc. from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Dalzell was a director of AOL.com, Inc. from 2009 until it was acquired by Verizon Communications Inc. in 2015. Mr. Dalzell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Dalzell brings to the Board extensive experience, expertise and background in information technology, platform software, cloud computing and cybersecurity, as shares when determiningwell as a global perspective, gained from his service as the Chief Information Officer of Amazon.com, Inc. He also brings corporate leadership experience gained from his service in various senior executive roles at Amazon.com, Inc.
Other Public Company Boards
Twilio, Inc. since 2014 (serves on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sasan-goodarzi.jpg]
Committees:
None
Sasan Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business & Self-Employed Group, Intuit Inc. He has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit Inc., and a member of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2019.
Director since: N/A      Age: 50
Mr. Goodarzi has been Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Small Business Group since May 2016. He previously was Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Consumer Tax Group from August 2015 through April 2016 and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Consumer Tax Group from August 2013 to July 2015. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2011 to July 2013, having rejoined Intuit after serving as Chief Executive Officer of Nexant Inc., a privately held provider of intelligent grid software and clean energy solutions, since November 2010. During his previous tenure at Intuit from 2004 to 2010, Mr. Goodarzi led several business units including Intuit Financial Services and the professional tax division. Prior to joining Intuit, Mr. Goodarzi worked for Invensys, a global provider of industrial automation, transportation and controls technology, serving as global president of the
products group. He also held a number of shares owned. Directors must comply with the new guidelines within five years after the date the director joins the Board. If any director does not meet the stock ownership requirement within this time frame, 50% of his or her annual cash retainers will be madesenior leadership roles in the formautomation control division at Honeywell. Mr. Goodarzi holds a Bachelor of Intuit stock until compliance is achieved. AsScience degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Central Florida and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Goodarzi will bring to the Board a deep understanding of Intuit’s business and culture as well as instrumental contributions in developing and implementing the company’s new strategic priorities.
Other Public Company Boards
Atlassian Corporation Plc. since 2018 (serves on the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement21

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-dliu.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Compensation and Organizational Development
Deborah Liu
Vice President, Marketplace, Facebook, Inc.
Director since: 2017      Age: 42
Ms. Liu has had various roles at Facebook, an online social networking company, since July 31, 2016, each2009. She has run their developer and commerce businesses as Vice President, Marketplace since August 2017, prior to which, she served as Vice President, Platform and Marketplace from October 2015 to July 2017. She served as Director of Product Management from February 2014 to September 2015, during which time she led the development of Facebook’s first mobile ad product for apps and Audience Network while also building the company’s games business and payments platform. Ms. Liu has been named one of the current directorsmost powerful female engineers of 2017 by Business Insider and is a 15-year veteran in compliancethe tech industry. Prior to Facebook, she spent several years in product management roles at PayPal and eBay, including leading the integration between the two companies. Actively involved with promoting diversity and women in tech, Ms. Liu serves on the board of Expanding Your Horizons Network, a non-profit that
focuses on inspiring girls to pursue STEM careers. She co-created the Women in Product nonprofit after realizing that there was no forum for this policy.underrepresented community to connect and serves as the Board Chair. Ms. Liu has a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Duke University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business.
Relevant Expertise
As the vice president of marketplace of a public technology company, Ms. Liu brings to the Board the experience and understanding of the power of mobile platforms and building personalized and rich experiences across apps, products, people and third-party integrations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-snjohnson.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development (Chair)

Nominating and Governance
Suzanne Nora Johnson
Former Vice-Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group
Director since: 2007      Age: 61
Lead Independent Director since: 2016
Ms. Nora Johnson held several management positions at The Goldman Sachs Group, including Vice Chairman, Chairman of the Global Markets Institute, and Head of the Global Investments Research Division from 1985 until 2007. Ms. Nora Johnson’s significant non-profit board affiliations include, among others, the Brookings Institution, the Carnegie Institution for Science and the University of Southern California. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Southern California and a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Ms. Nora Johnson brings to the Board valuable business experience managing large, complex, global institutions as well as insights into how changes in the financial services industry, public policy and the macro-economic environment affect our businesses.
Other Public Company Boards
American International Group, Inc. since 2008 (serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee);
Pfizer Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Audit Committee);
VISA Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Compensation Committee and serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee)
22INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

PROPOSAL NO. 2
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-ddpowell.jpg]
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMCommittees:
Intuit’s
Acquisition

Audit and Risk (Chair)
Dennis D. Powell
Former Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Director since: 2004      Age: 70
Mr. Powell was executive advisor of Cisco Systems, Inc. from 2008 to 2010. He joined Cisco in 1997 and held several management positions throughout his tenure, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2008; Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance Vice President from 2002 to 2003; and Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2002. Prior to Cisco, Mr. Powell held the position of senior partner at Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where his tenure spanned 26 years. Mr. Powell served on the board of directors of VMware, Inc. from 2007 until 2015. Mr. Powell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting from Oregon State University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Powell brings to the Board executive management experience with large, global organizations, as well as deep financial expertise and insights into operational issues, which he gained through his tenure as an executive at a large public technology company.
Other Public Company Boards
Applied Materials, Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Audit Committee and serves on the Corporate Governance and the Nominating Committee and the Investment Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bdsmith.jpg]
Committees:
None
Brad D. Smith
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Intuit Inc. until January 1, 2019, at which time he will become Executive Chairman of the Board.
Director since: 2008      Age: 54
Chairman since: 2016
Mr. Smith is currently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, and has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”)announced his decision to step down from his role as President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Smith joined Intuit in 2003 and has served over the years in a number of senior positions: Senior Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Division from 2006 to 2007; Senior Vice President and General Manager, QuickBooks from 2005 to 2006; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group from 2004 to 2005; and Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Accountant Central and Developer Network from 2003 to 2004. Before joining Intuit, Mr. Smith was at ADP, where he held several executive positions from 1996 to 2003, including Senior Vice President of Marketing and Business Development. Mr. Smith served on the board of directors of Yahoo! Inc. from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from Marshall University and a Master’s degree in Management from Aquinas College.
Relevant Expertise
Having served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, Mr. Smith brings to the Board significant knowledge of Intuit’s strategy, markets, operations and employees and provides industry expertise and context on all matters that come before the Board.
Other Public Company Boards
Nordstrom, Inc. since 2013 (serves as Chairman of the Board, on the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee);
SurveyMonkey since 2017 (chairs the Compensation Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement23

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-tszkutak.jpg]
Committees:

Audit and Risk

Nominating and Governance
Thomas Szkutak
Former Chief Financial Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.
Director since: 2018      Age: 57
Mr. Szkutak served as the independent registered public accountingSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amazon.com, a global online retailer and cloud computing company, from 2002 until 2015. Prior to that, he spent 20 years with General Electric, where he held a variety of positions, including chief financial officer of GE Lighting from 2001 to 2002, finance director of GE Plastics Europe from 1999 to 2001, and executive vice president of finance at GE Asset Management (formerly known as GE Investments) from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Szkutak has also served as an advisor and operating partner of Advent International, a global private equity firm, since August 2017. He is a graduate of GE’s financial management program. Mr. Szkutak received a
Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Boston University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Szkutak brings to perform the auditBoard deep financial expertise and executive management experience with large, global organizations, which he gained through his experience as the chief financial officer of Intuit’s consolidateda publicly traded company.
Other Public Company Boards
athenahealth, Inc. since 2016 (chairs the Audit Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rvazquez.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Audit and Risk
Raul Vazquez
Chief Executive Officer and Director, Oportun, Inc.
Director since: 2016      Age: 47
Mr. Vazquez has served as Chief Executive Officer and board member of Oportun, a financial statementstechnology company, since April 2012. Prior to joining Oportun, he spent nine years at Walmart in various senior leadership roles, including Executive Vice President and President of Walmart West, Chief Executive Officer of Walmart.com, and Executive Vice President of Global eCommerce for developed markets. Mr. Vazquez previously worked in startup companies in e-commerce, at a global strategy consulting firm focused on Fortune 100 companies, and as an industrial engineer for Baxter Healthcare. Mr. Vazquez served as a member of the effectivenessboard of internal control over financial reporting fordirectors of Staples, Inc. from 2013 to June 2016. Mr. Vazquez also served as chairman of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2017. AsFederal Reserve Board’s Community Advisory Council from September 2015 to November 2017. Mr. Vazquez has also served on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s
Consumer Advisory Board from August 2016 until June 2018. Mr. Vazquez received a matterBachelor of good corporate governance we are asking stockholders to ratify this selection. RepresentativesScience degree, a Master of Ernst & Young are expected to attend the Meeting. They will have the opportunity to makeScience degree in industrial engineering from Stanford University and a statementMaster’s degree in Business Administration from The Wharton School at the Meeting if they wishUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Vazquez brings to do sothe Board a wide range of experience in innovative consumer financial products, retail, marketing, e-commerce, technology and will be availablecommunity development, as well as corporate leadership experience with global organizations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
24INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-jweiner.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development

Nominating and Governance
Jeff Weiner
Chief Executive Officer, LinkedIn Corporation
Director since: 2012      Age: 48
Mr. Weiner has served as the Chief Executive Officer of LinkedIn, an online professional network provider, since June 2009, and as a director of LinkedIn from 2009 to respond2016. He served as LinkedIn’s Interim President from December 2008 until June 2009. Before joining LinkedIn, Mr. Weiner was an executive in residence at Accel Partners and Greylock Partners, both venture capital firms, from September 2008 to appropriate questions from stockholders. If the selection of Ernst & Young is not ratified, the Audit and Risk Committee will consider whether it should select another independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit and Risk Committee’s Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
It is the policyJune 2009. From May 2001 to June 2008 he held several positions at Yahoo! Inc., one of the Audit and Risk Committee to pre-approve nearworld’s largest digital media companies, including as an Executive Vice President of Yahoo’s network division. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in economics from The Wharton School at the beginningUniversity of each fiscal year all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm during that fiscal year. The Audit and Risk Committee authorizes specific projects within categories of services, subject to a budget for each project. The Audit and Risk Committee may also pre-approve particular services during the fiscal year on a case-by-case basis. The independent auditor and management periodically reportPennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Weiner brings to the AuditBoard experience and Risk Committeeinsights as the actual fees incurred versus the pre-approved budget.chief executive officer of a successful technology company. He also has deep expertise and knowledge in social networking platforms, consumer web and mobile products.
Fees Paid to Ernst & YoungOther Public Company Boards
The following table shows fees that we paid (or accrued) for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for fiscal 2016 and 2015:None

Fee Category 
Fiscal
2016
 
Fiscal
2015
Audit Fees $4,635,000
 $4,098,000
Audit-Related Fees 69,000
 91,000
Tax Fees 
 51,000
All Other Fees 
 
Total Fees $4,704,000
 $4,240,000
Audit Fees
These fees consist of amounts for professional services rendered in connection with the integrated audit of our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, and statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.


Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including agreed-upon audit procedures that focus on a specific business process. For fiscal 2016, audit-related fees consisted of fees for agreed-upon procedures for our Consumer Tax business. For fiscal 2015, audit-related fees consisted of fees for agreed-upon procedures for our Mint Bills and Consumer Tax businesses.
Tax Fees
Intuit paid no tax fees to Ernst & Young in fiscal 2016. Tax fees paid to Ernst & Young in fiscal 2015 were for international tax services in connection with an acquisition.
All Other Fees
Intuit paid no other fees to Ernst & Young in fiscal 2016 or fiscal 2015.
For more information about Ernst & Young, please see the “Audit and Risk Committee Report” on page 27.
Approval of this Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote on this proposal that are present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting and are voted “for” or “against” the proposal. Abstentions will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Brokers may exercise their discretion to vote on this Proposal since this is a routine matter (if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares).
ELECTION MECHANICS
Each nominee, if elected, will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until a qualified successor is elected, unless the nominee dies, resigns or is removed from the Board prior to such meeting. Although we know of no reason why any of the nominees would not be able to serve, if any nominee is unable to serve or for good cause does not serve, the proxy holder can vote your shares either for a substitute nominee (if one is proposed by the Board) or just for the remaining nominees, leaving a vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board.
If a nominee does not receive more votes in favor than votes against his or her re-election, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, in accordance with Intuit’s Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles, each director has submitted an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if stockholders do not elect the director. In that situation, our Nominating and Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board would act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it, within 90 days of the date that the election results were certified.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
The Board recommends that you vote
FOR the ratificationelection of each of the selectionnominated directors.
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement25

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Director Compensation
Overview of Our Compensation Program for
Non-Employee Directors
Our director compensation programs are designed to provide an appropriate incentive to attract and retain qualified non-employee board members and to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the equity and cash compensation for directors on an annual basis and making recommendations to the Board if it determines changes are needed.
Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and considers information from its independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, regarding the amounts and type of compensation paid to non-management directors at companies within the same peer group the committee used to assess executive compensation.
In October 2017, as a result of this review, the Compensation Committee recommended no changes to the director cash compensation program but did recommend certain changes to director equity compensation, which the Board approved. In particular, the $75,000 RSU grant that had previously been provided to new directors upon joining the Board was discontinued, and the vesting schedule of certain director equity awards was modified, as described further below. In addition, the stock ownership guideline that applies to non-employee directors was increased from five times the annual Board cash retainer to ten times the Board cash retainer.
In October 2018, the Compensation Committee again reviewed director compensation and recommended, and the Board determined, to increase the annual cash retainers for non-employee directors to $75,000 in calendar 2019.
2018 Annual Cash Retainers
Non-employee directors are paid annual cash retainers for Board membership, plus additional cash retainers for their committee service in the amounts shown in the following table:
PositionAnnual Amount ($)​
Non-Employee Board Member(1)60,000​
Lead Independent Director*40,000​
Members of Ernst & Young LLP.



AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT
We, the memberseach of the Audit and Risk Committee, assistAcquisition Committee, and
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee
15,000​
Members of the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by overseeing Intuit’s accountingNominating and financial reporting processes, the qualifications, independence and performance of Intuit’s independent auditor, the performance of Intuit’s internal audit department and Intuit’s internal controls. We also are responsible for selecting, evaluating and setting the compensation of Intuit’s independent auditor. Intuit’s management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Intuit’s financial statements, including setting accounting and financial reporting principles and designing Intuit’s system of internal control over financial reporting. The Governance Committee10,000​
Audit and Risk Committee has selected the independent registered public accounting firmChair**32,500​
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Chair**25,000​
Acquisition Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee Chairs**17,500​
(1)
Beginning in calendar 2019, the annual retainer for Non-Employee Board Members will be $75,000.
*
The Lead Independent Director also receives the Board membership retainer.
**
Committee chairs also receive the committee membership retainer.
26INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Director Compensation |Overview of Our Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors

These retainers are paid in quarterly installments and are pro-rated for any changes to committee service that occur during the year. Directors may elect to defer cash retainers into tax-deferred Intuit stock units by making an irrevocable written election before the start of each calendar year. These tax-deferred stock units, known as Conversion Grants, are granted quarterly and are fully vested at the time of grant. The shares underlying these stock units are distributable five years from the date of grant, or upon an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of the ownership of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant).
We reimburse non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.
2018 Director Equity Compensation Program
Grants are made to non-employee directors in the form of a fixed dollar value of RSUs in the following amounts:
Board PositionFixed Amount of Ernst & Young as Intuit’s independent auditor, with responsibility for performing an independent audit of Intuit’s consolidated financial statements and for expressing opinionsAward ($)​Vesting schedule​
Non-Employee Board Member (annual grant)260,000​Generally vests in full on the conformity of Intuit’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting based on their audit. The Audit and Risk Committee oversees the processes, although members first business day
of the Audit and Risk Committee are not engaged in12th month following the practice of auditing or accounting.grant date.​
Because the formula is based on a fixed dollar amount, the number of RSUs awarded annually to non-employee directors varies, depending on the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The annual grants are awarded on the day following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For a director who joins between annual meetings, the annual grant will be prorated based on the number of full months of expected service until the first anniversary of the most recent annual meeting, and it will vest on the same day as the other directors’ annual grants. Once RSUs vest, issuance of shares is deferred until five years from the date of grant, or an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant). The short vesting schedule serves to avoid director entrenchment, while the five-year deferral ensures long-term alignment of director interests with those of our stockholders.
All of the RSUs that we grant to our directors have dividend rights, which are accumulated and paid only when the shares are issued. Dividend equivalent rights on RSUs that fail to vest are forfeited.
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that the annual aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year (not including awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments) may not exceed $625,000, plus an additional $250,000 for any Lead Independent Director or non-employee Chairman of the Board.
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016, the Audit and Risk Committee carried out the duties and responsibilities as outlined in its charter, including the following specific actions:
Reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditor Intuit’s quarterly earnings announcements, consolidated financial statements, and related periodic reports filed with the SEC;
Reviewed with management its assessment of the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting;
Reviewed with the independent auditor and management the audit scope and plan;
Reviewed the internal audit plan with the internal auditor; and
Met in periodic executive sessions with each of the independent auditor, representatives of management, and the internal auditor.
We reviewed and discussed with management and representatives of Ernst & Young the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 and Ernst & Young’s opinion on the audited financial statements and the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young represented that its presentations included the matters required to be discussed with the Audit and Risk Committee by applicable auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
The Audit and Risk Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of Intuit’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Consistent with its charter, the Audit and Risk Committee has evaluated Ernst & Young’s qualifications, independence and performance. The Audit and Risk Committee has concluded that provision of the services described in that section is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young. In addition, we have received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with us concerning independence and discussed with Ernst & Young the firm’s independence.
Based on the reports, discussions and review described in this report, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to in this report and in the charter, we recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016. We also selected Ernst & Young as Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017.
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Dennis D. Powell (Chair)
Eve Burton
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Hearst Corporation
Director since: 2016      Age: 60
Ms. Burton joined The Hearst Corporation, one of the nation’s largest global diversified communications companies, in 2002 as Vice President and General Counsel. She was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel in 2012, and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since August, 2018. Ms. Burton has responsibility for day-to-day management of the Office of General Counsel, which provides services to all of Hearst’s more than 350 businesses around the world, including legal, compliance, labor relations, government affairs and corporate human resources. She is also one of Hearst’s leaders in establishing worldwide strategic enterprise deals with technology and content partners. Ms. Burton is a member of the CEO’s strategic advisory group, the Hearst Venture Investment Committee and Hearst’s Risk Working Group. She is also involved with Hearst’s innovation program. Prior to joining Hearst, Ms. Burton served as Vice President and Chief Legal Counsel at Cable News Network (CNN). Ms. Burton also serves on the Board of Directors of Hearst and previously served
on the Board of Directors of AOL. Her non-profit Board affiliations include the David and Helen Gurley Brown Institute for Media Innovation at Stanford and Columbia Universities and she is also a trustee of Middlebury College. Ms. Burton holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Hampshire college and a Juris Doctor degree from Columbia Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Ms. Burton brings to the Board legal and business experience as a general counsel for a global company engaged in a broad range of diversified communications activities and strategic partnerships and investments. She also brings insights into operational and security issues facing online consumer services companies, as well as expertise in the area of government relations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-sdcook.jpg]
Committees:
None
Scott Cook
Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc.
Director since: 1984      Age: 66
A co-founder of Intuit, Mr. Cook served as Intuit’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1994 and as Chairman of the Board from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Cook served as a director of eBay Inc., from 1998 to 2015, where he was a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Cook has been a director of the Procter & Gamble Company since 2000. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Southern California and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Cook brings to the Board experience as an entrepreneur and corporate executive with a background in guiding and fostering innovation at companies in technology and other sectors, as well as his knowledge of Intuit’s operations, markets, customers, management and strategy and his experience as a Board member of other large, global, consumer-focused companies.
Other Public Company Boards
The Procter & Gamble Company since 2000 (serves on the Innovation & Technology Committee and the Compensation & Leadership Development Committee)
20INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rldalzell.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition (Chair)

Audit and Risk
Richard L. Dalzell
Raul VazquezFormer Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.

Director since: 2015      Age: 61
Mr. Dalzell was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Amazon.com, Inc., until his retirement in 2007. Previously, Mr. Dalzell served in numerous other positions at Amazon.com, Inc., including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Architecture and Platform Software and Chief Information Officer from 2001 to 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2000 to 2001, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to his employment with Amazon.com, Inc., Mr. Dalzell was Vice President of the Information Systems Division at Walmart Inc. from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Dalzell was a director of AOL.com, Inc. from 2009 until it was acquired by Verizon Communications Inc. in 2015. Mr. Dalzell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point.
Relevant Expertise
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
The AuditMr. Dalzell brings to the Board extensive experience, expertise and Risk Committee is responsible for review,background in information technology, platform software, cloud computing and approval or ratification as appropriate, of transactions between Intuit (or its subsidiaries) and any “related person” of Intuit. Under SEC rules, “related persons” include directors, officers, nominees for director, 5% stockholders, and their immediate family members. The Audit and Risk Committee adopted a written set of procedures, which are described below, to evaluate these transactions and obtain approval or ratification by the Audit and Risk Committee.
Identification of Related Persons.  Information about our directors and executive officers and persons related to them and their affiliated entities is collected and updated through annual Director & Officer Questionnaires and quarterly director affiliation summaries. Directors and executives provide the names of their immediate family memberscybersecurity, as well as a global perspective, gained from his service as the entities with which they and their immediate family members are affiliated, including board memberships,Chief Information Officer of Amazon.com, Inc. He also brings corporate leadership experience gained from his service in various senior executive officer positions, and charitable organizations.roles at Amazon.com, Inc.
Audit and Risk Committee Annual Pre-Approval.  On an annual basis, Intuit’s procurement and legal departments prepare requests for pre-approval of transactions or relationships involving related persons or parties with which Intuit is expected to do business during the upcoming fiscal year. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews these requests during its regular fourth quarter meeting and generally pre-approves annual spending levels for each transaction or relationship.Other Public Company Boards
Periodic Approvals.  During the year, the list of known related persons is circulated to appropriate Intuit employees and is used to identify transactions with related persons. When Intuit identifies an actual or potential transaction with a related person that was not pre-approved byTwilio, Inc. since 2014 (serves on the Audit and Risk Committee, Intuit’s legal department collects information regarding the transaction, including the identity of the other party, the value of the transaction, and the size and significance of the transaction to both Intuit and the other party. This information is provided to the Audit and Risk Committee, which in its discretion may approve, ratify, rescind, place conditions upon, or take any other action with respect to the transaction.
Monitoring of Approved Transactions and Relationships.  Following approval by the Audit and Risk Committee, Intuit personnel review and monitor the transactions and relationships from time to time. If spending levels approach the limits approved by the Audit and Risk Committee, Intuit prepares and submits a new approval request to the Audit and Risk Committee for review at its next meeting.
Since the beginning of fiscal 2016, there have been no transactions and there currently are no proposed transactions in excess of $120,000 between Intuit (or its subsidiaries) and a related person in which the related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

PROPOSAL NO. 3
APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

General
In October 2004, our stockholders approved the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which we designed to reflect our commitment to having best practices in both compensation and corporate governance. When originally approved in 2004, the Plan’s term ran through December 9, 2006. In each of 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011 and 2014, our stockholders approved extensions to the term of the Plan, increases to the number of shares available under the Plan, and certain other amendments as brought before the stockholders from time to time.
On October 19, 2016, Intuit’s Compensation and Organizational Development Committee approved an amendment and restatement of the Plan. This amendment and restatement: (1) increases the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan, (2) extends the term of the Plan, (3) introduces lower limits on equity grants under the Restated 2005 Plan to non-employee directors, (4) adds cash-based awards as a permissible type of award under the Plan, (5) makes some additions to the list of qualifying performance criteria, and (6) makes certain other amendments described more fully below. Although not all of the changes to the Plan are required to be approved by stockholders, we have included these discretionary amendments in a single amendment and restatement of the Plan that we are submitting for stockholder approval at the annual meeting.
In the discussion of this proposal, we refer to the currently existing version of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as the “Plan,” and we refer to the version of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan in the event that the stockholders approve this proposal as the “Restated 2005 Plan.”
Material Amendments
The material differences between the Plan and the Restated 2005 Plan are described below. For further information on the terms of the Restated 2005 Plan as proposed, we encourage you to refer to the text of the Restated 2005 Plan, a copy of which has been filed with this proxy statement as Appendix B.
Increase in Share Reserve. Under the Restated 2005 Plan a total of 32,100,000 shares would be authorized for issuance for new awards, subject to stockholder approval of the Restated 2005 Plan, less grants made after July 31, 2016 (which grants are counted against the share pool at the fungible ratio described below). This reflects an increase of 23,110,386 shares to the 8,989,614 shares available for issuance as of July 31, 2016. The total historical authorization under the Restated 2005 Plan since its inception (including shares subject to outstanding awards and awards that have vested/exercised), if the Restated 2005 Plan is approved, will be 138,110,386. The share reserve for the Restated 2005 Plan will be reduced by one share for every one share that is subject to an option or stock appreciation right (“SAR”) granted after July 31, 2016 and 2.3 shares for every one share that is subject to an award other than an option or SAR granted after July 31, 2016. Assuming that aggregate equity awards are granted at levels consistent with recent historical practices, then we generally expect that the share reserve under the Restated 2005 Plan should be sufficient to cover the Company’s projected stock grants for a period of approximately three years, including the Company’s annual equity grants that are expected to be made in July 2019.
The following table shows certain information about the Plan, including outstanding awards, as of July 31, 2016:
Number of shares that will be authorized for future grant after stockholder approval of the Plan(1)32,100,000
Number of stock options outstanding at 7/31/168,345,851
Number of full-value awards (restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units) outstandingat 7/31/16
9,038,518
Weighted average remaining term of outstanding options6.07 years
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options$88.55
(1) Grants of stock-based awards other than options or SARs count against the authorization as 2.3 shares. The authorization will also be reduced by the number of shares granted between July 31, 2016 and the date of stockholder approval adjusted by the fungible ratio. Between July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2016, Intuit granted no options and 374,392 RSUs under the Plan. If all of the shares subject to these RSUs are issued, this would reduce the Plan’s share reserve by 861,102 shares (after adjusting the RSUs by the 2.3 fungible share ratio).
Director Limits. Under the Restated 2005 Plan, the aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year (not including Awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments), will not exceed $625,000, with such limit to be increased an additional $250,000 for any lead non-employee director or non-employee director who is chairman of the Board.

Cash-Based Awards. Under the Restated 2005 Plan, the Company can grant cash-based awards pursuant to which a participant may become entitled to receive an amount based on satisfaction of enumerated performance or service criteria.
Qualifying Performance Criteria under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The Plan (both as originally designed and as proposed in the Restated 2005 Plan) is designed to permit the grant of awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” not subject to Code Section 162(m)’s $1,000,000 deductibility cap, however, there can be no guarantee that amounts payable under the Plan will be treated as qualified “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m). In general, in order to grant awards that qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid must be disclosed to and approved by the company’s stockholders at least once every five years. For purposes of Code Section 162(m), the material terms include (i) the individuals eligible to receive compensation, (ii) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goal is based, and (iii) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an individual under the performance goal. With respect to the various types of awards under the Plan, each of these aspects is discussed below, and stockholder approval of the Restated 2005 Plan will constitute approval of each of these aspects of the Restated 2005 Plan for purposes of the approval requirements of Code Section 162(m). The material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid were most recently approved by Intuit’s stockholders at our 2014 annual meeting.
Term. Currently, the term of the Plan is set to expire on October 29, 2023. The term of the Restated 2005 Plan would expire on January 19, 2027, unless extended by stockholder approval in the future.
Annual Stockholder Value Transfer Rate, Burn Rate and Overhang
We actively manage our long-term dilution by granting equity awards in accordance with an annual equity compensation budget that reflects both the amount required to attract and retain employees at each level of the Company and a cost that is reasonable relative to our market capitalization size, which we call the rate of stockholder value transfer (SVT). SVT is a cost-based burn rate measure that normalizes for the difference in compensation value between grants of options and full-value shares based on their relative grant date accounting value. Annual SVT shows the rate at which market capitalization value is transferred to employees through equity compensation awards, and is the primary measure used by Intuit in managing the overall annual equity compensation cost incurred. We believe that looking at the grant date fair value of equity compensation is important, because it reflects the equity compensation expense that reduces GAAP earnings.
The following table shows Intuit’s SVT for the preceding three fiscal years. Intuit’s average annual SVT cost of 1.56% was more than 25% below the 2.09% median of our compensation peer group over the last three years:
    FY14 FY15 FY16 FY14-16 Avg.
a Options Granted 2,206,000
 1,981,000
 2,553,000
 2,246,667
b Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price $82.15 $106.86 $113.08 $100.70
c Black-Scholes Fair Value % 26.0% 18.1% 18.0% 20.7%
d = a x b x c Fair Value of Option Grants $47,076,040 $38,411,590 $51,953,550 $45,813,727
e RSUs/PSUs Granted 3,896,000
 3,501,000
 4,072,000
 3,823,000
f Wtd. Avg. Grant Price $71.37 $89.58 $99.30 $86.75
g = e x f Fair Value of RSU Grants $278,057,520 $313,619,580 $404,349,600 $332,008,900
h = d + g Fair Value of All Grants $325,133,560 $352,031,170 $456,303,150 $377,822,627
i Wtd. Avg. Market Cap $20,734,400,000 $25,624,100,000 $26,382,650,000 $24,247,050,000
  Wtd. Avg. Basic Shares Outstanding 285,000,000
 281,000,000
 262,000,000
 276,000,000
j = h ÷ i Gross Annual SVT Cost 1.57% 1.37% 1.73% 1.56%

An additional metric that we use to measure the cumulative dilutive impact of our equity program is fully diluted overhang (the sum of (1) the number of shares subject to equity awards outstanding, but not exercised or settled and (2) the number of shares available to be granted (in each case, with no adjustment for the fungible ratio), divided by the sum of (1) the total common shares outstanding at the end of the year, (2) the number of shares subject to equity awards outstanding but not exercised or settled, and (3) the number of shares available to be granted). Our overhang as of July 31, 2016 was 9.3%. If the Restated 2005 Plan is approved, our potential overhang as of that date would increase to 16.1% and then will decline over time.
The following are the factors that were material to the evaluation of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee, with input from management and its outside consultant, in determining acceptable and targeted levels of dilution: competitive data from relevant peer companies, the current and future accounting expense associated with Intuit’s equity award

practices, input from stockholders, and the standards of stockholder advisory firms. Intuit’s equity programs are revisited at least annually and assessed against these (and other) measures.
Request for Stockholder Approval
We believe that our ability to attract and retain qualified, high-performing employees is vital to our success and growth as a company given the importance of knowledge, innovation and talent for employees in our industry. Equity compensation is a very effective incentive and retention tool that encourages and rewards employee performance that aligns with stockholders’ interests. In addition, when the Company makes employee compensation decisions, equity grants are rendered in their cash equivalent value so that there is full transparency regarding the costs involved. We believe that the Restated 2005 Plan is an essential platform for motivating and retaining our employees, and we request your approval of the Restated 2005 Plan.
Approval of this Proposal No. 3 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote on this proposal that are present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting and are voted "for" or "against" the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote
FOR the Intuit Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.

Approval of the Restated 2005 Plan enables Intuit to achieve, among others, the following objectives:
1. The continued ability of Intuit to offer stock-based incentive compensation to Intuit’s eligible employees and non-employee directors. We are requesting approval of 23,110,386 additional shares for the Restated 2005 Plan, which will provide for grants for both new hires and current employees.
2. Furthering compensation and governance best practices. The Restated 2005 Plan incorporates a number of features that are widely considered to be best practices in compensation or corporate governance. The Restated 2005 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of directors who are “independent” based on the standards set forth by NASDAQ. The Restated 2005 Plan introduces lower limits on awards to non-employee directors. It includes a recoupment provision that mandates the forfeiture of gains related to performance-based awards of any participant whose fraud or misconduct is a significant contributing factor to any restatement of financial results. All options or SARs must have an exercise price that is at least 100% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. The Restated 2005 Plan prohibits Intuit from taking any of the following actions without stockholder approval: directly or indirectly reducing the exercise price of stock options or SARs or, when the exercise price of an outstanding option or SAR is above fair market value, amending the terms of such outstanding option or SAR to provide for the cancellation and re-grant or the exchange of such outstanding option or SAR for either cash or a new award with a lower (or no) exercise price. The Restated 2005 Plan also does not contain an evergreen feature (evergreen features provide for automatic replenishment of authorized shares available under an equity plan) and does not provide for any tax gross-ups or tax reimbursement in connection with any type of equity award that may be granted under its terms. In order to continue these best practices, we are requesting the term of the Plan be extended until January 19, 2027, resulting in the ability to continue granting awards under the Restated 2005 Plan until that date.
3. Providing qualifying “performance-based compensation” that is fully tax-deductible to Intuit. The Restated 2005 Plan contains all the provisions required under Section 162(m) of the Code to grant qualifying “performance-based compensation.” These provisions allow Intuit to tie the equity compensation of its most highly compensated executive officers whose compensation is regulated by this law to performance goals that align with stockholder objectives, while assuring that Intuit maintains the ability to fully deduct awards which are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of deductibility under Code Section 162(m). Nevertheless, there can be no guarantee that amounts payable under the Plan will actually be treated as qualified “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) or that Intuit will not grant awards under the Plan that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m).
Background on Stock Compensation at Intuit
We believe that employee stock ownership is a significant contributing factor in achieving superior financial performance. Historically, Intuit has granted stock options and RSUs to the majority of its newly hired employees, and its equity granting practices have been an important component of Intuit’s overall compensation program. Recognizing that stock-based compensation is a valuable and limited resource, Intuit has actively managed its use of stock-based compensation. To that end and consistent with our general pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, only our higher performing employees receive annual equity awards.
We believe that stock options align employees’ interests directly with those of other stockholders, because the employee only realizes value from an option if the stock price increases after the date of the award. We also believe that RSUs align employees’ interests directly with those of other stockholders, as they provide greater value to employees as Intuit’s stock price

increases. Without stock-based compensation, Intuit would be at a disadvantage against competitors to provide the market-competitive total compensation packages that are necessary to attract, retain and motivate the employee talent critical to the future success of Intuit.
We strongly believe that our stock-based incentive programs and emphasis on employee stock ownership have been integral to our success in the past and will continue to be important to our ability to achieve superior performance in the years ahead. Therefore, we consider approval of the Restated 2005 Plan to be vital to Intuit’s continued success.
Purpose of the Plan
The Restated 2005 Plan will allow Intuit, under the direction of the Compensation Committee, to make broad-based grants of options, SARs, restricted stock awards, and RSUs to employees and non-employee directors, within the limits set forth in the Restated 2005 Plan. The purpose of these equity awards is to attract, retain and motivate talented employees and non-employee directors, further align their interests with those of our stockholders, and continue to link employee compensation with Intuit’s performance.
Key Terms of the Restated 2005 Plan
The following is a summary of the key provisions of the Restated 2005 Plan, as it would become effective if the stockholders approve this Proposal No. 3. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all the provisions of the Restated 2005 Plan. A copy of the Restated 2005 Plan has been filed with this proxy statement as Appendix B, and the following description of the Restated 2005 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to that Appendix.

Plan Termination Date:January 19, 2027
Eligible Participants:Employees of Intuit and its subsidiaries, non-employee directors of Intuit and certain advisors and consultants of Intuit and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the Plan. As of October 31, 2016, there were approximately 8,038 individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, including approximately 8,031 employees and seven non-employee directors. Intuit uses the services of a significant number of advisors and consultants at any given point in time, but Intuit has a long-standing practice of not granting awards under the Plan to its advisors and consultants, and at this time does not foresee changing that practice.
Closing Stock Price:The closing price of Intuit’s common stock on NASDAQ on October 31, 2016 was $108.74.
Share Reserve:Under the Restated 2005 Plan a total of 32,100,000 shares would be authorized for issuance for new awards, subject to stockholder approval of the Restated 2005 Plan, less grants made after July 31, 2016 (which grants are counted against the share pool at the fungible ratio described below). This reflects an increase of 23,110,386 shares to the 8,989,614 shares available for issuance as of July 31, 2016. The total historical authorization under the Restated 2005 Plan since its inception (including shares subject to outstanding awards and awards that have vested/exercised), if the Restated 2005 Plan is approved, will be 138,110,386 shares. The share reserve for the Restated 2005 Plan will be reduced by one share for every one share that is subject to an option or SAR granted after July 31, 2016 and 2.3 shares for every one share that is subject to an award other than an option or SAR granted after July 31, 2016. Shares that are subject to awards that have been forfeited, expired or settled for cash (in whole or part), or tendered or withheld in satisfaction of withholding tax liabilities arising from an award granted on or after July 21, 2016 other than an option or SAR will be added to the shares available for awards under the Restated 2005 Plan at the 2.3-to-one ratio described above.
Award Types:(1) Non-qualified and incentive stock options
(2) Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
(3) Restricted Stock Awards
(4) Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
(5) Cash-Based Awards
Fungible Share Reserve:Each share subject to an option or SAR will reduce the share reserve by one (1) share, and each share subject to restricted stock or a RSU will reduce the share reserve by two and three-tenths (2.3) shares. Each share that is credited back to the Restated 2005 Plan (under the circumstances described above under “Share Reserve”) will increase the share reserve by one (1) share if the share had been subject to an option or SAR, and by two and three-tenths (2.3) shares if the share had been subject to a restricted stock or RSU award.

162(m) Share Limits:No more than 2,000,000 shares (3,000,000 for a new hire grant) may be made subject to awards to a single participant in any fiscal year. The maximum cash amount payable pursuant to all cash-based awards granted in any calendar year to any participant will not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000). These limits are necessary for awards to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, and have been reduced by 50% from the prior limits in light of the increase in Intuit’s stock price (other than the cash limit, which is being added in connection with the addition of cash-based awards as a permissible award type under the Restated 2005 Plan), and are greater than the number of options or other awards that Intuit has granted to any individual in the past. These limits do not signal any intent on our part to significantly change our practices regarding the grant of equity awards or other awards to our executive officers.
162(m) Performance Criteria:
The grant or vesting of awards (other than options or SARs) that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code may be based on any one or more of the following performance criteria, or growth or other changes in the amount, rate or value of one or more performance criteria, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to Intuit as a whole or to one or more business units or subsidiaries, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and measured over a performance period to be determined by Intuit’s Compensation Committee, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous results or to a designated comparison group, either based upon GAAP or non-GAAP financial results, in each case as specified by Intuit’s Compensation Committee (or subcommittee): (i) cash flow (before or after dividends), (ii) earnings per share (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization), (iii) stock price, (iv) return on equity, (v) total stockholder return, (vi) return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital), (vii) return on assets or net assets, (viii) market capitalization, (ix) economic value added, (x) debt leverage (debt to capital), (xi) revenue or net revenue, (xii) income or net income, (xiii) operating income, (xiv) operating profit or net operating profit, (xv) operating margin or profit margin, (xvi) return on operating revenue, (xvii) cash from operations, (xviii) operating ratio, (xix) operating revenue, (xx) contract value, (xxi) client renewal rate, (xxii) operating cash flow return on income, (xxiii) adjusted operating cash flow return on income, (xxiv) employee productivity and satisfaction metrics, (xxv) market share, (xxvi) strategic positioning, or (xxvii) new product releases. These performance criteria may differ for awards granted to any one participant or to different participants.
Establishment of Performance Goals;Certification byCommittees:
Intuit’s Compensation Committee (or subcommittee) will establish the performance goals with respect to awards (other than options or SARs) intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code no more than ninety (90) days after the commencement of the period of service to which the performance goal relates (or, in the case of performance periods of less than one year, not later than the date upon which 25% of the performance period elapses), provided that the outcome of the performance goal is substantially uncertain at such time. The Compensation Committee (or subcommittee) is required to certify, in writing, the level of achievement of the performance goals prior to the payment, settlement or vesting of an award. Adjustments to the evaluation of the achievement of performance goals is permitted only in accordance with 162(m) and if timely approved in connection with the establishment of 162(m) performance criteria.

Vesting:Vesting of awards granted to employees is determined by the Compensation Committee and may be based on the completion of a specified period of service with Intuit, on the attainment of pre-established performance goals, on such other factors as the Compensation Committee determines, or on a combination of the foregoing. Although subject to change at any time at the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion, options and “time-based” RSUs granted to employees generally vest over three years. “Performance-based” RSUs generally vest over three years, contingent on the satisfaction of pre-established performance goals. RSUs issued to non-employee directors under our current grant program generally vest over a period of from one to two years, depending on the type of grant, and are generally subject to a mandatory deferral period of five years.
Other Award Terms:
Stock options and SARs will have a term no longer than ten years. Options and SARs will have an exercise price no less than 100% of the fair market value of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant (except for certain options granted in connection with a merger or other acquisition as substitute or replacement awards).
Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, upon termination of employment for any reason other than death or “Disability” (as defined in the Restated 2005 Plan), stock options will cease to vest. Options granted to directors, or to employees who have been actively employed by Intuit for at least one year, and in either case who die or incur a Disability will vest in full, unless otherwise provided in the award agreement. Upon termination of employment, restricted stock awards generally will cease to vest and the participant will be entitled to retain the shares only to the extent earned as of the date of termination. The effect of termination of service on SARs and RSUs is specified in the applicable award agreements.
Dividends or distributions paid with respect to shares subject to restricted stock awards will be retained by Intuit and paid to the applicable participant at the same time that the shares with respect to which such dividends or distributions were paid are released from the restrictions of the award. A participant will be entitled to receive dividend equivalent rights prior to the issuance of shares subject to RSUs to the extent and under the terms and conditions provided in the applicable award agreement. However,any such dividend equivalent rights that relate to RSUs that vest based on the achievement of performance goals will be paid upon the later of (i) the date dividends are paid to the common stockholders of Intuit, or (ii) the date the RSUs with respect to which such dividend equivalent rights are payable become vested, and will be forfeited to the extent the underlying award does not vest. Except with respect to RSUs, dividend equivalent rights will not be granted alone or in connection with any award under the Restated 2005 Plan.
Repricing Prohibited:The Restated 2005 Plan prohibits Intuit from taking any of the following actions without stockholder approval: directly or indirectly reducing the exercise price of stock options or SARs or, when the exercise price of an outstanding option or SAR is above fair market value, amending the terms of such outstanding option or SAR to provide for the cancellation and re-grant or the exchange of such outstanding Option or SAR for either cash or a new award with a lower (or no) exercise price. Notwithstanding the foregoing in the event of a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the Restated 2005 Plan), any Option or SAR with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the value of the consideration to be paid to the holders of Intuit’s common stock (on a per share basis) may be cancelled without any consideration.

Recoupment of AwardsIf Intuit issues a restatement of its financial results after the distribution of shares or cash upon settlement of an award with vesting conditioned on the achievement of performance goals, then a participant will be required to return to Intuit the value of the award that would not have vested or been issued based on the restated financial results. This recoupment provision applies to a participant whose fraud or misconduct was a significant contributing factor to the restatement of financial results.
Non-Transferability:
Awards granted under the Restated 2005 Plan are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution except that the Compensation Committee or its authorized delegates may consent to permit the transfer of an award other than an incentive stock option by gift or domestic relations order to an “authorized transferee” as defined in the Restated 2005 Plan. Transfers by an individual for consideration are prohibited.
Administration:
The Compensation Committee will administer the Restated 2005 Plan. To the extent required by applicable law (such as Section 162(m) of the Code or Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), certain awards may be administered by a qualifying subcommittee. The Restated 2005 Plan also allows the Compensation Committee to delegate to one or more officers of Intuit the ability to grant awards and take certain other actions with respect to participants who are not executive officers or directors, within such limits as the Compensation Committee establishes, and to approve certain changes to the forms and award agreements under the Restated 2005 Plan. The Compensation Committee will select the individuals who receive awards, determine the number of shares covered thereby, and, subject to the terms and limitations expressly set forth in the Restated 2005 Plan, establish the terms, conditions and other provisions of the awards. The Compensation Committee may interpret the Restated 2005 Plan and establish, amend and rescind any rules relating to the Restated 2005 Plan, including adoption of rules, procedures or sub-plans applicable to particular subsidiaries or employees in particular locations. The Compensation Committee may address unanticipated events and make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Restated 2005 Plan.
Corporate Transactions:In the event of a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the Restated 2005 Plan) involving Intuit, any outstanding awards granted under the Restated 2005 Plan may be assumed, continued, replaced, or substituted by the successor, which assumption, continuation, replacement, or substitution shall be binding on all participants. In the event such successor refuses to assume, continue, replace or substitute the awards, the awards will vest as to 100% of the underlying shares (based on such further terms and conditions, if any, provided in the applicable award agreement). A “Corporate Transaction” includes certain mergers, consolidations, or similar transactions; dissolutions or liquidations; certain sales or transfers of all or substantially all the assets of Intuit; and certain other transactions that qualify as a “corporate transaction” under Section 424(a) of the Code.
Amendment and Termination:The Board may terminate, amend or suspend the Restated 2005 Plan, provided that no action may be taken by the Board to amend this Plan in any manner (including an amendment to reduce or permit the reduction of the exercise of an option or SAR) that requires stockholder approval pursuant to the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder, or pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any rule promulgated thereunder, or pursuant to NASDAQ rules. In addition, the Board may not amend an outstanding award in a manner that materially impairs the rights of a participant without such participant’s consent, except as expressly authorized in the Restated 2005 Plan.


New Plan Benefits
Intuit’s executive officers and directors have an interest in approval of the Restated 2005 Plan because it relates to the issuance of equity awards for which executive officers and directors may be eligible. The benefits that will be awarded or paid under the Restated 2005 Plan to executive officers cannot currently be determined. Awards granted under the Restated 2005 Plan to executive officers are within the discretion of the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee has not determined future awards or who might receive them. Although not required by the Restated 2005 Plan,Nominating and subject to change at any time at the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion, Intuit’s current approved program generally provides for an initial grant for non-employee directors of RSUs covering the number of shares equal to $75,000Governance Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sasan-goodarzi.jpg]
Committees:
None
Sasan Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and for an annual grant for non-employee directors of RSUs covering the number of shares equal to $260,000. Each non-employee director also has the ability to elect to convert all of the director’s cash retainer(s) otherwise payable to the director during a calendar year into RSUs.
Aggregate Past Grants Under the Plan
The table below shows, as to each Named Executive Officer and the various indicated groups, the aggregate number of shares ofGeneral Manager, Small Business & Self-Employed Group, Intuit common stock subject to option grants, stock grants and RSU grants under the Plan since the Plan’s inception through October 31, 2016.

    Number of
    Restricted
    Stock Units
  Number of and Restricted
  Options Shares
Name Granted (#) Granted (#)
       
Named Executive Officers:      
Brad D. Smith  2,236,777
   2,006,550
 
R. Neil Williams  609,346
   646,459
 
Sasan K. Goodarzi  713,393
   594,562
 
H. Tayloe Stansbury  348,590
   396,730
 
Daniel A. Wernikoff  453,874
   454,075
 
All executive officers as a group (8 persons) 
  4,999,590
   4,582,074
 
All non-executive directors as a group (7 persons)  507,500
   137,774
 
All employees, excluding executive officers  61,538,533
   35,625,626
 
U.S. Federal Tax Consequences
Stock option grants under the Restated 2005 Plan may be intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code or may be non-qualified stock options. Generally, no federal income tax is payable by a participant upon the grant of a stock option and no deduction is taken by the Company. Intuit’s practiceInc. He has been to grant non-qualified stock options. Under current tax laws, if a participant exercises a non-qualified stock option, he or she will have taxable income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the common stock on the exercise dateappointed President and the stock option exercise price. Intuit will be entitled to a corresponding deduction on its income tax return. A participant will have no taxable income upon exercising an incentive stock option provided that the applicable periods for holding the resulting shares of stock are satisfied (except that alternative minimum tax may apply), and Intuit will receive no deduction when an incentive stock option is exercised. The tax treatment for a participant of a disposition of shares acquired through the exercise of an option depends on how long the shares were held and on whether the shares were acquired by exercising an incentive stock option or a non-qualified stock option. Intuit may be entitled to a deduction in the case of a disposition of shares acquired under an incentive stock option before the applicable holding periods have been satisfied.
For restricted stock awards, no taxes are due when the award is initially made (unless the recipient makes a timely election under Section 83(b) of the Code), but the award becomes taxable when it is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” (i.e., becomes vested or transferable). Income tax is paid at ordinary rates on the value of the stock when the restrictions lapse, and then at capital gain rates when the shares are sold if the value of the stock increases after the vesting date. Similarly, for RSUs, the award generally becomes taxable when the shares vest. Income tax is paid at ordinary rates on the

value of the RSUs when the restrictions lapse, and then at capital gain rates when the shares are sold if the value of the stock increases after the vesting date.
A participant will have taxable income at the time a cash-based award becomes payable and, if the participant has timely elected deferral to a later date, at such later date. At these times, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the value of the amount then payable.
As described above, awards granted under the Restated 2005 Plan may qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code in order to preserve federal income tax deductions by Intuit with respect to annual compensation required to be taken into account under Section 162(m) that is in excess of $1 million and paid to Intuit’s Chief Executive Officer or anyof Intuit Inc., and a member of the three other most highly compensated executive officers (excludingBoard of Directors, effective January 1, 2019.
Director since: N/A      Age: 50
Mr. Goodarzi has been Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Small Business Group since May 2016. He previously was Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Consumer Tax Group from August 2015 through April 2016 and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Consumer Tax Group from August 2013 to July 2015. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2011 to July 2013, having rejoined Intuit after serving as Chief Executive Officer of Nexant Inc., a privately held provider of intelligent grid software and clean energy solutions, since November 2010. During his previous tenure at Intuit from 2004 to 2010, Mr. Goodarzi led several business units including Intuit Financial Officer). To so qualify, optionsServices and other awards must be granted under the Restated 2005 Plan byprofessional tax division. Prior to joining Intuit, Mr. Goodarzi worked for Invensys, a committee consisting solelyglobal provider of two or more “outside directors” (as defined under regulations)industrial automation, transportation and satisfycontrols technology, serving as global president of the Restated 2005 Plan’s limits
products group. He also held a number of senior leadership roles in the automation control division at Honeywell. Mr. Goodarzi holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Central Florida and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Goodarzi will bring to the Board a deep understanding of Intuit’s business and culture as well as instrumental contributions in developing and implementing the company’s new strategic priorities.
Other Public Company Boards
Atlassian Corporation Plc. since 2018 (serves on the total numberCompensation and Leadership Development Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement21

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-dliu.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Compensation and Organizational Development
Deborah Liu
Vice President, Marketplace, Facebook, Inc.
Director since: 2017      Age: 42
Ms. Liu has had various roles at Facebook, an online social networking company, since July 2009. She has run their developer and commerce businesses as Vice President, Marketplace since August 2017, prior to which, she served as Vice President, Platform and Marketplace from October 2015 to July 2017. She served as Director of shares (or cash value) that may be awardedProduct Management from February 2014 to anySeptember 2015, during which time she led the development of Facebook’s first mobile ad product for apps and Audience Network while also building the company’s games business and payments platform. Ms. Liu has been named one participant during Intuit’s fiscal year. In addition, for awards other than options or SARs to qualify as “performance-based compensation,” the issuance or vesting of the award,most powerful female engineers of 2017 by Business Insider and is a 15-year veteran in the tech industry. Prior to Facebook, she spent several years in product management roles at PayPal and eBay, including leading the integration between the two companies. Actively involved with promoting diversity and women in tech, Ms. Liu serves on the board of Expanding Your Horizons Network, a non-profit that
focuses on inspiring girls to pursue STEM careers. She co-created the Women in Product nonprofit after realizing that there was no forum for this underrepresented community to connect and serves as the case may be, must be contingent upon satisfying performance goals based on one or moreBoard Chair. Ms. Liu has a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Duke University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business.
Relevant Expertise
As the vice president of marketplace of a public technology company, Ms. Liu brings to the Board the experience and understanding of the performance criteria described above, as establishedpower of mobile platforms and certified by a committee consisting solely of two or more “outside directors.”building personalized and rich experiences across apps, products, people and third-party integrations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-snjohnson.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development (Chair)

Nominating and Governance
Suzanne Nora Johnson
Former Vice-Chairman, The Compensation Committee may grant awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m)Goldman Sachs Group
Director since: 2007      Age: 61
Lead Independent Director since: 2016
Ms. Nora Johnson held several management positions at The Goldman Sachs Group, including Vice Chairman, Chairman of the Code, which awards would be subjectGlobal Markets Institute, and Head of the Global Investments Research Division from 1985 until 2007. Ms. Nora Johnson’s significant non-profit board affiliations include, among others, the Brookings Institution, the Carnegie Institution for Science and the University of Southern California. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Southern California and a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School.
Relevant Expertise
Ms. Nora Johnson brings to the $1 million deductibility limit of Code Section 162(m).
The Restated 2005 Plan has been drafted withBoard valuable business experience managing large, complex, global institutions as well as insights into how changes in the intention of avoiding the application of taxes under Section 409A of the Code to any participant on account of the grant, vesting, or settlement of awards.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information, as of July 31, 2016, concerning securities authorized for issuance under all of Intuit’s equity compensation plans, excluding the additional shares we are proposing to add to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan in Proposal No. 3 (share amounts in thousands).

Plan Category 
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights (#)
(a)
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights ($)
(b)(1)
  
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a)) (#)
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 16,904
(2) 89.20
  12,747
(5)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 480
(3) 4.85
  
 
Total 17,384
(4) 88.55
  12,747
 

(1)RSUs have been excluded for purposes of computing weighted average exercise prices.
(2)
Represents 8.282 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 8.622 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards, which are settled for shares of Intuit common stock on a one-for-one basis.
(3)
Represents 0.064 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 0.416 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards which were assumed in connection with corporate acquisitions.
(4)
Represents 8.346 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 9.038 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards.
(5)
Represents 8.990 million shares available for issuance under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 3.757 million shares available for issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


PROPOSAL NO. 4
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tablesfinancial services industry, public policy and the narrative discussion that accompaniesmacro-economic environment affect our businesses.
Other Public Company Boards
American International Group, Inc. since 2008 (serves on the compensation tables), is hereby approved.Nominating and Governance Committee);
As described inPfizer Inc. since 2007 (chairs the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the guiding philosophy ofAudit Committee);
VISA Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Compensation Committee isand serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee)
22INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-ddpowell.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Audit and Risk (Chair)
Dennis D. Powell
Former Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Director since: 2004      Age: 70
Mr. Powell was executive advisor of Cisco Systems, Inc. from 2008 to establish2010. He joined Cisco in 1997 and held several management positions throughout his tenure, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2008; Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance Vice President from 2002 to 2003; and Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2002. Prior to Cisco, Mr. Powell held the position of senior partner at Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where his tenure spanned 26 years. Mr. Powell served on the board of directors of VMware, Inc. from 2007 until 2015. Mr. Powell holds a compensation program that is designedBachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting from Oregon State University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Powell brings to compensate our executives basedthe Board executive management experience with large, global organizations, as well as deep financial expertise and insights into operational issues, which he gained through his tenure as an executive at a large public technology company.
Other Public Company Boards
Applied Materials, Inc. since 2007 (chairs the Audit Committee and serves on both overall Company performancethe Corporate Governance and individual employee performance; help achieve our corporate growth strategy; acquire, retainthe Nominating Committee and motivate talented executives with proven experience;the Investment Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bdsmith.jpg]
Committees:
None
Brad D. Smith
Chairman, President and have a greater portion of NamedChief Executive Officer, pay tiedIntuit Inc. until January 1, 2019, at which time he will become Executive Chairman of the Board.
Director since: 2008      Age: 54
Chairman since: 2016
Mr. Smith is currently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, and has announced his decision to short-step down from his role as President and long-term incentive programs than most otherChief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Smith joined Intuit employees, because they lead our key business units or functions,in 2003 and thus havehas served over the ability to directly influence overall company performance.
Intuit employsyears in a number of practicessenior positions: Senior Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Division from 2006 to 2007; Senior Vice President and General Manager, QuickBooks from 2005 to 2006; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group from 2004 to 2005; and Vice President and General Manager of Intuit’s Accountant Central and Developer Network from 2003 to 2004. Before joining Intuit, Mr. Smith was at ADP, where he held several executive positions from 1996 to 2003, including Senior Vice President of Marketing and Business Development. Mr. Smith served on the board of directors of Yahoo! Inc. from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from Marshall University and a Master’s degree in Management from Aquinas College.
Relevant Expertise
Having served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, Mr. Smith brings to the Board significant knowledge of Intuit’s strategy, markets, operations and employees and provides industry expertise and context on all matters that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, including:come before the Board.
A significant portion of our senior executive officer compensation is in the form of performance-based incentives, and in fiscal 2016, 50%Other Public Company Boards
Nordstrom, Inc. since 2013 (serves as Chairman of the annual equity incentive value granted as part of our regular equity grant cycle was inBoard, on the form of performance-based RSUs, which measure relative TSR compared to a peer group;
We do not provide supplemental company-paid retirement benefits designed for executive officers;
We do not provide any excise tax “gross-up” payments;
We do not provide perquisites or other executive benefits based solely on rank;
We prohibit directors and executive officers from pledging Intuit stock and engaging in hedging transactions involving Intuit stock;
We have “clawback” provisions for operating performance-based equity awards and beginning in the 2016 fiscal year implemented “clawback” provisions for cash bonus payments under our Senior Executive Incentive Plan;
We have stock ownership guidelines for executive officers at the senior vice president level and above and non-employee directors, with the CEO guideline set at six times salary, the senior vice president level and above guideline set at one and a half times salary, and the non-employee director guideline set at five times retainer; and
The CEO’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs granted in fiscal 2015 and 2016 include a mandatory one-year holding period, requiring the CEO to hold the underlying shares for at least one year after the awards vest.
Stockholders are urged to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, which discusses how our executive compensation policies and practices implement our compensation philosophy, and the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, which contains tabular information and narrative discussion about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that these policiesCorporate Governance and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals.Nominating Committee);
While the advisory vote to approve executive compensation is non-binding,SurveyMonkey since 2017 (chairs the Compensation Committee,Committee)
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement23

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-tszkutak.jpg]
Committees:

Audit and Risk

Nominating and Governance
Thomas Szkutak
Former Chief Financial Officer, Amazon.com, Inc.
Director since: 2018      Age: 57
Mr. Szkutak served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amazon.com, a global online retailer and cloud computing company, from 2002 until 2015. Prior to that, he spent 20 years with General Electric, where he held a variety of positions, including chief financial officer of GE Lighting from 2001 to 2002, finance director of GE Plastics Europe from 1999 to 2001, and executive vice president of finance at GE Asset Management (formerly known as GE Investments) from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Szkutak has also served as an advisor and operating partner of Advent International, a global private equity firm, since August 2017. He is a graduate of GE’s financial management program. Mr. Szkutak received a
Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Boston University.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Szkutak brings to the Board deep financial expertise and executive management experience with large, global organizations, which is responsiblehe gained through his experience as the chief financial officer of a publicly traded company.
Other Public Company Boards
athenahealth, Inc. since 2016 (chairs the Audit Committee)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-rvazquez.jpg]
Committees:

Acquisition

Audit and Risk
Raul Vazquez
Chief Executive Officer and Director, Oportun, Inc.
Director since: 2016      Age: 47
Mr. Vazquez has served as Chief Executive Officer and board member of Oportun, a financial technology company, since April 2012. Prior to joining Oportun, he spent nine years at Walmart in various senior leadership roles, including Executive Vice President and President of Walmart West, Chief Executive Officer of Walmart.com, and Executive Vice President of Global eCommerce for designingdeveloped markets. Mr. Vazquez previously worked in startup companies in e-commerce, at a global strategy consulting firm focused on Fortune 100 companies, and administering our executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal, and will consider the outcomeas an industrial engineer for Baxter Healthcare. Mr. Vazquez served as a member of the vote when making future compensation decisions for named executive officers.
We will continueboard of directors of Staples, Inc. from 2013 to hold our say on pay votes on an annual basis untilJune 2016. Mr. Vazquez also served as chairman of the next voteFederal Reserve Board’s Community Advisory Council from September 2015 to November 2017. Mr. Vazquez has also served on the frequencyConsumer Financial Protection Bureau’s
Consumer Advisory Board from August 2016 until June 2018. Mr. Vazquez received a Bachelor of advisory votes, unlessScience degree, a Master of Science degree in industrial engineering from Stanford University and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
Mr. Vazquez brings to the Board a wide range of Directors modifies its policy prior to that time. A non-binding advisory vote on our executive compensation program will again be includedexperience in our proxy statement next year.
The Board recommends that you vote
FOR approval of the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation.


COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
Set out below is the Compensation Discussioninnovative consumer financial products, retail, marketing, e-commerce, technology and Analysis, which is a discussion of Intuit’s executive compensation programs and policies written from the perspective of how we and management view and use such policies and programs. We strive to see that Intuit’s compensation programs are fiscally responsible, market responsive and performance based. Guided by these principles, we regularly review and monitor senior management’s compensation,community development, as well as their potential for largercorporate leadership roles, to produce the greatest value for Intuit’s three stakeholders – employees, customers and stockholders. To this end, the experience with global organizations.
Other Public Company Boards
None
24INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |Our Board Nominees

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-jweiner.jpg]
Committees:

Compensation and Organizational Development Committee has reviewed the components of compensation paid to each of Intuit’s officers for fiscal 2016, including annual base salary, target incentive bonus

Nominating and equity compensation.Governance
Given our role in providing guidance on program design, administering those programs and policies, and in making specific compensation decisions for senior executives, the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee participated in the preparation of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on the review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair)
Diane Greene
Jeff Weiner

Chief Executive Officer, LinkedIn Corporation

Director since: 2012      Age: 48
Mr. Weiner has served as the Chief Executive Officer of LinkedIn, an online professional network provider, since June 2009, and as a director of LinkedIn from 2009 to 2016. He served as LinkedIn’s Interim President from December 2008 until June 2009. Before joining LinkedIn, Mr. Weiner was an executive in residence at Accel Partners and Greylock Partners, both venture capital firms, from September 2008 to June 2009. From May 2001 to June 2008 he held several positions at Yahoo! Inc., one of the world’s largest digital media companies, including as an Executive Vice President of Yahoo’s network division. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Relevant Expertise
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISMr. Weiner brings to the Board experience and insights as the chief executive officer of a successful technology company. He also has deep expertise and knowledge in social networking platforms, consumer web and mobile products.
Other Public Company Boards
None
ELECTION MECHANICS
Each nominee, if elected, will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until a qualified successor is elected, unless the nominee dies, resigns or is removed from the Board prior to such meeting. Although we know of no reason why any of the nominees would not be able to serve, if any nominee is unable to serve or for good cause does not serve, the proxy holder can vote your shares either for a substitute nominee (if one is proposed by the Board) or just for the remaining nominees, leaving a vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board.
If a nominee does not receive more votes in favor than votes against his or her re-election, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, in accordance with Intuit’s Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles, each director has submitted an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if stockholders do not elect the director. In that situation, our Nominating and Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board would act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it, within 90 days of the date that the election results were certified.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominated directors.
Executive Summary41
Compensation Practices44
2016 “Say on Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation46
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives47
Specific Elements of Fiscal 2016 Compensation47
Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions53
Achievement of Performance Targets for July 2013 Performance-Based RSUs56
Use of Competitive Data58
Intuit’s Management Stock Purchase Program59
Employee Benefits60
Termination Benefits60
Role of Compensation Consultants, Executive Officers and the Board in Compensation Determinations60
Accounting and Tax Implications of Our Compensation Policies61
Stock Ownership Guidelines61
Intuit’s Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledging61
Intuit’s Equity Granting Policy for Senior Executives62
Our Board Nominees |Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement25

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Director Compensation
Overview of Our Compensation Program for
Non-Employee Directors
Our director compensation programs are designed to provide an appropriate incentive to attract and retain qualified non-employee board members and to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the equity and cash compensation for directors on an annual basis and making recommendations to the Board if it determines changes are needed.
Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and considers information from its independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, regarding the amounts and type of compensation paid to non-management directors at companies within the same peer group the committee used to assess executive compensation.
In October 2017, as a result of this review, the Compensation Committee recommended no changes to the director cash compensation program but did recommend certain changes to director equity compensation, which the Board approved. In particular, the $75,000 RSU grant that had previously been provided to new directors upon joining the Board was discontinued, and the vesting schedule of certain director equity awards was modified, as described further below. In addition, the stock ownership guideline that applies to non-employee directors was increased from five times the annual Board cash retainer to ten times the Board cash retainer.
In October 2018, the Compensation Committee again reviewed director compensation and recommended, and the Board determined, to increase the annual cash retainers for non-employee directors to $75,000 in calendar 2019.
2018 Annual Cash Retainers
Non-employee directors are paid annual cash retainers for Board membership, plus additional cash retainers for their committee service in the amounts shown in the following table:
PositionAnnual Amount ($)​
Non-Employee Board Member(1)60,000​
Lead Independent Director*40,000​
Members of each of Audit and Risk Committee, Acquisition Committee, and
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee
15,000​
Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee10,000​
Audit and Risk Committee Chair**32,500​
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) oversees Intuit’s compensation plans and policies, approves compensation of our executive officers and administers our equity compensation plans. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) contains context for the compensation actions approved by the CompensationChair**25,000​
Acquisition Committee and paid for fiscal 2016 Nominating and Governance Committee Chairs**17,500​
(1)
Beginning in calendar 2019, the annual retainer for Non-Employee Board Members will be $75,000.
*
The Lead Independent Director also receives the Board membership retainer.
**
Committee chairs also receive the committee membership retainer.
26INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Director Compensation |Overview of Our Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors

These retainers are paid in quarterly installments and are pro-rated for any changes to committee service that occur during the year. Directors may elect to defer cash retainers into tax-deferred Intuit stock units by making an irrevocable written election before the start of each calendar year. These tax-deferred stock units, known as Conversion Grants, are granted quarterly and are fully vested at the time of grant. The shares underlying these stock units are distributable five years from the date of grant, or upon an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of the ownership of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant).
We reimburse non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.
2018 Director Equity Compensation Program
Grants are made to non-employee directors in the form of a fixed dollar value of RSUs in the following amounts:
Board PositionFixed Amount of Award ($)​Vesting schedule​
Non-Employee Board Member (annual grant)260,000​Generally vests in full on the first business day
of the 12th month following the grant date.​
Because the formula is based on a fixed dollar amount, the number of RSUs awarded annually to non-employee directors varies, depending on the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The annual grants are awarded on the day following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For a director who joins between annual meetings, the annual grant will be prorated based on the number of full months of expected service until the first anniversary of the most recent annual meeting, and it will vest on the same day as the other directors’ annual grants. Once RSUs vest, issuance of shares is deferred until five years from the date of grant, or an earlier separation from the Board or change in control of Intuit. Directors generally may elect to defer settlement of their RSUs for a longer period of time (from six to ten years following the date of grant). The short vesting schedule serves to avoid director entrenchment, while the five-year deferral ensures long-term alignment of director interests with those of our stockholders.
All of the RSUs that we grant to our directors have dividend rights, which are accumulated and paid only when the shares are issued. Dividend equivalent rights on RSUs that fail to vest are forfeited.
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that the annual aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year (not including awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments) may not exceed $625,000, plus an additional $250,000 for any Lead Independent Director or non-employee Chairman of the Board.
Director Stock Ownership Requirement
In October 2017, the Board approved increasing the director stock ownership requirement from five times to ten times the amount of the annual Board member retainer for fiscal 2018. Unvested RSUs and vested deferred RSUs held by a Board member are counted as shares when determining the number of shares owned. Directors must comply with the new guidelines within five years from the date they join the Board. If any director does not meet the stock ownership requirement within this time frame, then 50% of his or her annual cash retainers will be made in the form of Intuit stock until compliance is achieved. As of October 31, 2018, all of our current directors were in compliance with the revised policy.
Director Stock Ownership Requirement |Director Compensation |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement27

Director Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the fiscal 2018 compensation earned by each Board member other than Mr. Smith, whose compensation is described under “Executive Compensation.”
Director NameFees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)​
Stock Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation
($)​
Total
($)​
Eve Burton(2)336,546(2)336,546
Scott D. Cook1,340,300(3)1,340,300
Richard L. Dalzell(2)340,298(2)340,298
Diane B. Greene25,62525,625
Deborah Liu22,500(2)327,122(2)349,622
Suzanne Nora Johnson150,000259,997409,997
Dennis D. Powell122,500259,997382,497
Thomas Szkutak(2)323,581(2)323,581
Raul Vazquez90,000259,997349,997
Jeff Weiner(2)323,581(2)323,581
(1)
These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during fiscal 2018, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). Please see the “Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2018” and “Outstanding Equity Awards for Directors at Fiscal Year-End 2018” tables for information regarding the grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the fiscal year and the number of awards outstanding for each director at the end of the fiscal year.
(2)
For Ms. Burton, Mr. Dalzell, Ms. Liu, Mr. Szkutak, and Mr. Weiner, the number in the “Stock Awards” column includes the value of Conversion Grants in addition to the value of the annual equity grant. Each of Ms. Burton, Mr. Dalzell, Ms. Liu, Mr. Szkutak and Mr. Weiner elected to receive some or all of the fees due to them for service on the Board and committees during calendar year 2018 in RSUs, in accordance with Intuit’s director compensation program. Beginning in January 2018, these Conversion Grants are granted on a quarterly basis, following the applicable meeting, and are fully vested at the time of grant. Due to the timing of the change in our practice with respect to Conversion Grants, in fiscal 2018 there were only three quarterly Conversion Grants. Please see the “Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2018” table for more information.
(3)
Because Mr. Cook is an employee of Intuit, he is not compensated as a director. Mr. Cook’s compensation shown in the table represents an annual salary of $650,000 and an incentive bonus of  $690,300 awarded for service in fiscal 2018. Mr. Cook did not receive any equity awards from Intuit during fiscal 2018.
28INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Director Compensation |Director Summary Compensation Table

Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2018
The following table shows each RSU grant made to each of our directors, other than Mr. Smith, during fiscal 2018, including the grant date, number of shares, and grant date fair value.
Stock Awards
Director NameGrant DateShares Subject
to Award
(#)​
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)(1)
Eve Burton1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
1/19/2018152(3)25,496
5/4/2018135(3)25,576
7/27/2018120(3)25,477
Scott D. Cook
Richard L. Dalzell1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
1/19/2018160(3)26,838
5/4/2018141(3)26,712
7/27/2018126(3)26,751
Diane B. Greene
Deborah Liu1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
1/19/2018134(3)22,477
5/4/2018118(3)22,355
7/27/2018105(3)22,293
Suzanne Nora Johnson1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
Dennis D. Powell1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
Thomas Szkutak1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
1/19/2018126(3)21,135
5/4/2018112(3)21,218
7/27/2018100(3)21,231
Raul Vazquez1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
Jeff Weiner1/19/20181,550(2)259,997
1/19/2018126(3)21,135
5/4/2018112(3)21,218
7/27/2018100(3)21,231
(1)
These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of these awards is equal to the closing market price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant.
(2)
Annual Non-Employee Board Member grant, which vests as to 100% of the shares on January 1, 2019, subject to the director’s continued service.
(3)
RSUs awarded pursuant to a Conversion Grant, which are granted quarterly, beginning January 2018, based on a fair value equal to 25% of the annual retainers for Board and committee service (as described above under “Annual Retainer and Equity Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors”) and calculated using the closing market price on the date of grant. As noted, beginning in January 2018, these Conversion Grants are granted on a quarterly basis, following the applicable meeting, and are fully vested at the time of grant. Due to the timing of the change in our practice with respect to Conversion Grants, in fiscal 2018 there were only three quarterly Conversion Grants.
Equity Grants to Directors During Fiscal Year 2018 |Director Compensation |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement29

Outstanding Equity Awards for Directors at
Fiscal Year-End 2018
The following table provides information on the outstanding equity awards held by our directors, other than Mr. Smith, as of July 31, 2018.
Director Name
Aggregate Shares Subject to
Outstanding Stock Awards
(#)(1)
Portion of Outstanding Stock Awards
that is Vested and Deferred
(#)(1)
Eve Burton9,4847,934
Scott D. Cook
Richard L. Dalzell13,73512,185
Diane B. Greene
Deborah Liu3,2661,438
Suzanne Nora Johnson13,00411,454
Dennis D. Powell13,00411,454
Thomas Szkutak1,888338
Raul Vazquez6,4594,909
Jeff Weiner15,81314,263
(1)
The amounts reflected as aggregate shares subject to outstanding stock awards include vested and deferred stock awards, for which settlement is deferred in accordance with Intuit’s director equity compensation program.
30INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Director Compensation |Outstanding Equity Awards for Directors at Fiscal Year-End 2018

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Proposal No. 2 Advisory Vote to
Approve Executive Compensation
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking stockholders to vote, on an advisory basis, to approve Intuit’s executive compensation.
The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement explains the Compensation Committee’s guiding compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee strives to establish a compensation program that:

compensates our executives based on both overall company performance and individual employee performance;

supports our corporate growth strategy;

enables Intuit to attract, retain and motivate talented executives with proven experience;

closely ties our Named Executive Officers’ compensation to short- and long-term incentive programs; and

makes incentive compensation a greater portion of overall pay for our Named Executive Officers than it is for most other Intuit employees, because they lead our key business units or functions and thus have the ability to directly influence overall company performance.
Intuit employs a number of practices that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, described under “Executive Compensation Highlights” in the Proxy Summary above and in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section below.
We urge our stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, which discusses how our policies and practices implement our compensation philosophy, and the “Executive Compensation Tables” section, which contains tables and a narrative discussion about the specific compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that Intuit’s policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and achieving its goals.
While the advisory vote to approve executive compensation is non-binding, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, values your opinions and will consider the outcome of the “say-on-pay” vote when making future compensation decisions for Named Executive Officers.
Unless the Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of say-on-pay votes, a non-binding advisory vote on our executive compensation program will again be included in our proxy statement next year.
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.jpg]
The Board recommends that you vote FOR approval of the advisory resolution to approve executive officers named below (the “Named Executive Officers”) and included in the “Fiscal Year 2016 Summary Compensation Table” on page 63:compensation.
Brad D. Smith, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
R. Neil Williams, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sasan K. Goodarzi, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group through April 30, 2016, and Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Group, effective May 1, 2016
H. Tayloe Stansbury, Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Daniel A. Wernikoff, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Group through April 30, 2016, and Executive Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group, effective May 1, 2016
Proposal No. 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement31

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Report
Set out below is the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which is a discussion of Intuit’s executive compensation programs and policies written from the perspective of how we and management view and use such policies and programs. We strive to see that Intuit’s compensation programs are fiscally responsible, market responsive, and performance-based. Guided by these principles, we regularly review and monitor senior management’s compensation, as well as their potential for larger leadership roles, to produce the greatest value for Intuit’s four sets of stakeholders: employees, customers, partners, and stockholders. To this end, the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee has reviewed the components of compensation paid to each of Intuit’s officers for fiscal 2018, including annual base salary, target incentive bonus and equity compensation.
Given our role in providing guidance on program design, administering these programs and policies, and making specific compensation decisions for senior executives, the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee participated in the preparation of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and reviewed and discussed its contents with management. Based on the review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair)
Deborah Liu
Jeff Weiner
32INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Compensation and Organizational Development Committee Report

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy and objectives and the decisions of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. For fiscal 2018, our Named Executive Officers were:
Named Executive Officers
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_named-executive.jpg]
Leadership Transitions
Over the course of the past year, we have announced a number of changes to our management team. All of these transitions reflect the Board’s commitment to orderly long-term succession planning.
In August 2018, we announced that Brad Smith will step down as the President and CEO of Intuit effective January 1, 2019 and will assume the role of Executive Chairman of the Board.
The Board appointed Sasan Goodarzi to assume the role of President and CEO effective January 1, 2019.
Laura Fennell, who served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary during fiscal 2018, assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Chief People and Places Officer effective August 1, 2018. The fiscal 2018 compensation described in this proxy statement relates to her service as General Counsel, and any discussion of fiscal 2019 decisions relates to her service as Chief People & Places Officer.
Tayloe Stansbury will be stepping down from his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, effective January 1, 2019, to be succeeded by Marianna Tessel, who currently serves as Senior Vice President, Chief Product Development Officer, for the Small Business & Self-Employed Group.
Neil Williams, our former Chief Financial Officer, stepped down from that role on January 31, 2018, and Michelle Clatterbuck assumed that role effective February 1, 2018.
Leadership Transitions|CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement33

Table of Contents
Executive Summary
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy and objectives, provides context for the compensation actions approved by the Compensation Committee, and explains the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee, which is made up entirely of independent directors, oversees Intuit’s compensation plans and policies, approves compensation of our executive officers, and administers our equity compensation plans.
CEO COMPENSATION
Our CEO’s compensation is aligned with stockholders’ interests. As illustrated at right, approximately 95% of total direct compensation for Mr. Smith in fiscal 2018 was performance-based, and thus strongly linked to Intuit’s results. Only his base salary (approximately 5% of his total direct compensation for fiscal year 2018) was a fixed amount, and it has not increased in six years.
The increase in our CEO’s fiscal 2018 compensation was substantially less than the increase in Intuit’s TSR for fiscal 2018. Mr. Smith’s total compensation in fiscal 2018 reflects an increase of 28.6% compared to last year. In contrast, Intuit’s TSR was 50% during the same one-year period. Compensation decisions for Mr. Smith reflected the company’s outstanding fiscal year 2018 performance, and continued our practice of paying his annual cash bonus at the same percentage as the Intuit-wide bonus pool, which supports the One Intuit Ecosystem strategy.
CEO Total Direct Compensation(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pie-ceo1.jpg]
(1)
Total direct compensation reflects base salary, actual bonus payout, and equity awards granted during fiscal 2018. Consistent with disclosure in the Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table, equity awards are reported at grant date fair value (which, for the Relative TSR RSUs, is based on the target number of shares subject to the award), and salary and incentive cash are reported based on the actual amounts earned with respect to fiscal 2018.
34INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | CD&A  | Executive Summary

Comparison of CEO Total Direct Compensation (TDC) and Intuit’s Indexed TSR for the Last Five Fiscal Years
[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_chrt-bar.jpg]
(1)
Total direct compensation reflects base salary, actual bonus payout, and equity awards granted during fiscal 2018. Consistent with disclosure in the Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table, equity awards are reported at grant date fair value (which, for the Relative TSR RSUs, is based on the target number of shares subject to the award), and salary and incentive cash are reported based on the actual amounts earned.
HOW OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REFLECTS PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE
On average, we deliver approximately 93.5% of the total direct compensation for all of our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Williams), through programs that link their pay with Intuit’s operating results or TSR.
Our executive compensation programs are designed to reward both short-term operating results and long-term growth, as measured by TSR. The only fixed component of pay is base salary. All annual cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards are tied either to company performance or stock price performance.
Incentive payouts under our annual cash incentive plan are based on revenue and non-GAAP operating income at fiscal year-end, as well as the company’s overall performance with respect to annual objectives for employees, customers, partners and stockholders (“True North” objectives).
The cash incentive payout percentage is the same for all Named Executive Officers and is aligned with the overall funding level of the company-wide bonus pool, which helps to drive consistent Intuit-wide outcomes.
Equity-based compensation is aligned with the long-term interests of Intuit’s stockholders by focusing our executive officers’ attention on both absolute and relative TSR. The following chart shows the allocation of the continuing Named Executive Officers’ total direct compensation for fiscal 2018, reflecting the importance of performance-based compensation.
Other NEOs Total Direct Compensation(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pie-neo2.jpg]
(1)
Total direct compensation reflects base salary, actual bonus payout, and equity awards granted during fiscal 2018. Consistent with disclosure in the Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table, equity awards are reported at grant date fair value (which, for the Relative TSR RSUs, is based on the target number of shares subject to the award), and salary and incentive cash are reported based on the actual amounts earned with respect to fiscal 2018.
Executive Summary  | CD&A  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement35

OUR FISCAL 2018 PERFORMANCE
Intuit’s financial performance for fiscal 2018 was very strong.
Revenue of annual cash bonuses, which are based upon achievement of annual corporate operating goals, including revenue, non-GAAP operating income and deferred revenue balance at fiscal year end, as well as on an assessment of individual contribution and performance. Our fiscal 2016 long-term compensation consisted of 50% performance-based RSUs based on relative total stockholder return (“Relative TSR RSUs”), 25% service-based RSUs and 25% non-qualified stock options.
$6B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  15% from FY17
Fiscal 2016 Business Highlights
Intuit achieved revenue of $4.7 billion, GAAP operating income of $1.2 billion, non-GAAP$1.5B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  7% from FY17
Non-GAAP operating income of $1.6 billion,
$2B
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]  14% from FY17
GAAP diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) of $3.69 and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.78 (see table on page A-3 of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures) and a one-year TSR of 6.19% for fiscal 2016.
Our revenue, GAAP and non-GAAP operating income and GAAP and non-GAAP earnings per share for fiscal 2016 exceeded our guidance range.
Key highlights$4.64
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]24.7% from fiscal 2016 include the following:

Fiscal 2016 revenue of $4.7 billion, an increase of 12% over fiscal 2015; GAAP operating income of $1.2 billion, an increase of 68% over the prior year, and non-GAAP operating income of $1.6 billion, up 36%; GAAP diluted earnings per share of $3.69, up from $1.28$3.72 in 2015, and non-GAAPFY17
Non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.78, up 46%,
$5.61
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_uparrow.gif]27.2% from $4.41 in each case, exceeding our guidance for the year; note that fiscal 2016 GAAP earnings per share includes $0.65 net income per share from discontinued operations and fiscal 2015 GAAP earnings per share includes $0.17 net loss per share from discontinued operations;FY17
An increase of 15% in TurboTax Online units in the U.S., with total TurboTax units growing 12% (excluding the Free File Alliance, which is our free tax offering for eligible taxpayers);
The Consumer Tax business had revenue growth of 10% for fiscal 2016;
Two dozen product innovations in TurboTax, driving share growth in the do-it-yourself software category for the third year in a row;
An increase of 41% in total QuickBooks Online subscribers, reaching 1.513 million subscribers at the end of the 2016 fiscal year, including 45% growth in QuickBooks Online subscribers outside the U.S. to 287,000 and growth in QuickBooks Self-Employed subscribers from 25,000 to 85,000;
Continued momentum in the Small Business Online ecosystem with revenue growth of 25% for the year;
Online payroll customer growth of 17% and online active payments customers growth of 6%;
Continued discipline in the Company’s financial strategy, focusing on cash management and maintaining a strong balance sheet, including paying dividends of $0.30 per share each quarter, and the repurchase of $2.3 billion Repurchased over
$270M

of shares in fiscal 2016, reducing our weighted average share count by 7%; and
Employee engagement and customer satisfaction scores that continuedincreased dividend15% to reflect best-in-class levels, with Intuit continuing its run of 15 consecutive appearances in Fortune Magazine’s “Top 100 Places to Work” list and placing at #4 on Fortune Magazine’s “Most Admired Software Company” list.$1.56

Stockholder Value Delivered
Intuit’s TSR has performed well in recent years. Measured at the end of fiscal 2016, we delivered one-year TSR of 6.19%, three-year annualized TSR of 21.52% and five-year annualized TSR of 20.22%, with our stock price achieving an all-time high as the fiscal year came to a close. The graph below compares the cumulative TSR on Intuit common stock for the last five full fiscal years with the cumulative total returns on the S&P 500 Index and the Morgan Stanley Technology Index for the same period. It assumes that $100 was invested in Intuit common stock and in each of the other indices on July 31, 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. Over this five-year period, Intuit’s TSR exceeded both the broad market (as evidenced by a comparison against the S&P 500 Index) and the overall technology sector (as evidenced by a comparison against the Morgan Stanley Technology Index). The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data – with Intuit common stock prices based on the closing price on the dates indicated – and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of Intuit’s common stock.
intu2016a01.jpg
 July 31, 2011
July 31, 2012
July 31, 2013
July 31, 2014
July 31, 2015
July 31, 2016
Intuit Inc.$100.00

$125.62

$139.91

$181.28

$236.44

$251.09
S&P 500$100.00

$109.13

$136.41

$159.52

$177.40

$187.36
Morgan Stanley Technology Index$100.00

$111.45

$118.36

$151.58

$169.91

$190.19



Compensation Practices
Intuit employs a number of practices that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and are intended to provide total compensation that is competitive and related to both Intuit’s and individual performance:
All fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 figures that appear in this section and throughout this proxy statement are as reported under ASC 605.
See Appendix A of this proxy statement for information regarding non-GAAP financial measures, including a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
In recognition of this year-over-year performance, total compensation for all named executive officers (other than Mr. Williams) in fiscal 2018 was higher than in fiscal 2017.
Compensation Practices
ü
Key financial highlights from fiscal 2018 included:

Generated revenue growth of 18%    A significant portion of our fiscal 2016 senior executive officer compensation is in the form of incentives tied to achievement of particular performance measures;
ü   We have “clawback” provisions for operating performance-based equity awards and beginning in the 2016 fiscal year implemented “clawback” provisions for cash bonus payments under our Senior Executive Incentive Plan;
ü   We have stock ownership guidelines for executive officers at the senior vice president level and above and non-employee directors, with the CEO guideline set at six times salary, the senior vice president level and above guideline set at one and a half times salary, and the non-employee director guideline set at five times annual cash retainer;
ü   The CEO’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs granted in fiscal 2015 and 2016 include a mandatory one-year holding period, requiring the CEO to hold the underlying shares for at least one year after the awards vest;
û We prohibit directors and executive officers from pledging Intuit stock or engaging in hedging transactions involving Intuit stock;
û   We do not provide supplemental company-paid retirement benefits designed for executive officers;
û   We do not provide any excise tax “gross-up” payments; and
û   We do not provide perquisites or other executive benefits based solely on rank.


Compensation Aligned with Stockholders’ Interests
As illustrated below, approximately 94% of target total direct compensation for Mr. Smith in fiscal 2016 was performance-based, consisting of 86% equity and 8% target annual cash bonus, ensuring a strong link between his target total direct compensation and the Company’s results. Only base salary, which is approximately 6% of his total target compensation, was fixed.

CEO Performance and Incentive Pay Mix - Target Total Compensation for Fiscal 2016
ceopiechart101016.jpg
More than 90% of the total direct compensation for all of our Named Executive Officers is delivered through programs that link pay realized by executive officers with financial and operational results and with TSR. Incentive payouts under our SEIP are based on revenue, non-GAAP operating income, and deferred revenue balance at fiscal year end, along with individual performance. Equity-based compensation consisting of Relative TSR RSUs, RSUs and non-qualified stock options align compensation with the long-term interests of Intuit’s stockholders by focusing our executive officers’ performance on both absolute and relative TSR. The following chart shows the allocation of the Named Executive Officers’ total direct compensation for fiscal 2016, reflecting the extent to which their total direct compensation for fiscal 2016 consisted of performance-based compensation.


Total Direct Compensation Mix for Fiscal 2016
neostackedbar102716.jpg
(1) Consistent with disclosure in the Fiscal 2016 Summary Compensation Table, equity awards are reported at grant date fair value, which, for the Relative TSR RSUs, are based on the target number of shares subject to the award, and salary and incentive cash are reported based on the actual amounts earned with respect to fiscal 2016.
2016 “Say on Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Intuit has provided stockholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation in each of the last five years. At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 83.3% of the votes cast in the “say on pay” advisory vote were “FOR” approval of our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee evaluated the results of the 2016 advisory vote together with the other factors and data discussed in the Small Business & Self-Employed Group, 14% for the Consumer Group and 4% in the Strategic Partner Group

Added over 1 million QuickBooks Online subscribers

Grew Online Ecosystem revenue 40% to $1.2 billion

Generated total stockholder return (TSR) of 50% during fiscal 2018, with annualized five-year TSR of 27.5%, which was in the top decile of S&P 500 constituents during the last five years
Other key accomplishments for fiscal 2018 included:

Leveraging the One Intuit Ecosystem to achieve synergies for our customers through offerings like the ProAdvisor matchmaking platform, TurboTax Live, and our TurboTax Self-Employed bundle

Earning employee engagement and customer satisfaction scores that continued to reflect best-in-class levels, including being chosen as one of Fortune Magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” for the 17th consecutive year

Using our matchmaking platform, which we provide as a service to help make our accountant partners and our small business customers more successful, to increase the number of small business customers working with an accountant to 58 percent, up five points as compared to the prior year, while at the same time, providing accountants three times the number of leads that they had received from us in prior years
36INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | CD&A  | Executive Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

In fiscal 2018, we paid cash bonuses at 118% of target, which was the same as the company-wide funding level, without individual adjustment. This decision recognizes the inter-connectedness of all business lines within the “One Intuit Ecosystem” and emphasizes officers’ inter-dependence rather than their individual performance.

On average, 93.5% of the fiscal 2018 total direct compensation of the Named Executive Officers who were serving at the end of the fiscal year was performance-based, with 95% of Mr. Smith’s compensation being performance-based.

Intuit achieved strong five-year TSR that exceeded the broad market. Our annualized TSR from the beginning of fiscal year 2014 through the end of fiscal year 2018 was 27.5%. In contrast, the S&P 500 index had annualized returns of 13.1% over the same period.

The CEO’s salary and bonus target were not increased for 2019, despite his outstanding fiscal 2018 performance, as the Compensation Committee determined those targets appropriately reflect his role and the comparable labor market. In addition, Mr. Smith’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs are subject to a holding period in the form of an automatic one-year deferral of the release of the underlying shares after vesting to increase his long-term alignment with stockholders.

The vesting schedule of service-based equity for all Intuit employees, including the Named Executive Officers, was increased from three to four years. Beginning with July 2018 annual awards, all service-based RSU and option awards will vest over four years. For RSUs, 25% of the shares will vest after one year, and the remainder will vest quarterly for the remaining three years. For options, 25% of the shares will vest after one year, and the remainder will vest monthly for the remaining three years. This change was made for better alignment with the practices of our peers.
2018 “Say-on-Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Intuit has provided stockholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation in each of the last six years. At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 96.1% of the votes cast in the “say on pay” advisory vote were “FOR” approval of our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee evaluated the results of the 2018 advisory vote together with the other factors and data discussed in this CD&A in determining executive compensation policies and decisions.
We value the opinions of our stockholders and seek their input as part of our regular stockholder outreach efforts. FeedbackThe feedback we received from stockholders regarding our executive compensation program was generally very positive. With the exception of a single stockholder, we did not receive specific criticisms or recommended changes regarding our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee had noted that the majority of shares cast “AGAINST” the “say on pay” proposal had been cast by a single affiliated stockholder group. Consequently, management and our Lead Independent Director engaged directly with that stockholder to better understand the reasons for its vote and provided its feedback to the Compensation Committee and the Board. As a result of this engagement, we have enhanced certain of our proxy disclosures.
After evaluating the outcome of the 20162018 advisory vote, stockholder feedback, and input from our independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that our executive compensation program isprograms are aligned with our compensation philosophy and Companycompany strategy, and the Committee decided not to make any material changes to those programs, beyond the change to vesting schedules for service-based equity awards.
We value the opinions of our overall fiscal 2016 executive compensation policiesstockholders and decisions.seek their input as part of our regular stockholder outreach efforts.
The Compensation Committee will continue to consider stockholder feedback, input from our independent compensation consultant, and the outcomes of future say-on-pay votes, when considering our executive compensation programs and policies and making compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.
Executive Summary  | CD&A  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement37

TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Committee will continue to consider stockholder feedback, input from our independent compensation consultant and the outcomes of future say on pay votes, when considering our executive compensation programs and policies and making compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.




Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
OUR GUIDING PHILOSOPHY
In setting policies and practices regarding compensation, the guiding philosophy of the Compensation Committee is to establishthat our compensation programs should:
[MISSING IMAGE: tv504131_chrt-flow3.jpg]
OUR STRATEGIES
We use a compensation program that is designed to:
Help achieve our corporate growthmix of cash and business strategy;
Compensate our executives based on both Company performance and individual performance;
Hire, retain and motivate talented executives with proven experience in an increasingly competitive market; and
Have a greater portion of Named Executive Officer pay opportunity tied to short- and long-term incentive programs than other Intuit employees, because these executives lead our key business units or functions and thus have the ability to directly influence overall Company performance.
equity incentives.The Compensation Committee believes that a mix of both cash and equity incentives isare important to an effective compensation structure, as annualstructure. Annual cash incentives reward executives for near-termshort-term operating results, while equity incentives motivate executives to execute on our long-term strategic plan in order to increase stockholder value.
We consider a diverse set of factors in determining compensation opportunities and incentive awards. In determining the amount of the cash and equity incentives our officers receive, the Compensation Committee considers each officer’s total compensation on both a short- and long-term basis to assess the retentiveprogram’s overall value in incentivizing and incentive value of his or her overall compensation, while taking into consideration additionalretaining that officer. The committee also considers other relevant factors, including, for example,such as market data, internal parity, succession planning, exceptional capability, and stockholder and proxy advisor perspectives.
We manage our equity compensation programs to provide competitive rewards that are commensurate with results delivered,delivered. The Compensation Committee considers measures related to dilution, burn rate, and the cost of the equity incentive program as compared to peers, while limiting dilutionrecognizing the need — in a competitive labor market — to stockholders. hire the world’s top talent, including top data scientists and mobile engineers, to create products that delight our customers while doing the best work of their lives.
Role of Compensation Consultants, Executive Officers and the Board in Compensation Determinations
The CompanyCompensation Committee has the authority to retain independent consultants and other experts to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities. The committee has engaged the services of FW Cook, a national executive compensation consulting firm, to review and provide recommendations concerning Intuit’s executive compensation program. FW Cook performs services solely on behalf of the Compensation Committee and interacts with the company and management only in the course of performing those services. As described below under “Fiscal 2018 Peer Group,” FW Cook assists the committee in defining our peer group, which is used as carefulcontext for evaluating our relative executive compensation levels and targeted when deploying stock-basedour practices for making compensation decisions. FW Cook also assists the committee in comparing our director compensation program and practices against those of our peers.
FW Cook attended all meetings of the Compensation Committee as itits independent advisor, responding to committee members’ inquiries and refining their analysis based on these questions. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to Nasdaq and SEC rules, and concluded that FW Cook is when payingindependent and that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook from independently representing the Compensation Committee.
38INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Compensation Committee also received support from Intuit’s human resources leaders in analyzing and establishing Intuit’s compensation programs for fiscal 2018. Members of Intuit’s management and staff, including the Chief People and Places Officer, members of her staff, and internal Intuit counsel, attend a portion of each meeting of the Compensation Committee.
Mr. Smith, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, provided recommendations to the committee regarding the cash and considers dilutionequity compensation of his executive staff  (including Named Executive Officers), succession planning, organizational development, and run rate in the contextuse of peers when granting equity withinincentive compensation to drive Intuit’s growth and support the ecosystem business model.
Mr. Smith also provided a self-review to the Compensation Committee to aid its approved plans. Whenevaluation of his performance.
The Compensation Committee determines the Company makes employee compensation decisions, equity grants are rendered in their cash equivalent value so that there is full transparency regardingfor Mr. Smith after obtaining information and input from FW Cook and conferring with the costs involved.
Specific Elements of Fiscal 2016 Compensation
CompensationBoard without Mr. Smith present. In determining compensation for allother Named Executive Officers, the committee considers Mr. Smith’s recommendations. Although the Compensation Committee receives advice and recommendations, the committee is solely responsible for making the final decisions on compensation for the Named Executive Officers.
Fiscal 2018 Peer Group
PEER GROUP COMPOSITION
Each year the Compensation Committee works with its independent compensation consultant to determine appropriate peer companies for benchmarking our executive compensation program. In choosing the peer group, the committee has two primary objectives:
First, to confirm that our peer group is relevant and includes companies:

with which we compete for executive and technical software development talent;

of similar scope and complexity;

of similar size, measured by revenue and market capitalization; and

that use similar compensation models (including the mix of cash, equity and short and long-term incentives).
Second, to create a sufficiently robust set of peers to ensure a degree of continuity year-over-year to avoid statistical distortion.
Using these objectives, FW Cook recommended a fiscal 2018 peer group of 14 companies with the following characteristics:
Criteria for Fiscal
2018 Peer Group
Characteristics
Technology companies with headquarters in CaliforniaAll are California technology innovators that Intuit competes with for executive talent.
Comparable pay modelsAll peer group members use a mix of base salary, annual cash awards and some form of equity grant to compensate executives.
SizePeer companies generally fall within a range of similar revenue between 0.4 and 2.5x and company market-capitalization value between 0.33 and 3.0x.
Year-over-year continuityOne company (Yahoo!) was removed from the peer group in fiscal year 2018, after it was acquired by Verizon.
FW Cook reviewed these criteria with the Compensation Committee in May 2018, and the committee determined that the following companies would make up the compensation peer group for fiscal 2016 is a mix of the principal components summarized in the following table2018 and described in greater detail below.fiscal year-end 2018 decisions.

Fiscal 2018 Peer Group |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement39

2018 Compensation Peer Companies
Adobe Systems, Inc.Electronic Arts, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.Twitter Inc.
Component of CompensationActivision Blizzard, Inc.Juniper Networks, Inc.Salesforce.com, Inc.VMware, Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.NetApp, Inc.Symantec Corporation
eBay Inc.Netflix, Inc.Tesla Motors, Inc.
All compensation decisions made in July 2018 relied on this peer group. Any discussion about components of executive officers’ compensation that occurred at the beginning of the fiscal year (including, for example, their salaries) relied on the peer data from the peer group approved by the Compensation Committee in May 2017, which was the same group of companies, except that it also included Yahoo!, before it was acquired by Verizon.
HOW PEER GROUP DATA WAS USED
The Compensation Committee used the publicly reported information regarding named executive officer compensation from these companies as a reference point in assessing compensation levels for Intuit’s Named Executive Officers. The committee then considered each individual officer’s role and scope of responsibilities relative to comparable positions at Intuit’s peers. Based on this information, the committee reviewed Intuit’s executive compensation programs and practices, and analyzed each Named Executive Officer’s base pay, cash bonus and equity awards. There is no targeted benchmark level of compensation.
Components of Compensation
OVERVIEW
The components of Intuit’s executive compensation program for fiscal 2018 are as follows:
ComponentPrimary Purpose
Base SalaryProvideProvides the security of a competitive fixed cash payment for services rendered
Annual BonusCash Bonuses
Reward achievement of annual company financialoperating goals, including revenue and non-GAAP operating income.
The funding percentage for all Named Executive Officers was determined based on the company’s achievement of True North Goals and is equal to the bonus funding percentage for the broader Intuit population, in keeping with our “One Intuit Ecosystem” business strategy.
Long-Term IncentivesMotivate and reward executives based on Intuit’s absolute performance and individual strategicperformance relative to peers, and operational objectivesvalue delivered to Intuit stockholders through stock price appreciation.
Stock Options

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_ico-pie50.gif]
Retain and motivate executives to build stockholder value over the life of the option, since options deliver value only if Intuit’s stock price appreciates after grant
Restricted Stock Units

Retain executives and provide alignment with stockholders’ interests during the vesting term (assuming the one-year GAAP operating income hurdle is met)
50%
Relative TSR RSUs
Retain
Relative TSR RSUs retain and align executives with stockholders for a minimum of three years, and offer upside for strong positive returns to stockholders relative to similar alternative investments over 12, 2412-, 24- and 36 month periods36-month periods.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_ico-pie25lowerleft.gif]
25%
Service-based RSUs
Service-based RSUs retain executives and provide alignment with stockholders’ interests during the vesting term (subject to achievement of a one-year GAAP operating income hurdle).
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_ico-pie25upperleft.gif]
25%
Stock Options
Stock Options retain and motivate executives to build stockholder value over the life of the option, since options deliver value only if Intuit’s stock price appreciates after they are granted.
40INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Components of Compensation

The Compensation Committee conducts its annual review process near the end of each fiscal year to determine each executive’s cash bonus, equity awards and any adjustments to base salary and target cash bonus opportunities for the following year. This timing allows the Company’scommittee to consider the company’s TSR performance to date and financial results for the fiscal year and TSR performance to date to be taken into account when making compensation decisions for its executives.year.
Base SalaryBASE SALARY
Base salaries provide the security of a fixed cash payment for services rendered. InEach July, 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewedreviews the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers in the context of the compensation information provided by FW Cook, the Compensation Committee’scommittee’s independent compensation consultant,consultant. The goal of this review is to determine whether the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers wereare competitive with our compensation peer group and to ensure those salaries reflect each executive’s roles,role, responsibilities, experience and performance as further described under “Use of Competitive

Data” on page 58. The fiscal 2016performance. Fiscal 2019 base salary decisions for each of our Named Executive Officers are described under “Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions” on page 53“Compensation Snapshot for Each NEO” below.
Annual Cash BonusesANNUAL CASH BONUSES
Intuit uses cash bonuses to reward achievement of annual Companycompany financial performance and individual strategic and operational objectives, all of which align with stockholder value. All employees (other than those eligible to participate in certain sales and customer care incentive programs), including each of Intuit’sThese bonuses are determined by a multi-step process.
At the beginning of the fiscal year:
Bonus targets are established. Each Named Executive Officers, haveOfficer has an annual bonus target that is a stated percentage of base salary determined by the individual’s role within Intuit. Bonussalary. The Compensation Committee set 2018 bonus targets for the Named Executive Officers were set by the Compensation Committeein July 2017 based on the scope and significance of each executive’s leadership role at Intuit, andas well as a review of market data. The target amounts are used as a starting point in the determination of cash bonuses, but actual bonus payments varied based on Company and individual
Senior Executive Incentive Plan performance as discussed below.
hurdle is established.Cash bonuses for our Named Executive Officers are paid outgenerally awarded under the SEIP, a stockholder-approved plan designed to provide for payments that arewas intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”)(before the Code was amended, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) as described in more detail below.
Funding SEIP participants are determined in the first quarter of the Company’sfiscal year. In fiscal 2018, participants included the CEO, the Chairman of the Executive Committee, and all Executive Vice Presidents at that time. (Ms. Clatterbuck was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer on February 1, 2018, so she participated in the general employee bonus plans, including the SEIP, is based on Company performance against specific revenue and operating income targets, as describedplan in more detail below. fiscal 2018.)
Each year, the Compensation Committee sets a Companycompany performance target whichthat must be achieved in order for any executiveSEIP participant to be eligible to receive a cash bonus under that bonus program. In July 2017, the SEIP.committee established a company GAAP operating income target of  $800 million as the minimum performance hurdle for any Named Executive Officer to be eligible for a cash bonus under the SEIP, and set the maximum payout at 250% of a participant’s target award.
SEIP bonus pool funding formula is determined. Baseline funding of the SEIP is based on company-wide performance against a formula that includes specific revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets. The Compensation Committee set two aggressive, equally weighted performance goals — one based on Intuit’s revenue and the other on non-GAAP operating income. (See the table on page A-3 of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures.) The fiscal 2018 revenue goal reflected growth of 12.6% over actual performance in fiscal 2017, and the non-GAAP operating income goal reflected 12.7% growth over actual performance in fiscal 2017. The committee believes these objective measurements serve as clear goals for management to drive both innovation and responsible cost-management.
At the end of the fiscal year:
Achievement of SEIP performance hurdle is certified. At the close of fiscal 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee certified that Intuit had exceeded the $800 million GAAP operating income threshold set at $600 million and thusthreshold. Accordingly, each participant in the SEIP was eligible, but not entitled, to receive a cash bonus under that plan.
Fiscal 2016 SEIP Funding
The Compensation Committee set aggressive, equally-weighted performance goals based on Intuit’s (1) revenue, (2) non-GAAP operating income (see table on page A-3 of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures), and (3) year-end deferred revenue balance goals, to fund the SEIP, as set forth in the table below. The Committee believes that the achievement of these goals drives long term stockholder value, capturing both the need for continued revenue and income growth as well as the importance of the shift to a subscription-based model for some of our most important product offerings, measured by deferred revenue.2018 baseline bonus funding is determined. The following table reflectsshows how Intuit actually performed against the two goals approved by the Compensation Committee for purposesat the beginning of calculating the fiscal year.
Components of Compensation |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement41

Based on these results, the formula yielded a baseline funding of the SEIP as well as the Company’s actual performance results.of 124.7% of target.
Measure
Weighting
Revenue
(50% weighting)
Non-GAAP Operating Income
(50% weighting)
Total
(100%)
FY18
Revenue(1)
($ Billions)
Bonus Pool
Funding as a
Percent of Target*
FY18 Operating
Income(1)
($ Billions)
Bonus Pool
Funding as a
Percent of Target*
Baseline Company
Performance as a
Percent of Target(2)
Maximum$6.02150%$2.02150%150%
$5.96133%$2.00133%133%
$5.89117%$1.98117%117%
Target$5.83100%$1.96100%100%
$5.7397%$1.9297%97%
$5.6393%$1.8993%93%
$5.5490%$1.8690%90%
$5.4975%$1.8475%75%
$5.3945%$1.8145%45%
$5.2915%$1.7815%15%
Threshold$5.25%$1.76%%
Actual 2018
performance
and funding
percentages
$5.95
130.3%
$1.98
119.2%
124.7%
*

Measure Revenue ($ Billions) Non-GAAP Operating Income ($ Billions) Deferred Revenue Balance ($ Billions) Total
               
Weighting 33.3%+33.3%+33.3%=100%
               
               
              Baseline
    Bonus Pool   Bonus Pool FY16 Bonus Pool Company
    Funding FY16 Funding Deferred Funding Performance
  FY16 as a Percent Operating as a Percent Revenue as a Percent as a Percent
  Revenue of Target* Income (1) of Target* Balance of Target* of Target(2)
Maximum $4.83 150% $1.55 150% $1.06 150% 150%
  $4.78 133% $1.54 133% $1.04 133% 133%
  $4.73 117% $1.52 117% $1.02 117% 117%
Target $4.68 100% $1.50 100% $1.00 100% 100%
  $4.60 95% $1.48 95% $0.96 95% 95%
  $4.52 90% $1.45 90% $0.93 90% 90%
  $4.44 85% $1.43 85% $0.90 85% 85%
  $4.41 71% $1.42 71% $0.88 71% 71%
  $4.37 57% $1.40 57% $0.86 57% 57%
  $4.33 43% $1.39 43% $0.85 43% 43%
  $4.29 28% $1.38 28% $0.83 28% 28%
  $4.25 14% $1.37 14% $0.81 14% 14%
Threshold $4.21 —% $1.35 —% $0.80 —% —%
Actual $4.69 105% $1.56 150% $1.00 100% 119%

* Linear interpolation between defined points. Fiscal 2018 revenue and operating income dollar figures above are rounded to the nearest ten million. The Bonus Pool Funding as a Percent of Target is calculated using dollars in millions. Thus, actual results may vary slightly from the figures presented above.
(1)
Financial performance may befor fiscal 2018 is based on ASC 605 results. Revenue was adjusted for restructuring charges, litigation-related expenses, and/or non-recurring asset write-downs, but no such adjustments were made.to exclude amounts associated with an acquisition during the year.
(2)
This represents a baseline for the funding of the company-wide bonus pool.SEIP. The Compensation Committee has discretion to adjustdetermine the actual SEIP payment levels for each participant upin an amount not to a maximum ofexceed 250% of the participant’s base salary not to exceedor $5 million.
The baseline
Bonus funding is approved. Based on its assessment of performance for fiscal 2018, and taking into account the recommendation of the CEO, the Compensation Committee set funding for the SEIP was 119.4% of target, based on Company revenue of $4.69 billion, non-GAAP operating income of $1.56 billion,at 118% — the same level as had already been approved for the bonus pool applicable to Intuit employees generally, and deferred revenue of $1.00 billionbelow the baseline formulaic funding level.
In setting this funding level, the committee determined that Intuit had met or exceeded expectations with respect to our four True North stakeholders (employees, customers, partners and stockholders), by achieving the following outcomes in fiscal 2016.2018:
Determination
Maintained employee engagement scores at best-in-class levels, as measured by an independent employee engagement analytics firm;

Maintained our ranking on Fortune magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” survey at #13, and ranked #1 in three regions outside the U.S.;

Attained improved customer satisfaction, as measured by net promoter scores, for both our QuickBooks Online and TurboTax products;

Grew QuickBooks Online subscribers in the U.S. by 38% and outside the U.S. by 62%;

Used our matchmaking platform, which we provide as a service to help make our accountant partners and our small business customers more successful, to increase the number of Cash Bonusessmall business customers working with an accountant to 58 percent, up five points as compared to the prior year, while at the same time providing accountants three times the number of leads that they had received from us in prior years; and
Eligible senior executives, including our

Grew the stock price at a higher rate than that of the Nasdaq Composite or S&P 500.
42INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Components of Compensation

Named Executive Officers, were awarded bonuses from the SEIP, and those bonuses were based on the full Company results described above, and not the performance of any particular functional group or business unit.Officer bonus awards are determined. The Compensation Committee adjusteddetermined that each Named Executive Officer (excluding Mr. Williams, who retired earlier in the cash bonusesyear) would receive a bonus equal to 118% of each oftarget. The committee believes aligning the short-term incentives paid to the Named Executive Officers relativewith those paid to the 119.4% baseline funding by 16%rest of our employees reinforces our One Intuit Ecosystem business strategy and promotes a boundary-less approach to 30% per individual, based on their individual performance during the 2016 fiscal year, as evaluated by the Compensation Committee and recommended by the CEO (for all Named Executive Officers except himself). The actual bonus payouts to our Named Executive Officers were in the range of 138% to 155% of their individual target bonus.driving Intuit-wide outcomes.
The fiscal 20162018 bonus decisionspayouts for each of our Named Executive Officers are described under “Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions”were as follows:
NameSalary
($)​
Target Bonus
as a Percent
of Salary
(%)​
Target Bonus
($)​
Actual Bonus
as a Percent
of Target
Bonus
(%)​
Actual Bonus
($)​
Brad D. Smith1,000,000175%1,750,000118%2,065,000
Michelle M. Clatterbuck(1)570,38583%475,000118%560,500
Laura A. Fennell675,00090%607,500118%716,850
Sasan K. Goodarzi750,000100%750,000118%885,000
H. Tayloe Stansbury675,00090%607,500118%716,850
R. Neil Williams750,000100%750,000%
(1)
Ms. Clatterbuck’s bonus calculation was based on page 53 below.the weighted average of her 60% bonus target for her prior role for the first half of the fiscal year, and her 100% bonus target for her role as CFO for the second half of the year.

Fiscal 2016 Long-Term IncentivesLONG-TERM INCENTIVES
For the fiscal 2016 regular2018 annual awards, which were granted in July 2016, Relative TSR RSUs comprised half of the annual equity value granted to2018, our Named Executive Officers when measured byreceived half of their annual equity grant date fair value in Relative TSR RSUs, and the other half was split evenly between service-based RSUs and stock options. (The value of equity grants is measured based on grant date fair value.)
Relative TSR RSUs
Relative TSR RSUs comprised fifty percent of the value of the regular annual long-term equity awards for fiscal 2016. Relative TSR RSUs cliff vest after a three-year period and are earned based on Intuit’s three-year relative TSR compared to a pre-established peer group, with three discrete performance periods covering 12, 24 and 36 months. Shares earned based on the 12- and 24- month relative TSR performance periods have an additional service-based vesting requirement, such that all of the earned shares “cliff vest” following the end of the 36-month period. In addition, Mr. Smith is required to hold the shares that he earns under the relative TSR RSU awards for one year following vesting to ensure longer term alignment with stockholders. Performance-based awards ensure that a meaningful share of our executives’ equity compensation is contingent upon future outperformance compared to a peer group rather than continued employment or the appreciation of the Company’s stock alone.
Further, ourOur Relative TSR RSUs align the interests of award holders and stockholders by rewarding award holders for better than average stockholder return compared to other software companies sincea pre-established peer group. Specifically, target shares are based on achievingearned only if we achieve a TSR ranking at the 60th percentile. The 60th percentile target position is toor above in our TSR peer group. These performance-based awards ensure that Intuit must perform better thana significant share of our executives’ equity compensation is contingent upon future outperformance compared to a peer group.
Vesting. Relative TSR RSUs cliff vest after a three-year period and are earned based on Intuit’s TSR over a three-year period compared to TSR among companies in a pre-established peer group, with three discrete performance periods covering 12, 24 and 36 months. Shares earned based on the majority12- and 24-month relative TSR performance periods have an additional service-based vesting requirement, since they do not vest until the end of the relative TSR peers to earn the target number of shares.36-month period. The three yearthree-year vesting schedule serves as a retention incentive and as a means of measuring and requiring maintenance of longer-term stock price performance. Subject to pro-rata retirement vesting, if an executive chooses to terminate his or her employment before the end of the three-year period, all of the Relative TSR RSUs subject to that award will be forfeited.
Intuit employees who are at least 55 years old and have worked for the company for at least 10 full years are considered “retirement eligible” under the terms of these awards, which provides some additional benefits, as further described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”
Mr. Smith’s award includes a holding period, in the form of an automatic deferral of the release of the shares that he earns under the relative TSR RSU awards for one year after the shares vest, to ensure longer term alignment with stockholders and accountability for strategic decision-making. Except in certain limited circumstances (death, disability or a change in control), the deferral period generally applies to vested shares even if Mr. Smith terminates service with the company.
Components of Compensation |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement43

Performance goals. The Compensation Committee chose to target the 60th percentile position to ensure that Intuit must perform better than the majority of the relative TSR peers before executives can earn the target number of shares. The use of discrete measurement periods of 12, 24 and 36 months aims to minimize the potential impact of short-term share price volatility over the duration of the three-year performance period. The CompanyCompensation Committee believes that this approach focuses Named Executive Officers on long-term stockholder return.
Our TSR peer group wasPeers. The “TSR Peers” were identified using objective selection criteria recommended by FW Cook, our independent compensation consultant. All are U.S.-based public companies within Intuit’s General Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) code as it was defined and constituted as of May 31, 2018 that have market capitalization and revenue greater than 0.25x Intuit’s, size, plus H&R Block, which is a direct, size-relevant competitor (the “TSR Peers”).competitor. The Compensation Committee believes that having 39 TSR Peers ensures that, even in the event of mergers or acquisitions, Intuit will have a robust peer group for purposes of comparing TSR.
The TSR Peers represent a wider software company sample than the companies we compete with directly for talent; this is not the same as the peer group used to benchmark executive compensation. The TSR Peers were chosen so that the Relative TSR RSUs will reward the Named Executive Officers based on objective measurement of Intuit’s one-, two- and three-year returnreturns compared to similar companies in which an Intuit stockholder might reasonably be expected to invest.
The Committee believes that having 48 TSR Peers ensures that, in spiteare:
Relative TSR Peer Companies
Accenture plcElectronic Arts, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.Facebook, Inc.Red Hat, Inc.
Adobe Systems IncorporatedFidelity National Info Services, Inc.salesforce.com, Inc.
Akamai Technologies, Inc.First Data CorporationServiceNow, Inc.
Alphabet Inc.Fiserv, Inc.Square, Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.FleetCor Technologies, Inc.Symantec Corporation
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.Global Payments Inc.Synopsys, Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.H&R Block, Inc.Total System Services, Inc.
CA, Inc.IBM CorporationTwitter Inc.
Citrix Systems, Inc.Mastercard IncorporatedVisa Inc.
Cognizant Technology SolutionsMicrosoft CorporationVMware, Inc.
DXC Technology CompanyOracle CorporationWorkday, Inc.
eBay Inc.Paychex, Inc.Worldpay, Inc.
44INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Components of mergers or acquisitions ofCompensation

The following changes were made to the Relative TSR Peers, the Company will maintain a robust peer group against which it can measure its TSR. The stockholder return of both Intuit and thefor Relative TSR Peers is measured using a thirty trading-day average at the start and the end of each performance period. The purpose of this averaging period isRSUs granted in fiscal 2018:
Seven 2017 TSR peer companies were removed in the fiscal 2018 award design because they no longer met the objective size requirement or were acquired:
Alliance Data Systems Corporation
Amdocs Limited
Cadence Design Systems
Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.
Computer Sciences Corporation
Gartner, Inc.
Vantiv, Inc.
Four companies that meet the size requirement were added:
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Square, Inc.
Worldpay, Inc.
How payouts link to reduce the effect of daily stock market volatility on the measurement of TSR.
There is aperformance. A “target” payout which is earned when Intuit’s performance is at the 60th percentile of the peersTSR Peers for the applicable performance period. These payouts may be as high asPayouts can range from 200% of target if(if Intuit’s TSR reaches the 100th percentile of the TSR Peers for the performance period and may beperiod) to as low as 0% of target if0 (if performance is below the 25th percentile of the TSR Peers for the performance period. Theperiod). However, in order to avoid particularly large awards for outperforming peers in a declining market when Intuit’s stockholders do not earn a positive return, payouts are capped at 100% of target in the event that Intuit’s relative TSR is above the 60th percentile of the TSR Peers, butif absolute TSR is negative over any of the three performance periods, in order to avoid particularly large award earnouts for outperforming peers in falling markets when Intuit’s stockholders do not earn a positive return.periods. The table below describessummarizes the relationship between relative TSR performance and the percent of target that may be earned under these awards based on relative TSR:awards:

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_outcomes1.jpg]
 
TSR
Percentile
Rank(1)
 
Shares Earned
as a Percent
of Target(2)
Maximum100
 200.0%
 95
 187.5%
 90
 175.0%
 85
 162.5%
 80
 150.0%
 75
 137.5%
 70
 125.0%
 65
 112.5%
Target60
 100.0%
 55
 95.0%
 50
 90.0%
 45
 80.0%
 40
 70.0%
 35
 60.0%
 30
 50.0%
 25
 40.0%
Threshold< 25.0
 %

(1)Linear interpolation between defined points.
(2)Payouts capped at 100% if absolute TSR is negative over anyDividends. Recipients of the three performance periods.

The Relative TSR peer group contains a wider software company sample thanRSUs, including the companies we competeNamed Executive Officers, are provided dividend-equivalent rights in conjunction with directly for talentthese awards, but the dividends are not paid until the shares vest and is not the same as the peer group used to benchmark executive compensation. The 48are issued. Dividend-equivalent rights on Relative TSR PeersRSUs that fail to vest are set forth below:
Relative TSR Peer Companies
Accenture plcComputer Sciences CorporationPaychex, Inc.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.eBay, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Adobe Systems IncorporatedElectronic Arts, Inc.Red Hat, Inc.
Akamai Technologies, Inc.Facebook, Inc.Sabre Corporation
Alliance Data Systems CorporationFidelity National Info Services, Inc.salesforce.com, Inc.
Alphabet Inc.First Data CorporationSymantec Corporation
Amdocs LimitedFiserv, Inc.Synopsys, Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.FleetCor Technologies, Inc.Total System Services, Inc.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.Gartner, Inc.Twitter Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Global Payments Inc.Vantiv, Inc.
CA, Inc.H&R Block, Inc.Visa Inc.
Cadence Design SystemsIBM CorporationVMware, Inc.
CDK GlobalMastercard IncorporatedThe Western Union Company
Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.Microsoft CorporationWorkday, Inc.
Citrix Systems, Inc.Open Text CorporationXerox Corporation
Cognizant Technology SolutionsOracle CorporationYahoo! Inc.


The following changes were made to the Relative TSR Peer Group for 2016:
Relative TSR Peer Company Changes
Three 2015 TSR peer companies were removed in the fiscal 2016 award design because they no longer met the objective size requirement or are being acquired:
Equinix, Inc.
Teradata Corporation
LinkedIn Corporation
Eleven companies that met the size requirement were added:
Accenture plc
Amdocs Limited
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
CDK Global, Inc.
First Data Corporation
Global Payments Inc.,
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Sabre Corporation
Vantiv, Inc.
Workday, Inc
forfeited.
Service-Based RSUs
In fiscal 2016,2018, 25% of the total value of the executive officers’ annual year-end equity awards was made in the form of service-based RSUs. These RSUs provide a link to stockholders’ interests because their value fluctuatestracks with changes in stock price and these RSUsprice. They also serve as a long-term incentive for officers to remain with Intuit, as they receivesince service-based RSUs have no value unless they remainthe recipient stays with the CompanyIntuit through the vesting period. In addition,
Service-based RSUs for Executive Vice Presidents and the RSUsCEO also have a performance component, as the Companycomponent. Intuit must achieve a one-year GAAP operating income hurdle before these RSUsthe awards will begin to vest, which qualifiesvest. This provision allowed the awards granted on or before November 2, 2017 to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (before Section 162(m) was amended, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017). TheseFor awards granted in July 2018, the Compensation Committee established a company GAAP operating income target at the time of grant.
Service-based RSUs granted beginning in July 2018 generally vest over threefour years, with one-thirdone-fourth of the shares vesting in July of each year beginning in 2017,2019, subject to achievement of the one-year GAAP operating income hurdle and continued service.service, and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. This is a change from service-based RSUs granted prior to July 2018, which vested annually over three years. Mr. Smith is required to hold his vestedSmith’s
Components of Compensation |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement45

awards include a holding period, in the form of an automatic deferral of the release of the shares that he earns under the service-based RSU sharesawards for one year following vestingafter the shares vest, to support longer-term alignment with stockholders. Except in certain limited circumstances (death, disability, retirement or a change in control), the deferral period generally applies to vested shares even if Mr. Smith terminates service with Intuit.
Intuit employees who are at least 55 years old and have worked for Intuit for at least 10 full years are considered “retirement eligible” under the terms of these awards. Upon retirement, an eligible recipient of service-based RSUs is entitled to pro-rata vesting based on the number of full months of service over the award term. Beginning in fiscal 2018, service-based RSU awards to retirement-eligible employees provided for a different four-year vesting schedule, such that they vest as to 12.5% of the award on December 31 of the year of grant, and quarterly thereafter. The Compensation Committee made this change to the vesting schedules to simplify the employment tax withholding obligations associated with these awards.
Intuit employees (including the Named Executive Officers) are provided dividend-equivalent rights in conjunction with RSU awards, but the dividends are not paid until the shares vest and are issued. Dividend-equivalent rights on RSUs that fail to vest are forfeited.
Stock Options
In fiscal 2016,2018, 25% of the total value of the executive officers’ annual equity awards was madeprovided in the form of non-qualified stock options. Stock options requirebecome valuable only if the price appreciation in order to be valuable awards andof Intuit stock appreciates after they are granted, so they align option holders with the specific goal of increasing stockholder value after the grant date. Stockvalue. Beginning in fiscal 2018, stock options vest over threefour years of continued service, with 33.333%25% of the shares vesting after one year and 2.778%2.083% of the shares vesting each month thereafter until fully vested, so long as the executive officer continues to work at Intuit.
Dividends
Intuit employees (includingwho are at least 55 years old and have worked for Intuit for at least 10 full years are considered “retirement eligible” under the Named Executive Officers) are provided dividend equivalent rights in conjunction with RSU awards, but the dividends are not paid until the shares vest. For Relative TSR RSUs, dividends are paidterms of these awards. Upon retirement, a recipient is entitled to pro-rata vesting based on the actual units that vest following measurementnumber of performance and satisfactionfull months of service over the award term. Other employees forfeit their unvested options if they terminate employment with Intuit before the end of the three-yearfour-year vesting requirement, and are subject to the same provisions as the underlying awards. Dividend equivalent rights on RSUs (including Relative TSR RSUs) that fail to vest are forfeited.period.

Determination of Equity Grant ValueHOW EQUITY GRANT VALUES WERE DETERMINED
The Compensation Committee considers multiple factors in determining the size of an executive’s equity awards, including but not limited to annual performance ratings, retention value of current equity holdings, and competitive equity award values amongfor executives with similar roles at peer companies for roles of similar size and scope. In order to be eligible to receive equity awards, an executive must havecompanies. Only executives with a performance rating of  “strong” or “outstanding,” and“outstanding” for the relevant year are eligible for equity awards; a rating of  “outstanding” will, for any given role, generally result in a larger equity grant than for any other rating. InThe committee exercises its judgment and discretion, and also considers the recommendations of the CEO, in setting specific awards for our Named Executive Officers, the Committee exercises its judgment and discretion.Officers. All annual equity granted to our Named Executive Officers reflects the portfolio mix of 50% Relative TSR RSUs, 25% time-based RSUs, and 25% stock options discussed above.
The value of the equity granted to Mr. Smith was determined based on a review by the Compensation Committee of data provided by FW Cook, in addition to the Compensation Committee’scommittee’s own subjective assessment of Mr. Smith’s performance.many years of outstanding performance as CEO. To determine the size of the equity awards for Messrs. Williams, Goodarzi, Stansbury and Wernikoff,other executive officers, the Compensation Committeecommittee used data provided by FW Cook, which estimated the range of grant values provided to executives in comparable positions at companies within Intuit’s compensation peer group, as discussed below.above. The Compensation Committeecommittee then considered the Chief Executive Officer’sCEO’s recommendations in order to determine where within the applicable range each executive’s equity grant value would fall. The Compensation Committeecommittee gives considerable weight to the CEO’s recommendations provided by the Chief Executive Officer because of hishe has direct knowledge of each other Named Executive Officer’s performance and contribution.contributions.
The realization of the executives’ grant date equity values is subject to a significant amount of performance risk, and the amount actually earned over the next several years could be significantly lower if Intuit’s absolute and relative TSR (compared against the TSR Peer Group) isPeers) are not strong. The challenging nature of Intuit’s performance-based equity goals is illustrated by the 60th percentile TSR target and the failure to earn full payouts of performance cash and equity awards despite continued, long-term positive TSR growth over the last five fiscal years.target.
The fiscal 20162018 equity decisions for each of our Named Executive Officers are described under “Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions” below.
Fiscal 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions
Brad Smith
In assessing Mr. Smith’s performance and resulting compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considered his impact“Compensation Snapshot for Each NEO” on the Company’s one-year operating plan and longer-term strategic plans.following pages.
The
46INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Components of Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Smith had delivered outstanding performance with respect to both his short and long-term goals. In particular, they determined it was appropriate to award his outstanding performance with respect to the following annual operating goals which were established by the

Fiscal 2018 Compensation Committee early in fiscal 2016:Actions
Revenue growth
Non-GAAP operating income growth
Leadership results
Build a high performing organization and a great environment for top talent to work:
Maintain high employee engagement (annual survey and related actions) in a highly competitive talent market (minimize regrettable losses of key talent)
Maintain rigorous talent management efforts (hiring, retention and development - with a specific focus on attracting/retaining top product and technical talent)
Enhance the product and engineering culture by engaging and empowering product, design and technical talent to develop and deliver great products and network effect platforms
Develop a collaborative work environment which empowers individuals at all levels to contribute and execute effectively in an ecosystem environment    
Deliver awesome customer experiences that create delight and grow market share:
Uphold the highest customer experience as measured by improvements in customer benefit metrics and net promoter scores, including transforming our approach to customer care
Cultivate an innovative culture where teams apply rapid experimentation to improve existing and/or build new products that are valued by customers

Build durable advantage in Intuit’s technology and infrastructure that empowers local teams to innovate quickly, increasing effectiveness and efficiency (strategic capabilities and services)
Develop a systemic process for identifying and capitalizing on inorganic opportunities to strengthen Intuit’s talent, technology and revenue trajectory
In assessing Mr. Smith’s performance against his one-year goals, the Compensation Committee noted that the Company exceeded its plan with respect to revenue, deferred revenue, operating income and EPS growth, as well as improved net promoter scores in each of the Company’s core products. It further noted that the Company’s revenue growth was above the peer median and its non-GAAP operating income growth was near the 75th percentile of the peer group.
The Compensation Committee also determined that Mr. Smith delivered outstanding progress toward the following longer-term goals established by the Compensation Committee early in fiscal 2016:
Long-term strategic plan for Intuit that accelerates our growth track
Our durable mission: improve our customers’ financial lives so profoundly, they can’t imagine going back to the old way
Demonstrate progress against: (1) being the operating system behind small business success and (2) doing the nations’ taxes by:COMPENSATION SNAPSHOT FOR EACH NEO
Brad Smith
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
1.Delivering awesome product experiences:
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_2018-bdsmith.jpg]
SUMMARY
Mr. Smith’s total compensation for fiscal 2018 of  $21.072 million represents a 28.6% increase from his fiscal 2017 total compensation, and positions his pay at approximately the 65th percentile of Intuit’s compensation peers. These compensation decisions reflect Mr. Smith’s sustained outstanding performance. The Compensation Committee believes this compensation package appropriately rewarded Mr. Smith for Intuit’s outstanding year, our five-year transformation, and robust annualized TSR of 50% for one year and 27.5% for five years, with five-year TSR in the top decile of the S&P 500. The committee believes the decisions described below reflect an appropriate increase from the prior year, especially because Mr. Smith’s fiscal 2017 compensation had reflected a decrease compared to fiscal 2016.
JULY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
After assessing Mr. Smith’s performance, as described below, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Board, without Mr. Smith present, and made the decisions described below with respect to his compensation.
a.Amazing first use
Fiscal 2018 Bonus Award: 118% of target, or $2,065,000

This figure represents the same percentage funding as the company-wide bonus pool. As in 2017, the committee took a “One Intuit Ecosystem” approach by setting bonus funding at the same percentage among senior executives to promote a boundary-less approach to driving Intuit-wide outcomes, and to align with the funding of the company-wide bonus pool.
Fiscal 2018 Target Equity Grant Value: $18,000,000

divided among Relative TSR RSUs (50% of value), time-based RSUs (25%) and time-based options (25%). Mr. Smith’s time-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs are subject to a holding period, in the form of an automatic deferral of the release of the shares that he earns under the awards for one year after the shares vest, to ensure long-term alignment with stockholders. The total value of the equity grant was an increase of  $3.75 million over 2017 to recognize both high performance over fiscal 2018 and the company’s multi-year transformation to a subscription-driven multi-product ecosystem strategy.
Fiscal 2019 Base Salary: $1,000,000

no change from fiscal 2018.
Fiscal 2019 Bonus Target: 175% of base salary

no change from fiscal 2018.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee assessed Mr. Smith’s impact on the one-year performance of the company and our major business units and on Intuit’s longer-term goals, including strategic plans. Based on this assessment, the committee rated Mr. Smith’s performance as outstanding.
Short-Term Goals
The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Smith delivered outstanding performance with respect to the annual goals established by the committee early in fiscal 2018, relating to the revenue growth, operating income growth and Mr. Smith’s leadership results.
Revenue and operating income growth. Fiscal year revenue was $6 billion, representing 15% annual growth. This growth was fueled by 18% growth in the Small Business and Self-Employed Group and 14% growth in the Consumer Group. GAAP operating income was $1.5 billion, versus $1.4 billion in fiscal 2017, and non-GAAP operating income was $2.0 billion, up 14% versus the prior year.
Fiscal 2018 Compensation Actions |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement47

Leadership Results. The committee observed that Mr. Smith delivered outstanding performance in achieving his goals, including:

Delivering awesome customer experiences that create delight and increase share, as measured by all employees engaging with customers and receiving refreshed training to identify and deliver customer benefits, strong customer net promoter scores, improved first-use experiences, and successful launch of new products, including TurboTax Live;

Continuing to build a high-performing organization and a great environment for the customer benefit muchbest talent, as measured by strong employee engagement scores and attrition rates better than competitors
peers; and

Continuing to lead and develop a robust culture of compliance, as demonstrated through continuous enhancements to Intuit’s compliance processes and capabilities, and realignment of the compliance team within the legal and compliance organization.
b.Reimagined mobile first/mobile only, capitalizing
Long-Term Goals
The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Smith delivered outstanding progress toward the longer-term goals it established early in fiscal 2018, including implementation of a long-term plan to accelerate Intuit’s growth track and execution of a multi-year leadership strategy.
Long-term strategic plan to accelerate the company’s growth track. The committee recognized Mr. Smith’s leadership in establishing Intuit’s new mission and One Intuit Ecosystem strategy and ensuring that leaders and employees understand the connection between their work and Intuit’s goals. It also noted that Intuit aligned organizational talent and resources around the refreshed strategy, in part by creating and empowering new cross-ecosystem leadership roles. In fiscal 2018, Intuit also continued to activate the ecosystem by connecting its customers, partners and products across traditional business lines through solutions like TurboTax Live, the TurboTax Self-Employed bundle, and the ProAdvisor matchmaking platform. The committee also noted Mr. Smith’s focused deployment of resources to accelerate critical technology, platform, and brand initiatives designed to enhance the long-term One Intuit Ecosystem strategy.
Multi-year leadership strategy. The committee assessed Mr. Smith’s progress against his multi-year leadership strategy, focusing on the unique mobile design and capabilities
2.Enabling the contributions of others to build network effect platforms
a.Solving multi-sided problems well, creating a virtuous circle of end users and contributors
b.Expanding globally through platforms that are localized by users and developers
3.Using data to create delight
a.Enabling customer data to deliver better product experiences and breakthrough benefits
Multi-year leadership strategy and progress
Management growthmanagement development and succession plans; strong business leaders and pipeline; hiring and retention of key technical talent
Positive trendplans, trends for employee engagement, results (annual survey and related actions); addressing any specific issues which arise (minimizing regrettable losses of key talent)
Positive trend for customer experience results as measured by sustained improvementresults. The committee recognized Mr. Smith’s performance in growing and developing the management team and technical talent while maintaining best-in-class employee engagement scores and strong customer benefit metrics and net promotersatisfaction scores in several key businesses.
Progress against global expansion strategies
In assessing Mr. Smith’s performance and progress toward these long-term goals, the Compensation Committee determined that under Mr. Smith’s leadership, Intuit has made significant progress toward its long-term strategic goals of being the operating system behind small business success and doing the nations’ taxes, as evidenced by the Company’s growth in QuickBooks Online subscribers to over 1.5 million at the end of the 2016 fiscal year, and our share gains in the do-it-yourself software market over the past three tax seasons. In addition, the Committee noted the improved conversion, attach rate and net promoter score, or NPS, with respect to the Company’s mobile offerings, as well as the Company’s success using data to power advances in both TurboTax and the Small Business Group. It also recognized Mr. Smith’s achievements with respect to growing and developing the Company’s management team and technical talent, as well as accelerating its global growth, all while continuing to maintain best-in-class employee engagement scores and high customer satisfaction scores in several key businesses. The Committee also noted that the Company’s TSR was at approximately the 70th percentile of the Company’s peer group for the past three years, and the 66th percentile for the past five years.
The Committee consulted with the Board without Mr. Smith present and made the following decisions with respect to his compensation:

Base salary. The Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Smith’s base salary was competitive with the Company’s peers and determined to maintain the base salary of Mr. Smith at the fiscal 2016 level for fiscal 2017.

Cash Bonus. The Committee concluded that Mr. Smith’s bonus would be paid at 155% of target, which was a 30% increase for individual performance over the 119.4% baseline funding achieved for exceeding corporate goals. In making this determination, no individual factor was assigned any specific weight by the Compensation Committee. Rather, the Compensation Committee considered the strong aggregate performance of all of these factors, assessed their overall impact on the Company and exercised its judgment in setting his bonus. The Committee also determined that Mr. Smith’s fiscal 2017 target bonus should be increased to 175% of salary, making an increased portion of his total cash compensation performance-based, and resulting in target fiscal 2017 cash compensation between the median and 75th percentile of the Company’s compensation peers.
Equity. The equity granted to Mr. Smith at the end of fiscal 2016 has a target value of $16,500,000. In determining his awards, the Compensation Committee reviewed data provided by FW Cook, in addition to the Compensation Committee’s own subjective assessment of Mr. Smith’s outstanding performance as well as strong Company performance overall and relative to Intuit’s peers. The Compensation Committee also maintained the one-year mandatory holding period for Mr. Smith’s service-based RSUs and his Relative TSR RSUs. Mr. Smith is required to hold the service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs for one year after they vest, and the shares can only be released early in the event of death, disability or a change in control of the ownership of the Company. The purpose of this holding period is to ensure longer-term alignment with stockholders. The target number shares subject to each of Mr. Smith’s Relative TSR RSUs, service-based RSUs and Stock Options is set forth below under “Fiscal 2016 Equity Grants.”
Other Named Executive Officers
The Compensation Committee determined the compensation for Intuit’s other Named Executive Officers based on each executive’s leadership and progress towardin achieving the Company’scompany’s one-year operating plan and making significant progress toward longer-term strategic plans. In evaluating these executives and determining each of their overall performance ratings, the Compensation Committeecommittee considered: (1) 

the performance evaluation and pay recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer,CEO, which took into account the performance of each executive’s business unit or functional group, the executive’s leadership capability, and the importance of retention,retaining the executive; and (2) 

the scope, degree of difficulty and importance of the executive’s responsibilities.
The Compensation Committeecommittee gives considerable weight to the evaluation provided by the Chief Executive OfficerCEO because of his direct detailed knowledge of each other Named Executive Officer’s performance and contribution. Incontributions. However, the committee has the sole responsibility for determining Named Executive Officer compensation.
Like the individualCEO, each of the other Named Executive Officers received a bonus payouts, no individual factor was assigned any specific weight by the Compensation Committee. Rather, the Compensation Committee assessed these factors and their overall impact on the Company and exercised its judgment in determining each executive’s fiscal 2017 base salary and fiscal 2016 cashof 118% of his or her target bonus, and equity awards.
Neil Williams.  The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Williams had outstanding performance for fiscal 2016. Under his leadership, Intuit’s finance team has continued to build strong partnershipsconsistent with the Company’s business units and external stakeholders to achieve excellent results. The Committee also recognized his leadershipfunding level of the Company’s corporate strategy and development team, which drove the Company’s divestiturescompany-wide bonus pool. The committee increased each of the Demandforce, Quickenother Named Executive Officers’ salaries between 3.7% and QuickBase businesses, as well as his leadership7.7% in order to better align their cash incentive compensation with that of the Company’s expense-management effort. In recognition of the foregoing, theour compensation peers and decided to maintain bonus target percentages at their fiscal 2018 levels.
48INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Fiscal 2018 Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Williams’ base salary by 3.4% to $750,000, a bonus award at 138% of target, which reflected an individual upward adjustment of 16% over the baseline bonus funded for operating performance versus Intuit’s annual goals, and equity grants with a value of $6,500,000.Actions

Michelle Clatterbuck
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective February 1, 2018
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_michelle-clatterbuck2.jpg]
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee determined that Ms. Clatterbuck delivered strong performance in her new role for the second half of fiscal 2018. Under her leadership, Intuit’s finance team continued to build strong partnerships with the company’s business units and external stakeholders to achieve excellent results. The committee recognized Ms. Clatterbuck’s strategic business acumen and operational rigor, as well as her contributions to the growth of Intuit’s stock price.
JULY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Fiscal 2018 Bonus Award: 118% of target, or $561,000

Ms. Clatterbuck’s bonus calculation was pro-rated, such that it was based on the weighted average of her bonus target for her prior role for the first half of the fiscal year and her bonus target for her current role as CFO for the second half of the year.
Fiscal 2018 Target Equity Grant Value: $6,000,000
Fiscal 2019 Base Salary: $700,000

an increase of  $50,000, or 7.7%
Fiscal 2019 Bonus Target: 100% of base salary

no change
In addition to the July 2018 decisions described above, Ms. Clatterbuck was awarded a service-based RSU grant with a value of  $2,000,000 in March 2018, in connection with her promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.
Laura Fennell
Executive Vice President and Chief People & Places Officer
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_laura-fennell.jpg]
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee determined that Ms. Fennell delivered outstanding performance in her role as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, where she led Intuit’s legal, compliance, privacy, information security and government affairs organizations for fiscal 2018. Ms. Fennell demonstrated execution excellence in managing Intuit’s legal affairs and information security teams due to her strong business acumen, operational rigor, and ability to build organizational capability. The committee observed that she was well positioned to assume her new role of Executive Vice President, Chief People & Places Officer, which occurred on August 1, 2018.
JULY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Fiscal 2018 Bonus Award: 118% of target, or $717,000
Fiscal 2018 Target Equity Grant Value: $6,000,000
Fiscal 2019 Base Salary: $700,000

an increase of  $25,000, or 3.7%
Fiscal 2019 Bonus Target: 90% of base salary

no change
Sasan Goodarzi.Fiscal 2018 Compensation Actions |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement49

Sasan Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business & Self-Employed Group
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sasan-goodarzi.jpg]
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Goodarzi delivered outstanding performance during fiscal 2018 in his role as head of Intuit’s Small Business & Self-Employed Group. Under his leadership, Small
Business & Self-Employed Group revenue grew 18% for the year and QuickBooks Online subscribers grew 43%, to more than 3.4 million. The committee recognized Mr. Goodarzi’s contributions to the growth of QuickBooks Online both inside and outside the U.S., as well as the continued improvement in QuickBooks Online’s net promoter scores. Finally, the committee recognized Mr. Goodarzi’s operational rigor and his ability to inspire and implement change.
JULY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Fiscal 2018 Bonus Award: 118% of target, or $885,000
Fiscal 2018 Target Equity Grant Value: $11,000,000
Fiscal 2019 Base Salary: $800,000

an increase of  $50,000, or 6.7%
Fiscal 2019 Bonus Target: 100% of base salary

no change
Tayloe Stansbury
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_tayloe-stansbury.jpg]
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Stansbury delivered outstanding performance in his role as Chief Technology Officer during fiscal 2018. Under his leadership, Intuit has continued to integrate artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities in both the TurboTax and QuickBooks offerings, and has enhanced security measures and migrated most of our core applications to the cloud. The committee recognized Mr. Stansbury’s outstanding technical leadership as well as his focus on recruiting top talent and championing diversity in Intuit’s technology ranks.
JULY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Fiscal 2018 Bonus Award: 118% of target, or $717,000
Fiscal 2018 Target Equity Grant Value: $6,000,000
Fiscal 2019 Base Salary: $700,000

an increase of  $25,000, or 3.7%
Fiscal 2019 Bonus Target: 90% of base salary

no change
Neil Williams
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer through January 31, 2018
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_neil-williams.jpg]
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Mr. Williams retired on January 31, 2018, so his fiscal 2018 performance was not assessed, and no compensation decisions were made for him in July 2018.
Mr. Williams is the only Named Executive Officer whose compensation was not more than 90% performance-based in fiscal 2018, because he retired in the middle of the fiscal year and did not receive a cash bonus for fiscal 2018 or equity award during fiscal 2018.
50INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Fiscal 2018 Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Goodarzi had outstanding performance in his role as the head of Intuit’s Consumer Tax business and in his transition to lead Intuit’s Small Business Group, beginning May 1, 2016. Under his leadership, TurboTax Online units grew 15% and total TurboTax units grew 12%. Mr. Goodarzi also led the Consumer Tax team in its introduction of two dozen product innovations, helping to expand the do-it-yourself software category while increasing the Company’s share in the category as well. The Committee also recognized Mr. Goodarzi’s execution of a smooth transition of the leadership of the Consumer Tax team to Mr. Wernikoff, as well as the fresh perspective he is bringing to his new role leading the Small Business Group. In recognition of his significant accomplishments during fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Goodarzi’s base salary by 3.4% to $750,000, a bonus award at 155% of target, which reflected an individual upward adjustment of 30% over the baseline bonus funded for operating performance versus Intuit’s annual goals, and equity grants with a value of $8,500,000.Actions
Tayloe Stansbury. The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Stansbury had outstanding performance in his role as the Chief Technology Officer during fiscal 2016. Under his leadership, the Company has transitioned its technology platform to a platform based on service oriented architecture that allows data to be accessed quickly and effectively to delight customers. The Compensation Committee recognized Mr. Stansbury’s outstanding technical acumen as well as the expansion of the scope of his responsibilities to include leadership of the Company’s data services team. In recognition of Mr. Stansbury’s


performance during the year, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in his base salary of 8.0% to $675,000, a bonus award at 140% of target, which reflected an individual upward adjustment of 17% over the baseline bonus funded for operating performance versus Intuit’s annual goals, and equity grants with a value of $6,000,000.
Daniel Wernikoff. The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Wernikoff had outstanding performance in his role as the leader of the Small Business Group, and in his transition to lead Intuit’s Consumer Tax Group, beginning May 1, 2016. Under his leadership, the Small Business Group increased total QuickBooks Online subscribers by 41% for the year, reaching more than 1.5 million QuickBooks Online subscribers; grew online active payments customers 6% and grew online payroll customers by 17%. The Compensation Committee also recognized Mr. Wernikoff’s leadership in driving significant growth in QuickBooks Online international subscribers, as well as in QuickBooks Self Employed subscribers. The Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Wernikoff’s base salary of 3.4% to $750,000, a bonus award at 138% of target, which reflected an individual upward adjustment of 16% over the baseline bonus funded for operating performance versus Intuit’s annual goals, and equity grants with a value of $8,500,000.
Fiscal 20162018 Equity Grants
The following table sets forthshows the intended target total annual equity grant value awarded to each Named Executive Officer at the end of fiscal 20162018, and the service-based RSUs, stock options and target number of Relative TSR RSUs, service-based RSUs and stock options granted in connection withbased on the fiscal 20162018 performance and compensation review process.
The intended values shown in the table may or may not be achieved, depending on whether performance criteria are met and how Intuit’s stock price performs over the vesting period.
Name
Total Intended
Value of Equity
Grant(1)
Relative TSR
RSUs (target #)
(50% of value)​
Service-based
RSUs (target #)
(25% of value)​
Stock Options (#)
(25% of value)​
Brad D. Smith$18,000,00041,00020,50088,500
Michelle M. Clatterbuck$6,000,00013,7836,92329,543
Laura A. Fennell$6,000,00013,7836,92329,543
Sasan K. Goodarzi$11,000,00025,27012,69354,162
H. Tayloe Stansbury$6,000,00013,7836,92329,543
R. Neil Williams$
(1)
    Target # of RSUs # of RSUs/Stock Options
    Relative    
    TSR    
  Value-Based Equity RSUs RSUs Stock Options
Name Grant (1) (50% of value) (25% of value) (25% of value)
Brad D. Smith $16,500,000
 74,000
 36,000
 213,000
R. Neil Williams $6,500,000
 29,289
 14,356
 84,153
Sasan K. Goodarzi $8,500,000
 38,302
 18,773
 110,046
H. Tayloe Stansbury $6,000,000
 27,036
 13,252
 77,679
Daniel A. Wernikoff $8,500,000
 38,302
 18,773
 110,046
(1) These values were estimated using data available to the Compensation Committee on July 20, 2016.25, 2018. They do not match exactly the grant date fair values presented in the Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table, which were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and take into account the price of Intuit’s common stock on the July 21, 201626, 2018 grant date.
Achievement of Performance Targets for July 2013 Performance-Based RSU Awards
PAYOUT OF RELATIVE TSR RSUS GRANTED IN 2015
In July 2013,2015, the Compensation Committee approved the grant to Intuit executives of performance-based RSUs to Company executives. Approximately half of the performance-based RSUsthat were tied to the achievement of Intuit’s three year operating goals (“2013 Operating Performance RSUs”) and half were tied to the relative total stockholder returns (“2013 Relative TSR RSUs”).over 12-, 24- and 36- month performance periods. In August 2016, the Compensation Committee certified the achievement of the operating performance goal RSUs at 42% of target and the achievement of the relative TSR performance RSUs at 126.8% of target. Both achievement levels were based on formulaic and non-discretionary achievement of the pre-established goals and objectives.
The operating goals reflect targeted compound annual growth rates in both revenue (50% of 2013 Operating Performance RSUs) and GAAP operating income (50% of 2013 Operating Performance RSUs) for the three-year period from August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2016. The earnout of the 2013 Operating Performance RSUs at only 42% of target during a time period when Intuit achieved compound annual revenue growth of 5.94% and had TSR above the 60th percentile demonstrates the aggressive performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The table below sets out the metrics for the revenue growth and operating income growth goals as well as the actual results and payout levels for the 2013 Operating Performance RSUs:


Measure Revenue Growth (CAGR) GAAP Operating Income Growth (CAGR) Total
               
Weighting 50%+50%=100%
               
        FY14-FY16     Combined
  FY14-FY16 Percent Payout as Operating Percent Payout as Payout as
  Revenue of Target a Percent Income of Target a Percent a Percent
  Growth Achieved of Target Growth Achieved of Target of Target
Maximum 13.1% 120% 200% 15.5% 120% 200% 200%
  12.5% 115% 175% 14.9% 115% 175% 175%
  12.0% 110% 150% 14.2% 110% 150% 150%
  11.4% 105% 125% 13.6% 105% 125% 125%
Target 10.9% 100% 100% 12.9% 100% 100% 100%
  9.3% 85% 95% 11.0% 85% 95% 95%
  7.6% 70% 90% 9.0% 70% 90% 90%
  5.7% 53% 68% 6.8% 53% 68% 68%
  3.8% 35% 45% 4.5% 35% 45% 45%
  1.9% 18.0% 23% 2.3% 18% 23% 23%
Threshold —% —% —% —% —% —% —%
Actual 5.9% 54.0% 70% 1.4% 11% 14% 42.0%
The earnouteach case, earning and vesting of the 2013these 2015 Relative TSR RSUs waswere based on Intuit’s percentile rank of total stockholder returnfor TSR among the TSR peer group established for fiscal 2013 (“2013 TSR Peers”)2015, based on the 30-day average closing stockmarket price of each 2013 TSR Peermember of that peer group at the beginning and the end of theeach performance period. Although
The graphic below describes the percent of target that could be earned under these awards based on relative TSR, peer group is modified each year, in order to be consistent,as well as the vestingactual achievement of the 2013 Relative TSR RSUs is based on the TSR peer group established in the year in which the 2013 Relative TSR RSUs were granted. The performance goals along with actual results for the 2013 Relative TSR RSUs are set out on the table below. Intuit’s relative TSR percentile rank was 70.7, following Intuit’s strong absolute three-year TSR of 79.47%performance for fiscal 2014 through fiscal 2016.each performance period, as certified by the Compensation Committee.
[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_outcomes2.jpg]
 Intuit’s TSR Percentile RankPayout as Percent of Target
Maximum100.0200.0%
 95.0187.5%
 90.0175.0%
 85.0162.5%
 80.0150.0%
 75.0137.5%
Actual70.7126.8%
 70.0125.0%
 65.0112.5%
Target60.0100.0%
 55.083.3%
 50.066.7%
 45.050.0%
 40.033.3%
 35.016.7%
Threshold30.0—%
Fiscal 2018 Compensation Actions |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement51



For all of the Named Executive Officers, the table below sets forth the number of 2013 performance-based2015 Relative TSR RSUs that vested on September 1, 2016.     
Name 2013 Operating Performance RSUs Vested 2013 Relative TSR RSUs Vested Total 2013 RSUs Vested Total 2013 Target RSUs Awarded
Brad D. Smith 23,940
 77,982
 101,922
 118,500
R. Neil Williams 9,030
 29,798
 38,828
 45,000
Sasan K. Goodarzi 9,030
 29,798
 38,828
 45,000
H. Tayloe Stansbury 5,670
 18,386
 24,056
 28,000
Daniel A. Wernikoff 9,030
 29,798
 38,828
 45,000
Use of Competitive Data
Each year the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant assists the Compensation Committee2018, except for Mr. Williams, whose Relative TSR RSUs vested pro-rata in defining the appropriate peer companies for useconnection with his retirement in comparing our executive compensation program against the peer group. The Compensation Committee’s objectives in using this market study were:February 2018.
1. To confirm that our peer group is relevant and includes:
a. Companies with which we compete for executive and technical software development talent;
b. Companies of similar scope and complexity;
c. Companies of similar size, measured by revenue and market capitalization; and
d. Companies with similar business lines.
2. To evaluate how our compensation compares to other companies using similar compensation models (including the mix of cash, equity and short and long-term incentives).
3. To create a sufficiently robust set of peers to ensure a degree of continuity year-over-year to avoid statistical distortion.


Using these objectives, FW Cook recommended a fiscal 2016 peer group with the following characteristics:

Name2015 Relative TSR RSUs Vested (#)​
Brad D. Smith95,814
Criteria for Fiscal 2016 Peer GroupMichelle M. Clatterbuck(1)Characteristics
Relevant Business Lines and Headquartered in San Francisco Bay AreaLaura A. FennellAll are Silicon Valley technology innovators and local companies that Intuit competes with for executive talent, and all except Tesla are software and services companies (GICS code 4510).37,721
Comparable Pay ModelsSasan K. GoodarziAll members of peer group use a mix of base salary, annual cash awards and some form of equity grant to executives. None of the members of the peer group have large defined benefit or similar retirement offerings as part of their ongoing executive compensation programs.56,582
SizeH. Tayloe StansburyPeer companies were selected in order to remain within a range of similar revenue between 0.4 and 2.5x and company market-capitalization value between 0.33 and 3.0x, subject to reasonable exceptions for direct business competitors and internal talent peers.37,721
Year-over-Year ContinuityR. Neil Williams(2)Three companies (PayPal, Netflix and Juniper Networks) were added to the list in fiscal 2016 and Equinix was removed, following its reclassification as a REIT during the year.32,385
(1)
FW Cook reviewed this data withMs. Clatterbuck did not receive an award of Relative TSR RSUs in 2015.
(2)
Mr. Williams retired in February 2018. Under the Compensation Committee in July 2016, and the Committee determined that the following companies would make up the compensation peer group for fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year-end 2016 decisions.


2016 Compensation Peer Companies
Adobe Systems, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.Salesforce.com, Inc.
eBay Inc.Symantec Corporation
Electronic Arts, Inc.Tesla Motors, Inc.
Juniper Networks, Inc.Twitter Inc.
LinkedIn CorporationVMware, Inc.
NetApp, Inc.Yahoo! Inc.
Netflix, Inc.

To the extent that peer data from FW Cook’s fiscal 2015 study were used for context in discussion about components of executive officers’ fiscal year 2016 compensation at the beginning of the fiscal year, the peer data were from the 2015 peer list. Many of the compensation peers are a local subsetterms of the TSR Peers described above,RSUs, he earned a pro rata number of the 2015 TSR RSUs, which was calculated as the Committee believes it is important for the compensation peers to be of similar size to the Company, to more accurately reflect the scope of Intuit’s operations, and also include the companies with which we compete for executive and technical talent. In addition, as the compensation peer group is refreshed annually, acquisitions of compensation peer companies are less likely to have a meaningful impactpercentage (based on the analysisnumber of Intuit’sfull months of service over the term of the award) of the sum of the number of TSR RSUs earned for each completed performance period and the target number of TSR RSUs that could have been earned for each incomplete performance period.
EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE SUCCESSION ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVES
In August 2018, Intuit announced that Mr. Smith will be stepping down from his role of President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2019, and that Mr. Goodarzi will assume the role of President and Chief Executive Officer at that time. Intuit also announced that Mr. Smith will assume the role of Executive Chairman of the Board.
In October, 2018, the Board of Directors (without Mr. Smith present) made the decisions described below with respect to his compensation measures relative to those of its peers.as Executive Chairman:

Base Salary, effective January 1, 2019: $750,000
Bonus Target, effective January 1, 2019: 100%
Executive Chairman RSU Grant Value: $3,000,000
The Board of Directors also made the decisions described below with respect to Mr. Goodarzi’s compensation peer group reflects publicly traded technology companies of similar size that are exclusively located in the San Francisco Bay Area where much ofas President and Chief Executive Officer:
Base Salary, effective January 1, 2019: $1,000,000
Bonus Target, effective January 1, 2019: 150%
52INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Fiscal 2018 Compensation Actions

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Other Benefits
MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PROGRAM
To help encourage our technical innovation occurs and where there is a concentration of executive and technical talent with the skills we seek. This Bay Area focus is a result of our review of geographically segmented market data in 2014, which indicated that there are market differences between executive compensation and aggregate equity use practices in local Bay Area technology companies and in technology companies outside of Northern California. This data is also consistent with our internal experience attracting and retaining skilled technical and executive talent. The Committee believes that recognition of our labor market is criticalexecutives to our success as we hire people with the skills required to transform Intuit's software products from desktop applications to an easy-to-use, delightful, mobile, cloud-based ecosystem. The Compensation Committee believes that our focus on local peer companies is important in light of our competition with them for talent that is critical to the Company’s ongoing success.

The Company used the publicly reported information regarding named executive officer compensation from these companies as a reference point in assessing each executive’s compensation level. The Company then considered each executive’s role and scope of responsibilities relative to the roles of comparable positions at Intuit’s peers. Based on the foregoing information, the Company reviewed Intuit’s executive compensation programs and practices, and analyzed each Named Executive Officer’s base pay, cash bonus and equity awards. There is no targeted benchmark level of compensation.
Intuit’s Management Stock Purchase Program
As a method of encouraging ownership ofown Intuit’s stock, by executives, Intuit maintains the Management Stock Purchase Program (“MSPP”)(MSPP). Under the MSPP, employees with a title of director or above (including the Named Executive Officers) may elect to defer up to 15% of their annual incentive bonus, which is then converted into deferred stock units based on the fair market value of Intuit’s stock on the date the bonus is awarded. These deferred stock units are fully vested on the grant date, but are not issued in the form of shares until the earlier of the third anniversary of the grant date or the termination ofdate the executive terminates employment with Intuit. Intuit also grants the employeeemployees who defer a portion of their annual bonuses an additional RSU for every deferred stock unit purchased through this deferral,the MSPP, up to a maximum number, as set forth below:

Executive Level
Maximum Number of
Matching RSUs
RSUs​
Director300 RSUsRSUs​
Vice President750 RSUsRSUs​
Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President1,500 RSUsRSUs​
Executive Chairman of the Board2,500 RSUs​
Chief Executive Officer3,000 RSUsRSUs​


These matching RSUs cliff vest as to 100% of the shares three years after the grant date, or on the recipient’s earlier death or disability. This three-year vesting period is intended to assist Intuit in retaining key talent. The RSUs granted pursuant to the MSPP are issued under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.

Deferred stock units purchased by employees under the MSPP, and theas well as any matching RSUs, accrue dividends.have dividend-equivalent rights. Dividends on the purchased deferred stock units are paid on the date the shares are issued which isor the third anniversarydate dividends are paid to the common stockholders of the grant date, unless the employees dies or becomes disabled prior to that time.company, as may be determined by Intuit. Dividends on matching RSUs are paid upon their vesting.
Employee BenefitsNON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
EachWe adopted the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDCP), effective January 1, 2008, to meet what were then new restrictions on deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The NQDCP was designed to generally track the provisions of our 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and the original Executive Deferred Compensation Plan that became effective during 2002. No new deferrals or contributions have been made to the 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan or the original plan since 2007.
The NQDCP provides that executives who meet minimum compensation requirements are eligible to defer up to 75% of their salaries and up to 75% of their bonuses. We have agreed to credit the participants’ contributions with earnings that reflect the performance of certain independent investment funds. We do not guarantee above-market interest on account balances. We may make discretionary employer contributions to participant accounts in certain circumstances; the timing, amounts and vesting schedules of such contributions are at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee or its delegate. No discretionary employer contributions were made for the benefit of any participant in fiscal year 2018.
Benefits under the NQDCP are unsecured and are general assets of Intuit. Participants are generally eligible to receive payment of their vested benefit at the end of their elected deferral period or after termination of their employment with Intuit for any reason, or at a later date to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Participants may elect to receive their payments in a lump sum or installments. Deferrals authorized by an executive and related earnings are always 100% vested. Discretionary company contributions and the related earnings vest as determined by Intuit at the time a particular contribution is made, and in any event vest completely upon the participant’s disability or death or a change in control of Intuit.
Other Benefits|CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement53

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
All employees with a title of director or above (including the Named Executive Officers and employee directors) isOfficers) are generally eligible to participate in a number of programs whichthat make up Intuit’s total compensation package, including health and welfare benefits, executive relocation benefits, our 401(k) Plan with a company-sponsored match component, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Planthe NQDCP, and ourthe MSPP. Intuit does not offer a defined benefit pension plan. In connection with eachMs. Clatterbuck’s appointment to the role of Mr. Goodarzi and Mr. Wernikoff serving as General Manager of the Consumer Tax GroupChief Financial Officer, she received reimbursement for a portion of the fiscal year, they each received certain travel assistance benefitsher relocation expenses associated with moving from San Diego, California to defray the costs of commuting from their respective primary residences in the San Francisco Bay Area, to San Diego, California and to cover housing and transportation costs in San Diego.accordance with our executive relocation policy.
Termination BenefitsTERMINATION BENEFITS
As discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on page 72,Control,” the Companycompany has agreed to provide severance payments to Mr. Smith (and, effective upon his January 1, 2019 assumption of the role of President and CEO, Mr. Williams,Goodarzi), as well as pro rata accelerated vesting of equity awards to all of our Named Executive Officers, if their employment is terminated under specific circumstances. The CompanyIntuit agreed to provide these benefits as consideration for theeach executive’s agreement to provide services as an employee. Intuit does not provide excise tax “gross-up” protection in the event that a change in control severancechange-in-control payment is considered an excess“excess parachute paymentpayment” under U.S. tax laws.
RoleOur Compensation Policies and Practices
Intuit employs a number of Compensation Consultants,practices that reflect our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and are intended to provide total compensation that is competitive and relates to both Intuit’s performance and the individual performance of our senior executives.
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Intuit has a mandatory stock ownership program that applies to employees at the senior vice president level and above (including the Named Executive Officers) and to members of the Board. The required ownership levels for our executives were increased as of the beginning of fiscal 2018, and the required ownership level for our non-employee directors was increased during fiscal 2018. To ensure continued alignment of interests among Intuit’s management, directors and stockholders, the ownership requirements are as follows:
RoleMinimum Value of Stock Ownership
Chief Executive Officer10x base salary
Chief Financial Officer and General Managers
of the company’s two principal business units
5x base salary
Other Executive Vice Presidents3x base salary
Senior Vice Presidents1.5x base salary
Board Members10x standard annual Board retainer ($600,000)
Executive Chairman of the Board10x base salary
Individuals must comply within five years after becoming subject to the guidelines. In addition, if existing senior officers are promoted to positions with a higher ownership requirement, they have three years to reach that higher level. A senior officer who has not reached the applicable ownership requirement must retain 50% of the shares remaining after payment of any applicable exercise price and tax withholding (“net shares”) until compliance is achieved. Any senior officer who has not achieved the applicable ownership requirement by the applicable compliance date must retain 100% of the net shares at the time of vesting of service-based or relative TSR RSUs, or exercise of options, until compliance is achieved. If a Board member has not met the stock ownership requirement by the required date, then 50% of that Board Member’s annual cash retainer will be paid in the form of Intuit stock until the required ownership level is reached. As of July 31, 2018, all Named Executive Officers subject to these requirements were in compliance with the revised guidelines, and as of October 31, 2018, all current directors were in compliance with the Boardupdated policy.
In addition to these ownership guidelines, Mr. Smith’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs are subject to a holding period in Compensation Determinations
The Compensation Committee has the authority to directly retain the servicesform of independent consultants and other experts to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee engaged the services of FW Cook, a national executive compensation consulting firm, to review and provide recommendations concerning allan automatic one-year deferral of the componentsrelease of the Company’s executiveunderlying shares after vesting to increase his long-term alignment with stockholders.
54INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |CD&A |Our Compensation Policies and Practices

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTUIT’S EQUITY GRANTING POLICY FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES
Equity grants made to Executive Vice Presidents or Section 16 officers must be approved by the Compensation Committee.
Timing of grants. During fiscal 2018, equity awards to employees generally were granted on regularly scheduled pre-determined grant dates. The CEO and Chief People and Places Officer do not have discretion to set other grant dates for awards made pursuant to their delegated authority. As part of Intuit’s annual performance and compensation program. FW Cook performs services solely on behalf ofreview process, the Compensation Committee approves stock option and has no relationshipRSU awards to our Named Executive Officers within a few weeks before Intuit’s July 31 fiscal year-end.
Option exercise price. The exercise price of a newly granted option (i.e., not an option assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition) is the Company or management except as it relates to performing those services. As described above under “Useclosing price on the Nasdaq stock market on the date of Competitive Data,” FW Cook assists the Committeegrant.
POLICY REGARDING DERIVATIVES, SHORT SALES, HEDGING AND PLEDGING
Intuit’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging shares on margin, trading in defining the peer companies used for evaluating our relative executive compensation levels and practices. FW Cook also assists the Committee in comparing our director compensation program and practices against those of our peers. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to NASDAQ and SEC rules, and it has concluded that FW Cook is independent and that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook from independently representing the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee received support from Intuit’s Human Resources Department in analyzing and establishing Intuit’s compensation programs for fiscal 2016. Membersderivative securities of Intuit’s managementcommon stock, engaging in short sales of Intuit securities, or purchasing any other financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and staff attend meetingsexchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Intuit securities.
CLAWBACKS
We have “clawback” provisions for cash bonus payments under the SEIP. In the event Intuit issues a restatement of its financial results for any period in the previous three fiscal years with respect to which an SEIP award was paid, and the restatement decreases the level of a performance result previously certified by the Compensation Committee, includingthen in the Executive Vice President of Human Resources, the Vice President of Compensation and an Intuit attorney. Mr. Campbell, the former Chairmandiscretion of the Board, regularly participated in Compensation Committee meetings until his retirement in January 2016, providing input on organizational structure, succession planning and executive development. Mr. Williams, our Chief Financial Officer, has providedcommittee, the Compensation Committee withrecipient of each award will be required to return to Intuit an analysis of Intuit’s financial performance, the financial impact of various types of equity awards and proposed performance hurdles for equity incentives. Mr. Smith, our Chief Executive Officer, has provided recommendationsamount equal to the Compensation Committee regardingamount of the cash and equity compensation of his executive staff (including Mr. Williams, Mr. Goodarzi, Mr. Stansbury and Mr. Wernikoff), succession planning, organizational development andaward that would not have been paid based on the use of incentive compensation to drive Intuit’s growth. Mr. Smith also provided a self-review to the Compensation Committee to aid its evaluation of his performance. As noted above, in making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committeerestated financial results.
Our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan also has the authority to engage the services of outside advisers, experts and others to assist the Compensation Committee, and it has engaged FW Cook. For this purpose, FW Cook attended all meetings of the Compensation Committee, responding to committee members’ inquiries and refining their analysis based on these questions.
The Compensation Committee determines the compensation“clawback” provisions for Mr. Smith after obtaining information and input from FW Cook and conferring with the Board without Mr. Smith present. In determining compensation for the Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Smith’s recommendations. The

Compensation Committee is, however, solely responsible for making the final decisions on compensation for the Named Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee holds individual meetings with members of Mr. Smith’s executive staff on an annual basis to discuss organizational development and leadership strategy. The Compensation Committee also interacts frequently with members of the executive staff to discuss their business unit or functional group activities.performance-based equity awards.
Accounting and Tax Implications of
Our Compensation Policies
In designing our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers the financial, accounting and tax consequences to Intuit as well as the tax consequences to our employees. In determining the aggregate number and mix of equity grants in any fiscal year, the Compensation Committee and management consider the size and share-based compensation expense of the outstanding and new equity awards relative to theour one- and three-year operating plans and relative to market capitalization.
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, before it was amended under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (which amendment became generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017), compensation in excess of  $1,000,000 per year to those executives (otherNamed Executive Officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer) whose compensation is detailed in the “Fiscal Year 2016 Summary Compensation Table” on page 63 isOfficer, was not tax deductible to Intuit unless certain requirements arewere met. TheThis $1,000,000 limit doesdid not apply to compensation that iswas considered “performance-based” under applicable tax rules. Intuit hashad taken steps to see that most of the executive compensation paid under its incentive programs, including the stockholder approvedstockholder-approved SEIP and performance-based RSUs, iswere designed with the intent that its deductibility not be limited by Section 162(m). We believe it is important to preserve flexibility in administeringWith the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the deductibility exemption for performance-based compensation programs as corporate objectives may not always be consistent with the requirements for full deductibility. Further, the application of Section 162(m) is complex and may change with time (with potentially retroactive effect). Accordingly, Intuit has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be limited to that which is deductible under Section 162(m) and, while Intuit striveshas been eliminated. As a result, compensation in excess of  $1,000,000 paid to award executive compensation that meets the deductibility requirements, Intuit may enter into compensation arrangements under which payments are not deductible on account of Section 162(m).
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Intuit has a mandatory stock ownership program that applies to employees at the senior vice president level and above (including the Named Executive Officers) and members of the Board. This program was refined in January 2012 and requires our executives and Board members to hold shares of Intuit common stock at least equal to the values indicated in the table below, which values are measured as of July 31 each year:

Stock Ownership Guidelines
Role
Minimum Ownership
Requirement
Chief Executive Officer6x base salary
Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President1.5x base salary
Board members5x standard annual Board retainer ($300,000)

All individuals subject to the requirements must comply within five years after the date the individual is appointed to a position subject to the guidelines. Unvested RSUs (other than performance-based RSUs) and vested but unissued RSUs are counted as shares when determining the number of shares owned. As of July 31, 2016, all Named Executive Officers and directors subject to these requirements were in compliance.
In addition to the ownership guidelines, the CEO’s service-based RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs beginning with the equity grant in the 2015 fiscal year are subject to a one-year mandatory holding period after the shares vest to increase his long-term alignment with stockholders.
Intuit’s Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledging
Intuit's Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors andcovered executive officers from pledging shares on margin, trading in derivative securitiesgenerally will not be deductible unless the compensation qualifies for certain transition relief.
Accounting and Tax Implications of Intuit's common stock, engaging in short sales of Intuit securities, or purchasing any other financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Intuit securities.Our Compensation Policies |CD&A |INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement55



[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Intuit’s Equity Granting Policy for Senior Executives
Executive Compensation Tables
Equity grants made to Senior Vice Presidents or above, to individuals who report to the Chief Executive Officer or to a committee of the Board must be approved by the Compensation Committee.
Timing of Grants.  Equity awards are typically granted on regularly scheduled grant dates on the seventh business day of each month. Exceptions to this practice are specifically approved by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Human Resources do not have discretion to set other grant dates for awards made pursuant to their delegated authority. As part of Intuit’s annual performance and compensation review process, the Compensation Committee approves stock option and RSU awards to our Named Executive Officers within a few weeks before Intuit’s July 31 fiscal year-end.
Option Exercise Price.  The exercise price of a newly granted option (i.e., not an option assumed or substituted in connection with a corporate transaction) is the closing price on the NASDAQ stock market on the date of grant.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Fiscal Year 20162018 Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows compensation earned by or granted as applicable,to our Named Executive Officers during the last three fiscal years, 2016, 2015as calculated under SEC rules.
Name and Principal PositionFiscal
Year​
Salary
($)​
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)​
Total
($)​
Brad D. Smith
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
20181,000,00012,858,0124,493,4372,065,000(4)(5)655,289(6)21,071,738
20171,000,0009,985,2043,556,3491,837,50010,00016,389,053
20161,000,00011,576,7853,876,6002,325,00010,00018,788,385
Michelle M. Clatterbuck
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
2018570,3856,548,2311,499,996560,500(5)147,788(7)9,326,900
Laura A. Fennell
Executive Vice President and
Chief People and Places Officer
2018675,0004,578,3501,499,996716,850(5)10,000(8)7,480,196
Sasan K. Goodarzi
Executive Vice President and
General Manager, Small Business &
Self-Employed Group
2018750,000(4)8,249,8272,749,983885,000(4)10,000(9)12,644,810
2017750,0005,999,8771,999,999630,00013,4879,393,363
2016725,0006,375,0802,002,837900,000225,66910,228,586
H. Tayloe Stansbury
Executive Vice President,
Chief Technology Officer
2018675,0004,584,6341,499,996716,850(5)11,046(10)7,487,526
2017675,0004,229,6891,374,977567,00010,3146,856,980
2016625,0004,586,4281,413,758700,00011,7507,336,936
R. Neil Williams
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2018455,7696,923(11)462,692
2017750,0004,124,7731,374,977630,00010,0006,889,750
2016725,0004,874,9961,531,585800,00010,0007,941,581
(1)
The amount, timing and 2014 by our Chairmangrant date fair value of these awards are described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer,Analysis” and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for fiscal 2016. We call these individuals our “Named Executive Officers.”

Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year 
Salary
($)
 
Stock Awards
($)(1)
 
Option Awards
( $)(2)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(3)
 
All Other Compensation
($)
 
Total
($)
Brad D. Smith 2016
 1,000,000
(4) 11,576,785
 3,876,600
 2,325,000
  10,000
(6) 18,788,385
Chairman, President and 2015
 1,000,000
  10,373,838
 3,174,993
 1,456,500
  10,000
  16,015,331
Chief Executive Officer 2014
 1,000,000
  10,172,624
 3,475,845
 1,890,000
  10,000
  16,548,469
                  
R. Neil Williams 2016
 725,000
  4,874,996
 1,531,585
 800,000
  10,000
(6) 7,941,581
Executive Vice President 2015
 700,000
  5,023,612
 1,499,983
 644,000
  10,000
  7,877,595
and Chief Financial Officer 2014
 700,000
  3,226,791
 1,081,187
 630,000
  10,000
  5,647,978
                  
Sasan K. Goodarzi 2016
 725,000
(4) 6,375,080
 2,002,837
 900,000
  225,669
(6) 10,228,586
Executive Vice President 2015
 650,000
  5,925,247
 1,874,999
 624,000
  228,304
  9,302,550
and General Manager, 2014
 620,000
  3,163,836
 1,081,187
 524,000
  250,000
  5,639,023
Small Business Group                 
                  
H. Tayloe Stansbury 2016
 625,000
  4,586,428
 1,413,758
 700,000
(5) 11,750
(6) 7,336,936
Executive Vice President, 2015
 600,000
  3,921,574
 1,249,993
 576,000
  17,060
  6,364,627
Chief Technology Officer                 
                  
Daniel A. Wernikoff 2016
 725,000
  6,465,068
 2,002,837
 800,000
  66,505
(6) 10,059,410
Executive Vice President 2015
 600,000
  5,850,175
 1,874,999
 600,000
  10,000
  8,935,174
and General Manager, 2014
 525,000
  3,010,934
 1,029,229
 358,500
  13,000
  4,936,663
Consumer Tax Group                


(1)
The amount, timing and grant date fair value of these awards are described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 41 and are included in the table below named “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2016.” In addition to annual stock awards, the amounts above include the fair value of RSUs which Intuit granted in August of each fiscal year to match RSUs which certain Named Executive Officers purchased with amounts deferred from their bonuses earned in the prior fiscal year under the MSPP. Amounts presented in the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 assuming no forfeitures. The grant date fair value of each of the RSU awards was calculated using the closing price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The service-based RSUs that are subject to a one-year operating income performance goal will all become subject to service-based vesting if the goal is satisfied, and will otherwise be forfeited in full. As a result, there is no distinction between the grant date fair value of these awards based upon the probable outcome of such conditions and the value of such awards assuming that the highest level of performance conditions is achieved. Likewise, with respect to the Relative TSR RSUs that may be earned depending on Intuit’s relative TSR, under FASB ASC Topic 718 the total grant date fair value of these RSUs remains the same whether the maximum, target, or below target number of RSUs is earned.
(2)
The amount, timing and grant date fair value of these awards are described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 41 and are included in the table below named “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2016.” Amounts presented in the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 assuming no forfeitures. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to stock option grants and for a complete description of the valuation of share-based compensation, see Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016.

(3)
These amounts represent the amounts earned for performance under Intuit’s SEIP during fiscal 2016 and paid in August 2016. The SEIP is described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 41.
(4)
The amount includes a deferral at the recipient’s election under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. See “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2016” on page 71 for more information.
(5)The amount includes a deferral of the amount set forth in the table below at the recipient’s election under the MSPP. Under the terms of the MSPP, a participant may elect to use a stated portion of his or her annual SEIP award to purchase RSUs under Intuit’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. Intuit then matches these purchased RSUs with another grant of RSUs that vest three years from the date of grant. The MSPP is described in greater detail on page 59.

Name Executive MSPP Contribution  ($) Deferred Stock Units Reserved for Executive Contribution  (#)
H. Tayloe Stansbury 104,916
 936


(6)The amount includes the items of other compensation set forth in the table below. In connection with Mr. Goodarzi’s role as General Manager of the Consumer Tax Group through April 2016, Mr. Goodarzi received travel assistance benefits to defray his costs of commuting from his primary residence in the San Francisco Bay Area to San Diego, California and to cover his housing and transportation costs in San Diego. In connection with Mr. Wernikoff’s role as General Manager of the Consumer Tax Group, which he assumed in May 2016, Mr. Wernikoff received travel assistance benefits to defray his costs of commuting from his primary residence in the San Francisco Bay Area to San Diego, California and to cover his housing and transportation costs in San Diego.

Name 401(k) Matching Contributions ($) 
Patent Bonuses
($)
 
Travel Assistance
($)
Brad D. Smith 10,000
 
 
R. Neil Williams 10,000
 
 
Sasan K. Goodarzi 10,000
 
 215,669
H. Tayloe Stansbury 10,000
 1,750
 
Daniel A. Wernikoff 10,000
 
 56,505


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2018” table below. In addition to annual stock awards, the amounts above include the fair value of RSUs that Intuit granted in August of each fiscal year to match RSUs that certain Named Executive Officers purchased with amounts deferred from their bonuses earned in the prior fiscal year under the MSPP. Amounts presented in the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of each of the RSU awards was calculated using the closing price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The RSUs that are conditioned on a one-year operating income performance goal will all become subject to service-based vesting if the goal is satisfied, but forfeited in full if it is not. As a result, there is no distinction between the grant date fair value of these awards based upon the probable outcome of such conditions and the value of such awards assuming the highest level of performance conditions is achieved. Likewise, the total grant date fair value of the Relative TSR RSUs that may be earned depending on Intuit’s relative TSR, remains the same whether the maximum, target, or below target performance is earned.
(2)
The amount, timing and grant date fair value of these awards are described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and are included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2018” table below. Amounts presented in the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to stock option grants and for a complete description of the valuation of share-based compensation, see Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018.
(3)
These amounts represent the amounts earned for performance under Intuit’s SEIP, or in the case of Ms. Clatterbuck, under the Intuit Performance Incentive Plan (IPI), during fiscal 2018 and paid in August 2018. The cash incentive programs are described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
(4)
The amount includes a deferral at the recipient’s election under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. See “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2018” for more information.
562016INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(5)
The amount includes a deferral of the amount set forth in the table below at the recipient’s election under the MSPP. Under the terms of the MSPP, a participant may elect to use a stated portion of his or her annual SEIP (or IPI, as applicable) award to purchase deferred stock units under Intuit’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. Intuit then matches these purchased units with another grant of RSUs that vests three years from the date of grant. The MSPP is described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.
NameExecutive MSPP Contribution
($)​
Deferred Stock Units Reserved
for Executive Contribution
(#)​
Brad D. Smith309,5521,467
Michelle M. Clatterbuck83,982398
Laura A. Fennell107,404509
H. Tayloe Stansbury107,404509
(6)
This amount includes $10,000 in matching contributions by Intuit into Mr. Smith’s 401(k) plan. It also includes a reimbursement of  $645,289 for tax penalties and associated gross-ups as a result of Intuit inadvertently failing to defer the release of Mr. Smith’s RSUs (both service-based and Relative TSR RSUs) for the required holding period after they had vested in July 2017, as specified in those awards. Mr. Smith did not sell the shares during the holding period, but the failure by Intuit to defer their release created a tax penalty under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to be paid by Mr. Smith. As this penalty was a result of Intuit’s administrative error, which was made without Mr. Smith’s knowledge or involvement, Intuit reimbursed Mr. Smith this amount as well as the fees due to his accountant to prepare the necessary amendments to his tax filings. This figure also reflects a gross-up of these amounts, in the amount of  $355,871, so that Mr. Smith would not be adversely affected financially as a result of Intuit’s error.
(7)
This amount includes $10,000 in matching contributions by Intuit into Ms. Clatterbuck’s 401(k) plan; an award under Intuit’s broadly available employee recognition, or “spotlight,” program of  $25, which was grossed-up in the amount of  $15, consistent with all awards made under that program; and relocation assistance in the amount of  $79,709 in connection with her appointment to the role of Chief Financial Officer and associated move, at Intuit’s request, from San Diego to the San Francisco Bay Area. Certain of the relocation expenses were grossed up, in the amount of  $58,039, as provided for under the terms of Intuit’s Executive Relocation Policy.
(8)
This amount includes $10,000 in matching contributions by Intuit into Ms. Fennell’s 401(k) plan.
(9)
This amount includes $10,000 in matching contributions by Intuit into Mr. Goodarzi’s 401(k) plan.
(10)
This amount includes $10,000 in matching contributions by Intuit into Mr. Stansbury’s 401(k) plan; as well as an award under Intuit’s broadly available employee referral program of  $500. Consistent with all awards made under that program, Mr. Stansbury’s referral bonus was grossed up in the amount of  $546.
(11)
This amount includes $6,923 in matching contributions by Intuit into Mr. Williams’ 401(k) plan.
Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement57

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2018
The following table provides information about Relative TSR RSUs and service-based RSUs granted to the Named Executive Officers under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 20162018, and cash awards for which the Named Executive Officers were eligible in fiscal 20162018 under our SEIP.SEIP or Intuit Performance Incentive Plan, as applicable.
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards(2)
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
Awards(3)
NameGrant Date​Board
Approval Date​
Target
($)​
Maximum
($)​
Target
(#)​
Maximum
(#)​
Shares
(#)​
($)​
Brad D. Smith8/11/20178/11/20172,017275,522(6)
7/26/20187/26/201841,00082,0008,141,370(4)
7/26/20187/26/201820,50020,5004,441,120(5)
1,750,0004,375,000
12,858,012
Michelle M. Clatterbuck8/11/20178/11/201735648,629(6)
3/15/20183/15/201811,2401,999,933(7)
7/26/20187/25/201813,78327,5662,999,870(4)
7/26/20187/25/20186,9236,9231,499,799(5)
475,000
6,548,231
Laura A. Fennell8/11/20178/11/201757678,681(6)
7/26/20187/25/201813,78327,5662,999,870(4)
7/26/20187/25/20186,9236,9231,499,799(8)
607,5001,518,750
4,578,350
Sasan K. Goodarzi7/26/20187/25/201825,27050,5405,500,015(4)
7/26/20187/25/201812,69312,6932,749,812(5)
750,0001,875,000
8,249,827
H. Tayloe Stansbury8/11/20178/11/201762284,965(6)
7/26/20187/25/201813,78327,5662,999,870(4)
7/26/20187/25/20186,9236,9231,499,799(5)
607,5001,518,750
4,584,634
R. Neil Williams
750,0001,875,000
(1)
Represents awards that could have been earned under the SEIP (for all Named Executive Officers other than Ms. Clatterbuck) or IPI (for Ms. Clatterbuck) based on performance in fiscal year 2018. These columns show the awards that were possible at the Target and Maximum levels of performance. The maximum award that could have been earned by each Named Executive Officer, other than Ms. Clatterbuck, was the lesser of 250% of the Target or $5 million. Ms. Clatterbuck’s target award level is based on the weighted average of her 60% bonus target for her prior role for the first half of the fiscal year, and her 100% bonus target for her role as CFO for the second half of the year. Her award was not subject to a maximum. Mr. Williams retired in February 2018 and did not receive any payment under the SEIP in fiscal 2018.
      
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 
All Other
Stock
Awards(1)
 
Grant Date Fair Value of
Stock Awards(2)
Name 
Grant
Date
 Board Approval Date 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
Shares
(#)
 

($)
Brad D. Smith 7/21/2016 7/21/2016  
  
 74,000
 148,000
 
 7,501,945
(5)
  7/21/2016 7/21/2016  
  
 36,000
 36,000
 
 4,074,840
(6)
      1,500,000
 3,750,000
(3)
 
 
 
 
       
  
  
  
  
 11,576,785
 
                  
R. Neil Williams 7/21/2016 7/20/2016  
  
 29,289
 58,578
 
 3,250,040
(5)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016  
  
 14,356
 14,356
 
 1,624,956
(6)
      580,000
 1,450,000
(3)
 
 
 
 
       
  
  
  
  
 4,874,996
 
                  
Sasan K. Goodarzi 7/21/2016 7/20/2016     38,302
 76,604
 
 4,250,164
(5)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016     18,773
 18,773
 
 2,124,916
(6)
      580,000
 1,450,000
(3)
 
 
 
 
                6,375,080
 
                  
H. Tayloe Stansbury 8/14/2015 8/14/2015     
 
 818
 86,397
(4)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016     27,036
 54,072
 
 3,000,037
(5)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016     13,252
 13,252
 
 1,499,994
(6)
      500,000
 1,250,000
(3)
 
 
 
 
                4,586,428
 
                  
Daniel A. Wernikoff 8/14/2015 8/14/2015     
 
 852
 89,988
(4)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016  
  
 38,302
 76,604
 
 4,250,164
(5)
  7/21/2016 7/20/2016  
  
 18,773
 18,773
 
 2,124,916
(6)
      580,000
 1,450,000
(3)
 
 
 
 
       
  
  
  
  
 6,465,068
 
(2)

(1)Awards made pursuant to Intuit’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. With respect to the RSUs described in footnote (5)
Awards made pursuant to Intuit’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. With respect to the RSUs described in footnote (4) that may be earned depending on Intuit’s relative TSR, the “Target” column reflects the number of RSUs that will be earned if the TSR performance goals are achieved at target levels, and the “Maximum” column reflects the maximum number of RSUs that could be earned if the highest level of performance is achieved. The RSUs described in footnote (5), which are conditioned on a one-year operating income performance goal will all become subject to service-based vesting if the goal is satisfied, and will otherwise be forfeited in full. As a result, there is no distinction between the “Target” and “Maximum” columns for these RSUs.
(3)
These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the MSPP matching RSUs described in footnote (6) was calculated using the closing price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the total grant date fair value of the RSUs described in footnote (4), which may be earned depending on Intuit’s relative TSR, the “Target” column reflects the number of RSUs that will be earned if the TSR performance goals are achieved at target levels, and the “Maximum” column reflects the maximum number of RSUs that could be earned if the highest level of performance is achieved with respect to the performance conditions. The RSUs described in footnote (6) that are subject to a one-year operating income performance goal will all become subject to service-based vesting if the goal is satisfied, and will otherwise be forfeited in full. As a result, there is no distinction between the “Target” and “Maximum” columns for these RSUs.
(2)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 assuming no forfeitures. With respect to the MSPP matching RSUs described in footnote (4), the grant date fair value was calculated using the closing price of Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. With respect to the RSUs described in footnote (5) that may be earned depending on Intuit’s relative TSR, under FASB ASC Topic 718

the total grant date fair value of these RSUs remains the same whether the maximum, target, or below target number of RSUs is earned. With respect to theThe RSUs described in footnote (6) that(5), which are subject toconditioned on a one-year operating performance goal, the RSUs will all become subject to service-based vesting if the goal is satisfied, and will otherwise be forfeited in full. As a result, there is no distinction between the grant date fair value of these awards based upon the probable outcome of such conditions and the value of such awards assuming that the highest level of performance conditions is achieved.
(3)
Represents awards that could have been earned under the SEIP based on performance in fiscal year 2016. These columns show the awards that were possible at the Target and Maximum levels of performance. The maximum award that could have been earned by each Named Executive Officer was the lesser of 250% of the Target or $5 million.
(4)Represents Intuit matching grants of RSUs under the MSPP with respect to deferrals of fiscal 2015 bonuses under the SEIP, which were paid and deferred in fiscal 2016, and which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(5)Depending on Intuit’s relative TSR for the one-, two- and three-year periods ending July 31, 2017, July 31, 2018 and July 31, 2019 compared to a pre-established peer group and the executive’s continued employment by the Company following each such date (the “Fiscal 2016 TSR Goals”), the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2019.
(6)
Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one-year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 331/3% of the shares on each of July 1, 2017, July 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019.

Depending on Intuit’s relative TSR for the one-, two- and three-year periods ending July 31, 2019, July 31, 2020 and July 31, 2021 compared to a pre-established peer group, and so long as the executive remains employed by Intuit following each such date, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2021.
58INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(5)
Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 25% of the shares on July 1, 2019, and 6.25% of the shares quarterly through July 1, 2022.
(6)
Represents Intuit matching grants of RSUs under the MSPP with respect to deferrals of fiscal 2017 bonuses under the SEIP or IPI, as applicable. The bonuses were paid and deferred in early fiscal 2018, and the matching grants vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(7)
These RSUs were issued in connection with Ms. Clatterbuck’s February 2018 promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and vest as to 3313% of the shares on each of March 1, 2019, March 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021.
(8)
These RSUs will vest as to 12.5% of the shares on December 31, 2018, and 6.25% of the shares quarterly through July 1, 2022.
The following table provides information about stock options granted to the Named Executive Officers under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016.2018.
NameGrant Date​
All Other Option Awards:
Number of Securities
Underlying Options
(#)(1)
Exercise or Base Price
of Options
($/share)​
Grant Date Fair Value of
Option Awards
($)(2)
Brad D. Smith7/26/201888,500216.644,493,437
Michelle M. Clatterbuck7/26/201829,543216.641,499,996
Laura A. Fennell7/26/201829,543216.641,499,996
Sasan K. Goodarzi7/26/201854,162216.642,749,983
H. Tayloe Stansbury7/26/201829,543216.641,499,996
R. Neil Williams
(1)
These awards vest as to 25% of the options on July 26, 2019 and 2.083% of the options each month thereafter.
(2)
These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
Name 
Grant
Date(1)
 
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
 
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Options
($/sh)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Option
Awards ($)(2)
Brad D. Smith 7/21/2016 213,000
 113.19
 3,876,600
R. Neil Williams 7/21/2016 84,153
 113.19
 1,531,585
Sasan K. Goodarzi 7/21/2016 110,046
 113.19
 2,002,837
H. Tayloe Stansbury 7/21/2016 77,679
 113.19
 1,413,758
Daniel A. Wernikoff 7/21/2016 110,046
 113.19
 2,002,837

(1)
This option vests as to 331/3% of the underlying shares on July 21, 2017 and 2.778% of the shares each month thereafter.
(2)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 assuming no forfeitures.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2018 |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement59


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20162018 Year-End
The following table provides information with respect to outstanding stock options held by the Named Executive Officers as of July 31, 20162018.
Outstanding Option Awards
NameNumber of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Exercisable
(#)​
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Unexercisable
(#)​
Option Exercise
Price
($)​
Option Grant
Date​
Option Expiration
Date​
Brad D. Smith114,82556.5207/25/1207/24/19
139,50063.1107/24/1307/23/20
227,45082.5907/24/1407/23/21
163,061107.2507/23/1507/22/22
141,99671,004(1)113.1907/21/1607/20/23
46,32892,672(2)135.3507/20/1707/19/24
88,500(3)216.6407/26/1807/25/25
Michelle M. Clatterbuck5,827107.2507/23/1507/22/22
4,7985,400(1)113.1907/21/1607/20/23
4,8849,772(2)135.3507/20/1707/19/24
29,543(3)216.6407/26/1807/25/25
Laura A. Fennell50,50082.5907/24/1407/23/21
64,197107.2507/23/1507/22/22
34,52317,263(1)113.1907/21/1607/20/23
17,91135,830(2)135.3507/20/1707/19/24
29,543(3)216.6407/26/1807/25/25
Sasan K. Goodarzi23,52656.5207/25/1207/24/19
53,00063.1107/24/1307/23/20
70,75082.5907/24/1407/23/21
96,296107.2507/23/1507/22/22
73,36236,684(1)113.1907/21/1607/20/23
26,05452,116(2)135.3507/20/1707/19/24
54,162(3)216.6407/26/1807/25/25
H. Tayloe Stansbury1,784107.2507/23/1507/22/22
2,15825,895(1)113.1907/21/1607/20/23
17,91135,830(2)135.3507/20/1707/19/24
29,543(3)216.6407/26/1807/25/25
R. Neil Williams
(1)
This award vested as to 331.3% of the options on July 21, 2017 and 2.778% of the options each month thereafter.
(2)
This award vested as to 3313% of the options on July 20, 2018 and 2.778% of the options each month thereafter.
(3)
This award will vest as to 25% of the options on July 26, 2019 and 2.083% of the options each month thereafter.
  Outstanding Option Awards
Name 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable (#)
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable (#)
 
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Option
Grant
Date
 
Option
Expiration
Date
Brad D. Smith 103,445
 
  37.98
 07/22/10 07/21/17
  110,496
 
  47.79
 07/20/11 07/19/18
  57,412
 57,413
(1) 56.52
 07/25/12 07/24/19
  139,500
 
  63.11
 07/24/13 07/23/20
  151,629
 75,821
(2) 82.59
 07/24/14 07/23/21
  54,348
 108,713
(3) 107.25
 07/23/15 07/22/22
  
 213,000
(4) 113.19
 07/21/16 07/20/23
R. Neil Williams 34,728
 
  56.52
 07/25/12 07/24/19
  53,000
 
  63.11
 07/24/13 07/23/20
  47,165
 23,585
(2) 82.59
 07/24/14 07/23/21
  25,676
 51,360
(3) 107.25
 07/23/15 07/22/22
  
 84,153
(4) 113.19
 07/21/16 07/20/23
Sasan K.Goodarzi 90,000
 
  42.78
 08/09/11 08/08/18
  23,526
 
  56.52
 07/25/12 07/24/19
  53,000
 
  63.11
 07/24/13 07/23/20
  47,165
 23,585
(2) 82.59
 07/24/14 07/23/21
  32,095
 64,201
(3) 107.25
 07/23/15 07/22/22
  
 110,046
(4) 113.19
 07/21/16 07/20/23
H. Tayloe Stansbury 917
 
  63.11
 07/24/13 07/23/20
  28,060
 22,452
(2) 82.59
 07/24/14 07/23/21
  21,396
 42,801
(3) 107.25
 07/23/15 07/22/22
  
 77,679
(4) 113.19
 07/21/16 07/20/23
Daniel A. Wernikoff 10,498
 
  47.79
 07/20/11 07/19/18
  15,684
 
  56.52
 07/25/12 07/24/19
  53,000
 
  63.11
 07/24/13 07/23/20
  44,898
 22,452
(2) 82.59
 07/24/14 07/23/21
  32,095
 64,201
(3) 107.25
 07/23/15 07/22/22
  
 110,046
(4) 113.19
 07/21/16 07/20/23
60INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2018 Year-End

(1)This option vests on July 25, 2017.
(2)This option vested as to 33 1/3% of the underlying shares on July 24, 2015 and 2.778% of the shares each month thereafter.
(3)This option vested as to 33 1/3% of the underlying shares on July 23, 2016 and 2.778% of the shares each month thereafter.
(4)This option vests as to 33 1/3 % of the underlying shares on July 21, 2017 and 2.778% of the shares each month thereafter.


The following table provides information with respect to outstanding RSUs held by the Named Executive Officers as of July 31, 2016,2018, excluding RSUsdeferred stock units purchased by the Named Executive Officers under the MSPP. The MSPP is described in greater detail on page 59.in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. The market value of the awards is determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares or units by $110.99,$204.24, the closing price of Intuit’s common stock on NASDAQNasdaq on July 31, 2016,2018, the last trading day of fiscal 2016.2018. For thethose awards whichthat are subject to performance-based conditions as described in the footnotes below, the number of shares reflects performance assuming achievement at target unless otherwise noted.

  Outstanding Stock Awards
Name 
Grant
Date
 
Number of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
 
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested ($)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested ($)
             
             
Brad D. Smith 07/20/11 23,100
(1) 2,563,869
 

  

  07/20/11 38,566
(2) 4,280,440
 

  

  07/25/12 12,895
(3) 1,431,216
 

  

  07/25/12 6,525
(4) 724,210
 

  

  07/25/12 25,795
(5) 2,862,987
 

  

  07/24/13 23,940
(6) 2,657,101
 

  

  07/24/13 77,982
(7) 8,655,222
 

  

  07/24/14 13,616
(8) 1,511,240
 

  

  07/24/14 

  

 184,200
(9) 20,444,358
  07/23/15 19,734
(10) 2,190,277
 

  

  07/23/15 

  

 133,200
(11) 14,783,868
  07/21/16 

  

 36,000
(12) 3,995,640
  07/21/16 

  

 74,000
(13) 8,213,260
R. Neil Williams 07/24/13 9,030
(6) 1,002,240
 

  

  07/24/13 29,798
(7) 3,307,280
 

  

  08/16/13 980
(14) 108,770
 

  

  07/24/14 4,233
(8) 469,821
 

  

  07/24/14 

  

 57,300
(9) 6,359,727
  08/15/14 1,128
(14) 125,197
 

  

  07/23/15 9,324
(15) 1,034,871
 

  

  07/23/15 

  

 62,928
(16) 6,984,379
  07/21/16 

  

 14,356
(17) 1,593,372
  07/21/16 

  

 29,289
(18) 3,250,786
Sasan K. Goodarzi 07/24/13 9,030
(6) 1,002,240
 

  

  07/24/13 29,798
(7) 3,307,280
 

  

  07/24/14 4,233
(8) 469,821
 

  

  07/24/14 

  

 57,300
(9) 6,359,727
  07/23/15 11,654
(15) 1,293,477
 

  

  07/23/15 

  

 78,660
(16) 8,730,473
  07/21/16 

  

 18,773
(17) 2,083,615
  07/21/16 

  

 38,302
(18) 4,251,139

  Outstanding Stock Awards
Name 
Grant
Date
 
Number of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
 
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested ($)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested ($)
             
             
H. Tayloe Stansbury 07/24/13 5,670
(6) 629,313
 

  

  07/24/13 18,386
(7) 2,040,662
 

  

  08/16/13 649
(14) 72,033
 

  

  07/24/14 4,033
(8) 447,623
 

  

  07/24/14 

  

 54,500
(9) 6,048,955
  07/23/15 7,770
(15) 862,392
 

  

  07/23/15 

  

 52,440
(16) 5,820,316
  08/14/15 818
(14) 90,790
 

  

  07/21/16 

  

 13,252
(17) 1,470,839
  07/21/16 

  

 27,036
(18) 3,000,726
Daniel A. Wernikoff 07/24/13 9,030
(6) 1,002,240
 

  

  07/24/13 29,798
(7) 3,307,280
 

  

  07/24/14 4,033
(8) 447,623
 

  

  07/24/14 

  

 54,500
(9) 6,048,955
  08/15/14 642
(14) 71,256
 

  

  07/23/15 11,654
(15) 1,293,477
 

  

  07/23/15 

  

 78,660
(16) 8,730,473
  08/14/15 852
(14) 94,563
 

  

  07/21/16 

  

 18,773
(17) 2,083,615
  07/21/16 

  

 38,302
(18) 4,251,139

Outstanding Stock Awards
(1)Based on the performance goals achieved as of July 31, 2014, these RSUs vested as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2014 and as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2016.
Name
(2)Based on the TSR goals achieved as of July 31, 2014, these RSUs vested as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2014 and as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2016.
(3)Grant
Date​
Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 50% of the shares on July 1, 2015 and will vest as to 50% of the shares on July 1, 2017.
(4)Based on the performance goals achieved as of July 31, 2015, these RSUs vested as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2015 and will vest as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2017.
(5)Based on the TSR goals achieved as of July 31, 2015, these RSUs vested as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2015 and will vest as to 50% of the shares on September 1, 2017.
(6)Based on the performance goals achieved as of July 31, 2016, these RSUs vested on September 1, 2016.
(7)Based on the TSR goals achieved as of July 31, 2016, these RSUs vested on September 1, 2016.
(8)Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 33 1/3 % of the shares on each of July 1, 2015 and July 1, 2016 and will vest as to 33 1/3% of the shares on July 1, 2017.
(9)Number of shares based on achievementShares
or Units of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2017 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portionStock
That Have Not
Vested
(#)​
Market Value of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2017.


Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested
($)​
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Number of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
(#)​
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Market or
Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
($)​
(10)Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 33 1/3 % of the shares on July 1, 2016 and will vest as to 33 1/3% of the shares on each of July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018 and be issued on the date that is one year following each vesting date.
Brad D. Smith07/23/1595,814(1)19,569,051
(11)Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2018 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2018 and be issued on September 1, 2019.
07/21/1611,999(2)2,450,676
(12)Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one-year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 33 1/3% of the shares on each of July 1, 2017, July 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019 and be issued on the date that is one year following each vesting date.
07/21/16148,000(3)30,227,520
(13)Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2019 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2019 and be issued on September 1, 2020.
07/20/1717,332(4)3,539,888
(14)Represents Intuit matching grants of RSUs under the MSPP, which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
07/20/17106,000(5)21,649,440
(15)Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 33 1/3 % of the shares on July 1, 2016 and will vest as to 33 1/3% of the shares on each of July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018.
08/11/172,017(6)411,952
(16)Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2018 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2018.
07/26/1820,500(7)4,186,920
(17)Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one-year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 33 1/3 % of the shares on each of July 1, 2017, July 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019.
07/26/1841,000(8)8,373,840
(18)Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2019 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2019.Michelle M. Clatterbuck08/14/15275(6)56,166
07/21/16921(9)188,105
07/21/1611,276(10)2,303,010
08/12/16295(6)60,251
07/20/171,847(11)377,231
07/20/1711,236(12)2,294,841
08/11/17356(6)72,709
03/15/1811,240(13)2,295,658
07/26/186,923(14)1,413,954
07/26/1813,783(15)2,815,040
Laura A. Fennell07/23/1536,461(16)(18)7,446,795
08/14/15658(6)(19)134,390
07/21/162,944(9)(20)601,283
07/21/1635,625(10)(21)7,276,050
08/12/16915(6)(22)186,880
07/20/176,772(23)(24)1,383,113
07/20/1741,055(12)(25)8,385,073
08/11/17572(6)(26)116,825
07/26/186,923(17)1,413,954
07/26/1813,783(15)2,815,040
Sasan K. Goodarzi07/23/1556,582(16)11,556,308
07/21/166,258(9)1,278,134
07/21/1676,604(10)15,645,601
07/20/179,850(23)2,011,764
07/20/1759,926(12)12,239,286
07/26/1812,693(14)2,592,418
07/26/1825,270(15)5,161,145
H. Tayloe Stansbury07/23/1537,721(16)7,704,137
08/14/15818(6)167,068
07/21/164,417(9)902,128
07/21/1654,072(10)11,043,665
08/12/16936(6)191,169
07/20/176,772(23)1,383,113
07/20/1741,198(12)8,414,280
08/11/17622(6)127,037
07/26/186,923(14)1,413,954
07/26/1813,783(15)2,815,040
R. Neil Williams
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2018 Year-End |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement61

(1)
Based on the performance goals achieved as of July 31, 2018, these RSUs vested on September 1, 2018 and will be issued on September 1, 2019.
(2)
Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 3313% of the shares on each July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018, and will vest as to 3313% of the shares on July 1, 2019 and will be issued on the date that is one year following each vesting date.
(3)
Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2019 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2019 and will be issued on September 1, 2020.
(4)
Because the performance goal of  $800 million in GAAP operating income was achieved, these RSUs vested as to 3313% of the shares on July 1, 2018, and will vest as to 3313% of the shares on each of July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 and will be issued on the date that is one year following each vesting date.
(5)
Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2020 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2020 and will be issued on September 1, 2021.
(6)
Represents Intuit matching grants of RSUs under the MSPP, which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(7)
Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one-year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 25% of the shares on July 1, 2019, and 6.25% each quarter thereafter and will be issued on the date that is one year following each vesting date.
(8)
Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2021 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2021 and will be issued on September 1, 2022.
(9)
Because the specified performance goals were achieved, these RSUs vested as to 3313% of the shares on each of July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018, and will vest as to 3313% of the shares on July 1, 2019.
(10)
Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2019 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2019.
(11)
These RSUs vested as to 3313% of the shares on July 1, 2018, and will vest as to 3313% of the shares on each of July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020.
(12)
Number of shares based on achievement of maximum goals. Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2020 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2020.
(13)
Promotion Grant which vests as to 3313% of the shares on each of March 1, 2019, March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021.
(14)
Assuming Intuit’s achievement of a one-year operating income performance goal, these RSUs will vest as to 25% of the shares on July 1, 2019 and 6.25% each quarter thereafter.
(15)
Depending upon Intuit’s TSR for the three-year period ending July 31, 2021 compared to a pre-established peer group, the earned portion of these RSUs will vest on September 1, 2021.
(16)
Based on the performance goals achieved as of July 31, 2018, these RSUs vested on September 1, 2018.
(17)
These RSUs will vest as to 12.5% of the shares on December 31, 2018, and 6.25% of the shares quarterly through July 1, 2022.
(18)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 1,260 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(19)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 27 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(20)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 62 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(21)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 423 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(22)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 21 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(23)
Because the performance goal of  $800 million in GAAP operating income was achieved, these RSUs vested as to 3313% of the shares on July 1, 2018, and will vest as to 3313% of the shares on each of July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020.
(24)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 71 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(25)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 143 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
(26)
Because Ms. Fennell is retirement eligible for purposes of this award, in December 2017, 4 additional shares were vested in order to cover required employment taxes (and income taxes related to such vesting).
62INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2018 Year-End

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
During Fiscal Year
20162018
The following table shows information about stock option exercises and vesting of RSUs for each of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2016,2018, including the value realized upon exercise or vesting, but excluding RSUsvesting. The table excludes deferred stock units purchased by the Named Executive Officers under the MSPP. The MSPP, which is described in greater detail on page 59.in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.

Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)​
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)​
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)​
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)​
Brad D. Smith110,49611,447,979171,80826,285,029
Michelle M. Clatterbuck36,1172,083,1763,474689,104
Laura A. Fennell35,1445,611,582
Sasan K. Goodarzi90,0008,320,04350,9028,284,503
H. Tayloe Stansbury74,6803,745,27443,9246,962,205
R. Neil Williams279,67719,128,85735,0204,964,341
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
 
Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
 
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
Brad D. Smith 200,000
 14,025,864
 139,233
 13,004,690
R. Neil Williams 
 
 37,152
 3,474,812
Sasan K. Goodarzi 
 
 29,662
 2,857,801
H. Tayloe Stansbury 28,275
 731,352
 21,346
 2,084,600
Daniel A. Wernikoff 
 
 24,390
 2,425,667
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2018 |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement63



Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
for Fiscal Year
20162018
The following table shows the non-qualified deferred compensation activity for each of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2018. The NQDCP and MSPP are described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.
NamePlan​Aggregate Balance
at July 31, 2017
($)​
Executive
Contributions
in Fiscal 2018
($)(1)
Aggregate Earnings
in Fiscal 2018
($)(2)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/​
Distributions
in Fiscal 2018
($)​
Aggregate Balance
at July 31, 2018
($)​
Brad D. SmithNQDCP9,022,3851,102,500953,01311,077,898(3)
MSPP275,522136,430411,952
Total9,022,3851,378,0221,089,44311,489,850
Michelle M. ClatterbuckNQDCP
MSPP120,60848,62962,367(42,478)189,126
Total120,60848,62962,367(42,478)189,126
Laura A. FennellNQDCP
MSPP323,40478,681147,808(101,178)448,715
Total323,40478,681147,808(101,178)448,715
Sasan K. GoodarziNQDCP3,468,553615,000287,5474,371,100(3)
MSPP
Total3,468,553615,000287,5474,371,100
H. Tayloe StansburyNQDCP
MSPP240,66684,965159,643485,274
Total240,66684,965159,643485,274
R. Neil WilliamsNQDCP
MSPP154,773293(155,066)
Total154,773293(155,066)
(1)
Amounts shown in this column for the NQDCP are included in the “Salary” or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the “Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table.” Amounts shown in this column for the MSPP were contributed from amounts earned under Intuit’s SEIP or IPI, as applicable, for fiscal 2017, which were paid in August 2017.
(2)
None of the amounts shown in this column are included in the “Fiscal Year 2018 Summary Compensation Table” because they are not preferential or above market.
(3)
The following amounts contributed to the NQDCP by the executive have also been reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation for fiscal 2018 or a prior fiscal year: Mr. Smith, $7,314,775 and Mr. Goodarzi, $2,880,000. The information in this footnote is provided to clarify the extent to which amounts payable as deferred compensation represent compensation reported in our prior proxy statements, rather than additional currently earned compensation.
642016INTUIT. The 2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“NQDCP”) is described below the table and the MSPP is described on page 59.for Fiscal Year 2018


Name Plan 
Aggregate
Balance at
July 31, 2015
($)
 
Executive
Contributions
in Fiscal 2016
($)(1)
 
Aggregate
Earnings in
Fiscal 2016
($)(2)
 
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
in Fiscal 2016($)
 
Aggregate
Balance at
July 31, 2016
($)
 
Brad D. Smith NQDCP 6,132,680
 728,250
 110,836
 
 6,971,766
(3)
  MSPP 
 
 
 
 
 
  Total 6,132,680
 728,250
 110,836
 
 6,971,766
 
              
R. Neil Williams NQDCP 
 
 
 
 
 
  MSPP 319,214
 
 10,813
 (96,060) 233,967
 
  Total 319,214
 
 10,813
 (96,060) 233,967
 
              
Sasan K. Goodarzi NQDCP 1,766,122
 602,000
 91,064
 
 2,459,186
(3)
  MSPP 
 
 
 
 
 
  Total 1,766,122
 602,000
 91,064
 
 2,459,186
 
              
H. Tayloe Stansbury NQDCP 
 
 
 
 
 
  MSPP 158,338
 86,397
 7,602
 (89,515) 162,822
 
  Total 158,338
 86,397
 7,602
 (89,515) 162,822
 
              
Daniel A. Wernikoff NQDCP 
 
 
 
 
 
  MSPP 150,722
 89,988
 7,762
 (82,653) 165,819
 
  Total 150,722
 89,988
 7,762
 (82,653) 165,819
 

(1)
Amounts shown in this column for the NQDCP are included in the “Salary” column of the “Fiscal Year 2016 Summary Compensation Table” on page 63. Amounts shown in this column for the MSPP were contributed from amounts earned under Intuit’s SEIP for fiscal 2015, which were paid in August 2015.
(2)None of the amounts shown in this column are included in the “Summary Compensation Table” because they are not preferential or above market.
(3)
The following amounts contributed to the NQDCP by the executive, and in certain cases by Intuit, have also been reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation for fiscal 2016 or a prior fiscal year: Mr. Smith, $5,049,775 and Mr. Goodarzi, $1,515,000.
In 2007, we adopted the NQDCP, which became effective January 1, 2008. We adopted the NQDCP to meet the requirements of the new restrictions on deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The NQDCP was designed to generally track the provisions of our 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2005, and the original Executive Deferred Compensation Plan that became effective March 15, 2002. All deferrals for compensation that would otherwise be payable on or after January 1, 2008 and employer contributions made on or after January 1, 2008 are credited to participants under the new NQDCP. No new deferrals or contributions will be made to the 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan or the original plan. The NQDCP and the 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan provide that executives who meet minimum compensation requirements are eligible to defer up to 75% of their salaries and up to 75% of their bonuses. We have agreed to credit the participants’ contributions with earnings that reflect the performance of certain independent investment funds. We do not guarantee above market interest on account balances. We may also make discretionary employer contributions to participant accounts in certain circumstances. The timing, amounts and vesting schedules of employer contributions are at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee or its delegate. The benefits under this plan are unsecured and are general assets of Intuit. Participants are generally eligible to receive payment of

their vested benefit at the end of their elected deferral period or after termination of their employment with Intuit for any reason or at a later date to comply with the restrictions of Section 409A. Participants may elect to receive their payments in a lump sum or installments. Discretionary company contributions and the related earnings vest completely upon the participant’s disability, death or a change in control of Intuit.
Potential Payments Upon Termination
of Employment or Change in Control
Described below are the individual arrangements Intuit has entered into with each of our Named Executive Officers and the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided under these arrangements, assuming hypothetically that the executive’s employment terminated under certain circumstances as of July 31, 2016,2018, and using the closing price of our common stock on July 31, 2016,2018, the last trading day of fiscal year 2016 ($110.992018 ($204.24 per share).
As a general matter, certainCertain benefits that are includedshown in the tables below are provided to all recipients of Intuit equity awards, not solely to Named Executive Officers. For example, Intuit’s stock options and service- and performance-based RSUs (including matching RSUs under the MSPP) generally provide for 100% acceleration of vesting upon termination due to death or disability. Also, Intuit’s service- and performance-basedservice-based RSUs (including matching RSUs under the MSPP) generally provide for pro rata accelerated vesting upon a recipient’s involuntary termination within one year following a change in control, and Intuit’s stock options and service- and performance-based RSUs (including matching RSUs under the MSPP) generally provide for pro rata accelerated vesting upon a recipient’s retirement. Performance-based RSUs generally provide for pro rata accelerated vesting on an involuntary termination or upon a recipient’s retirement as set forthbased on actual performance for any completed performance period and target performance for any incomplete performance period. In addition, performance-based RSUs generally provide for accelerated vesting on a change in the plan and applicable award documents.control based on actual performance. None of the Named Executive Officers other than Ms. Fennell would have been eligible for retirement, for purposes of such stock option and RSU vesting acceleration, or for any other termination-related benefits, had they been terminated as of July 31, 2016.2018.
Performance-based RSUs granted to Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents under Intuit’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan generally provide for pro rata accelerated vesting upon a recipient’s involuntary termination, as set forth in the plan and applicable award documents.
Intuit does not provide for any special severance payments or acceleration of equity upon a Named Executive Officer’s termination for cause or resignation without good reason. Under the NQDCP, participants in the plan will be eligible to receive their vested benefits under the plan upon termination of employment for any reason, and they will be eligible to receive discretionary company contributions and the related earnings upon the participant’s disability, death or a change in control of Intuit, as described above under “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2018.”
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement201665.”

Brad D. Smith
On October 1, 2007, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Smith, which superseded Mr. Smith’s prior September 6, 2005 employment agreement and provided that Mr. Smithhe would become the President and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, effective January 1, 2008. On December 1, 2008, Intuit amended Mr. Smith’s employment agreement in order to satisfy the technical documentary requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A”).Code.
Intuit can terminate Mr. Smith’s employment upon the written recommendation of the Board, and Mr. Smith can terminate his employment agreement at any time upon written notice to the Board. Intuit may terminate Mr. Smith’s employment upon the written recommendation of the Board. Under the circumstances described below, Mr. Smith is entitled to receive severance benefits subject to his execution of a valid and binding release agreement.
If Intuit terminates Mr. Smith other than for “Cause” (which includes gross negligence, willful misconduct, fraud and certain criminal convictions) or if Mr. Smith terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (which includes relocation or a reduction in duties, title or compensation), Mr. Smith ishe will be entitled to a single lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months of his then-current salary and 100% of his then-current target bonus.bonus, subject to his execution of a valid and binding release agreement.

The estimated payments or benefits whichthat would have been paid to Mr. Smith in a hypothetical termination on July 31, 2018 are as follows:
Brad D. Smith
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
Termination by Intuit Without
Cause or by Mr. Smith for
Good Reason
($)​
Termination
Without Cause
After CIC
($)​
CIC
(Continued
Employment)
($)​
Death or
Disability
($)​
Total Cash Severance2,750,0002,750,000
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance2,750,0002,750,000
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options12,849,088
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units36,875,81759,451,47359,324,70071,299,381
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives36,875,81759,451,47359,324,70084,148,469
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity39,625,81762,201,47359,324,70084,148,469
66INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

Michelle M. Clatterbuck
On January 19, 2018, Intuit and Ms. Clatterbuck entered into a promotion letter agreement in connection with Ms. Clatterbuck’s February 1, 2018 promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
The estimated payments or benefits that would have been paid to Ms. Clatterbuck in a hypothetical termination on July 31, 2018 are as follows:
Michelle M. Clatterbuck
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
Termination by Intuit Without
Cause or by Ms. Clatterbuck
for Good Reason
($)​
Termination
Without Cause
After CIC
($)​
CIC (Continued
Employment)
($)​
Death or
Disability
($)​
Total Cash Severance
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options1,164,863
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units1,426,1643,909,3023,536,63210,169,316
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives1,426,1643,909,3023,536,63211,334,179
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity1,426,1643,909,3023,536,63211,334,179
Laura A. Fennell
On March 31, 2004, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Fennell. The estimated payments or benefits that would have been paid to Ms. Fennell in a hypothetical termination on July 31, 2018 are as follows:
Laura A. Fennell
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
Termination by Intuit
Without Cause or
by Ms. Fennell for
Good Reason
($)​
Termination
Without Cause
After CIC
($)​
CIC
(Continued
Employment)
($)​
Death or
Disability
($)​
Retirement
($)​
Total Cash Severance
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options4,035,578
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units12,560,61519,972,91519,685,05224,035,05712,558,115
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives12,560,61519,972,91519,685,05228,070,63512,558,115
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity12,560,61519,972,91519,685,05228,070,63512,558,115
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement67

Sasan K. Goodarzi
On June 27, 2011, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Goodarzi. On November 15, 2018, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Goodarzi, which supersedes Mr. Goodarzi’s prior employment agreement and provided that he would become the eventPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Intuit, effective January 1, 2019.
Under the agreement, Mr. Goodarzi’s employment is at will and can be terminated at any time by Intuit or by Mr. Goodarzi.
If Intuit terminates Mr. Goodarzi other than for “Cause” (which includes gross negligence, willful misconduct, fraud and certain criminal convictions) or if Mr. Goodarzi terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (which includes relocation or a reduction in duties, title or compensation), he will be entitled to a single lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months of his then-current salary and 100% of his then-current target bonus, subject to his execution of a valid and binding release agreement.
The estimated payments or benefits that would have been paid to Mr. Goodarzi in a hypothetical termination on July 31, 2016 under the specified circumstances2018 (prior to his having entered into his new employment agreement) are as follows:
Sasan K. Goodarzi
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
Termination by Intuit Without
Cause or by Mr. Goodarzi for
Good Reason
($)​
Termination
Without Cause
After CIC
($)​
CIC
(Continued
Employment)
($)​
Death or
Disability
($)​
Total Cash Severance
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options6,942,967
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units20,763,50933,023,86033,023,86040,250,922
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives20,763,50933,023,86033,023,86047,193,889
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity20,763,50933,023,86033,023,86047,193,889
H. Tayloe Stansbury

On April 27, 2009, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Stansbury. The estimated payments or benefits that would have been paid to Mr. Stansbury in a hypothetical termination on July 31, 2018 are as follows:
H. Tayloe Stansbury
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
Termination by Intuit Without
Cause or by Mr. Stansbury for
Good Reason
($)​
Termination
Without Cause
After CIC
($)​
CIC
(Continued
Employment)
($)​
Death or
Disability
($)​
Total Cash Severance
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options4,826,068
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units14,145,95222,989,19622,660,56627,011,519
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives14,145,95222,989,19622,660,56631,837,587
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity14,145,95222,989,19622,660,56631,837,587
Brad D. Smith
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
 
Termination
Without
Cause or by
Mr. Smith for
Good Reason ($)
 
Termination
Without
Cause
After CIC ($)
 
Death or
Disability ($)
Total Cash Severance 2,500,000
 2,500,000
 
Total Benefits and Perquisites 
 
 
Total Severance 2,500,000
 2,500,000
 
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options 
 3,127,286
 5,687,189
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units 34,478,498
 40,594,083
 60,908,629
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives 34,478,498
 43,721,369
 66,595,818
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity 36,978,498
 46,221,369
 66,595,818
68INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

R. Neil Williams
On November 2, 2007, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Williams, which provided that Mr. Williamshe would become Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Intuit, effective January 7, 2008. On December 1, 2008, Intuit amended Mr. Williams’ employment agreement in order to satisfy the technical documentary requirements of Section 409A.409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
If Intuit terminates Mr. Williams retired from Intuit effective February 28, 2018, and received the following benefits:
R. Neil Williams
Retirement benefits
Retirement
($)​
Total Cash Severance
Total Benefits and Perquisites
Total Severance
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options329,248
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units9,888,624
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives10,217,872
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity10,217,872
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement69

Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table contains information about securities authorized for issuance under all of Intuit’s equity compensation plans as of July 31, 2018.
Plan Category
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(#)(a)(1)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
($)(b)(1)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))
(#)(c)(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders12,457,914(2)120.3425,181,960(5)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders79,280(3)5.03
Total12,537,194(4)120.2625,181,960
(1)
RSUs have been excluded for purposes of computing weighted average exercise prices.
(2)
Represents 5.154 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 7.383 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards, which are settled for shares of Intuit common stock on a one-for-one basis.
(3)
Represents 0.004 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 0.076 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards that were assumed in connection with corporate acquisitions.
(4)
Represents 5.158 million shares issuable upon exercise of options and 7.459 million shares issuable upon vesting of RSU awards.
(5)
Represents 22.791 million shares available for issuance under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 2.391 million shares available for issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For a description of the material terms of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, please see footnote 11 to our financial statements filed with our Form 10-K for fiscal 2018.
70INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Executive Compensation Tables|Equity Compensation Plan Information

CEO Pay Ratio
Pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, presented below is the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Smith to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding the CEO).
We identified our median employee from all full-time, part-time, and seasonal workers in the U.S., Canada, India and the United Kingdom who were included as employees on our payroll records as of a determination date of May 31, 2018, based on gross wages paid during the twelve-month period ending on that date. For permanent employees hired during the twelve-month period, compensation was annualized to reflect a full year of wages. Compensation for international employees was converted to U.S. dollar equivalents using exchange rates as of the determination date. As permitted by SEC rules, we excluded approximately 124 employees located in Australia, 39 employees located in Brazil, 37 employees located in France, 1 employee located in Germany, 146 employees located in Israel, and 34 employees located in Singapore, who in the aggregate represented approximately 4% of our 9,381 employees, resulting in an employee population of 9,000.
The fiscal 2018 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for Mr. Smith was $21,071,738, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement. The fiscal 2018 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our median employee was $147,184. The ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 2018 is 143 to 1.
The ratio presented above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u). The SEC’s rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other thancompanies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own ratios.
CEO Pay Ratio |Executive Compensation Tables|INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement71

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Proposal No. 3 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Intuit’s Audit and Risk Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of Intuit’s consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for “Cause” (which includes gross negligence, willful misconduct, fraudthe fiscal year ending July 31, 2019. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking stockholders to ratify this selection. If the selection of Ernst & Young is not ratified, the Audit and certain criminal convictions) orRisk Committee will consider whether it should select another independent registered public accounting firm.
Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to attend the Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if Mr. Williams terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (which includes relocation or a reduction in duties, title or compensation), Mr. Williamsthey wish, and will be entitledavailable to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
The Audit and Risk Committee’s Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
It is the policy of the Audit and Risk Committee to pre-approve, near the beginning of each fiscal year, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm during that fiscal year. The Audit and Risk Committee authorizes specific projects within categories of services, subject to a single lump sum severance payment equalbudget for each project. The Audit and Risk Committee also may pre-approve particular services during the fiscal year on a case-by-case basis. The independent registered public accounting firm and management periodically report to 12 monthsthe Audit and Risk Committee the actual fees incurred versus the pre-approved budget.
Fees Paid to Ernst & Young
The following table shows fees that we paid (or accrued) for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017:
Fee CategoryFiscal 2018​Fiscal 2017​
Audit Fees$5,023,000$4,591,000
Audit-Related Fees45,00036,000
Tax Fees15,000
All Other Fees50,000
Total Fees$5,083,000$4,677,000
72INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Proposal No. 3 Ratification of his then-current salarySelection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Fees
These fees consist of amounts for professional services rendered in connection with the integrated audit of our financial statements and 100%internal control over financial reporting, review of his then-current target bonus provided he signsthe interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, and statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including agreed-upon audit procedures that focus on a releasespecific business process. For fiscal 2018 and waiverfiscal 2017, audit-related fees consisted of claims.fees for agreed-upon procedures for our Consumer Tax business.
The estimated payments or benefits which would have beenTax Fees
Tax fees paid to Mr. WilliamsErnst & Young for fiscal 2018 were for indirect tax benchmarking services. Intuit paid no tax fees to Ernst & Young for fiscal 2017.
All Other Fees
Intuit paid no other fees to Ernst & Young for fiscal 2018. Other fees paid to Ernst & Young for fiscal 2017 were for permitted advisory services.
For more information about Ernst & Young, please see the “Audit and Risk Committee Report.”
[MISSING IMAGE: ig_bluecheck.gif]
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP.
Proposal No. 3 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement73

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Audit and Risk Committee Report
We, the members of the Audit and Risk Committee, assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by overseeing Intuit’s accounting and financial reporting processes; the qualifications, independence and performance of Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm; the performance of Intuit’s internal audit department; and Intuit’s internal controls. We also are responsible for selecting, evaluating and setting the compensation of Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm. Intuit’s management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Intuit’s financial statements, including setting accounting and financial reporting principles and designing Intuit’s system of internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit and Risk Committee has selected the independent registered public accounting firm of Ernst & Young as Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm, with responsibility for performing an independent audit of Intuit’s consolidated financial statements and for expressing opinions on the conformity of Intuit’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit and Risk Committee oversees the processes, although members of the Audit and Risk Committee are not engaged in the eventpractice of his termination on auditing or accounting.
During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 under2018, the specified circumstances areAudit and Risk Committee carried out the duties and responsibilities as follows:outlined in its charter, including the following specific actions:

Reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm Intuit’s quarterly earnings announcements, consolidated financial statements, and related periodic reports filed with the SEC;
R. Neil Williams
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
 
Termination
Without
Cause or by
Mr. Williams for
Good Reason ($)
 
Termination
Without
Cause
After CIC ($)
 
Death or
Disability ($)
Total Cash Severance 1,305,000
 1,305,000
 
Total Benefits and Perquisites 
 
 
Total Severance 1,305,000
 1,305,000
 
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options 
 
 861,900
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units 8,773,583
 10,721,228
 18,987,980
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives 8,773,583
 10,721,228
 19,849,880
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity 10,078,583
 12,026,228
 19,849,880

Sasan K. GoodarziReviewed with management its assessment of the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting;

Reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm and management the audit scope and plan;

Reviewed the internal audit plan with the internal auditor; and
On June 27, 2011, Intuit entered into
Met in periodic executive sessions with each of the independent registered public accounting firm, representatives of management, and the internal auditor.
We reviewed and discussed with management and representatives of Ernst & Young the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, and Ernst & Young’s opinion on the audited financial statements and the effectiveness of Intuit’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young represented that its presentations included the matters required to be discussed with the Audit and Risk Committee by applicable auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
The Audit and Risk Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm, both in fact and appearance. Consistent with its charter, the Audit and Risk Committee has made an employment agreementevaluation and concluded that Ernst & Young is qualified and independent. In addition, we have received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with Mr. Goodarzi. The estimated payments or benefits which would have been paidus concerning independence and discussed with Ernst & Young the firm’s independence.
Based on the reports, discussions and review described in this report, and subject to Mr. Goodarzithe limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to in this report and in the eventcharter, we recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Intuit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2018. We also selected Ernst & Young as Intuit’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019.
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Dennis D. Powell (Chair)
Richard L. Dalzell
Thomas Szkutak
Raul Vazquez
74INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Audit and Risk Committee Report

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
Stock Ownership Information
Security Ownership Table
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following table shows shares of his termination on JulyIntuit’s common stock that we believe are owned as of October 31, 2016 under the specified circumstances are as follows:2018 by:
Each Named Executive Officer;

Each director and nominee;
All current directors and executive officers as a group; and

Each stockholder beneficially owning more than 5% of our common stock.

Sasan K. Goodarzi
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
 
Termination
Without
Cause or by
Mr. Goodarzi for
Good Reason ($)
 
Termination
Without
Cause
After CIC ($)
 
Death or
Disability ($)
Total Cash Severance 
 
 
Total Benefits and Perquisites 
 
 
Total Severance 
 
 
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options 
 
 909,926
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units 9,068,636
 10,873,329
 21,390,432
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives 9,068,636
 10,873,329
 22,300,358
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity 9,068,636
 10,873,329
 22,300,358
H. Tayloe Stansbury
On April 27, 2009, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Stansbury. The estimated payments or benefits which would have been paid to Mr. StansburyUnless indicated in the event of his termination on July 31, 2016 under the specified circumstances are as follows:
H. Tayloe Stansbury
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
 Termination
Without
Cause or by
Mr. Stansbury for
Good Reason ($)
 Termination
Without
Cause
After CIC ($)
 Death or
Disability ($)
Total Cash Severance 
 
 
Total Benefits and Perquisites 
 
 
Total Severance 
 
 
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options 
 
 797,713
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units 6,514,176
 8,018,316
 15,630,184
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives 6,514,176
 8,018,316
 16,427,897
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity 6,514,176
 8,018,316
 16,427,897

Daniel A. Wernikoff
On February 13, 2003, Intuit entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Wernikoff. The estimated payments or benefits which would have been paidnotes, each stockholder has sole voting and investment power for all shares shown, subject to Mr. Wernikoffcommunity property laws that may apply to create shared voting and investment power. Except where a different address appears in the eventfootnotes, the address of his terminationeach beneficial owner is c/o Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mountain View, California 94039-7850.
We calculated the “Percent of Class” based on 259,570,224 shares of common stock outstanding on October 31, 2018. In accordance with SEC regulations, we also include (1) shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2018, and (2) shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs that are vested but unreleased, or will become vested and settled within 60 days of October 31, 2018. Those shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such option or RSU for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
(#)​
Percent of Class
(%)​
Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers:
Scott D. Cook(1)10,072,0333.88%
Brad D. Smith(2)1,052,550*
Michelle M. Clatterbuck(3)23,192*
Laura A. Fennell(4)228,840*
Sasan K. Goodarzi(5)406,967*
H. Tayloe Stansbury(6)14,909*
R. Neil Williams3,786*
Eve Burton(7)8,054*
Richard L. Dalzell(8)12,311*
Deborah Liu(9)1,543*
Suzanne Nora Johnson(10)35,828*
Dennis D. Powell(11)15,537*
Thomas Szkutak(12)438*
Raul Vazquez(13)4,909*
Jeff Weiner(14)24,380*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (18 people)(15)12,006,9164.60%
Other 5% Stockholders:
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(16)26,562,59810.23%
The Vanguard Group(17)17,346,7146.68%
BlackRock, Inc.(18)16,924,4686.52%
Capital World Investors(19)14,852,3375.72%
Security Ownership Table |Stock Ownership Information |INTUIT2019 Proxy StatementJuly 31, 201675 under the specified circumstances are as follows:

*
Indicates ownership of 1% or less.
(1)
Represents 9,920,032 shares held by trusts of which Mr. Cook is a trustee and 152,001 shares held by a trust Mr. Cook has investment control over, but of which he is not a trustee.
(2)
Includes 751,930 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Smith.
(3)
Includes 20,844 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Clatterbuck.
(4)
Includes 184,674 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Fennell.
(5)
Includes 369,130 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Goodarzi.
(6)
Includes 13,019 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Stansbury.
(7)
Represents 8,054 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Burton.
(8)
Represents 12,311 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Dalzell.
(9)
Represents 1,543 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Liu.
(10)
Includes 11,454 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Ms. Nora Johnson.
(11)
Includes 11,454 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Powell.
(12)
Represents 438 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Szkutak.
(13)
Represents 4,909 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Vazquez.
(14)
Includes 14,363 shares issuable upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by Mr. Weiner.
(15)
Includes 1,494,994 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units. Represents shares and options held by the 15 individuals in the table, plus an additional 10,768 outstanding shares and 90,871 shares issuable upon exercise of options and upon settlement of vested restricted stock units held by other executive officers.
(16)
Ownership information for T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2018 by Price Associates, reporting ownership as of February 28, 2018. Price Associates reported sole voting power as to 9,390,748 shares and sole dispositive power as to 26,562,598 shares. The address of Price Associates is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
(17)
Ownership information for The Vanguard Group is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018 by Vanguard, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2017. Vanguard reported sole voting power as to 348,750 shares, shared voting power over 56,510 shares, sole dispositive power as to 16,952,868 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 393,846 shares. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(18)
Ownership information for BlackRock, Inc. is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2018 by BlackRock, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2017. BlackRock reported sole voting power as to 14,544,811 shares and sole dispositive power as to 16,924,468 shares. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(19)
Ownership information for Capital World Investors is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018 by Capital World, reporting ownership as of December 31, 2017. Capital World reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 14,852,337 shares. The address of Capital World is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires Intuit’s directors, executive officers, and greater-than-10% stockholders to file forms with the SEC to report their ownership of Intuit shares and any changes in ownership. Anyone required to file forms with the SEC must also send copies of the forms to Intuit. We have reviewed all forms provided to us. Based on that review and on written information given to us by our executive officers and directors, we believe that all of our directors and executive officers filed the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a) during fiscal 2018.
Daniel A. Wernikoff
Incremental Amounts Payable
Upon Termination Event
 
Termination
Without
Cause or by
Mr. Wernikoff for
Good Reason ($)
 
Termination
Without
Cause
After CIC ($)
 
Death or
Disability ($)
Total Cash Severance 
 
 
Total Benefits and Perquisites 
 
 
Total Severance 
 
 
Gain on Accelerated Stock Options 
 
 877,749
Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units 8,948,862
 10,893,025
 21,356,883
Total Value of Accelerated Long-Term Incentives 8,948,862
 10,893,025
 22,234,632
Total Severance, Benefits & Accelerated Equity 8,948,862
 10,893,025
 22,234,632

76INTUIT2019 Proxy Statement |Stock Ownership Information |Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance



[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-pgtop.jpg]
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, VOTING AND PROXIES
Information About the Meeting, Voting and Proxies
Date, Time and Place of Meeting
We are holding the Meeting on Thursday, January 19, 201717, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time at our offices at 2750 Coast Avenue, Building 6, Mountain View, California 94043. We have first released this proxy statement to Intuit stockholders beginning on November 23, 2016.21, 2018.
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
We are pleased to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing individual printed copies of those materials to each stockholder.materials. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and cast your vote on the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability.online. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of the Meeting. We anticipate that
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability and would like a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed to stockholders on or about November 23, 2016.Availability.
Record Date, Outstanding Shares and Quorum
Only holders of record of Intuit common stock at the close of business on November 21, 201619, 2018 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Meeting. On the Record Date, we had approximately 256,668,630259,535,268 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. In order to have a quorum, a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on the Record Date must be present at the Meeting, either in person or by proxy. Abstention votesAbstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present“present” in determining whether we have a quorum. They will also be counted in determining the total number of shares entitled to vote on a proposal.
If by the date of the Meeting we do not receive proxies representing sufficient shares to constitute a quorum or to approve one or more of the proposals, the Chair of the Meeting, or the personsindividuals named as proxies, may propose one or more adjournments of the Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. The personsindividuals named as proxies would typically exercise their authority to vote in favor of adjournment.
For 10 days prior to the annual meeting,Meeting, a list of registered stockholders eligible to vote at the annual meetingMeeting will be available for review during our regular business hours at our headquartersoffices at 2700 Coast2600 Casey Avenue, Building 9, Mountain View, California 94043. If you would like to view the stockholder list, please call Intuit Investor Relations at (650) 944-3560 to schedule an appointment.
Voting and Revoking Proxies
The Board is soliciting proxies to vote your shares at the Meeting. All stockholders of record have three options for submitting their vote prior to the Meeting:
via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com (as described in the Notice of Internet Availability);
by phone (your Notice of Internet Availability provides information on how to access your proxy card, which contains instructions on how to vote by telephone); or
by requesting, completing and mailing in a paper proxy card, as outlined in the Notice of Internet Availability.
We encourage you to vote via the Internet.
If you sign and return your proxy card but do not give any instructions on how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted in favor of the election of each of the director nominees listed in Proposal 1 and in favor of Proposals 2, 3 and 4. As far as we know, no other matters will be presented at the Meeting. However, if any other matters of business are properly presented, the proxy holders named on the proxy card are authorized to vote the shares represented by proxies according to their judgment.
Whether you submit your proxy via the Internet, by phone or by mail, you may revoke it at any time before voting takes place at the Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares and you wish to revoke your proxy, you must deliver instructions to: Laura A. Fennell, Corporate Secretary, at Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850. You may also revoke a proxy by submitting a later-dated vote, in person at the Meeting or via the Internet, by phone or by mail. If a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder of your shares and you wish to revoke your proxy, you must contact the record holder of your shares directly.

Stockholder of Record or Beneficial Owner
Stockholder of Record (Record Holder)record (also known as a record holder).If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’sIntuit’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice of Internet Availability was sent directly to you by Intuit. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you also will also receive a proxy card.
Beneficial Ownerowner of Shares Heldshares held in Street Name.street name. If your shares are held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” The Notice of Internet Availability was forwarded to you by your nominee, which is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Meeting. You may receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from your nominee containing instructions that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Certain of these institutionsSome nominees offer Internet and telephone voting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you do not provide your nominee with specific voting instructions, your nominee may only vote on Proposal 23 (ratifying the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm). If your nominee does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on the other proposals, it will inform the Inspector of Elections that it does not have the authority to vote on this matter (a “broker non-vote”). If you wish to vote at the Meeting, you must bring to the Meeting a letter from the record holder confirming your beneficial ownership of the shares.
Information About the Meeting, Voting and Proxies  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement77

Required Vote
The table below shows the voting options, voting requirement, and effect of abstentions and Broker Non-Votes for each proposal to be presented at the Meeting.
ProposalVoting
Options
Vote Required to
Adopt the Proposal
Effect of
Abstentions
Effect of  “Broker
Non-Votes”(1)
1.
Election of directors
For, against, or abstain on each nomineeA nominee for director will be elected if the votes cast for such nominee exceed the votes cast against such nomineeNo effectNo effect
2.
Advisory vote to approve Intuit’s executive compensation (say-on-pay)
For, against, or abstainThe affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Meeting and voted for or against the proposalNo effectNo effect
3.
Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm
For, against, or abstainThe affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Meeting and voted for or against the proposalNo effect
Not applicable(1)
(1)
If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares, the nominee has discretionary authority to vote on Proposal No. 3, but not for either of the other proposals. See “Voting and Revoking Proxies” below.
Voting and Revoking Proxies
The Board is soliciting proxies to vote your shares at the Meeting. Please act as soon as possible to vote your shares, even if you plan to attend the Meeting. All stockholders of record have three options for submitting their vote prior to the Meeting:

online at www.proxyvote.com (as described in the Notice of Internet Availability);

by phone (your Notice of Internet Availability explains how to access your proxy card, which contains instructions on how to vote by telephone); or

by requesting, completing and mailing in a paper proxy card, as outlined in the Notice of Internet Availability.
We encourage you to vote via the Internet.
If your shares are held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must instruct your nominee how to vote the shares held in your account. If you do not provide voting instructions, your nominee may only vote on Proposal 3 (ratifying the selection of our independent registered public accountant). Without voting instructions regarding Proposals 1 and 2, your nominee will need to inform the Inspector of Elections that it does not have the authority to vote on those matters, resulting in a so-called “broker non-vote.”
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card but do not give any instructions on how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted in favor of the election of each of the director nominees listed in Proposal 1, and in favor of Proposals 2 and 3. As far as we know, no other matters will be presented at the Meeting. However, if any other matters of business are properly presented, the proxy holders named on your proxy card are authorized to vote your shares according to their judgment.
Whether you submit your proxy online, by phone or by mail, you may revoke it at any time before voting takes place at the Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares and you wish to revoke your proxy, you must deliver instructions to: Kerry J. McLean, Corporate Secretary, at Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California 94039-7850. You also may revoke a proxy by submitting a later-dated vote, whether in person at the Meeting, via the Internet, by phone or by mail. If a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder of your shares and you wish to revoke your proxy, you must contact the record holder of your shares directly.
78INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Information About the Meeting, Voting and Proxies

Soliciting Proxies
Intuit will pay all expenses of soliciting proxies to be voted at the Meeting. After the proxies are initially distributed, Intuit and/or its agents also may also solicit proxies by mail, electronic mail, telephone or in person. We have hired a proxy solicitation firm, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, to assist us in soliciting proxies. We will pay Innisfree a fee of  $10,000 plus their expenses, which we estimate will be approximately $3,500.$2,500. We will ask brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to prepare and send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to people or entities for whom they hold shares and to forward copies of the proxy materials to beneficial owners who request paper copies.
Voting Results
The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Meeting. The final voting results will be tallied by our Inspector of Elections and published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days of the Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to disclose preliminary voting results and then, within four business days after the final results are known, we will file an additional Form 8-K to disclose the final voting results.
Delivery of Voting Materials to Stockholders Sharing an Address
To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate materials to stockholders sharing the same address, we have adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) called “householding.” Under this procedure, certain stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy materials, as applicable, sent to stockholders until such time as one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to receive individual copies. This procedure will reduceHouseholding reduces duplicate mailings and savesaves printing costs and postage fees, as well as natural resources. If your shares are held in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee similarly may deliver only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy materials, as applicable, to multiple stockholders who share an address.
If you received a householded“householded” mailing this year, and you would like to have additional copies of our Notice of Internet Availability, of Proxy Materials, Annual Report on Form 10-K, and proxy materials, as applicable, mailed to you, please submit your request to Investor Relations, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California, 94039-7850, or call (650) 944-3560, and we will deliver these materials to you promptly upon such written or oral request.promptly. You may also contact us at thethis address or phone number above if you received multiple copies of the annual meetingproxy materials and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future. If you would like to opt out of  householding“householding” for future mailings, call (800) 542-1061 or send a written request to Investor Relations at the above address.
Annual Report on Form 10-K and Additional Materials
The Notice of 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 20162018 have been made available to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Meeting and who received the Notice of Internet Availability. The Annual Report on Form 10-K can also be viewed at http://investors.intuit.com/financial-information/annual-reports/default.aspx.​default.aspx.

Paper copiesYou can obtain a paper copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (excluding exhibits) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 may be obtained2018, without charge by writing to Investor Relations, Intuit Inc., P.O. Box 7850, Mail Stop 2700, Mountain View, California, 94039-7850, or by calling (650) 944-3560.
Information About the Meeting, Voting and Proxies  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement79

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for
the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Any stockholder who intends to present a proposal for inclusion in Intuit’s 20182020 proxy statement and form of proxy must submit the proposal, in writing, so that the Corporate Secretary receives it at our principal executive offices by the close of business on July 26, 2017.24, 2019. Such proposals also must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any other applicable SEC guidance relating to stockholder proposals.
Any stockholder who wishes to bringput a proposal or nominate a person for election toBoard nomination before the Board at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, that is not intended for inclusionwithout including such proposal in the Intuit’s 20182020 proxy statement, must provide written notice of the proposal or nomination to Intuit’s Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices, between the close of business on October 6, 20174, 2019 and the close of business on November 5, 2017.1, 2019. However, in the event that the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is to be held on a date that is more than 30 days before or 60 days after January 19, 201817, 2020 (the anniversary date of the Meeting) or if no Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held in the preceding year, then such notice must be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 105th day prior to the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and not later than the close of business on the later of the 75th day prior to the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is first made. In addition, our stockholders must comply with the procedural requirements in our bylaws.
In addition, ourOur bylaws provide that, under certain circumstances, a stockholder or group of stockholders may include director candidates that they have nominated in our proxy statement. These proxy access provisions permit a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, who have owned 3% or more of Intuit’s outstanding shares that are entitled to vote generally in the election of directors continuously for at least three years to submit director nominees (for the greater of 2two directors or up to 20% of our Board) for inclusion in our proxy materials, ifas long as the stockholder(s) provide timely written notice of such nomination and the stockholderstockholder(s) and nomineenominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws. Notice of director nominees must include the information required under our bylaws and must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices between the close of business on July 11, 20179, 2019 and the close of business on August 10, 2017,8, 2019, unless the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders has been changed by more than 30 days. In that case, such notice must be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 135th day prior to the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and not later than the close of business on the 105th day prior to the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is first made.
Our stockholders can find our bylaws on our website at http://investors.intuit.com/corporate-governance/conduct-and-guidelines/default.aspx. Our bylaws are alsoconduct-guidelines/​default.aspx or on file with the SEC. The chairmanChairman of the meetingMeeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any stockholder proposal or nomination if notice thereof is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with the bylaws. If a stockholder fails to meet these deadlines or fails to satisfy the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-4, as applicable (or, in some cases, even if the personsstockholder meets these deadlines and requirements), the individuals named as proxies will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority to vote on any such proposal or nomination as they determine appropriate if and when the matter is raised at the Meeting.



80INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Information About the Meeting, Voting and Proxies

APPENDIX
Appendix A
INTUIT INC.

Supplemental Information for the 20172019 Proxy Summary and Compensation Discussion and Analysis
in the Proxy Statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

TO MOST DIRECTLY COMPARABLE GAAP MEASURES
The 20172019 Proxy Summary (“Proxy Summary”) beginning on page 1 and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) beginning on page 41 of the proxy statement contain two non-GAAP financial measures  non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS). The table on page A-3 of this proxy statement reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures in the Proxy Summary and CD&A to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).
About Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect a comprehensive system of accounting, differ from GAAP measures with the same names, and may differ from non-GAAP financial measures with the same or similar names that are used by other companies.
We compute non-GAAP financial measures using the same consistent method from quarter to quarter and year to year. We may consider whether other significant items that arise in the future should be excluded from our non-GAAP financial measures.
We exclude the following items from all of our non-GAAP financial measures:

Share-based compensation expense

Amortization of acquired technology

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges

Gains and losses on disposals of businesses and long-lived assets

Professional fees for business combinations

We also exclude the following items from non-GAAP net income and diluted net income per share:

Gains and losses on debt and equity securities and other investments

Income tax effects and adjustments

Discontinued operations

Appendix A  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy StatementA-1

We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding Intuit’s operating results, primarily because they exclude amounts that we do not consider part of ongoing operating results when planning and forecasting and when assessing the performance of the organization, our individual operating segments or our senior management. Segment managers are not held accountable for share-based compensation expense, amortization, or the other excluded items and, accordingly, we exclude these amounts from our measures of segment performance. We believe that our non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate the comparison by management and investors of results for current periods and guidance for future periods with results for past periods.

The following are descriptions of the items we exclude from our non-GAAP financial measures.

Share-based compensation expenses. These consist of non-cash expenses for stock options, restricted stock units and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. When considering the impact of equity awards, we place greater emphasis on overall stockholder dilution rather than the accounting charges associated with those awards.

Amortization of acquired technology and amortization of other acquired intangible assets. When we acquire an entity, we are required by GAAP to record the fair values of the intangible assets of the entity and amortize them over their useful lives. Amortization of acquired technology in cost of revenue includes amortization of software and other technology assets of

acquired entities. Amortization of other acquired intangible assets in operating expenses includes amortization of assets such as customer lists, covenants not to compete and trade names.
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment chargescharges.. We exclude from our non-GAAP financial measures non-cash charges to adjust the carrying valuevalues of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets to their estimated fair values.
Gains and losses on disposals of businesses and long-lived assets. We exclude from our non-GAAP financial measures gains and losses on disposals of businesses and long-lived assets because they are unrelated to our ongoing business operating results.
Professional fees for business combinations. We exclude from our non-GAAP financial measures the professional fees we incur to complete business combinations. These include investment banking, legal and accounting fees.
Gains and losses on debt and equity securities and other investments. We exclude from our non-GAAP financial measures gains and losses that we record when we sell or impair available-for-sale debt and equity securities and other investments.
Income tax effects and adjustmentsadjustments.. We use In fiscal 2017 and the first quarter of fiscal 2018 we used a long-term non-GAAP tax rate for evaluating operating results and for planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. This long-term non-GAAP tax rate excludesexcluded the income tax effects of the non-GAAP pre-tax adjustments described above assumes the federal research and experimentation credit is continuously in effect, and eliminates the effects of non-recurring and period specificperiod-specific items, which can vary in size and frequency. Based on our current long-term projections at that time, we are usingused a long-term non-GAAP tax rate of 34% which is33%. This rate was consistent with the average of our normalized fiscal year tax rate over a four yearfour-year period that includesincluded the past three fiscal years plus the current fiscal year forecast. We will evaluate this long-term
In the second quarter of our fiscal 2018, we revised our estimated annual non-GAAP tax rate on an annual basisto reflect the change in the U.S. federal statutory rate, due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and whenever any significant events occur which may materially affect this long-term rate. This long-termJobs Act (2017 Tax Act). The federal statutory rate change, to 21%, was effective January 1, 2018, and therefore, the change resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 26.9% for our fiscal year 2018. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we adjusted our non-GAAP tax rate could be subjectfrom 26.3% to change for various reasons including significant changes in26.2% based on continued analysis of the impacts from the 2017 Tax Act. Because of the transitional impact of the 2017 Tax Act provisions, the fiscal 2018 non-GAAP tax rate is based on our geographic earnings mix or fundamentalcurrent year results only, without reference to long-term forecasts. This non-GAAP tax law changes in major jurisdictions in which we operate.rate excludes the income tax effects of the non-GAAP pre-tax adjustments described above and eliminates the effects of the non-recurring and period-specific items. We have applied this tax rate to year-to-date pre-tax income, after the elimination of the effects of the non-GAAP adjustments described above.
Operating results and gains and losses on the sale of discontinued operations. From time to time, we sell or otherwise dispose of selected operations as we adjust our portfolio of businesses to meet our strategic goals. In accordance with GAAP, we segregate the operating results of discontinued operations, as well as gains and losses on the sale of these discontinued operations, from continuing operations on our GAAP statements of operations, but continue to include them in GAAP net income or loss and net income or loss per share. We exclude these amounts from our non-GAAP financial measures.
A-2INTUIT 2019 Proxy Statement | Appendix A



INTUIT INC.

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

TO MOST DIRECTLY COMPARABLE GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

(In millions, unaudited)Fiscal Year Ended
July 31, 2018​
Fiscal Year Ended
July 31, 2017​
GAAP operating income$   1,497$   1,395
Amortization of acquired technology1512
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets62
Professional fees for business combinations2
Loss on sale of long-lived assets79
Share-based compensation expense382326
Non-GAAP operating income$1,981$1,735
GAAP net income$1,211$971
Amortization of acquired technology1512
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets62
Professional fees for business combinations2
Loss on sale of long-lived assets79
Share-based compensation expense382326
Net loss on debt securities and other investments69
Other income from divested businesses(8)
2017 Tax Act43
Income tax effects and adjustments(271)(170)
Non-GAAP net income$1,465$1,150
GAAP diluted net income per share$4.64$3.72
Amortization of acquired technology0.060.05
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets0.020.01
Professional fees for business combinations0.01
Loss on sale of long-lived assets0.30
Share-based compensation expense1.461.25
Net loss on debt securities and other investments0.020.03
Other income from divested businesses(0.03)
2017 Tax Act0.17
Income tax effects and adjustments(1.04)(0.65)
Non-GAAP diluted net income per share$5.61$4.41
Shares used in diluted per share calculations261261
(In millions, unaudited) Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2016 Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2015
     
GAAP operating income $1,242
 $738
Amortization of acquired technology 22
 30
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets 12
 12
Professional fees for business combinations 
 2
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges 
 148
Gain (loss) on sale of long-lived assets 1
 (31)
Share-based compensation expense 278
 242
Non-GAAP operating income $1,555
 $1,141
     
GAAP net income $979
 $365
Amortization of acquired technology 22
 30
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets 12
 12
Professional fees for business combinations 
 2
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges 
 148
Gain (loss) on sale of long-lived assets 1
 (31)
Share-based compensation expense 278
 242
Net loss on debt securities and other investments 5
 6
Income tax effects and adjustments (120) (83)
Net (income) loss from discontinued operations (173) 48
Non-GAAP net income $1,004
 $739
     
GAAP diluted net income per share $3.69
 $1.28
Amortization of acquired technology 0.08
 0.10
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets 0.04
 0.04
Professional fees for business combinations 
 0.01
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges 
 0.52
Gain (loss) on sale of long-lived assets 
 (0.11)
Share-based compensation expense 1.05
 0.85
Net loss on debt securities and other investments 0.02
 0.02
Income tax effects and adjustments (0.45) (0.29)
Net (income) loss from discontinued operations (0.65) 0.17
Non-GAAP diluted net income per share $3.78
 $2.59
     
Shares used in diluted per share calculations 265
 286
Appendix A  | INTUIT 2019 Proxy StatementA-3







APPENDIX B
Table
This page intentionally left blank

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_ibc.jpg]
Corporate Social Responsibility Highlights PEOPLE We believe the ability to power prosperity starts with having a world-class company culture with the world's top talent.We strive to foster a culture where all employees are empowered and challenged to do the best work of Contents

INTUIT INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

EFFECTIVE [____________], 2017

1.PURPOSE. The purpose of the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to the success of the Company and its Subsidiariestheir lives. 99.4¢ Average earnings by offering them an opportunity to participatewomen in the Company’s future performance through awardsU.S. for every $1 that men earn (as of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)2018) Ranking#4 For America’s Best Employer for Diversity by Forbes in 2018 36,000 Hours volunteered by Intuit employees with charities around the world in fiscal 2018 PRODUCT We serve approximately 50 million consumers, small businesses, and Cash-Based Awards. Capitalized terms not definedthe self-employed around the world.We believe our products and services have the power to transform financial lives for the better. That’s why we provide our products and expertise to help build greater financial capabilities, especially for those who need them most. In fiscal 2018: 126,000 2.3M $68M Nonprofit recipients of QuickBooks product donations in the text are defined in Section 30.

2.SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.

2.1    NumberU.S. and Canada Copies of Shares Available.

(a)Numberfederal and state TurboTax software donated to lower-income taxpayers Total value of Shares. (a) Subjectproduct donations PLANET Our mission to adjustment as provided in Section 2.2, priorpower prosperity around the world drives our commitment to this amendmentbeing a good corporate citizen and restatement,making the world a totalbetter place by protecting our environment. Goal 50% Goal 100% Goal 90% All Operations Reduce our carbon footprint throughout all operations by 50% by 2025 (compared to 2012) Renewable Energy Use 100% renewable energy by 2030 Waste Reduction Divert 90% of 115,000,000 Shares have been approvedour waste by the Company’s stockholders for Awards granted under the Plan, of which as of July 31, 2016, a total of 8,989,614 Shares remained available for new grants under the Plan. Under the Plan as amended and restated, a total of 138,110,386 Shares have been approved by the Company’s stockholders, which represents an increase of 23,110,386 Shares. The Shares available for Awards under the Plan after July 31, 2016 shall be reduced by one (1) Share for every one (1) Share that was subject to an Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted after July 31, 2016 and 2.3 Shares for every one (1) Share that was subject to an award other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted after July 31, 2016. Any Shares that are subject to Options or SARs shall be counted against this limit as one (1) Share for every one (1) Share granted, and any Shares that are subject to Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted against this limit as 2.3 Shares for every one (1) Share granted.

(b)If any Shares subject to an Award are forfeited, an Award expires or an Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), then in each such case the Shares subject to such Award shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, be added to the Shares available for Awards under the Plan, in accordance with Section 2.1(c) below. In the event that withholding tax liabilities from an Award granted on or after July 21, 2016 other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right are satisfied by the tendering of Shares (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of Shares by the Company, the Shares so tendered or withheld shall be added to the Shares available for Awards under the Plan in accordance with Section 2.1(c) below. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the following Shares shall not be added to the Shares authorized for grant under paragraph (a) of this Section: (i) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the purchase price of an Option, (ii) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation2020 To learn more about our corporate social responsibility efforts, including actual progress with respect to Optionsthese goals, please go to: https://www.intuit.com/company/social-responsibility/ Design by Addison www.addison.com

[MISSING IMAGE: ig_2019-bcover.jpg]
Powering Prosperity
Around the World
Corporate Headquarters
2700 Coast Ave.
Mountain View, CA 94043
650.944.6000
www.intuit.com

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pc1.jpg]
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000390945_1 R1.0.1.17 INTUIT INC. P.O. BOX 7850 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94039 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or SARs, (iii) Shares subjectmeeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the nominees listed in proposal 1 below and FOR proposals 2 and 3: 1. Election of Directors Nominees For Against Abstain 1a. Eve Burton 1b. Scott D. Cook 1c. Richard L. Dalzell 1d. Sasan Goodarzi 1e. Deborah Liu 1f. Suzanne Nora Johnson 1g. Dennis D. Powell 1h. Brad D. Smith 1i. Thomas Szkutak 1j. Raul Vazquez 1k. Jeff Weiner For Against Abstain 2. Advisory vote to approve Intuit Inc.'s executive compensation (say-on-pay) 3. Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2019 NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a SAR thatcorporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

[MISSING IMAGE: tv506224_pc2.jpg]
0000390945_2 R1.0.1.17 Please date, sign, and mail your proxy card back as soon as possible! Annual Meeting of Stockholders INTUIT INC. January 17, 2019 - Please detach and Mail in Envelope Provided - Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting To Be Held on January 17, 2019: The Notice & Proxy Statement and Annual report on Form 10-K are not issued in connectionavailable at www.proxyvote.com . INTUIT INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS January 17, 2019 The undersigned hereby appoints Sasan Goodarzi, Michelle Clatterbuck and Kerry McLean, or any of them as proxies, each with its stock settlementthe power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Intuit Inc. to be held at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time on exerciseJanuary 17, 2019, at Intuit's offices at 2750 Coast Avenue - Building 6, Mountain View, California 94043, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and (iv) Shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Options.

(c)Any Shares that again become available for Awards under the Plan pursuant to this Section shall be added as (i) one (1) Share for every one (1) Share subject to Options or SARs, and (ii) as 2.3 Shares for every one (1) Share subject to Awards other than Options or SARs.

(d)The Company may issue Shares that are authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares, including Shares repurchased by the Company, whether directly from a Participant pursuant to the terms of Awards granted under the Plan or on the open market.

(e)At all times the Company will reserve and keep available a sufficient number of Shares to satisfy the requirements of all outstanding Awards granted under the Plan.

2.2    Adjustment of Shares. If the outstanding Shares are affected by a merger, consolidation, reorganization, liquidation, stock dividend, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification, split-up, spin-off, share combination, share exchange, extraordinary dividend or distribution of cash (other than a normal cash dividend), property and/or securities, or other change in the capital structure of the Company, an adjustment shall be made in (a)vote the number of Shares (orshares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally at the meeting on the matters listed on the reverse side. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF INTUIT INC. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other securitiesbusiness as may properly come before the meeting, and at any adjournment or property) reserved for issuance under the Plan and the limits that are set forth in Section 2.3; (b)

the Exercise Prices of and number of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Options and SARs; (c) the number of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to other outstanding Awards, and (d) any performance conditions relating to Awards granted under the Plan, as shall be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, exercising its authority under Section 4 of the Plan, for the purpose of preventing the dilution or enlargement of rights and privileges under the terms of the Plan or any outstanding Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, fractions of a Share (or other security) will not be issued but will either be replaced by a cash payment equal to the Fair Market Value of such fraction of a Share (or other security) or will be rounded to a whole Share (or other security), as determined by the Committee and as permitted under Section 424(a) of the Code.

2.3    Section 162(m) Award Limits and ISO Limit. The aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards granted under this Plan in any fiscal year to any one Participant shall not exceed 2,000,000 Shares, other than new employees of the Company or of any Subsidiary, who are eligible to receive up to a maximum of 3,000,000 Shares issuable under Awards granted in the calendar year in which they commence their employment. The aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs under this Plan shall not exceed 138,110,386 Shares. The maximum cash amount payable pursuant to all Cash-Based Awards granted in any calendar year to any Participant under this Plan shall not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000).

2.4    Director Limits. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all Awards granted to any Non-Employee Director during any single calendar year (not including Awards granted in lieu of retainers or other cash payments for service as a Non-Employee Director), shall not exceed $625,000, with such limit to be increased an additional $250,000 for any Lead Non-Employee Director or Non-Employee Director who is Chairman of the Board.

2.5    Assumed or Substituted Awards of Acquired Companies. In the eventpostponement thereof (including matters that the Company acquires or combines with another company and grants Awards under the Plan in assumption or substitution of outstanding equity awards of such company, the number of Shares authorized for issuance under this Plan shall be increased to the extent necessary to satisfy such assumed or substituted awards (based on the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to theproxy holders of the equity securities of the acquired company, and in a manner consistent with Section 424(a) of the Code), and the issuance of Shares pursuant to such assumed or substituted awards shall not reduce the Shares otherwise authorized for issuance under the Plan.

3.ELIGIBILITY. ISOs may be granted only to employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) of the Company or of a Subsidiary. All other Awards may be granted to employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) or other individuals who are Non-Employee Directors, consultants or advisors of the Company or any Subsidiary; provided that such consultants or advisors render bona fide services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities. The Committee (or its designee under Section 4.1(c)) will from time to time determine and designate among the eligible persons who will be granted one or more Awards under the Plan. A person may be granted more than one Award under the Plan.

4.ADMINISTRATION.

4.1    Committee Authority. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee; provided, however, that any power of the Committee also may be exercised by the Board, except to the extent that the grant or exercise of such authority would cause any Award or transaction to (i) become subject to (or lose an exemption under) Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, (ii) cause an Award intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code to fail to satisfy such requirements, or (iii) fail to satisfy Rule 5605(d) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules (or any successor to such rule or other comparable rule as to which the Company may be required to comply). The Committee will have full power to implement and carry out the Plan and the purposes of the Plan, subject to the terms of the Plan, including but not limited to the authority to:

(a)construe and interpret the Plan, any Award Agreement and any other agreement or document executed pursuant to the Plan or relating to the administration or operation of the Plan;

(b)prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan or any Award, including determining forms and agreements used in connection with the Plan; provided that the Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or the officer in charge of Human Resources, the authority to approve revisions to the forms and agreements used in connection with the Plan that are designed to facilitate Plan administration both domestically and abroad, and that are not inconsistent with the Plan or with any resolutions of the Committee relating to the Plan;


(c)select persons to receive Awards; provided that the Committee may delegate to one or more individuals who would be considered “officers” under Section 157(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware the authority to grant an Award under the Plan to Participants who are not Insiders within such limit of the total number of Awards which may be granted by such officers established by resolution of the Committee;

(d)determine the terms of Awards;

(e)determine the number of Shares or other consideration subject to Awards;

(f)determine whether Awards will be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to, other Awards under the Plan or any other incentive or compensation plan of the Company or any Subsidiary;

(g)grant waivers of Plan or Award conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the satisfaction of performance goals under Awards intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code in the event of death, Disability, or a Corporate Transaction, or (ii) the waiver of the termination provisions applicable to Options under Section 5.6(b));

(h)determine the vesting, exercisability, transferability, and payment of Awards, including the authority to accelerate the vesting of Awards;

(i)correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement;

(j)determine whether an Award has been earned;

(k)establish subplans for the grant of Awards to Participants who are foreign nationals or are employed outside the U.S., which subplans may provide for different terms and conditions applicable to Awards if necessary or desirable to recognize differences in local law or tax policy;

(l)amend the Plan;

(m)address unanticipated events (including any temporary closure of the stock exchange on which the Company is listed, disruption of communications or natural catastrophe); and

(n)make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.

4.2    Committee Interpretation and Discretion. Any determination made by the Committee with respect to any Award pursuant to Section 4.1 above shall be made in its sole discretion at the time of grant of the Award or, unless in contravention of any express term of the Plan or Award, at any later time, and such determination shall be final and binding on the Company and all persons having an interest in any Award under the Plan. Any dispute regarding the interpretation of the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be submitted by the Participant or Company to the Committee for review. The resolution of such a dispute by the Committee shall be final and binding on the Company and Participant. The Committee may delegate to one or more individuals who would be considered “officers” under Section 157(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware the authority to review and resolve disputes with respect to Awards held by Participants who are not Insiders, and such resolution shall be final and binding on the Company and Participant. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, administration of the Plan shall at all times be limited by the requirement that any administrative action or exercise of discretion shall be void (or suitably modified when possible) if necessary to avoid the application to any Participant of immediate taxation and/or tax penalties or additional taxes under Section 409A of the Code.

5.OPTIONS. The Committee may grant Options to eligible persons and will determine (a) whether the Options will be ISOs or NQSOs; (b) the number of Shares subject to the Option; (c) the Exercise Price of the Option; (d) the period during which the Option may be exercised; and (e) all other terms and conditions of the Option, subject to the provisions of this Section 5 and the Plan.

5.1    Form of Option Grant. Each Option granted under the Plan will be evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement that will expressly identify the Option as an ISO or NQSO. The Stock Option Agreement will be substantially in a form and contain such provisions (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee or an officer of the Company (pursuant to Section 4.1(b)) has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

5.2    Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Option will be the date on which the Committee makes the determination and completes all necessary action on its part to grant the Option, unless a later date is otherwise specified by the Committee. The Stock Option Agreement, and a copy of the Plan and the current Prospectus for the Plan (plus any additional documents required to be delivered under applicable laws), will be delivered to the Participant withinknow, a reasonable time after the Option is granted. The Stock Option Agreement, the Plan, the Prospectus and other documents may be delivered in any manner (including electronic distribution or posting) that meets applicable legal requirements.

5.3    Vesting and Expiration Date. An Option will become vested and exercisable as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Stock Option Agreement governing such Option, subject to the provisions of Section 5.6, and subject to Company policies established by the Committee (or by individuals to whom the Committee has delegated responsibility) from time to time with respect to vesting during leaves of absences. An Option may be granted to allow for its exercisability prior to vesting. Vesting of an Option may be based upon completion of a specified period of service with the Company, the attainment of pre-established performance goals, such other factors as the Committee determines, or a combination of the foregoing. The Stock Option Agreement governing such Option shall set forth the last date that the Option may be exercised (the “Expiration Date”), and may provide for automatic exercise of the Option on such Expiration Date if the Exercise Price per Share is less than the Fair Market Value per Share on such Expiration Date and the Participant has not previously exercised the Option, or may provide that in the event that trading in the Company’s stock is prohibited by law, the term of the Option automatically shall be extended until the date that is 30 days after such prohibition is lifted, to the extent that such extension does not cause the Participant to become subject to taxation under Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Option will be exercisable after ten years from the date the Option is granted; provided that no ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder will be exercisable after five years from the date the Option is granted.

5.4    Exercise Price. The Exercise Price of an Option will be determined by the Committee when the Option is granted and may not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant; provided, however, that (i) the Exercise Price of any ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder will not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant, and (ii) in the event that the Company acquires or combines with another company and grants Awards under the Plan in assumption or substitution of outstanding equity awards of such company, the Exercise Price of such Options may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant if such Exercise Price is based on a formula that meets the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code set forth in the terms of the awards being assumed or substituted or in the terms of the agreement governing the acquisition transaction.

5.5    Procedures for Exercise. A Participant or Authorized Transferee may exercise Options by following the procedures established by the Company, as communicated and made available to Participants through the stock pages on the Intuit intranet web site, and/or through the Company’s electronic mail system. Payment for the Shares purchased must be made in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan and the Stock Option Agreement.

5.6    Termination of Employment.

(a)Vesting. Except as otherwise provided inbefore this Section 5.6(a) or in a Participant’s Stock Option Agreement, an Option will cease to vest on the Participant’s Termination Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Option granted to a Participant who is an employee who has been actively employed by the Company or any Subsidiary for one year or more or who is a director, will vest as to 100% of the Shares subject to such Option if the Participant is Terminated due to Disability or death, unless otherwise provided in such Participant’s Stock Option Agreement.

(b)Post-Termination Exercise Period. Following a Participant’s Termination, any unvested portion of the Participant’s Option shall terminate, and any vested portion of the Participant’s Option may be exercised during the periods set forth below, after which it automatically shall terminate:

(i)no later than 90 days after the Termination Date if a Participant is Terminated for any reason except death or Disability, unless a longer time period, not exceeding five years, is specifically set forth in the Participant’s Stock Option Agreement; provided that no Option may be exercised after the Expiration Date of the Option; or

(ii)no later than (A) twelve months after the Termination Date in the case of Termination due to Disability or (B) eighteen months after the Termination Date in the case of Termination due to death or if a Participant dies within three months after the Termination Date, unless a longer time period, not exceeding five years, is specifically set forth in the Participant’s Stock Option Agreement; provided that no Option may be exercised after the Expiration Date of the Option.


5.7    Limitations on Exercise. The Committee may specify a reasonable minimum number of Shares that may be purchased on any exercise of an Option; provided that the minimum number will not prevent a Participant from exercising an Option for the full number of Shares for which it is then exercisable.

5.8    Limitations on ISOs. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of grant) of Shares with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year (under the Plan or any compensatory stock plan of the Company or any parent or Subsidiary under which ISOs may be granted) shall not exceed $100,000. If the Fair Market Value of Shares on the date of grant with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, the Options for the first $100,000 worth of Shares to become exercisable in that calendar year will be ISOs, and the Options for the Shares with a Fair Market Value in excess of $100,000 that become exercisable in that calendar year will be NQSOs. If the Code is amended to provide for a different limit on the Fair Market Value of Shares permitted to be subject to ISOs, such different limit shall be automatically incorporated into the Plan and will apply to any Options granted after the effective date of the Code’s amendment.

5.9    Notice of Disqualifying Dispositions of Shares Acquired on Exercise of an ISO. If a Participant sells or otherwise disposes of any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO on or before the later of (a) the date two years after the Date of Grant, and (b) the date one year after the exercise of the ISO (in either case, a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the Company may require the Participant to immediately notify the Company in writing of such Disqualifying Disposition.

5.10    Modification, Extension or Renewal. Subject to Section 5.12, the Committee may modify or extend or renew outstanding Options and authorize the grant of new Options in substitution therefor; provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of the Participant, materially impair any of the Participant’s rights under any Option previously granted. Any outstanding ISO that is modified, extended, renewed or otherwise altered shall be treated in accordance with Section 424(h) of the Code.

5.11    No Disqualification. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, no term of the Plan relating to ISOs will be interpreted, amended or altered, and no discretion or authority granted under the Plan will be exercised, so as to disqualify the Plan under Section 422 of the Code or, without the consent of the Participant affected, to disqualify any ISO under Section 422 of the Code.

5.12    No Repricing. Except as otherwise provided in Section 2.2, the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option may not, directly or indirectly, be reduced without stockholder approval, and at any time when the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option is above the Fair Market Value per Share, the terms of such outstanding Option may not, directly or indirectly, be amended without stockholder approval, to provide for the cancellation and re-grant or the exchange of such outstanding Option for either cash or a new Award with a lower (or no) exercise price; provided, however, that in the event of a Corporate Transaction, any Option with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the value of the consideration to be paid to the holders of Common Stock (on a per share basis) may be cancelled without any consideration.

6.STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.

6.1    Awards of SARs. A Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”) is an award to an eligible person having a value equal to the value determined by multiplying the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Exercise Price and the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is being settled. The SAR may be granted for services to be rendered or for past services already rendered to the Company or any Subsidiary or for any other benefit to the Company determined by the Committee within the meaning of Section 152 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. All SARs shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement, which shall be in substantially a form (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee or an officer of the Company (pursuant to Section 4.1(b)) has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan.

6.2    Terms of SARs. The Committee will determine the terms of a SAR including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares deemed subject to the SAR; (b) the Exercise Price and the time or times during which the SAR may be settled; (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement of the SAR; and (d) the effect on each SAR of the Participant’s Termination. The Exercise Price of the SAR will be determined by the Committee when the SAR is granted and may not be less than 100% of Fair Market Value, except under the same circumstances that apply with respect to Options under Section 5.4(ii).

6.3    Vesting and Expiration Date. A SAR will be vested and exercisable within the times or upon the occurrence of events determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement governing such SAR. A SAR may be granted to allow for its exercisability prior to vesting. Vesting of a SAR may be based upon completion of a specified period of service with the Company, the attainment of pre-established performance goals, such other factors as the Committee determines,

or a combination of the foregoing. The Award Agreement shall set forth the Expiration Date for the SAR; provided that no SAR will be exercisable after seven years from the date the SAR is granted. And, provided further, that the Award Agreement may provide for automatic settlement of the SAR on such Expiration Date if the Exercise Price per Share is less than the Fair Market Value per Share on such Expiration Date and the SAR has not previously been settled, or may provide that in the event that trading in the Company’s stock is prohibited by law, the term of the SAR automatically shall be extended until the date that is 30 days after such prohibition is lifted, to the extent that such extension does not cause the Participant to become subject to taxation under Section 409A of the Code.

6.4    Form and Timing of Settlement. Payment with respect to a SAR shall be made in Shares, or such other consideration as is approved by the Committee.

6.5    No Repricing. Except as otherwise provided in Section 2.2, the Exercise Price of an outstanding SAR may not be reduced without stockholder approval, and at any time when the Exercise Price of an outstanding SAR is above the Fair Market Value per Share, the terms of such outstanding SAR may not, directly or indirectly, be amended without stockholder approval, to provide for the cancellation and re-grant or the exchange of such outstanding SAR for either cash or a new Award with a lower (or no) exercise price; provided, however, that in the event of a Corporate Transaction, any SAR with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the value of the consideration to be paid to the holders of Common Stock (on a per share basis) may be cancelled without any consideration.

7.RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS.

7.1    Awards of Restricted Stock. A Restricted Stock Award is an award to an eligible person of the issuance of Shares for services to be rendered or for past services already rendered to the Company or any Subsidiary or for any other benefit to the Company determined by the Committee within the meaning of Section 152 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. All Restricted Stock Awards shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement, which shall be in substantially a form (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee or an officer of the Company (pursuant to Section 4.1(b)) has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. No payment will be required for Shares awarded pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award. The number of Shares awarded shall be subject to the applicable limit or limits of Section 2.

7.2    Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. The Committee will determine the number of Shares to be awarded to the Participant under a Restricted Stock Award and any restrictions thereon. These restrictions may be based upon completion of a specified period of service with the Company, upon satisfaction of performance goals as set out in advance in the Participant’s Award Agreement, upon such other factors as the Committee determines, or a combination of the foregoing. If the Restricted Stock Award is to be earned upon the satisfaction of performance goals, the Committee shall: (a) determine the nature, length and starting date of any performance period for the Award; (b) select the performance goals, which may include one or more Qualifying Performance Criteria; and (c) determine the number of Shares that may be awarded to the Participant. Prior to the time that restrictions are lifted with respect to one or more Shares subject to a Restricted Stock Award as a result of satisfaction of the service or performance goals, the Committee may require that the Shares be held by the Company under the terms of an escrow or similar arrangements according to terms determined by the Company and as described further in Section 16 below. The Committee may adjust the performance goals applicable to a Restricted Stock Award during a Performance Period in the manner described in Section 10.3(b) below.

7.3    Dividends. A Participant who has received the grant of a Restricted Stock Award shall not be entitled to receive dividends and other distributions paid with respect to Shares subject to such Award during the period during which such Shares are restricted. However, any such dividends or distributions shall be retained by the Company and shall be paid to the Participant at the same time that the Shares which respect to which such dividends or distributions were paid are released from the restrictions of the Award described in Section 7.2 above.

7.4    Termination of Employment. If a Participant is Terminated prior to full vesting of a Restricted Stock Award for any reason, then such Participant will be entitled to retain the Shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award only to the extent the restrictions on such Shares have lapsed as of the date of Termination in accordance with the Award Agreement, unless the Committee will determine otherwise, and only then if the lapse of such restrictions would not cause a Restricted Stock Award intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code to fail to satisfy such requirements.

7.5    83(b) Election. To the extent a Participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to a Restricted Stock Award, within ten days of filing such election with the Internal Revenue Service, the Participant must notify the Company in writing of such election.

8.RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

8.1    Awards of Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) are Awards denominated in units of Shares under which the issuance of Shares (or the settlement in an equivalent value in cash) is subject to such conditions (including continued employment or other service, the attainment of pre-established performance goals, which may include one or more Qualifying Performance Criteria, other factors as the Committee determines, or a combination of the foregoing.) as the Committee shall determine. RSUs may be granted for services to be rendered or for past services already rendered to the Company or any Subsidiary or for any other benefit to the Company determined by the Committee within the meaning of Section 152 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. All RSUs shall be awarded pursuant to an Award Agreement, which shall be in substantially a form (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee or an officer of the Company (pursuant to Section 4.1(b)) has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

8.2    Terms of RSUs. The Committee will determine the terms of a RSU including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares deemed subject to the RSU; (b) the time or times at which the RSU vests; (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement; and (d) the effect on each RSU of the Participant’s Termination.

8.3    Timing of Settlement. Settlement of a RSU shall be made no later than March 15 of the year following the year of vesting; provided that to the extent permissible under law, the Committee may permit a Participant to defer payment under a RSU to a date or dates after the RSU is earned, provided that the terms of the RSU and any deferral election satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

8.4    Dividend Equivalent Rights. A Participant shall be entitled to receive dividend equivalent rights prior to the issuance of Shares subject to the RSU to the extent and under the terms and conditions provided in the applicable Award Agreement; provided that, any such dividend equivalent rights that relate to RSUs that vest based on the achievement of performance goals shall be paid upon the later of (a) the date dividends are paid to the common stockholders of the Company, or (b) the date the RSUs with respect to which such dividend equivalent rights are payable become vested (it being understood that no dividend equivalent rights will be paid with respect to Shares underlying any RSUs that do not vest, but that dividend equivalent rights equal to the dividends declared on the Company’s Common Stock from and after the date of grant of the unvested RSUs shall be paid as and when such RSUs vest). Except as explicitly provided for in this Section 8.4, dividend equivalent rights shall not be granted alone or in connection with any Award under the Plan.

8.5    Voting Rights. A Participant shall not be entitled to voting or any other rights as a stockholder with respect to a RSU, unless and until such RSU is settled in Shares.

9.CASH-BASED AWARDS

9.1    Performance or Service Criteria. The Committee shall establish the service or performance criteria and level of achievement versus these criteria, if applicable, that shall determine the amount(s) payable under a Cash-Based Award. The Committee may specify the percentage of the Cash-Based Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the performance criteria for any portion of a Cash-Based Award that is intended by the Committee to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be a measure based on one or more Qualifying Performance Criteria (as defined in Section 10.3(a)) selected by the Committee and specified at the time the Cash-Based Award is granted. The Committee shall certify the extent to which any Qualifying Performance Criteria has been satisfied, and the amount payable as a result thereof, prior to payment of any Cash-Based Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

9.2    Timing and Form of Payment. The Committee shall determine the timing of payment of any Cash-Based Award. Payment of the amount due under a Cash-Based Award may be made in cash or in Shares, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may provide for or, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify, may permit a Participant to elect, the payment of any Cash-Based Award to be deferred to a specified date or event. Any deferral election shall comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code to the extent applicable.

10.QUALIFYING PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION.

10.1    General. The Committee may establish performance criteria and level of achievement versus such criteria that shall determine the number of Shares to be granted, retained, vested, issued or issuable under or in settlement of or the amount payable pursuant to an Award, which criteria may be based on Qualifying Performance Criteria or other standards of

the performance of the Company and its Subsidiaries or any portion thereof and/or personal performance factors. In addition, the Committee may specify that an Award or a portion of an Award is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, provided that the performance criteria for such Award or portion of an Award that is intended by the Committee to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be a measure based on one or more Qualifying Performance Criteria selected by the Committee and specified at the time the Award is granted. Notwithstanding satisfaction of any performance goals, the number of Shares issued under or the amount paid under an Award may be reduced, but, in the case of any Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, not increased, by the Committee on the basis of such further considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion shall determine, except as may be otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement. Without the express authorization of the Committee, the exercise of discretion described in the preceding sentence may not be exercised with respect to any Award to be settled in Shares if the exercise of such discretion would result in the “modification” of such Award (or any other Award to be settled in Shares) or cause such Award (or any other Award to be settled in Shares) to be accounted for as a liability under applicable accounting standards if such Award was accounted for as equity at the time of grant.

10.2    Establishment of Performance Goals. In the case of any Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall establish the performance goals with respect to such Award not later than ninety (90) days after the commencement of the period of service to which the performance goal relates (or, in the case of performance periods of less than one year, not later than the date upon which 25% of the performance period elapses), provided that the outcome of the performance goal is substantially uncertain at such time.

10.3    Qualifying Performance Criteria.

(a)For purposes of this Plan, the term “Qualifying Performance Criteria” shall mean any one or more of the following performance criteria, or growth or other changes in the amount, rate or value of one or more performance criteria, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to the Company as a whole or to one or more business units or Subsidiaries, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and measured over a performance period to be established by the Committee, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous results or to a designated comparison group, either based upon Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) or non-GAAP financial results, in each case as specified by the Committee: (i) cash flow (before or after dividends), (ii) earnings per share (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization), (iii) stock price, (iv) return on equity, (v) total stockholder return, (vi) return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital), (vii) return on assets or net assets, (viii) market capitalization, (ix) economic value added, (x) debt leverage (debt to capital), (xi) revenue or net revenue, (xii) income or net income, (xiii) operating income, (xiv) operating profit or net operating profit, (xv) operating margin or profit margin, (xvi) return on operating revenue, (xvii) cash from operations, (xviii) operating ratio, (xix) operating revenue, (xx) contract value, (xxi) client renewal rate, (xxii) operating cash flow return on income, (xxiii) adjusted operating cash flow return on income, (xxiv) employee productivity and satisfaction metrics, (xxv) market share, (xxvi) strategic positioning, or (xxvii) new product releases. Qualifying Performance Criteria may differ for Awards granted to any one Participant or to different Participants.

(b)To the extent consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may appropriately adjust any evaluation of performance under a Qualifying Performance Criteria.

10.4    Certification by Committee. The Committee shall certify, in writing, the extent to which any Qualifying Performance Criteria has been satisfied, and the amount payable as a result thereof, prior to payment, settlement or vesting of any Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

11.PAYMENT FOR SHARE PURCHASES.

11.1    Payment. Payment for Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan may be made by any of the following methods (or any combination of such methods) that are described in the applicable Award Agreement and that are permitted by law:

(a)in cash (by check);

(b)in the case of exercise by the Participant, Participant’s guardian or legal representative or the authorized legal representative of Participant’s heirs or legatees after Participant’s death, by cancellation of indebtedness of the Company to the Participant;

(c)by surrender of shares of the Company’s Common Stock (including by withholding Shares otherwise issuable pursuant to the applicable Award);

(d)in the case of exercise by the Participant, Participant’s guardian or legal representative or the authorized legal representative of Participant’s heirs or legatees after Participant’s death, by waiver of compensation due or accrued to Participant for services rendered;

(e)by tender of property;

(f)with respect only to purchases upon exercise of an Option, and provided that a public market for the Company’s stock exists, through a “same day sale” commitment from the Participant or Authorized Transferee and a FINRA Dealer meeting the requirements of the Company’s “same day sale” procedures and in accordance with law; or

(g)any other benefit to the Company determined by the Committee within the meaning of Section 152 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

11.2    Issuance of Shares. Upon payment of the applicable Exercise Price or purchase price (or a commitment for payment from the FINRA Dealer designated by the Participant or Authorized Transferee in the case of an exercise by means of a “same-day sale”), and compliance with other conditions and procedures established by the Company for the purchase of shares, the Company shall issue the Shares registered in the name of Participant or Authorized Transferee (or in the name of the FINRA Dealer designated by the Participant or Authorized Transferee in the case of an exercise by means of a “same-day sale”) and shall deliver certificates representing the Shares (in physical or electronic form, as appropriate). The Shares may be subject to legends or other restrictions as provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement or permitted under applicable law.

12.WITHHOLDING TAXES.

12.1    Withholding Generally. Whenever Sharessolicitation, are to be issued in satisfaction of Awards granted under the Plan, the Company may require the Participant to remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax requirements prior to the delivery of any Shares. If a payment in satisfaction of an Award is to be made in cash, the payment will be net of an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local and foreign withholding tax requirements. In other circumstances triggering a withholding tax liability for the Company or any Subsidiary, the Participant shall be required to make adequate arrangements to satisfy such tax withholding obligation, whether out of the value of the Award or otherwise. The Company may provide for further details regarding a Participant’s satisfaction of any such withholding tax liability in the Award Agreements, which need not be the same for all Participants or for all Awards of a particular type.

12.2    Stock Withholding. When, under applicable tax laws, a Participant incurs tax liability in connection with the grant, issuance, modification, exercise, lapse of restrictions or vesting of any Award or other circumstances relating to any Award that is subject to tax withholding and the Participant is obligated to pay the Company the amount required to be withheld, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, allow the Participant to satisfy the withholding tax obligation by electing to have the Company withhold from the Shares to be issued that number of whole Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld (or, if and when the Company adopts any applicable accounting standard allowing for greater Share withholding, up to such withholding rate that will not cause an adverse accounting consequence or cost)presented), determined on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined. All elections by a Participant to have Shares withheld for this purpose shall be made in accordance with the requirements established by the Committee and be in writing (including an electronic writing) in a form acceptable to the Committee.

13.PRIVILEGES OF STOCK OWNERSHIP.No Participant or Authorized Transferee will have any rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any Shares until the Shares are issued to the Participant or Authorized Transferee. After Shares are issued to the Participant or Authorized Transferee, the Participant or Authorized Transferee will be a stockholder and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such Shares; provided, however, that if the Shares are subject to any vesting requirements or similar restrictions, any new, additional or different securities or property that the Participant or Authorized Transferee may become entitled to receive with respect to the Shares by virtue of a stock dividend, stock split or any other change in the corporate or capital structure of the Company, as described in further detail in Section 2.2, as well as any dividends or distributions or other payment made with respect to such Shares, will be subject to the same restrictions as the Shares themselves.

14.TRANSFERABILITY. No Award and no interest therein, shall be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and no Award may be made subject to execution, attachment or similar process; provided, however that with the consent of the Committee, a Participant may transfer an Award other than an ISO to an Authorized Transferee. Transfers by the Participant for consideration are prohibited.


15.CERTIFICATES. All certificates for Shares or other securities delivered under the Plan (whether in physical or electronic form, as appropriate) will be subject to stock transfer orders, legends and other restrictions that the Committee deems necessary or advisable, including without limitation, restrictions under any applicable federal, state or foreign securities law, or any rules, regulations and other requirements of the SEC or any stock exchange or other public securities market on which the Shares may be listed.

16.ESCROW. To enforce any restrictions on a Participant’s Shares, the Committee may require the Participant to deposit all certificates representing Shares, together with stock powers or other transfer instruments approved by the Committee, appropriately endorsed in blank, with the Company or an agent designated by the Company, to hold in escrow until such restrictions have lapsed or terminated, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends referencing such restrictions to be placed on the certificates.

17.SECURITIES LAW AND OTHER REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. An Award shall not be effective unless the Award is in compliance with all applicable state, federal and foreign securities laws, rules and regulations of any governmental body, and the requirements of any stock exchange or other public securities market on which the Shares may then be listed, as they are in effect on the date of grant of the Award and also on the date of exercise or other issuance. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, the Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver certificates for Shares under the Plan prior to (a) obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable, and/or (b) completion of any registration or other qualification of such shares under any state, federal or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable. The Company shall be under no obligation to register the Shares with the SEC or to effect compliance with the registration, qualification or listing requirements of any state, federal or foreign securities laws, stock exchange or automated quotation system, and the Company shall have no liability for any inability or failure to do so.

18.NO OBLIGATION TO EMPLOY. Nothing in the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan shall confer or be deemed to confer on any Participant any right to continue in the employ of, or to continue any other relationship with, the Company or any Subsidiary or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate Participant’s employment or other relationship at any time, with or without cause.

19.REPRICING PROHIBITED; EXCHANGE AND BUYOUT OF AWARDS. Except as otherwise provided in Section 2.2, the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option or SAR may not be reduced without stockholder approval, and at any time when the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option or SAR is above the Fair Market Value per Share, the terms of such outstanding Option or SAR may not, directly or indirectly, be amended without stockholder approval, to provide for the cancellation and re-grant or the exchange of such outstanding Option or SAR for either cash or a new Award with a lower (or no) exercise price; provided, however, that in the event of a Corporate Transaction, any Option or SAR with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the value of the consideration to be paid to the holders of Common Stock (on a per share basis) may be cancelled without any consideration.

20.CORPORATE TRANSACTIONS.

20.1    Assumption or Replacement of Awards by Successor. In the event of a Corporate Transaction, any or all outstanding Awards may be assumed or continued or replaced by the successor, which assumption or replacement shall be binding on all Participants. In the alternative, the successor may substitute equivalent Awards or provide substantially similar consideration to Participants as was provided to stockholders (after taking into account the existing provisions of the Awards). The successor may also issue, in place of outstanding Shares held by the Participant, substantially similar shares, other securities or other property subject to repurchase restrictions no less favorable to the Participant. In the event such successor, if any, refuses to assume, continue, replace or substitute the Awards, as provided above, pursuant to a Corporate Transaction or if there is no successor due to a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, such Awards shall immediately vest as to 100% of the Shares subject thereto (unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement) at such time and on such conditions as the Board shall determine and the Awards shall expire at the closing of the transaction or at the time of dissolution or liquidation. If a successor decides to assume, continue, replace or substitute all then outstanding Awards, such successor shall not be required to treat all then outstanding Awards in the same fashion.

20.2    Other Treatment of Awards. Subject to any greater rights granted to Participants under Section 20.1, in the event of a Corporate Transaction, any outstanding Awards shall be treated as provided in the applicable agreement or plan of merger, consolidation, acquisition, dissolution, liquidation or sale of assets.

20.3    Assumption of Awards by the Company. The Company, from time to time, also may use the Plan to substitute, replace or assume outstanding awards granted by another company, whether in connection with an acquisition of such

other company or otherwise, by either (a) granting an Award under the Plan in substitution of such other company’s award, or (b) assuming such award as if it had been granted under the Plan if the terms of such assumed award could be applied to an Award granted under the Plan. In the event the Company assumes an award granted by another company, the terms and conditions of such award shall remain unchanged in all material respects (except that in the case of an option or stock appreciation right, the exercise price and the number and nature of Shares issuable upon exercise of such option or stock appreciation right will be adjusted appropriately in a manner not inconsistent with Section 424(a) of the Code), unless determined otherwise by the Committee. In the event the Company elects to grant a new Option or SAR rather than assuming an existing option, such new Option or SAR may be granted with a similarly adjusted Exercise Price.

21.TERM OF PLAN. The Plan will terminate on January 19, 2027, unless extended beyond such date by stockholder approval; provided, however, that ISOs may not be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of the Board adoption of the Plan in October 2016.

22.AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN. The Board may at any time terminate or amend the Plan in any respect, including without limitation, amendment of any Award Agreement or instrument to be executed pursuant to the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Board nor the Committee shall, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, amend the Plan in any manner, including reducing the exercise price of an Option or SAR, that requires such stockholder approval pursuant to (a) the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder, (b) the Exchange Act or any rule promulgated thereunder or (c) the listing requirements of the national securities market on which the Shares are listed. In addition, no amendment that would materially impair the rights of a Participant under an outstanding Award may be made without the consent of the Participant, except as expressly authorized under the Plan. Unless otherwise provided, an Award shall be governed by the version of the Plan in effect at the time such Award was granted.

23.NONEXCLUSIVITY OF THE PLAN; UNFUNDED PLAN. None of the adoption of the Plan by the Board, the submission of the Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval, or any provision of the Plan shall be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of stock options and bonuses otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. The Plan shall be unfunded and no Participant shall have any claim on any particular assets or securities of the Company or any Subsidiary. Neither the Company nor the Board shall be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by Awards made pursuant to the Plan. Neither the Company, the Committee, nor the Board shall be deemed to be a trustee of any amounts to be paid under the Plan.

24.NO LIABILITY OF COMPANY. Neither the Company nor any parent or Subsidiary that is in existence or hereafter comes into existence shall be liable to a Participant or any other person as to: (i) the non-issuance or sale of Shares as to which the Company has been unable to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder; and (ii) any tax consequence expected, but not realized, by any Participant or other person due to the receipt, exercise, settlement or change to the terms of any Award granted hereunder.

25.GOVERNING LAW. This Plan and any Award Agreement or other agreements or documents hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to choice of law principles of Delaware or other jurisdictions. Any action, suit, or proceeding relating to the Plan or any Award Agreement will be brought in the state or federal courts of competent jurisdiction in Santa Clara County in the State of California.

26.RECOUPMENT OF AWARDS. In the event that the Company issues a restatement of its financial results after the distribution of Shares or cash upon settlement of an Award with vesting conditioned on the achievement of performance goals, which restatement decreases the level of achievement of the goals from the level(s) previously determined by the Committee, then the Participant will be required to deliver to the Company, within 30 days after receipt of written notification by the Company, an amount in cash or equivalent value in Shares (or a combination of the two) equal to the net proceeds realized by the Participant on the settlement of the Award and, if applicable, subsequent salefor the election of any Shares that would not have vested or been issued based on the restated financial results. This Section 26 only will applya person to a Participant if it is determined by the Committee in good faith that fraud or misconduct engaged in by the Participant (directly or indirectly) was a significant contributing factor to such restatement of financial results.

27.AGREEMENT TO REPAYMENTS OF INCENTIVE COMPENSATION WHEN REPAYMENTS ARE REQUIRED UNDER FEDERAL LAW. This provision applies to any policy adopted by NASDAQ Global Market (or any other exchange on which the securities of the Company are listed) pursuant to Section 10D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. To the extent any such policy requires the repayment of incentive-based compensation received by a Participant, whether paid pursuant to an Award granted under this Plan or any other plan of incentive-based compensation maintained in the past or

adopted in the future by the Company, by accepting an Award under this Plan, the Participant agrees to the repayment of such amounts to the extent required by such policy and applicable law.

28.ADOPTION. This Amendment and Restatement of the Plan as set forth herein was approved by the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee on October 19, 2016.

29.SECTION 409A. Awards granted under the Plan are intended to comply with, or be exempt from, the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code and shall be limited, construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. Although the Company does not guarantee any particular tax treatment, to the extent that any Award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, it shall be paid in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code, including regulations and any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the United States Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto. In no event whatsoever shall the Company be liable for any additional tax, interest or penalties that may be imposed on a Participant by Section 409A of the Code or any damages for failing to comply with Section 409A of the Code. Should any payments made in accordance with the Plan be determined to be payments from a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, as defined by Section 409A of the Code and are payable in connection with a Participant’s Separation from Service, that are not exempt from Section 409A of the Code as a short-term deferral or otherwise, these payments, to the extent otherwise payable within six (6) months after the Participant’s date of Separation from Service, will be paid in a lump sum on the earlier of the date that is six (6) months after the Participant’s date of Separation from Service or the date of the Participant’s death. For purposes of the Plan, a “Separation from Service” means an anticipated permanent reduction in a Participant’s level of bona fide services to twenty percent (20%) or less of the average level of bona fide services performed by a Participant over the immediately preceding thirty-six (36) month period. For purposes of Section 409A of the Code, the payments to be made to a Participant in accordance with this Plan shall be treated as a right to a series of separate payments.

30.DEFINITIONS. As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(a)Authorized Transferee” means the permissible recipient, as authorized by the Plan and the Committee, of an Award that is transferred during the Participant’s lifetime by the Participant by gift or domestic relations order. For purposes of this definition, a “permissible recipient” is: (i) a child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law of the Participant, including any such person with such relationship to the Participant by adoption; (ii) any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the Participant’s household; (iii) a trust in which the persons in (i) or (ii) have more than fifty percent of the beneficial interest; (iv) a foundation in which the persons in (i) or (ii) or the Participant control the management of assets; or (v) any other entity in which the person in (i) or (ii) or the Participant own more than fifty percent of the voting interests.

(b)Award” means any award under the Plan, including any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Cash-Based Award.

(c)Award Agreement” means, with respect to each Award, the written agreement delivered by the Company to the Participant (which agreement may be in electronic form) setting forth the terms and conditions of the Award (including but not limited to a Stock Option Agreement).

(d)Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(e)“Cash-Based Award” means a cash-based opportunity awarded under Section 9 pursuantif any nominee named in Proposal 1 becomes unable to which a Participant may become entitled to receive an amount based on satisfaction of enumerated performance and/serve or service criteria.

(f)Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,for good cause will not serve. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND PROMPTLY MAIL THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE SO THAT THE SHARES MAY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Continued, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

(g)Committee” means the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee of the Board, or such other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan, or if no committee is appointed, the Board; provided, however, that (i) for purposes of establishing performance goals and certifying the achievement of such performance goals with respect to any Award intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, “Committee” may mean a subcommittee of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee of the Board comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code; (ii) for purposes of granting any Award intended to be exempt from the application of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act through complying with the requirements of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, “Committee” may mean a subcommittee of the Compensationmarked, dated and Organizational Development Committee of the Board comprised solely of two or more “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Section 16 and Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act; and (iii) for any purposes required under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, “Committee” may mean a subcommittee

of the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee of the Board that satisfies Rule 5605(d) under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

(h)Company” means Intuit Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, or any successor corporation.

(i)Corporate Transaction” means (a) consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction either (i) as a result of which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction own directly or indirectly following such transaction less than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the controlling entity resulting from such transaction or (ii) after which such ownership as among those persons who were stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction is not in substantially the same proportions both immediately before and immediately after such transaction; (b) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company; (c) the sale, exchange, lease or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (d) consummation of any other transaction which qualifies as a “corporate transaction” under Section 424(a) of the Code whereafter control of the Company is held by a person or group of related persons who did not control the Company immediately prior to the occurrence of such transaction.

(j)Disability” means (i) the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (ii) the Participant is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than 3 months under an accident and health plan covering employees of Intuit; provided, however, that for purposes of determining the post-termination exercise period of ISOs, “Disability” shall have the meaning set forth under Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

(k)Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

(l)Exercise Price” means the price at which a Participant who holds an Option or SAR may purchase the Shares issuable upon exercise of the Option or SAR.

(m)Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock determined as follows:

(i)if such Common Stock is then quotedsigned, on the NASDAQ Global Market, its closing price on the NASDAQ Global Market on such date or if such date is not a trading date, the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Market on the last trading date that precedes such date;

(ii)if such Common Stock is publicly traded and is then listed on a national securities exchange, the last reported sale price on such date or, if no such reported sale takes place on such date, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on the principal national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to trading;

(iii)if such Common Stock is publicly traded but is not quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market nor listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on such date, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, for the over-the-counter market; or

(iv)if none of the foregoing is applicable, by the Board of Directors in good faith.

(n)FINRA Dealer” means a broker-dealer that is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

(o)Insider” means an officer or director of the Company or any other person whose transactions in the Company’s Common Stock are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.side.

(p)ISO” means an Option that satisfies the requirements for an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and does not provide that it will not be treated as an “incentive stock option”.

(q)NQSO” means an Option that is not an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

(r)Option” means an Award pursuant to Section 5 of the Plan.

(s)Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Company’s Board of Directors who is not a current employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.

(t)Participant” means a person who receives an Award under the Plan.

(u)Plan” means this Intuit Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

(v)Prospectus” means the prospectus relating to the Plan, as amended from time to time, that is prepared by the Company and delivered or made available to Participants pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

(w)Restricted Stock Award” means an award of Shares pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan.

(x)Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan.

(y)SEC” means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(z)Shares” means shares of the Company’s Common Stock $0.01 par value per share, and any successor security.

(aa)Stock Appreciation Right” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan.

(ab)Stock Option Agreement” means the agreement which evidences an Option.

(ac)Subsidiary” means any entity (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of entities beginning with the Company if, at the time of granting of the Award, each of the entities other than the last entity in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of voting securities in one of the other entities in such chain.

(ad)Ten Percent Stockholder” means any person who directly or by attribution owns more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Subsidiary.

(ae)Termination” or “Terminated” means, for purposes of the Plan with respect to a Participant, that the Participant has ceased to provide services as an employee, director, consultant, independent contractor or adviser, to the Company or a parent or Subsidiary; provided that a Participant shall not be deemed to be Terminated if the Participant is on a leave of absence approved by the Committee or by an officer of the Company designated by the Committee; and provided further, that during any approved leave of absence, vesting of Awards shall be suspended or continue in accordance with guidelines established from time to time by the Committee. Subject to the foregoing, the Committee shall have sole discretion to determine whether a Participant has ceased to provide services and the effective date on which the Participant ceased to provide services (the “Termination Date”).



END OF DOCUMENT




intuit2016proxycardpage11121.jpg



intuit2016proxycardpage21121.jpg